Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51379
|
| Title: | 個人、國家與世界：論約翰彌爾的公眾參與理論 |
| Authors: | 黃培維
Huang, Pei Wei |
| Contributors: | 葉浩
黃培維
Huang, Pei Wei |
| Keywords: | 約翰彌爾
效益主義
公民精神
公民參與
帝國主義
John Stuart Mill
Utilitarianism
idea of citizenship
citizen participation
Imperialism |
| Date: | 2010 |
| Issue Date: | 2011-10-05 14:49:13 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本文從個人、國家和世界三個層面來重新建構約翰彌爾的公眾參與理論。其公眾參與理論包含了公民精神和公民參與這兩個部份。公民精神主要強調合作的精神，天才和菁英組成的知識階級公民必須和其他大眾階級的公民合作，才可以減少痛苦得到快樂，唯有合作才能讓每個人可以充分運用到自己的能力，享受到高級樂趣，得到個人的幸福，也讓社會獲得更多的效益。合作的精神必須透過實際的參與才可以學習，因此參與本身具有教育的功能。彌爾認為公民精神必須透過國家內部的地方和中央雙軌式的參與才可以培養，由知識階級擔任引導的角色，在參與過程中協助大眾階級的學習。這種方式擴展到世界上就是文明國家對野蠻國家的帝國主義干預。殖民地不適用於不干預原則，因為他們必須透過和統治者的合作，才能學習如何運用自己的能力來得到幸福。
This study tries to reconstruct John Stuart Mill’s theory of public participation from three perspectives: individual, national and international. This theory consists of an account of citizenship as well as an account of citizen participation. At the core of Mill’s idea of citizenship is cooperation between intelligent citizens, which include geniuses and elites, and the masses. By cooperation, people can make best use of their capacities, and attain their own higher pleasures and ultimately happiness. This citizen spirit can only be cultivated through political participation, and thus it has implications on education policy. The purpose of educating the masses is to help them develop and use their intellectual ability, and to do so intelligent citizens must assume the role of leading their fellow citizens with regard to political participation. And only from this perspective can we truly understand Mill’s theory of international intervention – or liberal imperialism, according to which civilized states are allowed to intervene the barbarian ones. Colonized population must cooperate with and learn from their rulers – that is to say, to conduct their own experiments in living under their colonizer’s tutelage. |
| Reference: | 一、中文部份
(一)中文專書
江宜樺。2001。《自由民主的理路》，台北市：聯經。
李酉潭。1999。《自由、平等與民主 : 約翰彌勒與孫中山的政治思想》，台北市：國立編譯館。
林玉体。1999。《西洋教育史》，台北市：師大書苑。
尚杰。2005。《西方哲學史第五卷：啟蒙時代的法國哲學》，江蘇：人民出版社。
張明貴。1986。《約翰彌爾》，台北市：東大。
浦興祖等。2009。《西方政治學說史》，上海：復旦大學出版社。
(二)期刊論文
江宜樺。2005。<公民理念與公民的教育>，《通識教育季刊》，12(1)：27-44。
陳俊宏。1998。<永續發展與民主：審議式民主理論初探>，《東吳政治學報》，9：85-122。
梁福鎮。2009。<全球化脈絡下台灣公民教育的挑戰與回應>，《教育科學期刊》，8(1)：63-86。
張福建。2005。<參與和公民精神的養成：彌爾《代議政府論》的一種解讀>，《東吳政治學報》，21：41-61。
黃俊龍。2003。<民主社會的菁英統治：對密爾《論代議政府》的一個詮釋>，《政治科學論叢》，18：217-240。
蔡英文。1999。<公民德性、市民社會與主權國家：現代市民社會論述之探討>，《政治科學論叢》，10：83-112。
盧倩儀。2004。<審議式超國家主義>，《問題與研究》，43：53-71。
羅新陽。2007。<解讀幸福指數>，《寧波廣州電視大學學報》，5(1)：97-101。
(三)會議論文
李酉潭。2010。<生態主義與台海兩岸的發展—從約翰彌勒綠色自由主義的觀點談起>，「中國政治學會年會暨『能知的公民？民主的理想與實際』研討會」。高雄：中山大學，11月6-7日。
(四)學位論文
馬仲民。2000。《約翰．密爾論民主公民的品質及其條件》，台北市：國立政治大學政治研究所碩士論文。
莊富源。2006。《轉變中的臺灣公民社會與公民教育 : 有關學校公民教育問題靣向及其發展趨勢之硏究》台北市：國立政治大學中山人文社會科學硏究所博士論文。
(五)翻譯著作
克柏萊。1981。《西洋教育史》，楊亮功譯，台北市：協志。
馬克福森。1993。《自由民主的經驗與時代》，張明貴譯，台北市：桂冠。
馬秋德爾。1981。《印度通史》，李志夫譯，台北市：國立編譯館。
羅勃茲。1986。《英國史》，賈士蘅譯，台北市：五南。
盧梭。1989。《愛彌兒》，李平漚譯，台北市：五南。
彌爾。1990。《論自由及論代議政治》，郭志嵩譯，台北市：協志工業叢書。
彌爾。2007。《功利主義》，劉富勝譯，上海：光明日報。
彌爾。2007。《我的知識之路：約翰彌爾自傳》，吳衡康、吳良健譯，台北市：網路與書。
彌爾。2009。《政治經濟學原理》，金謫、金熠譯，北京：華夏出版社。
彌爾。2009。《精神科學的邏輯》，李滌非譯，杭州：浙江大學。
二、英文部份
(一)英文專書
Berlin, Isaiah. 1969. Four Essays on Liberty. London; New York: Oxford University Press.
