政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/146534

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/146534

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51639181 Online Users : 612

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Law > Department of Law > Theses > Item 140.119/146534

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146534

Title:	探討網路近用權作為國際人權法之新興權利之地位與發展 The Emergence of the Right to Internet Access: An Analysis of its Status as a New Human Right in International Law
Authors:	俞亞廷 Yue, Ya-Ting
Contributors:	許耀明 Hsu, Yao-Ming 俞亞廷 Yue, Ya-Ting
Keywords:	國際人權法網路近用權網路近用 International Human Rights Law Human Rights Human Dignity Right to Internet Access Internet Access
Date:	2023
Issue Date:	2023-08-02 13:55:02 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	聯合國人權委員會的特別報告員Frank La Rue在2011年曾提交「增進和保護見解與言論自由權問題」（report on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression）之報告，其中，特別報告員不僅強調網路對於實現各項人權之重要性，亦認定網路近權應屬於《公民與政治權利公約》第19(2)條言論自由權。此外，聯合國大會於2016年《關於促進、保護以及享受網路人權》之決議中，強調應以人權作為基礎，從而建立一個可近用之網路。這兩項文件之論述之共同點是均將網路近用權視作一項附屬於言論自由權之權利，然而新型冠狀病毒（COVID-19）迫使人們透過網路繼續日常生活時，彰顯了網路逐漸成為個人基本需求的狀態，同時展現缺乏網路近用（Internet access）者在教育、工作、健康等方面保障之缺失。基於此本文旨在探討網路近用是否得成為國際人權法架構下的一項獨立人權，從而保障個人得透過網路行使其他受到國際人權法所保障之權利。本論文嘗試透過現有之相關資料以釐清網路近用權是否可以成為國際人權法框架之下新興人權。是以，本論文將對於人權概念進行分析，再進一步根據相關之學說見解建立認定新興人權所需之要件。本論文為分析新興人權產生之過程，將以水權作為案例進行分析，從而觀察國際人權法對於新權利之認定是否與本論文建立之架構相符。此外，由於臺灣政府在2017年已經聲明網路近用權應為一項人權，本論文將進一步檢視臺灣在保障該權利所採取之相關政策是否符合國際人權法之規定。 The question of whether Internet access should be recognized as an independent human right in line with the principles of international human rights law is examined in this paper. In 2011, the Special Rapporteur Frank La Rue issued a report on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, in which he stated that “the Internet has become an indispensable tool for realizing a range of human rights, combating inequality, and accelerating development and human progress ensuring universal access to the Internet should be a priority for all states.” Further, in 2016, the United Nations General Assembly underlined in the resolution on the promotion, protection and enjoyment of human rights on the Internet that in order to provide an open, accessible and nurtured Internet, a human-based approach should be applied. Though none of the current international human rights instruments have explicitly recognized an actual right to Internet access, many states, as well as scholars, have agreed that the aforementioned materials proved the existence of a right to Internet access. Such recognition, however, was regarded the Internet access as a medium under the right to freedom of opinion and expression, rather than an independent human right. As the Internet permeates every aspect of our daily-life, Internet access has gradually become a prerequisite to exercise human rights, especially during the pandemic, when everyone was forced to continued their life via the Internet. Accordingly, this paper decided to assess whether the right to Internet access can be established as an autonomous human right. In order to explore whether Internet access can be regarded as a human right, it is necessary to clarify the definition of the term “human rights” in advance. However, due to the complex and multifaceted nature of human rights, it is difficult to reach a consensus on its definition as it involves difference fields, such as philosophy, politics, and law. Hence, instead of giving a definition of human rights, this paper decides to conceptualize it. Through the conceptualization of the idea of human rights through its moral and political roots, ultimately concluded that such term refers to rights that are based on human dignity. Further, while this paper delves into the evolution of international human rights law, the ever-changing nature of international law was acknowledged. Further, this paper explored models and approaches for the emergence of new human rights and concluded a three-phase approach. According to the three-phase approach, the recognition of a new human right needs to go through three phases: (1) human rights activists or scholars advocate for the recognition of a new human right, (2) the new human right achieved the “full recognition”, and (3) this new human right presents a binding force upon states. In order to justify the three-phase approach, this paper further used the right to water as an exemplar. Moreover, concerning the right to Internet access, in accordance with relevant materials, this paper discovered that the recognition of the right to Internet access is in-progress. The recognition of the right to Internet access not only on a national level but also on a regional level. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of Internet access for the realization and implementation of other human rights, which makes Internet access more than just a medium under the right to freedom of opinion and expression. Recently, the United Nations human rights commissioners have resonated the idea of establishing the right to Internet access as an independent human right, which further justifies the importance of recognizing it. The Republic of China (“Taiwan”) is widely known for being a proactive nation that is committed to the principles of international human rights. With regards to the right to Internet access, Taiwan recognized it as a fundamental human right as early as in 2017. In order to promote and protect the right to Internet access, Taiwan has implemented various policies and programs to ensure that every citizen and foreign visitors has access to an open Internet with sufficient infrastructure. As a result of the digitalization of the government and the high Internet penetration rate, Taiwan was able to swiftly respond to the COVID-19 pandemic while ensuring that the human rights of every individual were not affected. In conclusion, Taiwan might set a positive example for other nations, with the ever-increasing importance of the Internet in our daily lives, it is crucial for every individual to have access to the Internet. as the recognition to the right to Internet access continues to gain momentum globally, this paper hopes that it will soon be recognized as an autonomous human right at the international level, ensuring that everyone can enjoy the same human rights online and offline.
Reference:	1. Book Baxi, Upendra. 2008. THE FUTURE OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Oxford University Press. Boersema, David. 2011. PHILOSOPHY OF HUMAN RIGHTS: THEORY AND PRACTICE. Routledge. Clapham, Andrew. 2016. HUMAN RIGHTS: A VERY SHORT INTRODUCTION. Oxford University Press. Crawford, James. 2012. BROWNLIE’S PRINCIPLES OF PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW. Oxford University Press. Chávarro, Jimena. 2014. THE HUMAN RIGHT TO WATER: A LEGAL COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE AT THE INTERNATIONAL, REGIONAL AND DOMESTIC LEVEL. Intersentia. Donnelly, Jack. 2003. UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS IN THEORY AND PRACTICE. Cornell University Press. Griffin, James. 2009. ON HUMAN RIGHTS. Oxford University Press. Hick, Steven et al..2000. HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE INTERNET. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Hegel, G. W. F.. 1977. THE PHENOMENOLOGY OF SPIRIT. (A.V. Miller trans.) Oxford University Press. Hegel, G. W. F.. 1988. SYSTEM OF ETHICAL LIFE (1802/3) AND FIRST PHILOSOPHY OF SPIRIT (PART III OF THE SYSTEM OF SPECULATIVE PHILOSOPHY 1803/4) (H.S. Harris and T.M. Knox trans.) SUNY Press. Honneth, Alfred. 2005. THE STRUGGLE FOR RECOGNITION: THE MORAL GRAMMAR OF SOCIAL CONFLICTS (STUDIES IN CONTEMPORARY GERMAN SOCIAL THOUGHT). (Joel Anderson trans.) The MIT Press. Humphrey, John. 1984. HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE UNITED NATIONS: A GREAT ADVENTURE. Brill Academic Pub. Kim, Uichol. 