English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51635138      Online Users : 579
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/30195
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30195


    Title: 智慧資本揭露之效益及其影響因素之研究
    Authors: 陳純綾
    Chen, Chun-Ling
    Contributors: 王文英
    陳純綾
    Chen, Chun-Ling
    Keywords: 智慧資本揭露
    資訊電子業
    公司特性
    公司價值
    揭露效益
    IC-related information disclosure
    electronic industry
    company property
    company value
    effects of IC disclosure
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2009-09-11 17:26:01 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在現今知識經濟的世紀中,智慧資本已成為企業獲取競爭優勢的關鍵要素。
    隨著智慧資本愈來愈重要,許多企業也逐漸在年報或其他公開資訊的管道中,揭
    露更多有關智慧資本的資訊。透過更多智慧資本資訊的揭露,為企業本身及投資
    人、債權人間建立起彼此溝通的橋樑。
    綜上所述,智慧資本的報導和揭露顯得日趨重要。相關智慧資本資訊的揭露
    能使投資人及相關利害關係人更了解公司發展的潛力及價值。而過去的文獻指出
    公司資訊揭露的程度會降低資金成本、提高公司股價、降低分析師盈餘預測誤差
    等效益。資訊的揭露可以使投資人修正對公司價值的評價,有提高股票流動率等
    效益。因此智慧資本揭露及報導能提昇財務報導的價值攸關性,適當地反應公司
    真正的價值。因此,對公司而言應多揭露相關智慧資本資訊,以期為公司帶來相
    關的效益。但是,哪些公司特性因素會影響智慧資本揭露程度及其是否會影響智
    慧資本揭露程度和其效益間的關聯性亦是值得我們進一步探討。
    若能透過一系列的分析,找出公司智慧資本揭露政策不足之處,相信能給公
    司適當的建議,以符合市場上的需求,適當地揭露智慧資本,以期反應公司真正
    的價值並提高公司價值。
    本研究係以我國資訊電子業之上市公司為研究對象,蒐集相關資料以統計分
    析方法進行,發現之結果如下:
    一、公司智慧資本揭露程度和公司價值呈顯著正相關。
    二、「公司規模」、「舉債程度」、「公司年齡」會顯著影響公司智慧資本揭露程度。
    三、「公司規模」、「獲利能力」、「公司年齡」、「智慧資本降加價值係數(VAICTM )」
    會顯著影響智慧資本揭露程度及公司價值間的關聯性。
    In this knowledge-based economy, intellectual capital is the key factor to help
    firms get its competitive advantage. As intellectual capital is more and more important,
    many enterprises gradually disclose IC-related information in annual reports or other
    ways. With more IC-related information disclosures, it could build a bridge to
    communicate between enterprises, investors, and creditors.
    To sum up the above-mentioned, intellectual capital disclosure and report is more
    and more significant with time. IC-related information discourses can make investors
    and stakeholders understand the value and potential of the company much more. Prior
    research indicates disclosing information could reduce the average cost of capital and
    increase company’s stock value and reduce analyst forecast errors. Information
    disclosure can make investors revise upward valuations of the company’s stocks and
    increase stock liquidity. Therefore, for companies, they should disclose IC-related
    information in order to bring effects. But, which kind of company would affect
    IC-related information and affect the relation between IC-related information and its
    effects is also worth to investigate further.
    If we can find out deficiency of company’s IC-related information with above
    analysis, it will be believed to give some appropriate suggestions in order to match
    market’s needs. Disclosing IC-related information is aimed to react the company’s
    real value.
    In this study, collecting data and statistics analysis are used. The public firms in
    the electronic industry are the objects of the thesis. We fund that:
    1. There is a positive and significant correlation between IC disclosure and market
    capitalization.
    2. Company size, leverage, and age will affect IC-related information disclosure
    significantly.
    3. Company size, profitability, age, and VAIC TM will affect the relation between
    IC-related information disclosure and its effects (market capitalization)
    significantly.
    Reference: 王立偉,2002,不同類型製造業內企業市場價值與帳面淨值差異之研究,私立東海大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。
    李坤致,2001,智慧資本與價值動因對企業價值影響之研究,國立中正大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。
    林江亮,2005,智慧資本與公司價值之攸關性之探討,產業論壇,第七卷,第1期:95-122。
    林鈺傑,2004,智慧資本與經營績效關係性之實證研究,國立政治大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
    邱碧珠,2000,資訊揭露程度與權益資金成本間之關係:我國資訊電子業之研究,國立台灣大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
    吳秀娟,2000,企業市場價值與淨值差異影響因素之研究—以我國資訊電子業為例,國立政治大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
    吳思華、賴鈺晶與顏妙如,2000,網際網路智慧資本衡量與發展措施研究,經濟部工業局軟體五年發展計畫。
    高玉芬,2005,以智慧資本觀點探討知識經濟時代的價值攸關性,國立台北大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。
    徐君毅,2001,研發與廣告支出與企業價值變動之因果關係研究,私立東海大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。
    陳美娟,1997,年報自願性揭露水準與公司特徵之關聯性研究,國立政治大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
    莊尚志,2003,資訊揭露程度與資金成本關係之實證研究,私立東吳大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
    張窈菱,2004,年報揭露程度與分析師盈餘預測關係之研究,國立政治大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
    張哲銘,2004,資訊揭露與公司價值之研究,國立台北大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
    曾俊堯與古永嘉,2003,智慧資本與公司無形價值關係之研究—台灣製造業為例,管理與系統,第11期(1月):1-30。
    曾栗萱,2003,智慧資本與經營績效關聯性之研究-以我國資訊產業為實證對象,國立政治大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
    傅坤泰,2003,智慧資本於企業績效評估之應用-以IC設計產業為例,私立輔仁大學金融學系未出版碩士論文。
    詹乾隆,2004,臺灣企業智慧資本管理與企業價值關聯性之探討,台北:東華書局。
    資策會,2001,我國產業智慧資本先導性個案研究,財團法人資訊工業策進分包學術機構研究計畫期末報告。
    溫士賢,2002,研發、廣告與人力支出和企業價值之關聯性探討-以台灣上市上櫃企業為例,國立台灣大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
    楊建國,2000,無形資產之評價,私立輔仁大學金融學系未出版碩士論文。
    歐進士、陳博舜與李貴富,2004,台灣資訊電子業之訓練活動的企業價值分析,人力資源管理學報,第四卷,第4期:51-72。
    廖芝嫻,2002,智慧資本與經營績效關聯之實證研究-以我國資訊電子業技術人力資本為例,國立政治大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
    鄭淑如,2004,智慧資本與市價淨值比及傳統績效指標關聯性之研究,私立輔仁大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
    蔡基德,2001,資訊電子業市場價值與帳面淨值之差異探討,國立台灣大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
    簡志豪,2001,影響智慧資本因子之研究-以我國上市資訊電子股為例,私立逢甲大學會計與財稅學系未出版碩士論文。
    羅庚辛、鄭明松、柯家瑜與許明峰,2004,智慧資本揭露程度與智慧資本績效的關聯性研究,政大智慧財產評論,第二卷,第2期: 51- 80。
    饒祥浩,2002,從企業、分析師及會計師觀點論資訊電子業智慧資本資訊之揭露,國立政治大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
    Abbott, W. F., and R. J. Monsen. 1979. On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: Self-reported disclosures as a method of measuring corporate social involvement. Academy of Management Journal 22 (Autumn): 501-515.
    Abdolmohammadi, M. J. 2005. Intellectual capital disclosure and market capitalization. Journal of Intellectual Capital 6 (3): 397-416.
    Aboody, D., and B. Lev. 1998. The value-relevance of intangibles: The case of software capitalization. Journal of Accounting Research 36 (3): 161-191.
    Amir, E., and B. Lev. 1996. Value-relevance of nonfinancial information: The wireless communication industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics 22 (1-3): 3-30.
    Anderson, E. W., C. Formell, and D. R. Lehmann. 1994. Customer satisfaction, market share, and profitability: Findings from Sweden. Journal of Marketing 58 (July): 53-66.
    Banker, R. D., G. Potter, and D. Srinivasan. 2000. An empirical investigation of an incentive plan that includes nonfinancial performance measures. The Accounting Review 75 (January): 65-92.
