Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136367
|
| Title: | 基於打分法之多因子選股策略建構：中國 A股市場實證分析
Constructing a Multi-factor Investing Strategy Based on Scoring Method: An Empirical Analysis of China A- share market |
| Authors: | 胡維維
Hu, Wei-Wei |
| Contributors: | 林建秀
Lin, Chien-Hsiu
胡維維
Hu, Wei-Wei |
| Keywords: | 中國A股市場
因子有效性
多因子模型
歸因分析
China A-share market
Factor validity
Multi-factor model
Attribution analysis |
| Date: | 2021 |
| Issue Date: | 2021-08-04 14:52:43 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究以2006年至2020年的中國A股市場爲對象構建打分法下的多因子選股策略，首先以中國A股市場股灾發生前的數據爲樣本，在規模類、估值類、質量類、成長類等常見的10大類因子中選擇了18個因子對其有效性進行識別，經過橫斷面t檢定、IC-IR檢定法、相關性檢定、因子分層回測一系列步驟對各類因子進行有效性、穩健型、獨立性以及一致性進行分析，最終篩選出6個風格因子，分別爲總市值對數、賬面市值比、每股收益成長率、非流動性指標、過去一個月股價報酬、過去一個月BETA值。
識別出有效因子後，再基於打分法對六因子進行隨機組合，發現在單因子的基礎上不斷加入其餘因子可以在一定程度上提升選股效果，樣本內績效最佳的投資策略爲由六因子共同排序打分所構建的策略，投組的夏普比率與信息比率分別達到了1.1767以及1.3061。爲檢驗六因子打分法的穩定性，將該策略應用於股灾後的數據進行回測檢驗，雖然結果顯示投組在整體上的表現仍優於基準指數滬深300，但在2017-2018年間的超額收益有所下降，最後透過投組歸因分析發現由於因子風格轉變以及行業輪動等原因造成策略發生階段性的失效。
This paper takes China`s A-share market from 2006 to 2020 as the object to construct a multi-factor investing strategy under the scoring method. First, taking the data before the 2015 China stock market crash as the sample, selected 18 factors from 10 common categories, such as size, valuation, quality, and growth to identify their effectiveness. Through a series of steps of cross-sectional T-test, IC-IR test, correlation test, and factor stratification test, the effectiveness, robustness, independence, and consistency of various factors were analyzed, and finally, 6 style factors were screened out: logarithm of total market capitalization, book-to-market ratio, EPS growth rate, Amihud ILLIQ, a stock price return of the past month, BETA of the past month.
After the effective factors are identified, these six factors are randomly combined based on the scoring method. It is found that adding other factors based on a single factor can improve the effect of stock selection to a certain extent. The investment strategy with the best performance in the sample is the six-factor model, the Sharpe ratio and Information ratio of the portfolio reached 1.1767 and 1.3061. This strategy was applied to the market after the 2015 crash to test the stability of the six-factor scoring method. Although the results showed that the portfolio`s overall performance was still better than the benchmark index CSI 300, the excess return declined from 2017 to 2018. Finally, through the attribution analysis, we can find that the strategy fails periodically due to factor style and industry rotation change. |
| Reference: | [1] Amihud, Y. and H. Mendelson, (1986). Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread. Journal of Financial Economics, 17(2), 223–249.
[2] Amihud, Y., (2002). Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series
effects. Journal of Financial Markets, 5(1), 31-56
[3] Arbel, A., Strebel, P. (1982). The neglected and small firm effects. Financial Review, 17(4), 201-218.
[4] Banz, Rolf W. (1981). The relationship between return and market value of common stocks. Journal of Financial Economics, 9(1), 3-18.
[5] Basu.S. (1977). Investment performance of common stocks in relation to their price-earnings ratios: a test of the efficient market hypothesis. Journal of Finance, 32(3), 663-682
[6] Blitz, D., & Van Vliet, P. (2007). The volatility effect: lower risk without lower return. Journal of Portfolio Management, 34(1), 102-113
[7] Chan, K.C. and Chen, N. (1991). Structural and return characteristics of small and large firms. Journal of Finance, 46(4), 1467-1484.
[8] Carhart, M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57-82.
[9] Chen, L, Novy-Marx, R, Zhang, L. (2010). An alternative three-factor model. Working paper. Washington University in St. Louis.
[10] De Bondt, W. F. M., R. H. Thaler. (1985). Does the stock market overreact?. Journal of Finance, 40(3), 793-805.
[11] Fama, E. F. and K. R. French, (1992). The cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427–465.
[12] Fama, E. F. and K. R. French. (2015). A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(1), 1-22.
[13] Haugen, R., W. Baker, (1996). Commonality in the determinants of expected stock returns. Journal of Financial Economies, 41(3), 401-439.
[14] Jegadeesh, N.and S. Titman. (1993). Return to buying winner and selling losers: implication for stock market efficiency, Journal of Finance,48(1),65-91.
[15] Lee, C. M. C., Y. Qu, and T. Shen (2017). Reverse mergers, shell value, and regulation risk in Chinese equity markets. Working paper. Stanford University.
[16] Reinganum, Marc R. (1981). Misspecification of capital asset pricing: Empirical anomalies based on earnings` yields and market values. Journal of Financial Economics, 9(1), 19-46.
[17] Rosenberg, B., Reid, K. and Lanstein, R. (1985). Persuasive evidence of market inefficiency. Journal of Portfolio Management, 11(3), 9-16.
[18] 孔東民.“流動性風險與資產定價：來自中國股市的證據”.南方經濟.2006(3). 91-107
[19] 王永宏,趙學軍.“中國股市‘慣性策略’和‘反轉策略’的實證分析”.經濟研究.2001(6).56-89
[20] 王春峰,韓冬,蔣祥林.“流動性與股票回報：基於上海股市的實證研究”.經濟管理.2002(24)58-67
[21] 朱世武,鄭淳.“中國資本市場股權風險溢價研究”.世界經濟.2003(11).62-70
[22] 李斌,馮佳捷. “中國股市的公司質量因子研究”. 管理評論. 2019(3).14-26
[23]肖軍,徐信忠.“中國股市價值反轉投資策略有效實證研究”.經濟研究.2004(3).55-64
[24] 林曉明.“華泰多因子模型體系初探”.華泰證券研究報告.(2016).
[25] 胡昌生，高玉森.“分析師情緒會影響股票價格嗎?”.金融研究. 2013 (6).193-206
[26] 柴宗澤. “證券流動專題研究（一）：非流動性因子ILLIQ的選股效力”.安信證券研究報告.(2013).
[27] 郭少石.“基於多因子模型的量化選股研究”.天津大學金融學系碩士論文.(2016).
[28]彭慧文.“中國股市個股非流動性、換手率和短期反轉的關係”. 金融發展研究.2013(9). 8-14
[29] 費洋.“A股市場多因選股量化模型構建及其檢驗”.浙江大學金融學系碩士論文.(2018).
[30] 楊雨晴.“系統波動率還是特質波動率？”. 厦門大學金融學系碩士論文.(2020).
[31] 雷璇.“基於回歸和打分法的因子選股模型對比分析”.大連理工大學金融學系碩士論文.(2019).
[32] 熊海斌,楊帆. “股息率與股票收益:基於中國股市經驗證據的研究”.商業研究. 2013 (8).151-156
[33] 蔡慶豐,楊侃.“是誰在“捕風捉影”：機構投資者VS證券分析師”.投資研究. 2018 (1).193-206
[34] 蘇冬蔚,麥元勛.“流動性與資産定價: 基於我國股市資産換手率與預期收益的實證研究”.經濟科學.2004(2).95-105 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
金融學系
108352036 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108352036 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202100728 |
| Appears in Collections: | [金融學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 203601.pdf | | 2309Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