1995. INDIVIDUALISM AND COLLECTIVISM: A PSYCHOLOGICAL, CULTURAL AND ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS. Copenhagen: NIAS Press. Kulesza, Joanna. 2012. INTERNATIONAL INTERNET LAW. (Magdalena Arent and Wojciech Wołoszyk Trans.) Routledge. Lauren, Paul. 1998. THE EVOLUTION OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS: VISIONS SEEN. University of Pennsylvania Press. Levy, Daniel & Sznaider, Natan. 2021. HUMAN RIGHTS AND MEMORIES. Penn State University Press. Li, Hui & Yang, Xin. 2021. CO-GOVERNED SOVEREIGNTY NETWORK: LEGAL BASIS AND ITS PROTOTYPE & APPLICATIONS WITH MIN ARCHITECTURE. Springer. Macklem, Patrick. 2015. THE SOVEREIGNTY AND HUMAN RIGHTS. Oxford University Press. Moka-Mubelo, Willy. 2017. RECONCILING LAW AND MORALITY IN HUMAN RIGHTS DISCOURSES: BEYOND THE HABERMASIAN ACCOUNT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Springer. Morsink, Johnannes. 1999. THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS: ORIGINS, DRAFTING & INTENT. University of Pennsylvania Press. Mowbray, Alastair. 2004. THE DEVELOPMENT OF POSITIVE OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS BY THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Oxford: Hart Publishing. Meiklejohn, Alexander. 1948. FREE SPEECH AND ITS RELATION TO SELF-GOVERNMENT. New York: Harper & Brothers. Mencius. 2003. MENCIUS. (D. C. LAU trans.) Chinese University Press. Molden, David. 2007. WATER FOR FOOD, WATER FOR LIFE: A COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT OF WATER MANAGEMENT IN AGRICULTURE. Routledge. Nickel, James. 2007. MAKING SENSE OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Wiley-Blackwell. Orend, Brian. 2002. HUMAN RIGHTS: CONCEPT AND CONTEXT. Broadview Press. O’Neill, Onora. 1996. TOWARDS JUSTICE AND VIRTUE: A CONSTRUCTIVE ACCOUNT OF PRACTICAL REASONING. New York: Cambridge University Press. Pejnović, Vesna. 2021. BEYOND CAPITALISM AND NEOLIBERALISM. Institute for Political Studies, Belgrade. Rosen, Michael. 2012. DIGNITY: ITS HISTORY AND MEANING. Harvard University Press. Salman, Salman & McInerney-Lankford, Siobhán. 2004. THE HUMAN RIGHT TO WATER: LEGAL AND POLICY DIMENSIONS. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. Shue, Henry. 1996. BASIC RIGHTS: SUBSISTENCE, AFFLUENCE, AND US FOREIGN POLICY. Princeton University Press. Sjöholm, Maria. 2022. INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW AND PROTECTION AGAINST GENDER-BASED HARM ON THE INTERNET. Springer. Sullivan, Roger. 1989. IMMANUEL KANT’S MORAL THEORY. Cambridge University Press. Taylor, Charles. 1991. THE MALAISE OF MODERNITY. House of Anansi Press. Thielbörger, Pierre. 2014. THE RIGHT(S) TO WATER: THE MULTI-LEVEL GOVERNANCE OF A UNIQUE HUMAN RIGHT. Springer. Winfield, P.H. 1941. FOUNDATIONS AND THE FUTURE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW. Cambridge University Press. Williams, Robert. 1997. HEGEL’S ETHICS OF RECOGNITION. University of California Press. Wu, Tim.2010. THE MASTER SWITCH: THE RISE AND FALL OF INFORMATION EMPIRES. Vintage. Xunzi. 2014. XUNZI: THE COMPLETE TEXT (Eric L. Hutton trans.) Princeton University Press. Zhang, Qianfan. 2016. HUMAN DIGNITY IN CLASSICAL CHINESE PHILOSOPHY: CONFUCIANISM, MOHISM, AND DAOISM. Springer Nature. 2. Book Chapter Arieli, Yehoshua. 2002. On the Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for the Emergence of the Dignity of Man and His Rights, in The Concept of Human Dignity in Human Rights Discourse 1-17, edited by David Kretzmer et al.. Brill – Nijhoff. Boysen, Sigrid. Remnants of a Constitutional Moment: The Right to Democracy in International Law, in The Cambridge Handbook of New Human Rights: Recognition, Novelty, Rhetoric 465-480, edited by Andreas von Arnauld et al.. Cambridge University Press. Cabestan, Jean-Pierre. 2000. The Relations Across the Taiwan Strait: Twenty Years of Development and Frustration, in China Review 105-134, edited by Chung-ming Lau and Jianfa Shen. The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press. Cali, Basak. 2020. The Case for the Right to Meaningful Access to the Internet as a Human Right in International Law, in The Cambridge Handbook of New Human Rights: Recognition, Novelty, Rhetoric 276- 283, edited by Andreas von Arnauld et al.. Cambridge University Press. Caranti, Luigi. 2011. Kant’s Theory of Human Rights, in Handbook of Human Rights 35-44, edited by Thomas Cushman. Routledge. Chaskalson, Arthur. 2002. Human Dignity as a Constitutional Value, in The Concept of Human Dignity in Human Rights Discourse 133-144, edited by David Kretzmer et al.. Brill Academic Pub. Chen, Yu-Jie. 2019. Isolated but Not Oblivious: Taiwan’s Acceptance of the Two Major human Rights Covenants, in Taiwan and International Human Rights: A Story of Transformation 207-225, edited by Jerome A. Cohen et al.. New York: Springer. Cheng, Tracey. 2015. Taiwan’s Sunflower Protest. Digital Anatomy of a Movement, in Digital Activism in Asia Reader 87-97, edited by Nishant Shah et al.. Lüneburg:meson press. Chinkin, Christine. 2018. Source, in International Human Rights Law 63-86, edited by Daniel Moeckli. Oxford University Press. Deibert, Ronald et al.. 2008. Good for Liberty, Bad for Security? Global Civil Society and the Securitization of the Internet, in Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering 123-149, edited by Ronald Deibert et al.. The MIT Press. Eide, Asbjørn. 1995. Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights as Human Rights, in Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights 9-28, edited by Asbjørn Eide et al.. Brill – Nijhoff. Froomkin, A. Michael. 1997. The Internet as a Source of Regulatory Arbitrage, in Borders in Cyberspace: Information Policy and the Global Information Infrastructure 129-163, edited by Brian Kahin et al.. The MIT Press. Gareth, Grainger. 2000. Freedom of Expression and Regulation of Information in Cyberspace: Issues concerning Potential International Cooperation Principles, in the International Dimensions of Cyberspace Law 71-25, edited by Bruno Padirac. Routledge. Griffin, James. 2012. Human Rights: Questions of Aim and Approach, in The Philosophy of Human Rights: contemporary controversies 3-16, edited by Gerhard Ernst at el.. De Gruyter. Ikäheimo, Heikki. 2014. Hegel’s Concept of Recognition – What is it?, in Recognition – German Idealism as an Ongoing Challenge 11-38, edited by Christian Krijnen. Brill. Klabbers, Jan. 2012. International Institutions, in The Companion to International Law 228-244, edited by James Crawford et al.. Cambridge University Press. Maliks, Reidar & Føllesdal, Andreas. 2014. Kantian Theory and Human Rights, in Kantian Theory and Human Rights 1-7, edited by Reidar Maliks and Andreas Føllesdal. Masferrer, Aniceto. 2016. Taking Home Human Dignity More Humanely: A Historical Contribution to the Ethical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy, in Human Dignity of the Vulnerable in the Age of Rights 221- 256, edited by Aniceto Masferrer et al.. Springer. McCaffrey, Stephan. 2005. The Basic Right to Water, in Fresh Water and International Economic Law 93, edited by Edith Brown Weiss et al.. Oxford University Press. McCall-Smith, Kasey. 2020. The Proliferation of Human Rights: Between Devotion and Calculation, in Can we Still Afford Human Rights? Critical Reflections on University, Proliferation and Cost 114-142, edited by Jan Wouters et al..Edward Elgar Publishing. Mutua, Makau. 2001. Politics and Human Rights: an essential symbiosis, in The Role of Law in International Law 149-176, edited by Michael Byers. Oxford University Press. Pollicino, Oreste. 2020. The Right to Internet Access Quid Iuris?, in The Cambridge Handbook of New Human Rights: Recognition, Novelty, Rhetoric 263-275, edited by Andreas von Arnauld et al.. Cambridge University Press. Ratej, Ana. 2020. Image of a Human Person in Totalitarian Regimes, in Image and Man: Correlations 87-94, edited by Marcin Godawa et al.. Pontifical University of John Paul II in Karkow Press. Risse, Thomas & Sikkink, Kathryn. 