Berger, Fred R. 1984. Happiness, Justice, and Freedom: the Moral and Political Philosophy of John Stuart Mill. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bowen, James. 1981. A History of Western Education. London: Routledge.
Cook, Ian. 1998. Reading Mill: Studies in Political Theory. Australia: Palgrave Macmillan.
Donner, Wendy. 1991. The Liberal Self: John Stuart Mill`s moral and political philosophy. Ithaca, N.Y. : Cornell University Press.
Fine, Robert .2007. Cosmopolitanism. London; New York, N.Y.: Routledge.
Gray, John. 1996. Mill on Liberty : A Defence. London; New York: Routledge.
Gray, John and Smith, G.W.(ed.). 1991. J.S. Mill, On liberty in Focus. London; New York: Routledge.
Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis.2004. Why Deliberative Democracy？.N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Himmelfarb, Gertrude. 1990. On Liberty and Liberalism: The Case of John Stuart Mill. New York: Knopf.
Holbraad, Carsten. 1970. The Concert of Europe: A Study in German and British International Theory, 1815-1914. Harlow: Longmans.
Levin, Michael. 2004. J.S. Mill on Civilization and Barbarism. London; New York: Routledge.
Mill, James. 1992. Analysis of The Phenomena of The Human Mind. Vol. 1 & Vol. 2. London: Routledge.
Mill, John Stuart. 1963-91. The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. ed. John M. Robson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Nussbaum, Martha C. 1997.Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Parekh, Bhikhu C. 2000. Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan.
Pitts, Jennifer. 2005. A Turn to Empire : The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Ryan, Alan. 1970. The Philosophy of John Stuart Mill. Pantheon Books.
Smart, Paul. 1991. Mill and Marx : Individual Liberty and The Roads to Freedom. New York: Manchester University Press.
Smith, G.W.(ed.) .1998. John Stuart Mill`s Social and Political Thought: Critical Assessments. London ; New York: Routledge.
Skorupski , John. 1989. John Stuart Mill. London; New York: Routledge.
Skorupski, John (ed.). 1998. The Cambridge Companion to Mill. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Skorupski , John. 2006. Why Read Mill today?. London; New York: Routledge.
Ten, C.L. (ed.). 1999. Mill`s Moral, Political, and Legal Philosophy. Brookfield, Vt.: Ashgate.
Ten, C.L. (ed.). 2008. Mill`s On Liberty: A Critical Guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, Dennis F. 1976. John Stuart Mill and Representative Government. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Urbinati, Nadia .2002. Mill on Democracy: From the Athenian Polis to Representative Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex (ed.). 2007. J.S. Mill`s Political Thought : A Bicentennial Reassessment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Varouxakis, Georgios. 2002. Mill on Nationality. London ; New York: Routledge.
Varouxakis, Georgios and Schultz ,Bart(ed.). 2005. Utilitarianism and Empire. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books.
Walzer, Michael. 2006. Just and Unjust Wars : a moral argument with historical illustrations. New York: Basic Books.
West, Henry R. (ed.). 2006. The Blackwell Guide to Mill`s Utilitarianism. Malden, MA ; Oxford: Blackwell Pub.
Zastopuil, Lynn. 1998. John Stuart Mill and India. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
(二)多作者論文集中之論文
Donner, Wendy. 1998. “Mill`s utilitarianism” in “The Cambridge companion to Mill” edited by John Skorupski. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Donner, Wendy. 2006. “Mill`s theory of value” in “The Blackwell guide to Mill`s Utilitarianism” edited by Henry R. West. Malden, MA ; Oxford: Blackwell Pub.
Donner, Wendy. 2007. “John Stuart Mill on education and democracy” in “J.S. Mill`s political thought : a bicentennial reassessment” edited by Nadia Urbinati and Alex Zakaras. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Donner, Wendy. 2008. “Autonomy, tradition, and the enforcement of morality” in “Mill`s On liberty : a critical guide” edited by C.L. Ten. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Goldberg, David Theo. 2005. “Liberalism`s limits: Carlyle and Mill on the negro question” in “Utilitarianism and empire” edited by Bart Schultz and Georgios Varouxakis. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books.
Holmes, Stephen. 2007. “Making Sense of Liberal Imperialism” in “J.S. Mill`s political thought : a bicentennial reassessment” edited by Nadia Urbinati and Alex Zakaras. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Miller, J. Joseph. 2005. “Chairing the Jamaica Committee: J. S. Mill and the limits of colonial authority” in “Utilitarianism and empire” edited by Bart Schultz and Georgios Varouxakis. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books.
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2005. “Mill on happiness: the enduring value of a complex critique” in “Utilitarianism and empire” edited by Bart Schultz and Georgios Varouxakis. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books.
O’Brink, David. 2008. “Mill`s liberal principles and freedom of expression” in “Mill`s On liberty : a critical guide” edited by C.L. Ten. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Varouxakis, Georgios. 2005. “Empire, race, euro-centrism: John Stuart Mill and his critics” in “Utilitarianism and empire” edited by Bart Schultz and Georgios Varouxakis. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books.
Varouxakis, Georgios. 2007. “Cosmopolitan Patriotism in J.S. Mill’s Political Thought and Activism” in “J.S. Mill`s political thought : a bicentennial reassessment” edited by Nadia Urbinati and Alex Zakaras. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Walzer, Michael. 2007. “Mill’s ‘A Few Words on Non-Intervention’” in “J.S. Mill`s political thought : a bicentennial reassessment” edited by Nadia Urbinati and Alex Zakaras. New York: Cambridge University Press.
(三)期刊論文
Anderson, Elizabeth S. 1991. “John Stuart Mill and Experiments in Living” Ethic 102(1): 4-26.
Berger, Fred R. 1978. “Mill’s Concept of Happiness” Interpretation 7:95-117.
Bell, Duncan. 2006. “Empire and International Relations in Victorian Political Thought” The Historical Journal 49(1): 281-298.
Bell, Duncan. 2010. “John Stuart Mill on Colonies” Political Theory 38(1): 34-64.
Doyle, Michael.2010. “A few words on Mill, Walzer, and Nonintervention” Ethics & International Affairs 23(4): 349-369.
Donner, Wendy. 1993. “John Stuart Mill’s Liberal Feminism” Philosophical Studies 69: 155-166.
Diamond, Larry. 1994. “Rethinking Civil Society: Toward Democratic Consolidation” Journal of Democracy, 5(3): 4–17.
Diamond, Larry. 2006. “Promoting Democracy in Post-Conflict and Failed States Lessons and Challenges” Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 2(2): 93-116.
Gibbs, Benjamin. 1986. “Higher and Lower Pleasures” Philosophy 61(235): 31-59.
Gray, John. 1981. “John Stuart Mill on Liberty, Utility, and Rights” Nomos 23: 80-116.
Harris, Abram L. 1964. “John Stuart Mill: Servant of the East India Company” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 30(2): 185-202.
Held, David. 2002. “Globalization, Corporate Practice and Cosmopolitan Social Standards” Contemporary Political Theory 1:59-78.
Holliger, David. 2001. “Not Universalist, Not Pluralists:the new cosmopolitans find their own way” Constellations 8(2): 236-248.
Martin, Rex. 1972. “A Defense of Mill’s Qualitative Hedonism” Philosophy 42: 140-151
Miller, Kenneth E. 1961. “John Stuart Mill’s Theory of International Relations” Journal of the History of Ideas 22(4): 493-514.
O’Brink, David. 1992. “Mill`s Deliberative Utilitarianism” Philosophy & Public Affairs 21: 67-103.
Prager, Carol A. L. 2005. “Intervention and Empire: John Stuart Mill and International Relations” Political Studies 53: 621-640.
Riley, Jonathan. 1991. “One Very Simple Principle” Utilitas 3:1-35.
Rees, J.C. 1977. “The Thesis of the Two Mills” Philosophical Studies 25(3): 369-382.
Sen, Amartya. 1983. “Liberty and Social Choice” Journal of Philosophy 80 (1): 5-28.
Sullivan, Eileen P. 1983. “Liberalism and Imperialism: J.S. Mill’s Defense of the British Empire” Journal of the History of Ideas 44: 599-617.
Varouxakis, Georgios. 1998. “John Stuart Mill on Race” Utilitas 10(1): 17-33.
Varouxakis, Georgios. 1999. “Guizot’s Historical Works and J. S. Mill’s Reception of Tocqueville” History of Political Thought 20(2): 292-312.
(四)會議論文
葉浩。2009。 “Experiments in Living Progressive Being and Liberal Imperialism: An Interpretation of J. S. Mill’s International Political Thought”，中華民國國際關係學會第二屆年會暨「國際新情勢與兩岸新紀元：機會與挑戰」國際學術研討會議。 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
政治研究所
97252009
99 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097252009 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [政治學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 200901.pdf | 1377Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 2162 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