    Bhargava, S. 1994. Profit sharing and the financial performance of companies: Evidence from UK panel data. The Economic Journal 104 (September): 1044-1056.
    Botosan, C. A. 1997. Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. The Accounting Review 72 (July): 323-349.
    Bowen, R. M., A. K. Davis, and S. Rajgopal. 2002. Determinants of revenue-reporting practices for internet firms. Contemporary Accounting Research 19 (4): 523-562.
    Bozzolan, S., F. Favotto, and F. Ricceri. 2003. Italian annual intellectual capital disclosure: An empirical analysis. Journal of Intellectual Capital 4 (4): 543-558.
    Brennan, N. 2001. Reporting intellectual capital in annual reports: Evidence from Ireland. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 14 (4): 423-436.
    Bukh, P. N., C. Nielsen, P. Gormsen, and J. Mouritsen. 2004. Disclosure of information on intellectual capital in Danish IPO prospectuses. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 18 (6): 713-732.
    Chauvin, K. W., and M. Hirschey. 1993. Advertising, R&D expenditures and the market value of the firm. The Journal of Financial Management Association 22 (4): 128-140.
    Chen, M., S. Cheng, and Y. Hwang. 2005. An empirical investigation of the relationship between intellectual capital and firms` market value and financial performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital 6 (2): 159-176.
    Choi, B., D. W. Collins, and W. B. Johnson. 1997. Valuation implications of reliability differences: The case of nonpension postretirement obligations. The Accounting Review 72 (July): 351-383.
    Cockburn, I., and Z. Griliches. 1988. Industry effects and appropriability measures in the stock market`s valuation of R&D and patents. The American Economic Review 78 (May): 419-423.
    Doucouliagos, C. 1995. Worker participation and productivity in labor-managed and participatory capitalist firms: A meta-analysis. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 94 (1): 58-77.
    Edvinsson, L., and M. S. Malone. 1997. Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company’s True Value by Finding It’s Hidden Brainpower. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, Inc.
    Firer, S., and S. M. Williams. 2003. Intellectual capital and traditional measures of corporate performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital 4 (3): 348-360.
    Garcia-Ayuso, M. 2003a. Factors explaining the inefficient valuation of intangibles. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 16 (1): 57-69.
    ____. 2003b. Intangibles: Lessons from the past and a look into the future. Journal of Intellectual Capital 4 (4): 597-604.
    Garcia-Meca, E., and I. Martinez. 2005. Assessing the quality of disclosure on intangibles in the Spanish capital market. European Business Review 17 (4): 305-313.
    Goh, P. C. 2005. Intellectual capital performance of commercial banks in Malaysia. Journal of Intellectual Capital 6 (3): 385-396.
    Guthrie, J., and R. Petty. 2000. Intellectual capital: Australian annual reporting practices. Journal of Intellectual Capital 1 (3): 241-251.
    Guthrie, J., R. Petty, and F. Ricceri. 2006 The voluntary reporting of intellectual capital: Comparing evidence from Hong Kong and Australia. Journal of Intellectual Capital 7 (2): 254-271.
    Healy, P. M., A. P. Hutton, and K. G. Palepu. 1999. Stock performance and intermediation changes surrounding sustained increases in disclosure. Contemporary Accounting Research 16 (3): 485-520.
    Healy, P. M., and K. G. Palepu. 1993. The effect of firms’ financial disclosure strategies on stock prices. Accounting Horizons 7 (11): 1-11.
    Hendricks, J. 1976. The impact of human resource accounting information on stock investment decisions: An empirical study. The Accounting Review 51 (2): 292-350.
    Hooks, J., D. Coy, and H. Davey. 2002. The information gap in annual reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 15 (4): 501-522.
    Hope, Ole-Kristian. 2003. Disclosure practices, enforcement of accounting standards, and analysts’ forecast accuracy: An international study. Journal of Accounting Research 41 (2): 235-273.
    Hurwitz, J., S. Lines, B. Montgomery, and J. Schmidt. 2002. The linkage between management practices, intangibles performance and stock returns. Journal of Intellectual Capital 3 (1): 51-61.
    Ittner, C., and D. Larcker. 1998a. Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction. Journal of Accounting Research 36 (3): 1-35.
    ____. 1998b. Innovations in performance measurement: Trends and research implications. Journal of Management Accounting Research 10: 205-238.
    Kim, M., and J. R. Ritter. 1999. Valuing IPOs. Journal of Financial Economics 53 (3): 409-437.
    Klein, A. 1996. Can investors use the prospectus to price initial public offerings? The Journal of Financial Statement Analysis 2 (Fall): 23-40.
    Klette, T. J. 1996. R&D, scope economies, and plant performance. Journal of Economics 27 (3): 502-522.
    Lang, M. H., and R. J. Lundholm. 1996. Corporate disclosure policy and analyst behavior. The Accounting Review 71 (October): 467-492.
    ____. 2000. Voluntary disclosure and equity offerings: Reducing information asymmetry or hyping the stock? Contemporary Accounting Research 17 (4): 623-642.
    Long, R. J. 2000. Employee profit sharing: Consequences and moderators. Industrial Relations 55 (3): 477-504.
    Mavridis, D. G. 2004. The intellectual capital performance of the Japanese banking sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital 5 (1): 92-115.
    ____. 2005. Intellectual capital performance determinants and globalization status of Greek listed firms. Journal of Intellectual Capital 6 (1): 127-141.
    Meek, G. K., C. B. Roberts, and S. J. Gray. 1995. Factors influencing voluntary annual report disclosure by U.S., U.K. and continental European multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies 26 (3): 555-572.
    Morbey, G. K. 1989. R&D expenditures and profit growth. Research Technology Management 32 (3): 20-23.
    Pennings, J. M., K. Lee, and A. van Witteloostuijn. 1998. Human capital, social capital, and firm dissolution. Academy of Management Journal 41 (August): 425-440.
    Petty, R., and S. Cuganesan. 2005. Voluntary disclosure of intellectual capital by Hong Kong companies: Examining size, industry and growth effects over time. Australian Accounting Review 15 (July): 40-50.
    Pulic, A. 1998. Measuring the performance of intellectual potential in knowledge economy. Available online :http://www.measuring-ip.at/Opapers/Pulic/Vaictxt.vaictxt.html
    ____. 2000. VAIC - An accounting tool for IC management. International Journal of Technology Management 20 (5-8): 702-714.
    Riahi-Belkaoui, A. 2003. Intellectual capital and firm performance of US multinational firms. Journal of Intellectual Capital 4 (2): 215-226.
    Saenz, J. 2005. Human capital indicators, business performance and market-to-book ratio. Journal of Intellectual Capital 6 (3): 374-385.
    Shiu, H. 2006a. The Application of the value added intellectual coefficient to measure corporate performance: Evidence from technological firms. International Journal of Management 23 (2): 356-366.
    ____. 2006b. Application of the VAIC method to measures of corporate performance: A quantile regression approach. Journal of American Academy of Business 8 (March): 156-161.
    Sougiannis, T. 1994. The accounting based valuation of corporate R&D. The Accounting Review 69 (January): 44-68.
    Stewart, T. A. 1997. Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.
    Sveiby, K. E. 1997. The New Organizational Wealth - Managing and Measuring Knowledge-based Assets. New York: Berrett-Koehler Publishing Group, Inc.
    Vergauwen, P. G. M. C., and F. J. C. van Alem. 2005. Annual report IC disclosures in the Netherlands, France and Germany. Journal of Intellectual Capital 6 (1): 89-104.
    Verrecchia, R. 1983. Discretionary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics 5 (December): 179-194.
    ____. 1990. Endogenous proprietary cost through firm interdependence. Journal of Accounting and Economics 12(January): 245-250.
    Welker, M. 1995. Disclosure policy, information asymmetry and liquidity in equity markets. Contemporary Accounting Research 11 (Spring): 801-827.
    Williams, S. M. 2001. Is intellectual capital performance and disclosure practices related? Journal of Intellectual Capital 2 (3): 192-203.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    94353011
    95
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094353011
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2280View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback