| Reference: | 中文部分
方永泉（2003）。〈從遊戲意義的轉折來反思當代遊戲文化的特徵及其引發
的教育思考〉，《教育研究集刊》，49（3）：63-92。
李俊德（2005）。〈從可玩性觀點探討多人線上遊戲之人機互動設計原則研究〉，《行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告》。.
林玉婷（2006）。《卽時通訊軟體MSN Messenger暱稱之呈現與溝通策略》。
政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
邱莉玲（2006年8月10日）。〈Open小將讓購物變成a special trip〉，《工商時報》，D3版。
洪英正、錢玉芬譯（2003）。《人際溝通》。台北：學富。（原書 Devito, J. A.. [2001]. Interpersonal communication book. New York: Longman Books.）
卓耀宗譯（2000）。《設計心理學：以使用者為中心、安全易用的日常生活用品 的設計原理》。台北：遠流。（原書 Norman, D. A. [1998]. The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.）
許恬忻（2007）。〈企業公關人員如何使用 MSN：以證券公關人員為例〉，《廣告學研究》，28：59-86。
翁鵲嵐、鄭玉屏、張志傑譯（2005）。《情感設計》。台北：田園城市。（原書Norman, D. A. [2003]. Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York: Basic Books.）
曾懿晴（2009年4月7日）。〈要你常來「網」 msn機器人正夯〉，《聯合報》，頁Ａ7。
曾懿晴（2010年9月12日）。〈msn寵物機器人 上線3天 4千人迷戀〉，《聯合報》，頁Ａ8。
曹家榮（2008）。〈MSN Messenger 的媒介訊息：從符擔性看MSN人際關係展演〉，《資訊社會研究》，14：133-166。
游曉貞、陳國祥、邱上嘉（2006）。〈直接知覺論在產品設計應用與審視〉，《設計學報》，11：13-27。
陳華均（2009）。《對話中的媒體“不”等式再探：互動同伴身分與使用者性別對人機互動中持續惱人行為的反應之影響》。清華大學資訊系統與應用研究所碩士論文。
陳蓉萱（2006）。《科技化人際關係新圖像：MSN使用者運用在場訊息的分析》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
黃齡儀（2008）。〈媒介空間中的凝視、語言和意義：以 Skype 視訊為例〉，《資訊社會研究》，14：167-195。
蔡育忠（2008）。《知覺系統的環境賦使：以跳越障礙之視覺判斷為例》。中正大學運動與休閒教育研究所碩士論文。
鄧怡莘、董芳武（2006）。〈人機互動中之社會線索：語音與互動形式對兒童參與數位學習的影響〉，《設計學報》，11：81-97。
劉曉嵐、陳雅萍、林永泰、楊佳芬、盧依欣、黃素微等譯（2004）。《人際溝通》台北：洪葉。（原書Adler, R. B.,& Towne, N. [2002]. Looking out looking in. Singapore: Thomson Books.）
鄭佳美（2005）。《以支應性理論探討環境屬性與使用者行為關係之研究.》。中興大學園藝學所碩士論文。
譚天、吳佳真譯（1998）。《虛擬化身：網路世代的身份認同》。台北：遠流。（原書 Turkle, S. [1996]. Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Touchstone Books.）
英文部分
Angeli, D. A., Brahnam, S., Wallis, P., & Dix, A. (2006). Misuse and abuse of interactive technologies. Proceedings of Abuse: The Darker Side of Human-Computer Interaction Workshop, Canada.
Angeli, D. A., & Brahnam, S. (2008). I hate you! Disinhibition with virtual partners. Interacting with Computers, 20(3), 302-310.
Angeli, D. A., Johnson, G., & Coventry, L. (2001). The unfriendly user: Exploring social reactions to chatterbots. Proceedings of the International Conference on Affective Human Factors Design, Asean Academic Press, London.
Aharoni, E., & Fridlund, A. J. (2007). Social reactions toward people vs. computers: How mere labels’ shape interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2175-2189.
Bartneck, C., & Hu. J. (2008). Exploring the abuse of robots. Interaction Studies, 9(3), 415-433.
Boyle, T., & Cook, J. (2004). Understanding and using technological affordances: A commentary on Conole and Dyke. Reserch in Learning Technology, 12(3), 295-299.
Brooks, R.(2002). Flesh and machines: How robots will change us. New York: Pantheon Books.
Clark, H. (1999). How do real people communi-cate with virtual partners? Proceedings Psychological Models of Communication in Collaborative Systems, North Falmouth, MA.
Collins, H. (1990). Artificial experts: Social knowledge and intelligent machines. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M.,&LeFevre,J. (1989). Optimal experience in work and Leisure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 815-822.
Dautenhahn, K. (2007). Methodology and themes of human-robot interaction: A growing research field. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 4(1), 103-108.
Drury, J., Scholtz, J.& Yanco H. (2003). Awareness in human-robot interactions.
Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Washington, DC.
Frissen, V. (1995). Gender is calling: Some reflections on past, present and future uses of the telephone. In K. Grint. & R. Gill (Eds.), The gender-technology relation: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 79-94). London: Taylor and Francis.
Gaver, W. (1991). Technology affordances. Proceeding of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing System, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Giusti, L., & Marti, P. (2006). Interpretative dynamics in human robot
interaction. Proceedings of the 15th IEEE international symposium on robot and humaninteractive communication, Hatfield,UK.
Gibson, J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510.
Grint, K., & Woolgar, S. (1997). The machine at work: Technology, work, and organization. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Haslam, N.,（2006）.Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 252-264.
Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441-456.
Kim, M. S., Sur, J., & Gong, L. (2009). Humans and humanoid social robots in communication contexts. AI & Society, 24(4), 317-325.
Kling, R., & Scacchi, W. (1982). The web of computing: Computer technology as social organization. Advances in Computers, 21, 3-85.
Kling, R. (1992). Audiences, narratives, and human values in social studies of technology. Science, Technology & Human Values, 17(3), 349-365.
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P., & Jochems, W. (2002). The sociability of computer- supported collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology & Society, 5(1), 8-22.
Langer, E. (1992). Matters of mind: Mindfulness/mindlessness in perspective. Consciousness and Cognition,1(3), 289-305.
Lee, C. (2007). Affordances and text-making practices in online instant messaging. Written Communication, 24(3), 223-249.
Lee, E., & Nass, C. (2002). Experimental tests of normative group influence and representation effects in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 349-381.
Lester, J., Branting, K., & Mott, B. (2004). Conversational agents. Practical Handbook of Internet Computing. Baton Rouge: CRC Press.McGrenere, J., & Ho, W. (2000). Affordances: Clarifying and evolving a concept. Proceedings of Graphics Interface, Montreal, Canada.
Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81-103.
Pollini, A. (2009). A theoretical perspective on social agency. AI & Society. 24(2),165–171.
Poster, M. (1995). Postmodern virtualities: The second media Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Rafaeli, A., & Sutton. R. I. (1989). The expression of emotion in organizational life . Research in Organizational Behavior, 11, 1-43.
Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television and new media like real people and places. New York: CSLI.
Shechtman, N., & Horowitz, L. (2003). Media inequality in conversation: How people behave differently when interacting with computers and people. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems ACM, Florida.
Shieber, S. (1994). Lessons from a restricted Turing test. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 37(6), 70-78.
Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 526-537.
Taggart. W., Turkle, S., & Kidd, C. D. (2005) .An interactive robot in a nursing home.Proceedings of Social Mechanisms of Android Sci-ence: A COGSCI Workshop, Stresa, Italy.
Toffler, A. (1981). The third wave. New York: Bantam Books.
Trenholm, S., & Jensen, A. (2003). Interpersonal communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Walther, J. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication research, 23(1), 3-43.
Whitby, B. (2008). Sometimes it`s hard to be a robot: A call for action on the ethics of abusing artificial agents. Interacting with Computers, 20(3), 326-333.
Zhao, S. (2006). Humanoid social robots as a medium of communication. New Media & Society, 8(3), 401-419.
Ziemke, T. (2001). Disentangling notions of embodiment. Paper presented at the Workshop on Developmental Embodied Cognition, Edinburg, UK. |
