Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54737
|
| Title: | 校長分布式領導對組織健康影響之研究
A study of the impact of distributed leadership on school organizational health |
| Authors: | 陳麗捐 |
| Contributors: | 吳政達
陳麗捐 |
| Keywords: | 分布式領導
組織健康
Distributed leadership
school organizational health |
| Date: | 2011 |
| Issue Date: | 2012-10-30 11:34:42 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 摘要
本研究旨在探討桃園縣國民中小學校長實施分布式領導及學校組織健康之現況，分析在不同個人背景變項及學校環境背景變項中，教師對校長實施分布式領導的知覺差異情形，並探討實施分布式領導對學校組織健康之影響。
為達上述目的，本研究採用問卷調查法，以桃園縣245所國中小學教師為母群體，採分層隨機抽樣，共計抽取52所國中小，寄發問卷656份，回收比例86%。扣除填答不全的無效問卷後，可用問卷501份，可用率為88％。本研究使用SPSS 17.0 for windows 統計套裝軟體進行統計分析，獲致以下結論：
一、 桃園縣國民中小學教師知覺校長分布式領導及學校組織健康情形為中高程度。
二、 教師知覺分布式領導以「學校文化」感受程度最高，其次為「分享責任」。教師知覺組織健康則以「倡導與關懷」、「教師凝聚力」的感受程度最高。
三、 男性教師知覺校長分布式領導與學校組織健康之程度均高於女性教師。
四、 資深教師在知覺校長分布式領導與學校組織健康之程度均高於年輕或年資少之教師。
五、 兼任行政職務之教師知覺校長分布式領導與學校組織健康之程度均高於導師或專任教師。
六、 不同教育程度之教師在知覺校長分布式領導與學校組織健康之程度無顯著差異。
七、 學校規模為小型(24班以下)之教師，在知覺校長分布式領導與學校組織健康之程度均高於中、大型學校教師。
八、 小學教師在知覺校長分布式領導與學校組織健康之程度均高於國中教師。
九、 校長分布式領導對學校組織健康具有正向且顯著之影響。
最後依據上述結論，提出具體建議，以作為教育行政機關、學校機關首長及學術研究等相關單位參考。
關鍵詞：分布式領導、組織健康
This research explores the current state of distributed leadership and school organizational health in elementary and junior high schools across Taoyuan County, analyzing how factors including various personal backgrounds and school environments affect the results of this research. In addition, the degree of awareness displayed by teachers concerning distributed leadership as well as the effect of distributed leadership on school organizational health is explored.
In order to achieve the above, this research utilizes survey methodology with the teachers of the 245 elementary and junior high schools in Taoyuan County as the entire population under study. With random, stratified sampling, 656 questionnaires were sent to teachers across 52 schools with an 86% reply rate. Out of the returned questionnaires, 88% were valid, a total of 501 questionnaires. The results were tabulated and analyzed using the SPSS 17.0 for Windows program and the following conclusions were obtained:
1. The level of awareness of the teachers of Taoyuan County’s elementary and junior high schools of distributed leadership and school organizational health is moderately high.
2. Teachers are most aware of the “school culture” and secondly the “shared responsibility” aspects of distributed leadership. Teachers are most aware of the “initiating structure and consideration” and secondly the “teacher affiliation” aspects of school organizational health.
3. Overall, male teachers possess a higher level of awareness of distributed leadership and school organizational health than do female teachers.
4. Senior, more experienced teachers are more aware of distributed leadership and school organizational health than are junior, less experienced teachers.
5. Teachers who also perform administrative duties demonstrate a higher degree of awareness of distributed leadership and school organizational health than do counselors or teachers who do not perform administrative duties.
6. Teachers with varying levels of education do not display significant difference regarding awareness of distributed leadership and school organizational health.
7. Teachers of smaller schools (with less than 24 classes) are generally more aware of distributed leadership and school organizational health than are teachers are larger schools.
8. Elementary school teachers possess a higher level of awareness of distributed leadership and school organizational health than do junior high school teachers.
9. Distributed leadership has a positive correlation and significant effect on school organizational health.
Based on the conclusions listed above, I have made practical suggestions that educational administrative institutions, school institutions and research institutions could use as reference.
Terms: Distributed leadership, school organizational health |
| Reference: | 中文部份：
方慶林(2010)。臺北縣國民小學分散式領導對學生學習態度影響之研究 (未出版之碩士論文) 。國立政治大學，台北市。
王孟如(2008)。高級中學學校組織健康與教師組織承諾關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學，新北市。
向家逸(2010)。分佈式領導、教師組織公民行為與教師集體效能感關係之研究：以桃園縣國小為例(未出版之碩士論文)。中原大學，桃園縣。
何怡欣(2007)。台南縣市國民小學教務主任服務領導與教師工作士氣關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台南大學，台南市。
何建霖(2008) 國民小學學校分佈式領導、教師同僚專業互享與學生學習表現之研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學，嘉義縣。
吳清山、林天祐(2010)。教育名詞。教育資料與研究雙月刊，95，149-150。
林振成(2003)。國民中學學校氣氛與教師士氣之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。彰化師範大學，彰化縣。
邱國隆(1999)。國民小學組織氣氛與教師士氣關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院，台北市。
邱榮茂(2002)。台中縣國民小學校長領導行為與管理模式之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。台中師範學院，台中市。
洪瑞斌、李志鴻、周志明、劉兆明(2007)。從組織文化的角度探究健康組織之意涵。應用心理研究，36，151-191
徐韶佑(2001)。國民小學校長轉型領導與教師服務士氣關係之研究─以台北市、台北縣及桃園縣為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台北教育大學，台北市。
秦夢群(2010)。教育領導理論與應用。台北：五南。
秦夢群、吳勁甫(2006) 國中校長轉型領導、學校組織健康與教組織承諾關係之研究，教育研究集刊，52(3)，141-172
秦夢群、吳勁甫、鄧鈞文(2007) 國民中學學校組織健康面之建構與衡量。教育政策論壇，10(3)，75-102
張建邦(1982) 台灣六所大學官僚、同僚與政治管理模式之研究。台北：驚聲文物供應中心。
張嘉原(2008)國民小學學校組織健康、組織學習與教師效能感關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學，台北市。
張蘊涵(2009)。組織健康與績效關係之研究：臺北市政府教育局實證分析(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學，新北市。
許嘉純(2008)。競值架構之校長領導效能與教師工作士氣關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學，南投縣。
陳冠之(2004)。台南縣市國民小學教師工作士氣現況及其影響因素之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台南大學，台南市。
陳宣妏(2008)。台北縣市國民中學學校組織健康與教師組織信任關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學，新北市。
廖雪吟(2006)。桃竹苗四縣市國民小學校長教學領導與教師工作士氣之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。
劉文章(2010)。臺北縣國民小學分散式領導對教師學術樂觀影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學，台北市。
劉敏雯(2008)。 桃竹苗四縣市國民小學教師專業發展動機與學校組織健康關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。
蔡政良(2008)。學校組織健康與教師專業發展評鑑變革關注關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。逢甲大學，台中市
蔡進雄(2004) 領導新典範：後英雄式領導的意涵及其對學校行政領導的啟示。 教育政策論壇，7(1)，111-130。
鄭晶文(2008)。國中學校組織健康與教師組織公民行為關係之探究(未出版之碩士論文)。逢甲大學，台中市。
賴志峰(2008)。分佈式領導的意義、構面與主張。教育研究月刊，171，28-40。
賴志峰(2008)。分佈式領導理論之探究—學校領導者、追隨者和情境的交互作用。國民教育研究學報，20，87-133。
賴志峰(2009)。中小學分布式領導風格量表之檢證。初等教育學刊，34，25-52。
賴志峰(2009)。教師領導的理論及實踐之探析。教育研究與發展期刊，5(3)，2009.09
賴志峰(2010)。學校領導新議題：理論與實踐。台北：高等教育。
薛承祐(2010)國民中學校長家長式領導層面、學校組織健康與教師組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學，台北市
謝文全(2007)。教育行政學。台北：高等教育。
顏童文(2006) 國民小學組織動態能耐、組織健康氣候與學校創新經營關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學，台北市
嚴靜娜(2001)。國民小學教師工作士氣及其影響因素之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。台北市立師範學院，台北市。
外文部份：
Barry, D. (1991). Managing the bossless Team: Lessons in distributed leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 20(1), 31-47.
Bennett, J. B., Cook R. F., & Pelletier, K. R. (2002). Toward an integrated framework for comprehensive organizational wellness: concepts, practices, and research in workplace health promotion, Handbook of occupational health psychology Washington, DC : American Psychological Association. 69-95
Bentley, R. R., & Rampel, A. M. (1980). Manual for the Purdue Teacher Opinionnaire. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Research Foundation.
Bevans, K., Bradshaw, C., Miech R &Leaf B (2007). Staff and school-level predictors of school organizational health: a multilevel analysis. .Joumal of school health, 77(.6)
Bush, T. (1995). Theories of educational management (2nd ed.). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Bush,T.(2003). Theories of educational leadership and management(3rd ed.). London:sage
Carson,J. B., & Tesluk, P. E. & Marrone, J.A. (2007). Share leadership in teams an investigation of tecedent condition and performance. Academy of Management Journal 2007, Vol. 50, No. 5, 1217–1234
Charles, M. P. (1987). An Investigation of Factors That Influence Teacher Morale and Satisfaction with Work Conditions. Doctoral dissertation. Eugene, Oregon: Division of Educational Policy and Management, University of Oregon.
Clift, R. T., & Thurston, T. W. (1995). (Eds.). Distributed leadership: School improvement through collaboration. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Conger, J. A., & Pearce, C. L. (2003). A landscape of opportunities. In C. L. Pearce, &J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership. Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 285–303). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Copland, M.A.(2002). The Bay Area School Reform Collaborative: Building the Capacity to Lead, http://www.stanford.edu/group/suse-crc/cgi-bin/drupal/sites/default/files/BASRC-Phase1.pdf
Drath, W. H. (1998). Approaching the future of leadership development. In C. D., McCauley, et al. (Eds.), The center for creative leadership handbook of leadership development (pp. 403-432). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington, IN: National Educational Services
Elmore, R.F. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership (Report). Washington D.C.:Albert Shanker Institute
Gordon, Z. V. (2005). The effect of distributed leadership on student achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of Central Connecticult, Connecticult, New Britain.
Gragg, W.L.(1955).Teacher Moral. Clearing House, 29(5),pp493-494
Grint,K.(2005). .Leadership:limits and possibilities.New York:Palgrave macmillan.
Gronn, P. (2000). Distributed properties: A new architect for leadership. Educational Management and Administration, 28(3), 317-338.
Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership. In K. Leithwood & P. Hallinger (Eds). Second International handbook of educational leadership and administration (653-696) Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Harris,A.(2003a). Teacher leadership as distributed leadership:Heresy, fatasy or possibility. School leadership & Management, 23(3)313-324
Harris, A. (2002). Distributed leadership in schools: Leading or misleading? Management in Education, 16(5), 10-13.
Hart, P. M., Wearing, A. J., Conn, M., Carter, N.L., & Roger K D (2000). Development of the School Organisational Health Questionnaire: A measure for assessing teacher morale and school organizational climate British Journal of Educationl Psyschology; 70, ProQuest Education Joumals, 211-228
HayGroup. (2004). The five pillars of distributed leadership in schools. Nottingham, UK: National College for School Leadership.
Hoy, W. K., & Feldman, J. A.(1987). Organizational health: The concept and its measure. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 20(4), 30-38.
Hoy, W. K., & Hannum, J. (1997). Middle School climate: An empirical assessment of organizational health and student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33, 290-311
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (1987). Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice. 3rd Ed. New York: Random House.
Hoy, W. K., & Sabo, D. J.(1998).. Quality middle schools: Open and healthy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Hoy, W. K., & Tarter, C. J.(1990). Organizational climate school health and student achievement: a comparative analysis. Unpublished paper.
Hoy, W. K., Smith, P. A., & Sweetland, S. R. (2002). The development of the organizational climate index for high schools: its measure and relationship to faculty trust. High School Journal, 86(2), 38-49.
Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Kottkamp, R. B.(1991). Open schools/healthy schools:Measuring organizational climate. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Wiskowskie, L.(1992). Faculty trust in colleagues: Linking the principal with school effectiveness. Journal of Research and development in Education,26（1）, 38-58.
Hoy,W. K., & Woolfolk, A. E. (1993). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and the organizational health of schools. The Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 355-372
http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1088&context=doctoral
Hulpia, H., Devos, G. & Rosseel, Y. (2009). The relationship between the perception of distributed leadership in secondary schools and teachers’ and teacher leaders’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment：School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20( 3), 291–317
Lashway, L. (2002). Developing instructional leaders. ERIC Digest 160 (July), Clearinghouse on Educational Management, University of Oregon.
Lashway, L. (2003). Distributed Leadership. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association Chicago, IL.
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (1999). The relative effects of principal and teacher sources of leadership on student engagement with school. Educational Administration Quarterly,35(S), 679-706.
Leithwood, K.,Jantzi, D.,Ryan, S., & Steinbach, R. (2002). Distributed leadership in secondary school, Paper presented at the British Educational Leadership Management & Administration Society Conference ,Birmingham, England,
MacBeath, J., Oduro, G., & Waterhouse, J. (2004). Distributed leadership in action:Full report. Nottingham, UK:National College For School Leadership.
Parsons, T. (1967). Some ingredients of a general theory of formal organization. In A. W. Halpin(Ed.), Administrative theory in education 40-72. New York: Macmillan.
Pearce, C.L.(2004). The future of leadership:Combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work. Academy of Management Executive, 2004, Vol. 18, No. 1
Rowland, K. A. (2008). The Relationship of Principal Leadership and Teacher Morale. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from
Sergiovanni, T. J. (2001). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Somech, A. (2005). Directive Versus Participative Leadership: Two Complementary Approaches to Managing School Effectiveness Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 777-800
Spillane, J.P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Waters, T., Marzano, R., & NcNulty, B. (2004). Leadership that sparks learning.Educational Leadership, 81(7), 48-51. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
學校行政碩士在職專班
97911010
100 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097911010 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [學校行政碩士在職專班] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 101001.pdf | 2845Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 531 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
