政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/13237

政大典藏 > Journals of NCCU > Chengchi journal of Japanese studies > No.1 > Journal articles > Item 140.119/13237

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/13237

Title:	日本語の「依頼使役文」の非対格性検証能力－テモラウ構文の統語的制約－日語依賴使役句的非對格檢驗性--依賴使役句的構文限制-- The Verification of Unaccusativity through the Request-Causative Construction in Japanese--The Syntactic Restriction on the-temorau Construction
Authors:	吉田妙子 Yoshida,Taeko
Keywords:	非對格動詞;依賴使役句;Temorau構文;恩惠表現;被害表現;有生命名詞組;無生命名詞組;二格名詞組;Tewa構文;願望表現 Unaccusative verb;The request-causative construction;The-temorau construction;Benefactive;Adversative;±animated;Ni-marked NP;-tewa construction;Subjunctive
Date:	2004-01
Issue Date:	2008-12-08 11:26:53 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	為了證明動詞的非對格性，學者們提出了各種的檢驗方法。影山（1996）針對「Ｎ ni Ｖ shitemorau」依賴使役句（temorau構文）的Ｖ（動詞）部分，指摘出非對格動詞無法出現在依賴使役句中，提出了「依賴使役句的檢驗法」。但是，影山所主張的「依賴使役句的檢驗法」，筆者認為有下列２個問題點。\\r 1. 誠如竹林（1998）等學者的指摘，依賴使役句中動作的主事者（Ｎ）若為有生命名詞組時，Ｖ即使是非對格動詞也能出現在依賴使役句中。 2. 依賴使役句除了可表示恩惠外，在「tewa構文」中也可以表示被害。此外，高見‧久野（2002）的論文中全面否定影山的主張，指摘出「依賴使役句中動作的主事者（Ｎ）若為無生命名詞組時，Ｖ即使是非對格動詞也能出現在依賴使役句中」，但筆者認為高見‧久野的主張也必須稍作修改。因為，高見‧久野的論文中所列舉的例句，全都是表示假定願望的從屬子句，且表示假定願望表現的句中可出現各種從屬子句。\\r 基於上述理由，筆者認為無法用動詞的非對格性檢驗日語的依賴使役句。 The unaccusativity of verbs has been argued for years in kinds of ways to verify. Kageyama(1996) suggests that in ‘-temorau’ construction; i.e., N ni V shiteimorau, no unaccusative verb ever appear in terms of his original test on the request-causative construction. Yet there remains some insufficiency, which I shall argue through the two following points. (1) As Takebayashi(1998) pointed, the unaccusative verb may appear in the ‘-temorau’ construction if the embedded actor NP is [+animated]. (2) ‘-Temorau’ Construction can be benefactive also adversative as well. There is also an argument set out by Takami & Kuno(2002) in which the unaccusative verb may exist even if the embedded actor NP is [-animated], which apparently stands against Kageyama’s viewpoints. I assume that the argument needs to be revised because all the embedded actor NPs in ‘-temorau’ construction appear in subjunctive clauses that many kinds of constructions beyond ‘-temorau’ can be embedded. We may conclude, therefore, the verification of the request-causative construction is invalid to verify the unaccusativity of verbs.
Relation:	政大日本研究, 1, 121-147
Data Type:	article
Appears in Collections:	[No.1] Journal articles

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
06.「日本語の「依頼使役文」の非対格性検証能力－テモラウ構文の統語的制約－」吉田妙子.pdf		491Kb	Adobe PDF2	561	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...