1999. The Socialization of International Human Rights Norms into Domestic Practices: Introduction, in The power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change 1-38, edited by Thomas Risse et al.. Cambridge University Press. Russell, Sage. 2002. Minimum State Obligations: International Dimensions, in Exploring the Core Content of Socio-Economic Rights: South African and International Perspectives, edited by Danie Brand et al.. Protea Boekhuis. Segura-Serrano, Antonio. 2006. Internet Regulation and the Role of International Law, in Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 191-272. Koninklijke Brill N. V. Selwyn, Neil & Facer, Kari. 2010. Beyond Digital Divide: Toward an Agenda for Change, in Handbook of Research on Overcoming Digital Divides: Constructing an Equitable and Competitive Information Society (Volume I) 1-20, edited by Enrico Ferro et al.. IGI Global. Shelton, Dinah. 2011. The Legal Status of Normative Pronouncements of Human Rights Treaty Bodies, in Coexistence, Cooperation and Solidarity 553-575, edited by Holger P. Hestermeyer et al.. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Spiro, Peter. 2008. NGOs in International Environmental Lawmaking: Theoretical Models, in THE OXFORD HANDBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW 771-790, edited by Daniel Bodansky et al.. Oxford University Press. Susi, Mart. 2020. Novelty in New Human Rights: The Decrease in Universality and Abstractness Thesis, in The Cambridge Handbook of New Human Rights: Recognition, Novelty, Rhetoric 21-33, edited by Andreas von Arnauld et al.. Cambridge University Press. Szasz, Paul. 1995. General Law-Making Process in United Nations Legal Order (Volume 1), edited by Oscar Schachter et al.. Cambridge University Press. Tarasiewicz, Pawel. 2019. John Paul II on Totalitarianism: A Timeless Lesson, in La Humildad Del Maestro 440-451, edited by Antonio R. Miñón Sáenz et al..Madrid: Ediciones Encuentro. Taubman, Antony. 2017. International Governance and the Internet, in Law and the Internet 3-44, edited by Lillian Edwards and Charlotte Waelde. Oxford: Hart Publishing. Thielbörger, Pierre. 2020. Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed and Something Blue: Lessons to be Learned from the Oldest of the ‘New’ Rights – the Human Right to Water, in The Cambridge Handbook of New Human Rights: Recognition, Novelty, Rhetoric 70-78, edited by Andreas von Arnauld et al.. Cambridge University Press. Thienel, Tobias. 2014. The Living Instrument Approach in the ECHR and Elsewhere: Some Remarks on the Evolutive Interpretation of International Treaties, in Aus Kiel In Die Welt: Kiel’s Contribution to International Law 165-200, edited by J. Delbrück et al.. Duncker & Humblot GmbH. von der Decken, Kerstin et al.. 2020. Recognition of New Human Rights: Phases, Techniques and the Approach of ‘Differentiated Traditionalism’, in The Cambridge Handbook of New Human Rights: Recognition, Novelty, Rhetoric 7-20, edited by Andreas von Arnauld et al.. Cambridge University Press. Waldron, Jeremy. 2012. Lecture 1: Dignity and Rank, in Dignity, Rank, and Rights 13-46, edited by Meir Dan-Cohen. Oxford University Press. Wong, David. 2017. Reflection Dignity in Confucian and Buddhist Thought, in Dignity: A History 67-72, edited by Remy Debes. Oxford University Press. 3. Journal Article Ackerly, Brooke. 2017. Interpreting the Political Theory in the Practice of Human Rights, LAW AND PHILOSOPHY 36(2): 135-153. Agrawal, Shivangi & Ting, Hsiu-I. 2023. Online higher Education During and Beyond COVID-19 Pandemic: Insights from Professors and Students at a Taiwan University, AQUADEMIA7(1): 2542-4874. Aldiyarova, Aidana. 2018. The Right of Access to Information through the Internet: The Comparison of “Hard Law” and “Soft Law”, MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES 3(2): 17-23. Alston, Philp. 1984. Conjuring up New Human Rights: A Proposal for Quality Control, THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 78(3): 607-621 Alston, Philp. 1998. Making Space for New Human Rights: The Case of the Right to Development, HARVARD HUMAN RIGHTS YEARBOOK 1: 3-40. Alves, José A. Lindgren. 2000. The Declaration of Human Rights in Postmodernity, HUMAN RIGHTS QUARTERLY22(2): 478-500. Anawalt, Howard. 1984. The Right to Communicate, DENVER JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW & POLICY13(2): 219-236. Anzelmo, Erin. 2005. Cyberspace in International Law: Does the Internet Negate the Relevance of Territoriality in International Law?, STUDIA DIPLOMATICA 58(4): 153-169. Arden, Justice. 2016. Water for All? Developing a Human Right to Water in National and International Law, INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW QUARTERLY 65(4): 771-789. Au, Yung. 2022. Pandemic, & Platformisation in Hong Kong: Toward Cities of Alternative, DIGITAL GEOGRAPHY 3: 1-13. Best, Michael. 2004. Can the Internet be a Human Right?,HUMAN RIGHTS & HUMAN WELFARE 4(1):23-31. Barrios, Raudiel. 2017. Reflections on Access to Internet in Cuba as a Human Right, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE 3(4):15-27. Bagaric, Mirko and James Allan. 2006. The Vacuous Concept of Dignity, JOURNAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS 5:257-270. Bilaney, Kunal & Thampi, Gauri. 2020. Internet Access as an Independent Human Right: a Palpable Consequence of the COVID-19 Pandemic? , KATHMANDU SCHOOL OF LAW REVIEW8(2): 82-97. Bluemel, Erik. 2004. The Implications of Formulating a Human Right to Water, ECOLOGY LAW QUARTERLY31(4): 957-1006. Bradley, Curtis & Goldsmith, Jack. 1999. Pinochet and International Human Rights Litigation, MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW 97(7): 2129-2184. Campos, Andre. 2022. The Political Conception of Human Rights and Its Rule(s) of Recognition, CANADIAN JOURNAL OF LAW & JURISPRUDENCE 35(1): 95-116. Cerf, Vinton & Kahn, Robert. 1974. A Protocol for Packet Network Intercommunication, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS 22: 637-648. Charney, Jonathan and Prescott, J. R. V.. 2000. Resolving Cross-Strait Relations between China and Taiwan, THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 94(3): 453-477. Charnovitz, Steve. 2006. Nongovernmental Organizations and International Law, THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 100(2): 348-372. Charnovitz, Steve. 1997. Two Centuries of Participation: NGOs and International Governance, MICHIGAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 18(2):183-286. Chang, Jing-Sen. 2004. The Planning and Implementation of the Challenge 2008 National Development Plan, NATIONAL POLICY QUARTERLY3(2): 135-163. Chang, S.B. et al.. 2017. Exploring the Internet Resource for Senior Citizens in Taiwan, IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT 909-913. Chen, George C. C.. 1997. Electronic Commerce on the Internet: Legal Developments in Taiwan, JOURNAL OF COMPUTER & INFORMATION LAW 16(1): 77-123. Chen, Alexander et al.. 2018. How Seniors in Taiwan Use Information Technology: Computer and Cell Phones, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION 34(2): 166-176. Chen, Yen-Pin et al.. 2022. The Prevalence and Impact of Fake News on COVID-19 Vaccination in Taiwan: Retrospective Study of Digital Media, JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH24(4): e36830. Christianto, Hwian & Krisina, Michelle. 2022. Fulfilling the Right to Education During COVID-19 Pandemic Period: A Comparative Study, JAMBURA LAW REVIEW 4(1):1-17. Cinelli, Matteo et al.. The Echo Chamber Effect on Social Media, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 118(9): e2023301118. Clarke, James. Fitche and Hegel on Recognition, BRITISH JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY PHILOSOPHY17(2): 365-385. Crawford, Colin. 2003. Cyberspace: Defining a Right to Internet Access through Public Accommodation Law, TEMPLE LAW REVIEW 76: 225-276. Custers, Bart. 2022. New Digital Rights: Imagining Additional Fundamental Rights for the Digital Era, COMPUTER LAW & SECURITY REVIEW 44: 1-13. Dawes, Sharon. 2008. The Evolution and Continuing Challenges of E-Governance, PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW 68: S86-S102. Dahiya, Shefali et al.. 2021. Lessons from Internet Use and Performance During COVID-19, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION POLICY11: 202-221. Deibert, Ronald & Rohozinski, Rafal. 2010. Liberation VS. Control: The Future of Cyberspace, JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY PRESS 21(4): 43-57. Delbruck, Jost. 1982. International Protection of Human Rights and State Sovereignty, INDIANA LAW JOURNAL57(4): 567-578. Diallo, Boubacar. The Binding Force of International Legal Standards in the Fact of the Recurrent Practice of Soft Law, ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 7:79-91. Douzinas, Costas. 2002. Identity, Recognition, Rights or What can Hegel Teach Us about Human Rights?, JOURNAL OF LAW AND SOCIETY 29(3): 379-405. Michael E. Ellis, James P. Downey, Alexander N, Chen, and Hsin-Ke Lu, Why Taiwanese Senior Use Technology, 26 ASIA PAC. MANAG. REV. 149, 150(2021). Ellis, Michael et al.. 2021. Why Taiwanese Senior Use Technology, ASIA PACIFIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW 26: 149-159. Emery, Gilles. 2011. The Dignity of Being a Substance: Person, Subsistence, and Nature, NOVA ET VETERA 9(4):991-1001. Faturoti, Bukola. 2022. Online Learning During COVID19 and Beyond: A Human Right Based Approach to Internet Access in Africa, COMPUTERS & TECHNOLOGY36(1):68-90. Fraser, Nancy. 2001. Recognition without Ethics?, THEORY, CULTURE & SOCIETY 18:21-42. Flikschuh, Katrin. 2008. Reason, Right, and Revolution: Kant and Locke, PHILOSOPHY AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS 36(4):375-404. Fitzmaurice, Malgosia. 2007. The Human Right to Water, FORDHAM ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REVIEW 18(3): 537-585. Finnemore, Martha & Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. International Norm Dynamics, INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION AT FIFTY: EXPLORATION AND CONTESTATION IN THE STUDY OF WORLD POLITICS52(4): 887-917. Fredman, Sandra. 2021. A Human Rights Approach: The Right to Education in the Time of COVID-19, CHILD DEVELOPMENT92(5): e900-e903. Garbe, Amber et al.. 2020. COVID-19 and Remote Learning: Experiences of Parents with Children During the Pandemic, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH 4(3): 45-65. Gerber, Paula & Chen, Bruce. 2011. Recognition of the Human Right to Water: Has the Tide Turned?, ALTERNATIVE LAW JOURNAL 36: 21-27. Goldsmith, Jack & Posner, Eric. 1999. A Theory of Customary International Law, UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW 66(4): 1113-1177. Giupponi, María & Paz, Martha. 2015. The Implementation of the Human Right to Water in Argentina and Colombia, ANUARIO MEXICANO DE DERECHO INTERNACIONAL 15(1):323-352. Guyette, Fred. 2013. Thomas Aquinas and Recent Questions about Human Dignity, DIAMETROS 38:112-126. Habermas, Jürgen. 2010. The Concept of Human Dignity and the Realistic Utopia of Human Rights, METAPHILOSOPHY41(4): 464-480. Hardberger, Amy. 2005. Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Water: Evaluating Water as a Human Right and the Duties and Obligations it Creates, NORTHWESTERN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS 4(2): 331-362. Hanley, Steven. 1998. International Internet Regulation: A Multinational Approach, UIC JOHN MARSHALL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & PRIVACY LAW 16(4): 997-1024. Hathaway, Oona. 2007.Why Do Countries Commit to Human Rights Treaties?, THE JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION 51(4):588-621. Haugen, Hans. 2014. Is Internet Access a Human Right? For Everyone or only for Persons with Disabilities?, KRITISK JUSS 40(1): 26-51. Hayden, Patrick. 2012. The Human Right to Health and the Struggle for Recognition, REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES 38(3):569-588. Heri, Corina. 2020. Justifying New Rights: Affectedness, Vulnerability, and the Rights of Peasants, GERMAN LAW JOURNAL21(4): 702-720. Hesford, Wendy. 2011. Human Rights Rhetoric of Recognition, RHETORIC SOCIETY QUARTERLY 41(3): 282-289. Hinchman, Lewis. 1984. The Origins of Human Rights: A Hegelian Perspective, THE WESTERN POLITICAL QUARTERLY37(1):7-31. Hsiao, Anne Hsiu-An. 2011. The International Status of Unrecognized Claimants to Statehood: A Comprehensive Analysis of Taiwan and the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, ISSUES AND STUDIES 47: 1-55. Hu, Yung-Hsiang. 2021. Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Online Learning Behaviors of University Students in Taiwan, 27(1) EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLogy 27(1): 469-491. Hughes, Glenn. 2011. The Concept of Dignity in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, THE JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS 39(1): 1-24. Iivari, Netta et al.. 2020. Digital Transformation of Everyday Life – How COVID-19 Pandemic Transformed the Basic Education of the Young Generation and Why Information Management Research Should Care?, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 55: 102183. James, David. 2006. Kant and Hegel on the Right of Rebellion, HISTORY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT27(2):331-348. Jian, Shu-Wan et al.. 2020. Contact Tracing with Digital Assistance in Taiwan’s COVID-19 Outbreak Response, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES 101(22):348-352. Johnson, David & Post, David. 1996. Law and Borders – The Rise of Law in Cyberspace, STANFORD LAW REVIEW 48: 1367-1402. Kaur, Harpreet. 2021. Protecting Internet Access: A human rights treaty approach, BROOKLYN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW46(2): 767-799. Ke, Hao-Ren & Hwang, Ming-Jiu. 2000. The Development of Digital Libraries in Taiwan, THE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY 18(5): 336-346. Kolstad, Hans. Human Rights and Democracy – Obligations and Delusions, THE PHILOSOPHY OF HUMAN RIGHTS OBLIGATIONS AND OMISSIONS7(1):14-35. Koshy, Susan. 1999. From Cold War to Trade War: Neocolonialism and Human Rights, SOCIAL TEXT 58: 1-32. Kreth, Gravie. 2022. Gap in Internet Access in Sri Lanka Violates Human Rights, HUMAN RIGHTS BRIEF 25(2): 98-102. Krasikov, Dmitry & Lipkina, Nadezhda. 2020. Sovereignty in Cyberspace: A Scholarly and Practical Discussion, ADVANCES IN SOCIAL SCIENCE, EDUCATION AND HUMANITIES RESEARCH 498: 156-160. Kulesza, Joanna & Weber, Rolf. 2021. Protecting the Internet with International Law, COMPUTER LAW & SECURITY REVIEW 40: 1-12. Kundu, Anamika et al.. 2020. A Case for Recognition of the Right to Internet Access in the Age of Information, JOURNAL OF INDIAN LAW & SOCIETY11(2):13-26. Lamond, Grant. 2014. Analogical Reasoning in the Common Law OXFORD JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES 34(3): 567-588. Lee, Shing Haeng & Fu, King-wa. 2019. Internet Use and Protest Politics in South Korea and Taiwan, JOURNAL OF EAST ASIAN STUDIES 19: 98-109. Lehr, William et al.. 2019. Whither the Public Internet?, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION POLICY 9: 1-42. Li, Jeffrey (Chien-Fei). 2013. Internet Control or Internet Censorship – Comparing the Control Models of China, Singapore, and the United States to Guide Taiwan’s Choice, PITT. JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY LAW & POLICY 14: 1-43. Liang, Te-Hsin. 2011. Service Cognition and Use, and Their Promotion of Quality of Life in Taiwan, SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH 102(1): 99-110. Liao, Fu-te. 2002. Bringing International Human Rights Home: Comparative Analyses and Taiwan’s Prospects, TUNGHAI UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 17: 153-224. Macklin, Ruth. 2003. Dignity is a Useless Concept, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 327: 1419-1420. Maddux, Cleborne. 1994. Educational Prospects – and Problems, EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY34(7): 37-42. Mattson, David & Clark, Susan. 2011. Human Dignity in Concept and Practice, POLICY SCIENCES 44: 303-319. Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor. 2005. The Shaper of Governance: Analyzing the World of Internet Regulation, VIRGINIA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL Law 43:1-69. McCrudden, Christopher. 2008. Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 19(4): 655-724. McConnaughey, James et al.. 2013. Online and On Point: Broadband Usage in Canada and the United States, JOURNAL OF INFORMATION POLICY 3: 123-157. McCaffrey, Stephan. 1992. Human Right to Water: Domestic and International Implications, GEORGETOWN INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REVIEW 5: 1-24. McDougal, Myres. 1955. The Hydrogen Bomb Tests and the International Law of the Sea, THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 49(3):356-361. Mewes, Heather. 1998. Memorandum of Understanding on the Generic Top-Level Domain Name Space of the Internet Domain Name System, BERKELEY TECHNOLOGY LAW JOURNAL 13(1): 235-247. Meshel, Tamar. 2015. Human Rights in Investor-State Arbitration: The Human Right to Water and Beyond, JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTE SETTLEMENT 6(2): 277-307. Mladenov, Marijuana & Staparski, Tamara. 2022. Human Rights Approach to Internet Access with a Special Emphasis on the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights, REVIEW OF EUROPEAN LAW 24:23-38. Morrison, Fred. 1995. The Significance of Nuremberg for Modern International Law, MILITARY LAW REVIEW 149:207-214. Mueller, Milton et al.. 2007. The Internet and Global Governance Principles and norms for a New Regime, GLOBAL GOVERNANCE 13(2): 237-254. Murrell, Peter. 2017. Design and Evolution in Institutional Development: The Insignificance of the English Bill of Rights, JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS 45: 36-55. Ndeunyema, Ndjodi. 2020. Unmuddying the Waters: Evaluating the Legal Basis of the Right to Water Under Treaty Law, Customary International Law, and the General Principles of Law, MICHIGAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 41(3): 455-490. Nguyen, Madison. 2020. Mutual Recognition: The Struggle for Power and Domination, PANDION: THE OSPREY JOURNAL OF RESEARCH & IDEAS1(2):1-13. Ni, Peimin. 2014. Seek and You Will Find It; Let Go and You Will Lose It: Exploring a Confucian Approach to Human Dignity, A JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHILOSOPHY13(2):173-198. Nuyen, Anh Tuan. 2010. Is Internet Access a Human Right?, WEBIST 2010 – PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEB INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY 2:287-292. Olivier, Michèle. 2002. The Relevance of ‘Soft Law’ as a Source of International Human Rights, THE COMPARATIVE AND INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 35(3): 289-307. Palmer, Ellie. 2009. Protecting Socio-Economic Rights through the European Convention on Human Rights: Trends and Developments in the European Court of Human Rights, ERASMUS LAW REVIEW 2(4): 397-425. Pandey, Purnima & Yu, Mei-Kuei. 2022. Experiences of Foreign Residents During COVID-19 Pandemic in Taiwan, JOURNAL OF MIGRATION AND HEALTH 5: 100080. Peczenik, Aleksander. 1969. Empirical Foundations of Legal Dogmaticss, NOUVELLE SÉRIE 12(45): 32-64. Peng, Yung-Chuan et al.. 2005. Internet and E-commerce Adoption by the Taiwan Semiconductor Industry, NDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS 105(4):476-490. Penney, Jonathon. 2011. Internet Access Rights: A Brief History and Intellectual Origins, WILLIAM MITCHELL LAW REVIEW38(1): 11-42. Pennock, James Roland. 1981. Rights, Natural Rights, and Human Rights – A General View, HUMAN RIGHTS 23: 1-28. Perritt Jr., Henry. 1998. The Internet is Changing International Law, CHICAGO-KENT LAW REVIEW 73(4): 997-1054. Perritt Jr., Henry. 2000. The Internet is Changing the Public International Legal System, KENTUCKY LAW JOURNAL 88(4): 885-955. Pian, Wenjing et al.. 2021. The Causes, Impacts and Countermeasures of COVID-19 “Infodemic”: A Systematic Review Using Narrative Synthesis, INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT 58(6): 102713. Post, David. 1996. Governing Cyberspace, THE WAYNE LAW REVIEW43(1):155-171. Racherla, Pradeep & Mandviwalla, Munir. 2013. Moving from Access to Use of the Information Infrastructure: A Multilevel Sociotechnical Framework, INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH 24(3):709-730. Rhode, Deborah, 2002. Legal Scholarship, HARVARD L.AW REVIEW 115(5): 1327-1361. Riedel, Eibe. 1991. Standards and Sources. Farewell to the Exclusively of the Sources Triad in International Law?, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 2(2):58-84. Reglitz, Merten & Rudnick, Abraham. 2020. Internet Access as a Right for Realizing the Human Right to Adequate Mental (and other) Health Care, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH49(1): 97-103. Rogers, John. 2000. The Internet and Public International Law, KENTUCKY LAW JOURNAL 88(2):803-808. Roth, Brad. 2009. The Entity that Dare Not Speak Its Name: Unrecognized Taiwan as a Right-Bearer in the International Legal Order, EAST ASIA LAW REVIEW 4: 91-124. Rowen, Ian. 2015. Inside Taiwan’s Sunflower Movement: Twenty-Four Days in a Student-Occupied Parliament, and the Future of the Region, THE JOURNAL OF ASIAN STUDIES74(1): 5-21. Rustad, Michael & D’Angelo, Diane. 2011. The Path of Internet Law: An Annotated Guide to Legal Landmarks, DUKE LAW & TECHNOLOGY REVIEW 12: 1-74. Sanders, Cynthia & Scanlon, Edward. 2021. The Digital Divide is a Human Rights Issue: Advancing Social Inclusion Though Social Work Advocacy, JOURNAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS SOCIAL WORK 6: 130-143. Salman, Salman.2012. The Human Right to Water – Challenges of Implementation, PROCEEDINGS OF THE ANNUAL MEETING (AMERICAN SOCIETY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW) 106: 44-46. Sangsuvant, Kitsuron. 2014. Balancing Freedom of Speech on the Internet Under International Law, NORTH CAROLINA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 39(3): 701-755. Sembou, Evangelia. 2003. Hegel’s Idea of a ‘Struggle for Recognition’: The Phenomenology of Spirit, HISTORY POLITICAL THOUGHT24(2): 262-281. Shandler, Ryan & Canetti, Daphna. 2019. A Reality of Vulnerability and Dependence: Internet Access as a Human Right, ISRAEL LAW REVIEW 52(1): 77-98. Sheriff, Vaffi Foday. 2019. Concept of Human Dignity in Islamic, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE 3(1): 148-155. Shevchuk, Oleksandr et al.. 2021. Human Right to Internet Access in healthcare in the “Right to Health Concept”: Legal Issues, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 10(2): 286-300. Shope, Mark. 2012. The Adoption and Function of International Instruments: Thoughts on Taiwan’s Enactment of the Act to Implement the ICCPR and the ICESCR, INDIANA INTERNATIONAL & COMPARATIVE LAW REVIEW 22: 159-192. Simma, Bruno. 1988. A Hard look at soft law: remarks, PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASIL ANNUAL MEETING 82: 377-381. Song, Andrew. 2015. Human Dignity: A Fundamental Guiding Values for a Human Rights Approach to Fisheries, MARINE POLICY 61: 164-170. Steiner, Henry. 1991. The Youth of Rights, HARVARD LAW REVIEW104(4): 917-935. Sun, Hsiu-hui. 1998.An Exploratory Analysis of the Development of Internet in Taiwan, JOURNAL OF AUDIO-VISUAL MEDIA AND TECHNOLOGIES 3: 1-20. Sun, Pinghua. 2019. P.C. Chang’s Concept of Human Dignity for the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, JOURNAL OF EAST ASIA AND INTERNATIONAL LAW 12:91-106. Sun, Mingfei et al.. 2022. Does Social Media Users’ Interaction Influence the Formation of Echo Chambers? Social Network Analysis Based on Vaccine Video Comments on YouTube, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH PUBLIC HEALTH 19(23): 15869-15883. Szoszkiewicz, Łukasz. 2018. Internet Access as a New Human Right? State of the Art on the Threshold of 2020, ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 8:49-62. Tai, Yu-Lin et al..2021. The Effect of a Name-Based Rationing Plan in Taiwan on Public Anxiety Regarding a Mask Shortage During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Observational Study, JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH 5(1): e21409-e21418. Theilen, Jens. 2021. The Inflation of Human Rights: A Deconstruction, LEIDEN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW34(4): 831-854. Tsatsou, Panayiota. 2018. Social Media and Informal Organization of Citizen Activism: Lessons from the Use of Facebook in the Sunflower Movement, SOCIAL MEDIA + SOCIETY 4(1). Tseng, Chinyang Henry et al.. 2022. Exploring the COVID-19 Pandemic as a Catalyst for Behavior Change Among Patient Health Record App Users in Taiwan: Development and Usability Study, JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH24(1):1-17. Tully, Stephen. 2014. A Human Right to Access the Internet? Problems and Prospects, HUMAN RIGHTS LAW REVIEW 14(2): 175-195. Vranken, Jan. 2012. Exciting Times for Legal Scholarship, LAW AND METHOD2: 42-62. Wang, Xiaomei. 2016. A Human Right to Internet Access: A Gewirthian Approach, FRONTIERS OF PHILOSOPHY IN CHINA 11(4): 652-670. Wiśniewski, Adam. 2021. The European Court of Human Rights and Internet-Related Cases, BIALYSTOK LEGAL STUDIES 26(3): 109-133. White, Emily. There is no such thing as a right to human dignity: A reply to Conor O’Mahony, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 10(2): 575-584. Woodhouse, Melvin. 2004. Threshold, Reporting, and Accountability for a Right to Water under International Law, UNIVERSITY OF DENVVER WATER LAW REVIEW 8(1):171-199. Wong, Derek. 2013. The Position of ‘Sinking States’ at International Law, MELBORNE JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 14(2): 346-391. Wu, Shiann Ming et al.. 2018. Smart Cities in Taiwan: A Perspective on Big Data Applications, SUSTAINABILITY10(1): 106-120. Wu, Wann-Yih & Chen, Shuo-Pei. 2005. A Prediction Method Using the Grey Model GMC(1,n) Combined with the Grey Relational Analysis: A Case Study on Internet Access Population Forecast, APPLIED MATHEMATICS COMPUTATION 169(1): 198-217. 4. Legislation (1) Article 27(1)(b) of S. AFR. CONST., 1996. (2) Congress, U.S. (2015) Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015m Bills, S, 754. (3) 393/2003 Communications Market Act (amendment to up 363/2011), sec.60 c (Finland). (4) 1975 Syntagma [Syn.] [Constitution] 5a (Greece). (5) Organization of African Unity, African Charter on Human Rights and People’s Rights, Article 9 (1982). 5. Cases Subhash Kumar v State of Bihar, (1991) SCC 420, 424 (India). Ahmet Yıldırım v. Turkey, European Court of Human Rights, Case no. 3111/10, Judgment, 18 December 2012. Amnesty International Togo and Others v. The Togolese Republic, Case no. ECW/CCJ/APP/61/18, ECOWAS ,6 July 2020. The Registered Trusties of the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) and Others v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, Case no. ECW/CCJ/JUD/40/22, Judgment, ECOWAS ,14 July 2022. Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India, (2020) 3 SCC 3 (India). Cengiz and Others v. Turkey, European Court of Human Rights, Case no.48226/10 and 14027/11, Judgment,1 December 2015. Compulsory Membership in an Association Prescribed by Law for the Practice of Journalism, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Advisory Opinion OC-5/85, 13 November 1985. Faheema Shirin RK v. State of Kerala, 2020 AIR (Ker.) 13 (India). Golder v. United Kingdom, European Court of Human Rights, Case no. 4451/70, Judgment,21 February 1975. Kalda v. Estonia, European Court of Human Rights, Case no. 17429/10, Judgment, 19 January 2016. Kablis v. Russia, European Court of Human Rights, Case no.48310/16 and 59663/1, Judgment, 30 April 2019. Mazibuko and Others v. City of Johannesburg and others, 2009 (CCT 39/09) ZACC 28. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. v. Turkey, European Court of Human Rights, Case no. 25479/19, Judgment, 24 March 2022. Valdelomar and Sibaja v. Costa Rican Superintendence of Telecommunications, (2017) Supreme Court of Final Appeal, Exp., 17-000191-007-CO, 1(Costa Rica). 6. Conventions and Treaties Charter of United Nations, 24 Oct., 1045, 1 U.N.T.S. XVI. Statute of the International Court of Justice, 18 April, 1946, 33 U.N.T.S. 993. Vienna Convention on the Laws of Treaties, 22 May, 1969, 1155 U.N.T.S 331. International Covenant on Civil and Politi cal Rights, 16 Dec., 1996, 999 U.N.T.S. 171. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 16 Dec., 1996, 993 U.N.T.S. 3. Convention on the Rights of the Child, 20 Nov., 1989, 1577 U.N.T.S. 3. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, 18 Dec., 1979, 1249 U.N.T.S. 13. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, G.A. Res. 217A(III), U.N. Doc. A/810 (Dec.10, 1948). African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, 11 July 1990, OAU, Doc. CAB/LEG/24.9/49. The Protocol to the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa, 1 July 2003, available at: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Women/WG/ProtocolontheRightsofWomen.pdf. 7. UN Documents G.A. Res 40/171, UN Doc A/RES/40/171, Item 12 (17 December 1985). G.A. Res 40/171, UN Doc A/RES/40/171, Item 12 (17 December 1985). G.A. Res. 56/183, U.N. Doc. A/RES/56/183 (31 January 2002). G.A. Res. 68/167 (18 December 2013) U.N. Doc. A/RES/68/167; UNGA Res. 69/166 (18 December 2014) U.N. Doc. A/RES/69/166. G.A. Res. 217A(III), U.N. Doc. A/810 (Dec.10, 1948). UNGA, Report by Group of Governmental Experts on Development in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security, A/68/98, U.N. Doc. A/70/174 (22 July 2015). United Nations, Commission of the Commission on Human Rights, Summary Record of the Twelfth Meeting, U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/SR.12, 5 (1947). U.N., Econ. & Soc. Council, General Comment No. 14: The Right to the highest attainable standard of health (Art.12), UN Doc. HRI/GEN/1/Rev.9 (Vol. I), ¶ 78(27 May 2008). U.N., Econ. & Soc. Council, General Comment No. 4: The Right to adequate housing (Art.11 par. 1), UN Doc. HRI/GEN/1/Rev.9 (Vol. I), ¶ 8(b) (13 Dec. 1991). United Nations Sub-commission on Prevention of Discrimination and protection of Minorities, Human Rights and the Environment: Second Progress Report, UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/1993/7, 36(1993). United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, ch. I principle 1, U.N. Doc. A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1 (Jan. 1, 1973). The United Nations Water Conference, Report of the United Nations Water Conference, Mar del Plata, 11, U.N. Doc. E/CONF.70/29 (March 25, 1977) (‘Mar del Plata Action Plan’). International Law Association London Conference, Final Report of the Committee on the Formation of Customary International Law: Statement of Principles Applicable of General Customary International Law, ¶2 (2000). Int’l Law Comm’n, Formation and Evidence of Customary International Law: Elements in the Previous Work of the International Law Commission that Could Be Particularly Relevant to the Topic, UN Doc. A/CN.4/659 (14 Mar. 2013). Dublin Statement on Water and Sustainable Development adopted at the International Conference on Water and the Environment, Dublin, Ireland, principle 4(31 Jan. 1992). Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights, Concluding Observations of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Israel, UN Doc. E/C.12/1/Add.27 (4 Dec. 1998). Human Rights Council, Res. 15/9, U.N. Doc. A/RES/64/292 (August 3, 2010). UNESCO, Res. 4/19, Recs. of the General Conference, 21st Sess., Vol.1, adopted Sep. 23- Oct. 28, 1980. World Summit on the Information Society, Tunis Agenda for the Information Society, ¶35, U.N. Doc. WSIS-05/TUNIS/DOC/6(Rec.1)-E, 2005. The United Nations Administrative Committee on Coordination, Statement on Universal Access to Basic Communication and Information Services (1997). UNHRC Res. A/HRC/RES/20/8 (16 July 2012). UNHRC Res. A/HRC/RES/26/13 (14 July 2014). UNHRC Res. A/HRC/RES/32/13 (18 July 2016). Frank La Rue (Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression), U.N. Doc. A/HRC/17/27 (May 2011). UNHRC, Res. A/HRC/32/L.20, U.N. Doc. A/HRC/20/L.13 (June 2012). HRC, General Comment No.34: Article 19: Freedoms of Opinion and Expression, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/G/34 (12 Sep. 2011). HRC, General Comment No. 26: Continuity of Obligations, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/Rev.1/Add.8 (Dec. 8, 1997). HRC, Comments of the Human Rights Committee: Republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/79 Add.14 (Dec.28, 1992). 8. Online Sources Ted X Talks, Why do People Oppose Every Government Policy? Reflections of an Official(為什麼民眾反對政府的每個政策？一個官員的反思), YouTube (Dec. 30, 2015), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtxgzPhrlDM. CTS, A-Bian Released a Technology White Paper(阿扁發表科技白皮書)(14 Jan. 2000), https://news.cts.com.tw/cts/general/200001/200001140037645.html. Audrey Tang, Inside Taiwan’s New Digital Democracy (Mar. 12, 2019), https://www.economist.com/open-future/2019/03/12/inside-taiwans-new-digital-democracy. African Declaration on Internet Rights and Freedoms, https://africaninternetrights.org/sites/default/files/African-Declaration-English-FINAL.pdf (last visited April 18, 2023). BBC News, Internet “wake-up call” (October 28, 1999), http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/490583.stm. BBC News, How Internet Access is Improving in Nigeria (20 Feb. 2020), https://www.bbc.com/news/business-51377955. Chris Wang and Shih Hsiu-chuan, Cabinet as Pulled from YouTube, Taipei Times, (Oct. 18, 2012), https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2012/10/18/2003545458. Wen-Sung Chen & San-Chi Wang, A Preliminary Study on the Development History of the Internet in Taiwan, 2005 Taiwan Area Network Conference (陳文生與王三吉，台灣網際網路發展歷程研究之初探，TANET 2005 台灣網際網路研討會) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/113242/1/242.pdf?TSPD_101_R0=08da84e244ab2000d46a515c3a74ecabe91ca03a9f4df2a747738167322013dec6d482c363b1184a081f7efe7a143000c2672d14bbee280013b3c4ba5e127d2dd308a892a54e7160f3a542d80d3da721175d1d4fde80d21681b5e81694bcd133. Commission of the European Communities, Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A Strategy for a Secure Information Society, https://ec.europa.eu/information_society/doc/com2006251.pdf. Emma Cockerell, Audrey Tang: Taiwan’s Digital Minister on Harnessing Technology for Social Good (March 11, 2021), https://china.usc.edu/audrey-tang-taiwans-digital-minister-harnessing-technology-social-good. Enru Lin, The Sunflower movement, brought to you by the Internet (Apr. 3, 2014), https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/feat/archives/2014/04/03/2003587148. European Parliament, Recommendation of 26 March 2009 to the Council on Strengthening Security and Fundamental Freedoms on the Internet, (March 26, 2009), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0194_EN.html. European Commission, Broadband in Finland (9 Feb.2023), https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/broadband-finland. European Court of Human Rights, Factsheet – Access to Internet and Freedom to Receive and Imaprt Information and Ideas, https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/FS_Access_Internet_ENG.pdf. Executive Yuan, DIGI+: Digital nation and Innovative Economic Development Program (September 9, 2019), https://english.ey.gov.tw/News3/9E5540D592A5FECD/659df63b-dad4-47e3-80ab-c62cb40a62cd. Executive Yuan, Taiwan Flexes Digital Muscles with iTaiwan Free Wi-Fi Service (April 11, 2017), https://english.ey.gov.tw/News3/9E5540D592A5FECD/47b65eab-a446-4eb3-8c70-bbfcefd16487. Executive Yuan, Executive Yuan Unveils Digital Infrastructure Project (March 21, 2017), https://english.ey.gov.tw/Page/61BF20C3E89B856/8537ea6c-3cc6-4f7a-bda1-08da04cbf87a. Executive Yuan, Taiwan’s 5G action plan (Jan. 30, 2020), https://english.ey.gov.tw/Page/61BF20C3E89B856/64e30f1f-03a1-43a9-8a9b-814249c4dca8. Erin Hale, Audrey tang on Why tackling Misinformation is Crucial in Pandemic (Nov. 23, 2021), https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/11/23/audrey-tang-on-why-tackling-misinformation-is-crucial-in-pandemic. Freedom House, Freedom on the Net 2022: Taiwan, https://freedomhouse.org/country/taiwan/freedom-net/2022 (last visited: May 3, 2023). Global Policy Forum, Secretary-General, Receiving Doctorate of Law, Gives Commencement Address Notre Dame (May 19, 200), https://archive.globalpolicy.org/secgen/annan/2000/kofi4.htm. G0V, g0v Manifesto, https://g0v.tw/intl/en/manifesto/en/ (last visited: May 2, 2023). G0V, Events and Activities, https://g0v.tw/intl/en/event/ (last visited: May 2, 2023). Gugulethu Mhlungu, Why Internet access Needs to be Considered a Basic Human Right (July 14, 2022), https://www.globalcitizen.org/en/content/internet-access-basic-human-right/. Human Rights Council, The Promotion, Protection, and Enjoyment of Human Rights on the Internet (27 June 2016), https://www.article19.org/data/files/Internet_Statement_Adopted.pdf. ITU, Two-Thirds of the World’s Population Uses the Internet, but 2.7 Billion People Remain Offline (September 16, 2022), https://www.itu.int/en/mediacentre/Pages/PR-2022-09-16-Internet-surge-slows.aspx. ITU, Household Internet Access in Urban Areas Twice as High as in Rural Areas (30 Nov., 2020), https://www.itu.int/en/mediacentre/Pages/pr27-2020-facts-figures-urban-areas-higher-internet-access-than-rural.aspx. Institute for Information Industry, https://www.iii.org.tw/Press/NewsDtl.aspx?nsp_sqno=2117&fm_sqno=14# (last visited: May 3, 2023). Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Statement of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights 1/20: Covid-19 and Human rights: he Problems and Challenges Must be Addressed from a Human Rights Perspective and with Respect for International Obligations (April 9,2020), https://www.corteidh.or.cr/tablas/alerta/comunicado/Statement_1_20_ENG.pdf. John Perry Barlow, A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace (Febuary 8, 1996), https://www.eff.org/zh-hant/cyberspace-independence. Kosta Grammatis and Vint Cerf, Internet is a Human Right (Jan. 4, 2012) http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/05/opinion/internet-access-is-not-a-human-right.html. Llywodraeth Cymru Welsh Government, Towards a Welsh Minimum Digital Living Standard: Interim Report (1 Sep. 2022), https://www.gov.wales/towards-welsh-minimum-digital-living-standard-interim-report. Ministry of Digital Affairs, Smart Taiwan: A Model of Democracy, https://ithelp.ithome.com.tw/articles/10236019 (last visited April 20, 2023). Ministry of Digital Affairs, Government Digital Infrastructure, https://moda.gov.tw/en/digital-affairs/digital-service/operations/242 (last visited: May 3, 2023). Michael Karanicolas, Bridging the Divide: Understanding and Implementing Access to the Internet as a Human Right, (December 22. 2013), https://openjournals.uwaterloo.ca/index.php/JoCI/article/view/2648/3346. Model Inter-American Law on Access to Public Information (June 8, 2010), https://www.rti-rating.org/wp-content/uploads/OAS-model-Law.pdf. Mitchell Ignatius Baker, Mencius and Aristotle on Human Nature: Resources for Human Dignity (Sep. 1, 2021), at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3915212. National Development Council Startup Island Taiwan, 2021 Taiwan Municipalities Startup Ecosystem Report, https://www.startupislandtaiwan.info/2021%20Taiwan%20Municipalities%20Startup%20Ecosystem%20Report.pdf. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and World Health Organization, Right to Health: Fact Sheet No.31, https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Publications/Factsheet31.pdf. Office of the Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Freedom of Expression and the Internet, http://www.oas.org/en/iachr/expression/docs/reports/2014_04_08_Internet_ENG%20_WEB.pdf. SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR FOR FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, STANDARDS FOR A FREE, OPEN, AND INCLUSIVE INTERNET, http://www.oas.org/en/iachr/expression/docs/publications/internet_2016_eng.pdf . Paul De Hert and Dariusz Kloza, Internet (access) as a New Fundamental Right. Inflating the Current Rights Framework?, (December 12, 2012), https://ejlt.org/index.php/ejlt/article/view/123/268. Puma Shen, New Variants of COVID-19 Disinformation in Taiwan (May 2022), https://www.ndi.org/sites/default/files/%28English%29%20NDI%20May%202022%20Report_New%20Variants%20of%20COVID-19%20Disinformation%20in%20Taiwan.pdf. Recommendation CM/Rec (2016) 5 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on internet freedom (April 13, 2016), https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectId=09000016806415fa. Republic of China, Digital Nation and Innovative Economic Development Program, https://digi.taiwan.gov.tw (last visited April 20, 2023). Research, Development and Evaluation Commission, Executive Yuan, Republic of China (Taiwan) (1997, November). E-Government 3-Year Mid-range Program (first phase), https://www.teg.org.tw/event/history.php?lg=eng&id=11313&gid=11314. Research, Development and Evaluation Commission, Executive Yuan, Republic of China (Taiwan) (2012, December). E-Taiwan: No One Left Behind, https://www.teg.org.tw/upload/e-Taiwan%20-%20No%20One%20Left%20Behind.pdf. Taiwan Network Information Center, 2016 Annual Report (July 2016), https://www.twnic.tw/file/twnic16d.pdf. Taiwan E-Governance Research Center, E-Government Chronology, https://www.teg.org.tw/event/history.php?lg=eng&id=11313&gid=11314 (last visited: April 24, 2023). Taiwan Network Information Center, Taiwan Internet Report 2022, https://english.ey.gov.tw/News3/9E5540D592A5FECD/8d3df9ac-e22d-4923-b747-cb6eb17526c9. Taiwan Internet Report, The Effect of COVID-19 on Internet Use, https://report.twnic.tw/2020/en/index.html (last visited April 21, 2023). Taiwan Centers for Disease Control, Name-based Rationing System for Purchases of Masks to be Launched on February 6; Public to Buy Masks with Their (NHI) Cards (Feb. 4, 2020), https://www.cdc.gov.tw/En/Bulletin/Detail/ZlJrIunqRjM49LIBn8p6eA?typeid=158 Taiwan Centers for Disease Control, Name-based Rationing System for At-home COVID-19 Test Kits to be Launched on April 28 and Allow People to Purchase Test Kits with Their NHI Card; Starting May 1, People Buying Masks Through Name-based Mask Distribution System can Purchase Them at 145 Pharmacies Nationwide (April 27, 2022), https://www.cdc.gov.tw/En/Bulletin/Detail/rGeS26Buh0cqn8HqwyX_QQ?typeid=158. Taiwan News, Digital Ministers Shares How Taiwan Battles “Infodemic” (Jan. 30, 2021), https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4115590. Taiwan Today, Minister without Portfolio Tang Flies Flag for Taiwan at launch of Declaration for the Future of the Internet (May 2, 2022), https://taiwantoday.tw/news.php?unit=2&post=218390. Taiwan Network Information Center, Taiwan Internet Report 2018, https://report.twnic.tw/2018/TWNIC_Tai Matthew Strong, Taiwan’s Digital minister to Sign Declaration for the Future of the Internet (April 28, 2022), https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4521771.wanInternetReport_2018_EN.pdf. Tim Berners-Lee and Harry Halpin, Internet Access is a Human Right, (June 2012), https://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin/homepage/publications/def-timbl-halpin.pdf. Tina Hsaio, 10 Things Taiwan does Better than Anyplace Else, CNN, (September 1, 2017), https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/10-things-taiwan/index.html. TEAM JST, How to Get Free Wi-Fi 24/7 in Taiwan! (Feb. 21, 2014), https://jetsettimes.com/countries/taiwan/taipei/taipei-essentials/how-to-get-free-wi-fi-247-during-your-entire-trip-to-taiwan/. This Day, Community Banks Take Internet Services to Rural Areas (15 Feb, 2001), https://allafrica.com/stories/200102150324.html. The United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and Expression, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) Representative on Freedom of the media, the Organization of American States (OAS) Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and the African Commission on Human and People’s Rights (ACEPR) Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and Access to Information, Joint Declaration on Freedom of Expression and the Internet (June 1, 2011), http://www.law-democracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/11.06.Joint-Declaration.Internet.pdf. The Guardian, Gordon Brown Promises Free Laptops and Broadband for Poor Families (11 Jan. 2010), https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2010/jan/11/gordon-brown-free-laptops-broadband. Travel in Taiwan, Free Wifi in Taiwan (March 6, 2022), https://6omg.wordpress.com/2022/03/06/free-wifi-in-taiwan/. United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner, It May be Time to Reinforce Universal Access to the Internet as a Human Right, Not Just a Privilege, high Commissioner tells Human Rights Council (March 10, 2023), https://www.ohchr.org/en/news/2023/03/it-may-be-time-reinforce-universal-access-internet-human-right-not-just-privilege-high. United Nations high Commissioner for Human Rights, Report of Promotion, Protection and Enjoyment of Human Rights on the Internet: Ways to bridge the Gender Digital Divide from a Human Rights Perspective (5 May 2017), https://www.ohchr.org/en/calls-for-input/report-ways-bridge-gender-digital-divide-human-rights-perspective. United Nations, Low-cost Laptop Project for Poor Children Closer to Reality, Say UN Advocate (22 Oct. 2007), https://news.un.org/en/story/2007/10/236722. United Nations General Assembly Economic and Social Council, Progress made in the Implementation of and Follow-up to the Outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society at the Regional and International Levels, U.N. Doc. A/78/62-E/2023/49, https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/a78d62_en.pdf. UNGA, Millennium Declaration, (September 2000), https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/united-nations-millennium-declaration. Vincent Y. Chao, How Technology Revolutionized Taiwan’s Sunflower Movement (April 15, 2014), The Diplomat, https://thediplomat.com/2014/04/how-technology-revolutionized-taiwans-sunflower-movement/. Vincent Chen, Taiwan: Snapshot of the Internet around 1990 (Oct. 13, 2012), https://sites.google.com/site/internethistoryasia/book1/snapshot-of-internet-in-taiwan-draft. Vint G. Cerf, Internet Access is Not a Human Right, New York Times (4 January,2012) https://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/05/opinion/internet-access-is-not-a-human-right.html. World Summit on the Information Society, 2003 Geneva Declaration of Principles and Plan of Action (10-12 Dec. 2003), https://www.itu.int/net/wsis/docs/promotional/brochure-dop-poa.pdf. 9. Miscellaneous Commission of the European Communities, Illegal and harmful content on the Internet, 8(1996). International Telecommunications Union, World Telecommunication Development Report: Universal Access, 1 (1998).
Description:	碩士國立政治大學法律學系 109651046
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109651046
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Law] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
104601.pdf		1474Kb	Adobe PDF2	127	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback