政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/99829

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/99829

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51276812 線上人數 : 812

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 社會科學學院 > 政治學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/99829

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99829

題名:	邊沁的最大幸福原則：其理論內涵及應用 Jeremy Bentham’s Greatest Happiness Principle: Its Theory and Application
作者:	吳文和
貢獻者:	陳建綱吳文和
關鍵詞:	最大幸福原則邊沁效益主義多元成家同性婚姻同志少數羅爾斯彌爾康德諾奇克 Greatest Happiness Principle Jeremy Bentham Utilitarianism Pluralistic Family Same-sex marriage LGBT minorities John Rawls John Stuart Mill Immanuel Kant Robert Nozick
日期:	2016
上傳時間:	2016-08-09 11:56:50 (UTC+8)
摘要:	邊沁和效益主義主張「最大多數的最大幸福」，這樣的主張引起了擔憂，如羅爾斯擔憂是否會對少數者有不合理的要求。由於羅爾斯著作的深遠影響，本文試圖重新反思這些對邊沁和效益主義的批判。本文回到邊沁的著作，依據邊沁的理論前提和內涵，進而回應羅爾斯與諾奇克等對邊沁思想之疑問，並說明邊沁的最大幸福原則與康德批評的幸福原則之不同。批評者時常過度簡化了邊沁的思想，這不僅是對邊沁人性觀的片面解讀，也有違邊沁講求「證據」的經驗主義知識論。呼應諾貝爾經濟學獎得主康納曼所提出的「回到邊沁」之主張，本文的結論是「經驗效益的理性計算」、「依賴經驗的假設檢定」和「外力的法律制裁」只是用來協助道德，最大幸福原則的主要道德動力來源是人自身同情共感地不想讓她/他/牠者受苦，此與羅爾斯的互惠式正義理論不同；同時，效益必須以客觀經驗證據為基礎，最大幸福原則不只不會對少數者有不合理之要求，還主張為少數者爭取合理之「公民與法律權利」。此外，本文承繼邊沁將理論應用於社會改革之精神，效仿邊沁生前曾為英國性少數發聲和對婚姻改革之努力，將最大幸福原則應用於我國伴侶盟提出的多元成家草案。本文的觀點是，最大幸福原則能突破目前人權理論遭遇之各說各話的困境，不只為多元成家草案提供一個雙方均能接受之原則，最大幸福原則也足以作為個人道德生活和公共立法的指引。
參考文獻:	邊沁原著及縮寫 Fragment 1995 “A Fragment on Government,” in John Bowring ed., The Works of Jeremy Bentham: Vol. 1. London: Thoemmes Press. Principles 1995 “Principles of Morals and Legislation,” in John Bowring ed., The Works of Jeremy Bentham: Vol. 1. London: Thoemmes Press. Civil 1995 “Principles of the Civil Code,”in John Bowring ed., The Works of Jeremy Bentham: Vol. 1. London: Thoemmes Press. Rationale 1995 “The Rationale of Reward,” in John Bowring ed., The Works of Jeremy Bentham: Vol. 2. London: Thoemmes Press. Book 1995 “The Book of Fallacies,” in John Bowring ed., The Works of Jeremy Bentham: Vol. 2. London: Thoemmes Press. Fallacies 1995 “Anarchical Fallacies,” in John Bowring ed., The Works of Jeremy Bentham: Vol. 2. London: Thoemmes Press. Manual 1995 “Manual of Political Economy” in John Bowring ed., The Works of Jeremy Bentham: Vol. 3. London: Thoemmes Press. View 1995 “View of a Complete Code of Laws,” in John Bowring ed., The Works of Jeremy Bentham: Vol. 3. London: Thoemmes Press. Pannomial 1995 “Pannomial Fragments,” in John Bowring ed., The Works of Jeremy Bentham: Vol. 3. London: Thoemmes Press. Bill 1995 “Radical Reform Bill,” in John Bowring ed., The Works of Jeremy Bentham: Vol. 3. London: Thoemmes Press. Evidence 1995 “Rationale of Evidence,” in John Bowring ed., The Works of Jeremy Bentham: Vol. 6. London: Thoemmes Press. Judicial Evidence 1995 “Rationale of Judicial Evidence,” in John Bowring ed., The Works of Jeremy Bentham: Vol. 7. London: Thoemmes Press. Constitutional Code 1995 “Constitutional Code,” in John Bowring ed., The Works of Jeremy Bentham: Vol. 9. London: Thoemmes Press. Table 1983 “A Table of the Springs of Action ” in Amnon Goldworth ed., The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: Deontology together with A table of the springs of action and the article on Utilitarianism. New York: Oxford University Press. Deontology 1983 “Deontology ” in Amnon Goldworth ed., The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: Deontology together with A table of the springs of action and the article on Utilitarianism. New York: Oxford University Press. Article 1983 “The Article on Utilitarianism ” in Amnon Goldworth ed., The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: Deontology together with A table of the springs of action and the article on Utilitarianism. New York: Oxford University Press. Code 1983 “Constitutional Code ” in F. Rosen ed., The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: Constitutional Code. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Constitutional 1989 “Constitutional Code Rationale ” in Philip Schofield ed., The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: First Principles Preparatory to Constitutional Code. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Greece 1990 “Constitutional Code: Greece ” in Philip Schofield ed., The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: Securities against misrule and other constitutional writings for Tripoli and Greece. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Codification 1998 “Codification Proposal ” in F. Rosen and Philip Schofield ed., The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: Legislator of the world. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Sexual 2014 “Of Sexual Irregularities” in Philip Schofield ed., The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham. New York: Oxford University Press. FG 1988 A Fragment on Government, ed. by J. H. Burns and H. L. A. Hart, with an introduction by Ross Harrison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Theory 1970 Theory of Legislation, ed. by R. Hildreth. London: Paternoster Row. Paederasty 2009 “An Essay on Paederasty,” in Robert B. Baker and Kathleen J. Wininger ed.,Philiosophy and Sex. (Fourth)New York: Prometheus Books. 外文部分 Albee, Ernest 1957 A History of English Utilitarianism. (2nd) London: George Allen and Unwin. Beccaria, Cesare 2009 On Crimes and Punishments. (5th) New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishes. Baird, Vanessa 2007 The No-Nonsense Guide to Sexual Diversity. Oxford: New Internationalist. Brogan, A. P. 1991 “John Locke and Utilitarianism,”in Richard Ashcraft ed.,John Locke:Critical Assessments: Vol. 4. London: Routledge, pp.690-710. Crimmins, James E. 1990 Secular Utilitarianism: Social Science and Critique of Religion in Thought of Jeremy Bentham. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1996 “Contending Interpretations of Bentham’s Utilitarianism” Canadian Journal of Political Science 29(4):751-777. 2002 “Bentham and Hobbes: An Issue of Influence” Journal of the History of ideas 63(4):677-696. Campos Boralevi, Lea 1984 Bentham and the Oppressed. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Diogenes Laertius 1925 Lives of eminent philosophers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Giddens, Anthony 1992 The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press. Halevy, Elie 1960 The Growth of Philosophic Radicalism. Boston: The Beacon Press. Hare, R. M. 1982 “Ethical theory and Utilitarianism,” in Amartya Sen and Bernard Williams ed., Utilitarianism and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., pp.23-38. Hart, H. L. A. 1982 Essays on Bentham: Jurisprudence and Political Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1983 Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Harsanyi John. C. 1982 “Morality and the theory of rational behaviour,” in Amartya Sen and Bernard Williams ed., Utilitarianism and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., pp.39-62. Himmelfarb, Gertrude. 1970 “Bentham’s Utopia: The National Charity Company” Journal of British Studies 10(1):80-125. Hobbes, Thomas 1950 Leviathan, with an introduction by A. D. Lindsay. New York: E. P. Dutton and Co., Inc. Hume, David 1978 A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. by L. A. Selby-Bigge, with text revised and variant readings by P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Jevons, William Stanley 2013 The Theory of Political Economy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Kahneman, Daniel 1997 “Back to Bentham? Explorations of Experienced Utility” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(2):375-405. Kelly, Paul Joseph 1990 Utilitarianism and Distributive Justice: Jeremy Bentham and the Civil Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Kant, Immanuel 1949 Fundamental Principle of the Metaphysic of Morals. Oxford: Clarendon Press, translated by Tomas K. Abbott. New York: Liberal Arts Press, Inc. 1799 The Metaphysic of Morals: divided into Metaphysical Elements of Law and od Ethics. London: Printed for the translatior; and sold by William Richardson. Kymlicka, Will 2002 Contemporary Political Philosophy. (2nd) Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lyons, D 1993 “Was Bentham a Utilitarian,” in Bhikhu Parekh ed., Jeremy Bentham: Critical Assessments: Vol. 2. London: Routledge, pp.381-403. Mill, John Stuart 1979 Utilitarianism. Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. 1950 On Bentham and Coleridge. New York: Harper & Brothers. 1937 Autobiography and Essay on Liberty. New York: P. F. Collier & Son Corporation. Morrow, John 2005 History of Western Political Thought: A Thematic Introduction.(2nd) New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Mather, James 1834 The Constitutions of Great Britain, France, and the United States of America. London:Effingham Wilson. Nozick, Robert 1974 Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Basic Books, Inc. Ng, Yew-Kwang. 1975 “Bentham or Bergson? Finite Sensibility, Utility Functions and Socail Welfare Function” The Review of Economic Studies 42(4):545-569. Parekh, Bhikhu 1993 “Bentham’s Theory of Equality,” in Bhikhu Parekh ed., Jeremy Bentham:Critical Assessments: Vol. 3. London: Routledge, pp.645-663. Place F. 1970 “The Greatest Happiness of Principle,” in Bhikhu Parekh ed., Jeremy Bentham:Critical Assessments: Vol. 2. London: Routledge, pp.645-663. Plamenatz, John 1966 The English Utilitarians. (2nd) Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Posner, Eric A. 2008 “Human Welfare, not Human Rights” Colubia Law Review 108:1758-1801. Rawls, John 1971 A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Rosen, Harvey S. 2002 Public Finance. New York: McGraw-Hill. Rosen, Frederick 1983 Jeremy Bentham and Representative Democracy: A Study of the Constitutional Code. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2003 Classical Utilitarianism from Hume to Mill. London: Routledge. Rousseau 1994 The Social Contract. New York: Oxford. Schofield, Philip 2006 Utility and Democracy: The Political Thought of Jeremy Bentham. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Singer, Peter 2002 Animal Liberation. New York: HarperCollins Publishers Inc. Smart, J. J. C. 1973 Utilitarianism: for and against. New York: Cambridge University Press. Skinner, Quentin 2002 “Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas,” in Visions of Politics: Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 55-89. Sokol, Mary. 2011 Bentham, Law and Marriage. London: Bloomsbury. Twinning, William 1975 “The Contemporary Significance of Bentham’s Anarchical Fallacies” Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy 61(3):325-356. 中文著作卡維波 2015 〈為何同性戀平權不是同婚的有效理由？〉，《應用倫理評論》，58：57-67。何思瑩 2015 〈只破不立，無以為繼—談毀家廢婚派的幾點問題〉，《應用倫理評論》，58：69-99。余淑娟 2014 〈效益主義的當代省思〉，輔仁大學哲學系碩士在職專班。娄伶俐 2010 《主觀幸福感的經濟學理論與實證研究》上海：人民出版社。海耶克著，鄭正來、張守東、李靜冰譯 2000 《法律、立法與自由》北京：中國大百科全書出版社。徐偉初、歐俊男、謝文盛 2012 《財政學》，臺北：華泰。孫善豪 2002 〈價值形式與統治形式〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，2：47-83。許國賢 1995 〈福利權與使用他人的政治〉，《人文及社會科學集刊》，7(1)：223-245。 2004 〈德行、干預與個人自由〉，《政治科學論叢》，20：1-28。 2011 〈民主生活與公共利益：一個預備性的考察〉，《行政暨政策學報》，53：1-24。 2014 〈潘恩與邁斯特：革命時代裡的政治理論時刻〉，《東吳政治學報》，32(1)：143-213。梁文韜 2004 〈政治經濟學的哲學基礎、性質與方法論：古典效益主義思想家的觀點〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，10：33-82。陳昭如 2010〈婚姻作為法律上的異性戀父權與特權〉，《女學學誌：婦女與性別研究》，27：113-199。陳建綱 2011 〈從同情共感到效益：論《人性論》與《道德原理探索》的異與同〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，38：1-56。 2015 〈休謨是契約論者嗎？對高提也的”David Hume, Contractarian”之批判性反思〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，55：1-49。黃偉合 2005《英國近代自由主義研究─從洛克、邊沁到彌爾》北京：北京大學出版社。甯應斌 2007 〈同性戀是社會建構嗎？─保守與革命的社會建構論〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，20：1-55。簡至潔 2012 〈從同性婚姻到多元家庭─朝向親密關係民主化的立法運動〉，《台灣人權學刊》，1(3)：187-201。關啟文 2015 〈婚姻平權的反思〉，《應用倫理評論》，58：13-55。波斯特瑪(Postema)著，徐同遠譯 2013 《邊沁與普通法傳統》北京：法律出版社。葉浩 http://hpe.org.tw/3rdNHI_3_Program.pdf，查詢日期2015年9月20日。台灣社會變遷調查 http://www.ios.sinica.edu.tw/sc/cht/scDownload2.php#fourth，查詢日期2015年9月20日。法規資料庫 http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=A0000001，查詢日期2015年9月19日。公視新聞網 http://news.pts.org.tw/detail.php?NEENO=304707，查詢日期2015年8月28日。行政院主計總處 2014 《國民幸福指數年報》，臺北：行政院主計總處。立法院國會圖書館 http://npl.ly.gov.tw/do/www/homePage，查詢日期2015年7月8日。台灣同志遊行 http://twpride.org/twp/，查詢日期2015年7月8日。台灣伴侶權益推動聯盟 https://tapcpr.wordpress.com/，查詢日期2015年7月8日。台灣守護家庭 https://taiwanfamily.com/，查詢日期2015年7月8日。同志諮詢熱線 http://hotline.org.tw/，查詢日期2015年7月8日。婦女新知基金會 http://www.awakening.org.tw/chhtml/news_dtl.asp?id=1030，查詢日期2015年8月28日。國立國父紀念館中山學術資料庫 http://sunology.culture.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/s1gsweb.cgi/ccd=vQCm.3/record?r1=1&h1=4，查詢日期2015年8月16日。國家教育研究院 http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/229952/，查詢日期2015年8月11日。美國心理學學會 http://www.apa.org/about/policy/parenting.aspx 查詢日期2016年4月5日。衛生福利部疾病管制署 http://www.cdc.gov.tw/diseaseinfo.aspx?treeid=8d54c504e820735b&nowtreeid=dec84a2f0c6fac5b&tid=0D62EE0F6D4EBF8C 查詢日期2016年4月5日。參照大大養成所 http://leplab.blogspot.tw/2013/11/blog-post_8.html 查詢日期2016年4月5日。國政評論 http://www.npf.org.tw/1/12363 查詢日期2016年4月5日。財團法人罕見疾病基金會 http://www.tfrd.org.tw/tfrd/service_d/main/category_id/ 3查詢日期2016年4月5日。拉媽報 http://blog.yam.com/la_ma_news/article/9153706 查詢日期2016年4月5日。科學人 http://www.guokr.com/article/59746/ 查詢日期2016年4月5日。司法院大法官 http://www.judicial.gov.tw/constitutionalcourt/p10_02.asp?id=381 查詢日期2016年4月1日。公共政策網路參與平臺 http://join.gov.tw/openup/policies/detail/f69c2804-ba8c-46b0-b24f-6ae5db845789 查詢日期2016年3月28日。
描述:	碩士國立政治大學政治學系 101252007
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1012520071
資料類型:	thesis
顯示於類別:	[政治學系] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
007101.pdf	2267Kb	Adobe PDF2	2811	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