English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51721926      Online Users : 479
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 金融學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/130540
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/130540


    Title: 外匯報酬之流動性、動能及價值交易策略分析
    The Exchange Rate Return Pricing Models Including Factors of Liquidity, Momentum and Value Strategy
    Authors: 黃子桓
    Huang, Tzu-Huan
    Contributors: 林建秀
    Lin, Chien-Hsiu
    黃子桓
    Huang, Tzu-Huan
    Keywords: 外匯交易
    流動性交易策略
    動能交易策略
    價值交易策略
    Fama-MacBeth兩步驟迴歸
    FX trading
    Liquidity strategy
    Momentum strategy
    Value strategy
    Fama-MacBeth Regressions
    Date: 2020
    Issue Date: 2020-07-01 13:40:48 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究以探討流動性因子是否可解釋外匯報酬為主軸,比較兩種衡量流動性之指標Bid-Ask Spread與Corwin and Schultz (2012) 所建構之流動性因子,何者解釋外匯報酬能力較強。透過OLS迴歸及Fama-MacBeth兩步驟迴歸與定價誤差檢定,發現利用Corwin and Schultz(2012) 所建構之因子模型通過卡方聯合定價模型測試,其模型不存在定價誤差,故Corwin and Schultz (2012)所建構之因子模型較Bid-Ask Spread所建構之四因子模型更為適切。

    另一方面利用HML投組法將37國匯率資料透過貨幣高低價倍數(CS流動性指標)、貨幣前期超額報酬、貨幣五年累積實質匯率變化量(FXV值)之測度進行分類,分別建構出流動性、動能及價值交易策略因子。透過OLS迴歸及Fama-MacBeth兩步驟迴歸與定價誤差檢定,分別檢視二因子(市場因子及流動性因子)、三因子(市場、動能及價值因子)及四因子(市場因子、流動性、動能及價值因子)模型之外匯報酬定價能力。根據實證分析結果,三因子模型在變數解釋能力、調整後判定係數以及定價誤差為零之聯合卡方檢定皆表現的較二因子及四因子模型適切。
    This paper is mainly discussed whether the liquidity factor can explain the excess returns of foreign exchange, and compare the two liquidity factors constructed by Bid-Ask Spread and Corwin and Schultz (2012), which factors can explain the excess returns of foreign exchange properly. By using the OLS regression, Fama-MacBeth two-step regression and the test of pricing error, we found that only the factor model constructed by Corwin and Schultz (2012) passed the test of pricing error, which means that there was no pricing error in factor model constructed by Corwin and Schultz (2012) and is more suitable than the factor model constructed by Bid-Ask Spread.

    Further, we used the exchange rate data of 37 countries to construct the LIQ, MS, VALUE factors via HML (high minus low) methodology. Using the FX of high and low price multiples (CS index), last month of the FX excess return, and the FX five-year cumulative real exchange rate change (FXV) as the measurements. By the OLS regression and Fama-MacBeth two-step regression and test of pricing error, we respectively examined the pricing ability of two-factor model (market and liquidity factor), three-factor model (market, momentum and value factor) and four-factor model (market, liquidity, momentum and value factor). According to the empirical analysis, the three-factor model is the best model to explain the FX excess return, comparing with the two-factor and four-factor models. No matter the adjusted coefficient of determination, and the test of pricing error, three-factor model perform well indeed.
    Reference: [1] 詹場、胡星陽(2001),「流動性衡量方法之綜合評論」,國家科學委員會研究彙刊: 人文及社科學,11 卷三期,205-221。
    [2] Acharya, V.V., & Pedersen, L. H. (2005) Asset Pricing with Liquidity Risk. Journal of financial Econmics, 77(2), 375-410
    [3] Amihud, Y. (2002)Illiquidity and Stock Returns: Cross-Section and Time-Series Effects. Journal of Financial Markets 5(1):31-56.
    [4] Asness, C.S., Moskowitz, T.J., and Pedersen, L. (2013). Value and Momentum
    Everywhere. Journal of Finance, 68(3), 929-985.
    [5] Banti, C., Phylaktis K., and Sarno L., (2012) Global liquidity risk in the foreign exchange market, Journal of International Money and Finance, 2012, vol. 31, issue 2, 267-291
    [6] Barroso, P., & Santa-Clara, P. (2014). Beyond the carry trade: Optimal currency
    portfolios. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 50(5), 1037-1056.
    [7] Chih-Nan Chen, Chien-Hsiu Lin. (2019). The sources of pricing factors underlying the cross-section of currency returns, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance
    [8] Datar, V. T., Naik, N. Y., and Radcliffe, R. (1998) Liquidity and Stock Returns: An Alternative Test. Journal of Financial Markets, 1(2), 203-219.
    [9] Daniel, K., Hirshleifer, D., & Subrahmanyam, A. (1998). Investor Psychology and Security Market Under- and Overreactions. Journal of Finance, 53(6), 1839-1885.
    [10] Fama, E.F. (1970). Efficient Capital Market: A Review of Theory and Empirical
    Work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417.
    [11] Fama, E.F. (1984). Forward and Spot Exchange Rates. Journal of Monetary
    Economics, 14(3), 319-338. .
    [12] Fama, E.F., and French, K.R. (1993). Common risk factors in the return on stocks
    and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3-56.
    [13] Fama, E.F., and French, K.R. (1996). Multifactor Explanation of Asset Pricing
    Anomalies. Journal of Finance, 51(1), 55-84.
    [14] Fama, E.F., and MacBeth, J.D. (1973). Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical
    Tests. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 607–636.
    [15] Flood, M.D. (1994). Market structure and inefficiency in the foreign exchange
    market. Journal of International Money and Finance, 13(2), 131-158. \\
    [16] Grinblatt, M., & Han, B. (2005). Prospect theory, mental accounting, and momentum. Journal of Financial Economics, 78(2), 311-339.
    [17] Jegadeesh, N., and Titman, S. (1993). Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency. Journal of Finance, 48(1), 65-91.
    [18] Jegadeesh, N., and Titman, S. (2002). Profitability of Momentum Strategies: An
    Evaluation of Alternative Explanations. Journal of Finance, 56(2), 699-720.
    [19] Kroencke, T. A., Schindler, F., & Schrimpf, A. (2014). International diversification benefits with foreign exchange investment styles. Review of Finance, 18(5),1847- 1883
    [20] Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1994). Contrarian Investment,
    Extrapolation, and Risk. Journal of Finance, 49(5), 1541-1578.
    [21] Lustig, H., Roussanov, N., & Verdelhan, A. (2011). Common Risk Factor in Currency Markets. Review of Financial Studies, 24(11), 3731-3777.
    [22] Menkhoff, L., Sarno, L., Shmeling, M., and Schrimpf, A. (2012b). Currency
    Momentum Strategies. Journal of Financial Economics, 106(3), 660-684.
    [23] Menkhoff, L., Sarno, L., Shmeling, M., and Schrimpf, A. (2016). Currency value.
    Review of Financial Studies, 30(2), 416-441.
    [24] Nina Karnaukh, Angelo Ranaldo and Paul Söderlind (2015) No 1315, Working Papers on Finance.
    [25] Okunev ,J., and White, D. (2003). Do Momentum-Based Strategies Still Work in
    Foreign Currency Markets?. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(2), 425-447.
    [26] Paster ,L., and Stambaugh, R. F. (2001). Liquidity Risk and Expected Stock Returns. Journal of Political Economy, 111(3), 642-685.
    [27] Raza, A. (2015). Are Value Strategies Profitable in the Foreign Exchange Market.
    [28] Rouwenhorst, K.G. (1998). International momentum strategies. Journal of
    Finance, 53(1), 267-284.
    [29] Shane A. Corwin and Paul Schultz (2012) A Simple Way to Estimate Bid‐Ask Spreads from Daily High and Low Prices, The Journal of Finance
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    金融學系
    107352005
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107352005
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202000600
    Appears in Collections:[金融學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    200501.pdf2938KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback