English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51664213      Online Users : 552
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137518


    Title: 綠色債券監理之研究：以國際準則之最新發展為中心
    A Comparative Law Study on Green Bond`s Regulation: A Focus on the latest Developments of International Principles
    Authors: 陳俊元
    Chen, Chun-Yuan
    Contributors: 風管系
    Keywords: 綠色債券;綠色債券原則;綠色債券標準;歐盟綠色債券標準;認證
    Green bond;Green Bond Principles;Climate Bonds Standard;EU Green Bond Standard;certification
    Date: 2021-06
    Issue Date: 2021-10-26
    Abstract: 綠色債券為以促進永續發展為目標之金融工具，但如何強化監理以避免漂綠之問題，仍有待研究。本文旨在介紹分析重要國際準則之最新發展，包含國際資本市場協會之GBP、氣候債券倡議組織之CBS、以及草擬中之EU-GBS。再以此比較法研究為基礎，重新思考我國綠色債券監理之改善之道。就結論而言，本文建議我國法仍可採取公私協力的監理架構。亦即以國際準則為基礎，採行CBS v. 3.0或正式公佈後之EU-GBS，且刪除對能源供應專業之國營事業等之除外規定。再者，政府應提供適當激勵措施與機制，包括稅賦優惠、補助相關成本、擔保、資訊揭露機制、自律機制與行政處罰。如此應能兼顧私部門監理之彈性以及公部門監理之效力，而對綠色債券監理與市場之發展有所助益。
    Green bond is a financial instrument aiming to improve sustainable development, but the issue of how to enhance its regulation and to avoid ＂green washing＂ still requires more clarification. This research focuses on the latest developments of important international principles, including the GBP of International Capital Market Association, the CBS of Climate Bonds Initiative, the draft of EU-GBS. Based on such comparative law survey, this paper will propose solution for improving Taiwan`s green bond regulation. In conclusion, we suggest that Taiwan may adopt the framework of private and public regulatory structure. Based on international principles, Taiwan should follow the rules of CBS v. 3.0 or the official EU-GBS and cancel exclusions for state-owned energy supply enterprise. In addition, the authority should provide proper incentives and mechanisms, including tax preference, subsidy for relevant costs, warranty, information disclosure mechanism, self-discipline mechanism and administrative penalty. This approach is believed to balance the flexibility of private regulation and effect of public regulation, and finally benefit the green bond regulation as well as market development.
    Relation: 證券市場發展季刊, 33:2, 105-152
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.6529/RSFM.202106_33(2).0003 
    DOI: 10.6529/RSFM.202106_33(2).0003 
    Appears in Collections:[風險管理與保險學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    110.pdf984KbAdobe PDF2312View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback