English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51828908      Online Users : 519
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 金融學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/67602
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67602


    Title: 具提前解約權之聯貸信用違約交換及其指數型擔保債權憑證的評價與避險
    Pricing and Hedging of Loan CDS and CDX with Cancellable Rights
    Authors: 楊文瀚
    Yang, Wen Han
    Contributors: 江彌修
    Chiang, Mi Hsiu
    楊文瀚
    Yang, Wen Han
    Keywords: 聯貸信用違約交換
    提前解約權
    違約強度模型
    因子聯繫模型
    分券避險參數
    loan CDS
    cancellable rights
    intensity-based model
    factor copula
    tranche Deltas
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2014-07-21 15:38:37 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文利用隨機違約強度模型 (stochastic intensity-based model) 和擴展的高斯一因子聯繫模型 (extended one factor Gaussian copula model) 分別來探討具提前解約權之聯貸信用違約交換 (LCDS) 的單一資產和其指數型擔保債權憑證 (LCDX tranche swap) 的評價和避險。以上所有用到的兩個模型都是以外生給定的違約強度和可取消性的強度來決定違約和提前解約的事件的發生機率。
    本文將針對具提前解約權之聯貸信用違約交換 (Legacy LCDS) 以及沒有提前解約權之聯貸信用違約交換 (Bullet LCDS) 兩者進行比較,藉此觀察提前解約權 (Cancellable Rights) 對於此商品的信用價差之影響。同樣地,此一比較也會延伸至對於其指數型擔保債權憑證的部分的探討。另外,本文也將透過敏感度分析,來觀察參數φ (違約和可取性之間的相關性) 在模型中扮演的腳色。
    最後,本文利用風險衡量指標以及Delta避險的方式,將可以清楚看到模擬的結果中,其指數型擔保債權憑證在不同分券底下所具有的風險特徵和其避險所需負擔的成本,希望藉此提供投資人和後續研究者一些參考和方向。
    In this paper we investigate the pricing and hedging issues of Loan CDS (LCDS) and its index product, the Loan CDX (LCDX) tranche swap under intensity-based model and extended one factor Gaussian copula, respectively. Although market today has developed the bullet LCDS to remove the cancellation feature from syndicated loan derivatives expecting to improve the liquidity of the loan market, still a great proportion is traded on the Legacy LCDS with early termination.
    Here, we first address on the difference between the spread for Legacy LCDS and Bullet LCDS (LCDS with and without a cancellation feature), then we go further to consider the index product LCDX tranche swap to test the difference of the spread under different subordination levels. Consequently, our results suggest that the computed spread is generally higher for the Bullet LCDS and Bullet LCDX tranche swap; however, we find it really interesting that the super senior tranche for the cancellable Legacy LCDX tranche swap is possible to have a higher spread than the non-cancellable Bullet LCDX tranche swap when there is strong negative correlation between default and cancellation.
    Besides, we try to find out the role of the correlation parameter φ (correlation between default time and cancellation time) in both models using sensitivity analysis. Furthermore, using risk measures that consider expected loss and unexpected loss, we examine the risk characteristics of such products. Finally, we delve into the hedging issue for the LCDX tranche swap, again comparing results of the Legacy and Bullet version of the instrument. Efficient calculations for the hedging parameters and hedging costs are demonstrated, and we provide an in-depth analysis for the relevant hedging implications followed from our numerical results.
    Reference: 1. Bandreddi, S., Kakodkar, A., Shi, R.,Tanna, S., and Shchuchinov,Y. (2007). “A barrier model to price cancellation in LCDS. Credit Derivatives Strategy”, Merrill Lynch.
    2. Benzschawel, T., DaGraca, J., Kamra, A., and Yu, J. (2008). “Valuing loan credit default swap cancellability”. The Journal of Credit Risk 4(3), 21–38.
    3. Chiang, M., Yueh, M., and Lin, A. (2009). “The Pricing and Hedging of Synthetic CDOs Under the Conditional Independence Assumption”, The Official Publication of Taiwan Finance Association, volume 17, number 1, March 2009.
    4. Duffie, D., D. Filipovi´c, and W. Schachermayer (2003). “Affine Processes and Applications in Finance”, Annals of Applied Probability 13, 984.1053.
    5. Duffie, D., J. Pan, and K. Singleton (2000). “Transform Analysis and Asset Pricing for Affine Jump Diffusions”, Econometrica 68, 1343.1376.
    6. Dobranszky, P. and Schoutens, W. (2009). “Do not forget the cancellation: Marking-to-market and hedging LCDX tranches”, Working Paper.
    7. Dobranszky, P. (2008). “Joint modeling of CDS and LCDS spreads with correlated default and prepayment intensities and with stochastic recovery rate”, Tech. Rep. 08-04, Statistics Section, K.U. Leuven
    8. Elizalde, A., Jonsson, J., Gallo, A., Kakodkar A., and Bandreddi, S. (2007). Pricing cancellable LCDS. Credit Derivatives Strategy, Merrill Lynch.
    9. Gibson, M. (2004). “Understanding the risk of synthetic CDOs”, FEDS Discussion Papers, no. 2004-36, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
    10. Hull, J., and White, A. (2000).“Valuing credit default swaps: no counterparty default risk”, Journal of Derivatives 8(1), 29–40.
    11. Jarrow, R. and F. Yu (2001). “Counterparty Risk and the Pricing of Defaultable Securities”, Journal of Finance 56, 1765.1800.
    12. JP Morgan (2006). Credit derivatives handbook. Corporate Quantitative Research.
    13. Lando, D. (2004). Credit Risk Modeling. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
    14. Li, D. X. (2000). On default correlation: A copula function approach (working paper, The RiskMetrics Group), 99-07
    15. Liang, Michael (2009). “Valuation of Loan CDS and Synthetic Loan CDS with Prepayment Risk”, Financial Markets, Industrial Bank (China) Co.,Ltd
    16. Markit (2014). Markit Credit Indices: A Primer, January 2014.
    17. Markit (2010). One in the chamber: the new North American bullet LCDS contract and its impact on Markit LCDX indices and tranches.Web Resource, Markit.
    18. Markit. Markit LCDX Primer.
    19. Morgan, S., and Zheng, Z. (2007). From CDS to LCDS: accounting for cancellation. Quantitative Credit Research, Lehman Brothers.
    20. Ong, M., Li., D., Lu, D. (2012), “A survey of loan credit default swap pricing models”, Journal of Credit Risk Volume 8/Number 3, Fall 2012 (67–96).
    21. Scott, A., Beinstein, E., and Le, K. (2007), “Loan CDS: valuing the cancellable feature”, Corporate Quantitative Research, JP Morgan.
    22. Shek, H., Shunichiro, U., and Wei, Z. (2007), “Valuation of Loan CDS and CDX”, Working Paper, Stanford University.
    23. Wei, Z. (2007). “Valuation of loan CDS under intensity-based model”, Working Paper, Department of Statistics, Stanford University.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    金融研究所
    101352025
    102
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101352025
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[金融學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    202501.pdf1276KbAdobe PDF2315View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback