English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113324/144300 (79%)
Visitors : 51128148      Online Users : 854
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99829


    Title: 邊沁的最大幸福原則:其理論內涵及應用
    Jeremy Bentham’s Greatest Happiness Principle: Its Theory and Application
    Authors: 吳文和
    Contributors: 陳建綱
    吳文和
    Keywords: 最大幸福原則
    邊沁
    效益主義
    多元成家
    同性婚姻
    同志
    少數
    羅爾斯
    彌爾
    康德
    諾奇克
    Greatest Happiness Principle
    Jeremy Bentham
    Utilitarianism
    Pluralistic Family
    Same-sex marriage
    LGBT
    minorities
    John Rawls
    John Stuart Mill
    Immanuel Kant
    Robert Nozick
    Date: 2016
    Issue Date: 2016-08-09 11:56:50 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 邊沁和效益主義主張「最大多數的最大幸福」,這樣的主張引起了擔憂,如羅爾斯擔憂是否會對少數者有不合理的要求。由於羅爾斯著作的深遠影響,本文試圖重新反思這些對邊沁和效益主義的批判。本文回到邊沁的著作,依據邊沁的理論前提和內涵,進而回應羅爾斯與諾奇克等對邊沁思想之疑問,並說明邊沁的最大幸福原則與康德批評的幸福原則之不同。批評者時常過度簡化了邊沁的思想,這不僅是對邊沁人性觀的片面解讀,也有違邊沁講求「證據」的經驗主義知識論。呼應諾貝爾經濟學獎得主康納曼所提出的「回到邊沁」之主張,本文的結論是「經驗效益的理性計算」、「依賴經驗的假設檢定」和「外力的法律制裁」只是用來協助道德,最大幸福原則的主要道德動力來源是人自身同情共感地不想讓她/他/牠者受苦,此與羅爾斯的互惠式正義理論不同;同時,效益必須以客觀經驗證據為基礎,最大幸福原則不只不會對少數者有不合理之要求,還主張為少數者爭取合理之「公民與法律權利」。此外,本文承繼邊沁將理論應用於社會改革之精神,效仿邊沁生前曾為英國性少數發聲和對婚姻改革之努力,將最大幸福原則應用於我國伴侶盟提出的多元成家草案。本文的觀點是,最大幸福原則能突破目前人權理論遭遇之各說各話的困境,不只為多元成家草案提供一個雙方均能接受之原則,最大幸福原則也足以作為個人道德生活和公共立法的指引。
    Reference: 邊沁原著及縮寫

    Fragment
    1995 “A Fragment on Government,” in John Bowring ed., The Works of Jeremy Bentham: Vol. 1. London: Thoemmes Press.
    Principles
    1995 “Principles of Morals and Legislation,” in John Bowring ed., The Works of Jeremy Bentham: Vol. 1. London: Thoemmes Press.
    Civil
    1995 “Principles of the Civil Code,”in John Bowring ed., The Works of Jeremy Bentham: Vol. 1. London: Thoemmes Press.
    Rationale
    1995 “The Rationale of Reward,” in John Bowring ed., The Works of Jeremy Bentham: Vol. 2. London: Thoemmes Press.
    Book
    1995 “The Book of Fallacies,” in John Bowring ed., The Works of Jeremy Bentham: Vol. 2. London: Thoemmes Press.
    Fallacies
    1995 “Anarchical Fallacies,” in John Bowring ed., The Works of Jeremy Bentham: Vol. 2. London: Thoemmes Press.
    Manual
    1995 “Manual of Political Economy” in John Bowring ed., The Works of Jeremy Bentham: Vol. 3. London: Thoemmes Press.
    View
    1995 “View of a Complete Code of Laws,” in John Bowring ed., The Works of Jeremy Bentham: Vol. 3. London: Thoemmes Press.
    Pannomial
    1995 “Pannomial Fragments,” in John Bowring ed., The Works of Jeremy Bentham: Vol. 3. London: Thoemmes Press.
    Bill
    1995 “Radical Reform Bill,” in John Bowring ed., The Works of Jeremy Bentham: Vol. 3. London: Thoemmes Press.
    Evidence
    1995 “Rationale of Evidence,” in John Bowring ed., The Works of Jeremy Bentham: Vol. 6. London: Thoemmes Press.
    Judicial Evidence
    1995 “Rationale of Judicial Evidence,” in John Bowring ed., The Works of Jeremy Bentham: Vol. 7. London: Thoemmes Press.
    Constitutional Code
    1995 “Constitutional Code,” in John Bowring ed., The Works of Jeremy Bentham: Vol. 9. London: Thoemmes Press.
    Table
    1983 “A Table of the Springs of Action ” in Amnon Goldworth ed., The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: Deontology together with A table of the springs of action and the article on Utilitarianism. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Deontology
    1983 “Deontology ” in Amnon Goldworth ed., The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: Deontology together with A table of the springs of action and the article on Utilitarianism. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Article
    1983 “The Article on Utilitarianism ” in Amnon Goldworth ed., The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: Deontology together with A table of the springs of action and the article on Utilitarianism. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Code
    1983 “Constitutional Code ” in F. Rosen ed., The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: Constitutional Code. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    Constitutional
    1989 “Constitutional Code Rationale ” in Philip Schofield ed., The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: First Principles Preparatory to Constitutional Code. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    Greece
    1990 “Constitutional Code: Greece ” in Philip Schofield ed., The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: Securities against misrule and other constitutional writings for Tripoli and Greece. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    Codification
    1998 “Codification Proposal ” in F. Rosen and Philip Schofield ed., The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: Legislator of the world. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    Sexual
    2014 “Of Sexual Irregularities” in Philip Schofield ed., The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham. New York: Oxford University Press.
    FG
    1988 A Fragment on Government, ed. by J. H. Burns and H. L. A. Hart, with an introduction by Ross Harrison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Theory
    1970 Theory of Legislation, ed. by R. Hildreth. London: Paternoster Row.
    Paederasty
    2009 “An Essay on Paederasty,” in Robert B. Baker and Kathleen J. Wininger ed.,Philiosophy and Sex. (Fourth)New York: Prometheus Books.

    外文部分

    Albee, Ernest
    1957 A History of English Utilitarianism. (2nd) London: George Allen and Unwin.
    Beccaria, Cesare
    2009 On Crimes and Punishments. (5th) New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishes.
    Baird, Vanessa
    2007 The No-Nonsense Guide to Sexual Diversity. Oxford: New Internationalist.
    Brogan, A. P.
    1991 “John Locke and Utilitarianism,”in Richard Ashcraft ed.,John Locke:Critical Assessments: Vol. 4. London: Routledge, pp.690-710.
    Crimmins, James E.
    1990 Secular Utilitarianism: Social Science and Critique of Religion in Thought of Jeremy Bentham. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    1996 “Contending Interpretations of Bentham’s Utilitarianism” Canadian Journal of Political Science 29(4):751-777.
    2002 “Bentham and Hobbes: An Issue of Influence” Journal of the History of ideas 63(4):677-696.
    Campos Boralevi, Lea
    1984 Bentham and the Oppressed. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    Diogenes Laertius
    1925 Lives of eminent philosophers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    Giddens, Anthony
    1992 The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    Halevy, Elie
    1960 The Growth of Philosophic Radicalism. Boston: The Beacon Press.
    Hare, R. M.
    1982 “Ethical theory and Utilitarianism,” in Amartya Sen and Bernard Williams ed., Utilitarianism and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., pp.23-38.
    Hart, H. L. A.
    1982 Essays on Bentham: Jurisprudence and Political Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    1983 Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    Harsanyi John. C.
    1982 “Morality and the theory of rational behaviour,” in Amartya Sen and Bernard Williams ed., Utilitarianism and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., pp.39-62.
    Himmelfarb, Gertrude.
    1970 “Bentham’s Utopia: The National Charity Company” Journal of British Studies 10(1):80-125.
    Hobbes, Thomas
    1950 Leviathan, with an introduction by A. D. Lindsay. New York: E. P. Dutton and Co., Inc.
    Hume, David
    1978 A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. by L. A. Selby-Bigge, with text revised and variant readings by P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Jevons, William Stanley
    2013 The Theory of Political Economy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Kahneman, Daniel
    1997 “Back to Bentham? Explorations of Experienced Utility” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(2):375-405.
    Kelly, Paul Joseph
    1990 Utilitarianism and Distributive Justice: Jeremy Bentham and the Civil Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    Kant, Immanuel
    1949 Fundamental Principle of the Metaphysic of Morals. Oxford: Clarendon Press, translated by Tomas K. Abbott. New York: Liberal Arts Press, Inc.
    1799 The Metaphysic of Morals: divided into Metaphysical Elements of Law and od Ethics. London: Printed for the translatior; and sold by William Richardson.
    Kymlicka, Will
    2002 Contemporary Political Philosophy. (2nd) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Lyons, D
    1993 “Was Bentham a Utilitarian,” in Bhikhu Parekh ed., Jeremy Bentham: Critical Assessments: Vol. 2. London: Routledge, pp.381-403.
    Mill, John Stuart
    1979 Utilitarianism. Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.
    1950 On Bentham and Coleridge. New York: Harper & Brothers.
    1937 Autobiography and Essay on Liberty. New York: P. F. Collier & Son Corporation.
    Morrow, John
    2005 History of Western Political Thought: A Thematic Introduction.(2nd) New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Mather, James
    1834 The Constitutions of Great Britain, France, and the United States of America. London:Effingham Wilson.
    Nozick, Robert
    1974 Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Basic Books, Inc.
    Ng, Yew-Kwang.
    1975 “Bentham or Bergson? Finite Sensibility, Utility Functions and Socail Welfare Function” The Review of Economic Studies 42(4):545-569.
    Parekh, Bhikhu
    1993 “Bentham’s Theory of Equality,” in Bhikhu Parekh ed., Jeremy Bentham:Critical Assessments: Vol. 3. London: Routledge, pp.645-663.
    Place F.
    1970 “The Greatest Happiness of Principle,” in Bhikhu Parekh ed., Jeremy Bentham:Critical Assessments: Vol. 2. London: Routledge, pp.645-663.
    Plamenatz, John
    1966 The English Utilitarians. (2nd) Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    Posner, Eric A.
    2008 “Human Welfare, not Human Rights” Colubia Law Review 108:1758-1801.
    Rawls, John
    1971 A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    Rosen, Harvey S.
    2002 Public Finance. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Rosen, Frederick
    1983 Jeremy Bentham and Representative Democracy: A Study of the Constitutional Code. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    2003 Classical Utilitarianism from Hume to Mill. London: Routledge.
    Rousseau
    1994 The Social Contract. New York: Oxford.
    Schofield, Philip
    2006 Utility and Democracy: The Political Thought of Jeremy Bentham. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Singer, Peter
    2002 Animal Liberation. New York: HarperCollins Publishers Inc.
    Smart, J. J. C.
    1973 Utilitarianism: for and against. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Skinner, Quentin
    2002 “Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas,” in Visions of Politics: Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 55-89.
    Sokol, Mary.
    2011 Bentham, Law and Marriage. London: Bloomsbury.
    Twinning, William
    1975 “The Contemporary Significance of Bentham’s Anarchical Fallacies” Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy 61(3):325-356.

    中文著作

    卡維波
    2015 〈為何同性戀平權不是同婚的有效理由?〉,《應用倫理評論》,58:57-67。
    何思瑩
    2015 〈只破不立,無以為繼—談毀家廢婚派的幾點問題〉,《應用倫理評論》,58:69-99。
    余淑娟
    2014 〈效益主義的當代省思〉,輔仁大學哲學系碩士在職專班。
    娄伶俐
    2010 《主觀幸福感的經濟學理論與實證研究》上海:人民出版社。
    海耶克著,鄭正來、張守東、李靜冰譯
    2000 《法律、立法與自由》北京:中國大百科全書出版社。
    徐偉初、歐俊男、謝文盛
    2012 《財政學》,臺北:華泰。
    孫善豪
    2002 〈價值形式與統治形式〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》,2:47-83。
    許國賢
    1995 〈福利權與使用他人的政治〉,《人文及社會科學集刊》,7(1):223-245。
    2004 〈德行、干預與個人自由〉,《政治科學論叢》,20:1-28。
    2011 〈民主生活與公共利益:一個預備性的考察〉,《行政暨政策學報》,53:1-24。
    2014 〈潘恩與邁斯特:革命時代裡的政治理論時刻〉,《東吳政治學報》,32(1):143-213。
    梁文韜
    2004 〈政治經濟學的哲學基礎、性質與方法論:古典效益主義思想家的觀點〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》,10:33-82。
    陳昭如
    2010〈婚姻作為法律上的異性戀父權與特權〉,《女學學誌:婦女與性別研究》,27:113-199。
    陳建綱
    2011 〈從同情共感到效益:論《人性論》與《道德原理探索》的異與同〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》,38:1-56。
    2015 〈休謨是契約論者嗎?對高提也的”David Hume, Contractarian”之批判性反思〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》,55:1-49。
    黃偉合
    2005《英國近代自由主義研究─從洛克、邊沁到彌爾》北京:北京大學出版社。
    甯應斌
    2007 〈同性戀是社會建構嗎?─保守與革命的社會建構論〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》,20:1-55。
    簡至潔
    2012 〈從同性婚姻到多元家庭─朝向親密關係民主化的立法運動〉,《台灣人權學刊》,1(3):187-201。
    關啟文
    2015 〈婚姻平權的反思〉,《應用倫理評論》,58:13-55。
    波斯特瑪(Postema)著,徐同遠譯
    2013 《邊沁與普通法傳統》北京:法律出版社。
    葉浩
    http://hpe.org.tw/3rdNHI_3_Program.pdf,查詢日期2015年9月20日。
    台灣社會變遷調查 http://www.ios.sinica.edu.tw/sc/cht/scDownload2.php#fourth,查詢日期2015年9月20日。
    法規資料庫
    http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=A0000001,查詢日期2015年9月19日。
    公視新聞網
    http://news.pts.org.tw/detail.php?NEENO=304707,查詢日期2015年8月28日。
    行政院主計總處
    2014 《國民幸福指數年報》,臺北:行政院主計總處。
    立法院國會圖書館
    http://npl.ly.gov.tw/do/www/homePage,查詢日期2015年7月8日。
    台灣同志遊行
    http://twpride.org/twp/,查詢日期2015年7月8日。
    台灣伴侶權益推動聯盟
    https://tapcpr.wordpress.com/,查詢日期2015年7月8日。
    台灣守護家庭
    https://taiwanfamily.com/,查詢日期2015年7月8日。
    同志諮詢熱線
    http://hotline.org.tw/,查詢日期2015年7月8日。
    婦女新知基金會
    http://www.awakening.org.tw/chhtml/news_dtl.asp?id=1030,查詢日期2015年8月28日。
    國立國父紀念館 中山學術資料庫
    http://sunology.culture.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/s1gsweb.cgi/ccd=vQCm.3/record?r1=1&h1=4,查詢日期2015年8月16日。
    國家教育研究院
    http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/229952/,查詢日期2015年8月11日。
    美國心理學學會
    http://www.apa.org/about/policy/parenting.aspx 查詢日期2016年4月5日。
    衛生福利部疾病管制署 http://www.cdc.gov.tw/diseaseinfo.aspx?treeid=8d54c504e820735b&nowtreeid=dec84a2f0c6fac5b&tid=0D62EE0F6D4EBF8C 查詢日期2016年4月5日。
    參照大大養成所
    http://leplab.blogspot.tw/2013/11/blog-post_8.html 查詢日期2016年4月5日。
    國政評論
    http://www.npf.org.tw/1/12363 查詢日期2016年4月5日。
    財團法人罕見疾病基金會 http://www.tfrd.org.tw/tfrd/service_d/main/category_id/ 3查詢日期2016年4月5日。
    拉媽報
    http://blog.yam.com/la_ma_news/article/9153706 查詢日期2016年4月5日。
    科學人
    http://www.guokr.com/article/59746/ 查詢日期2016年4月5日。
    司法院大法官 http://www.judicial.gov.tw/constitutionalcourt/p10_02.asp?id=381 查詢日期2016年4月1日。
    公共政策網路參與平臺
    http://join.gov.tw/openup/policies/detail/f69c2804-ba8c-46b0-b24f-6ae5db845789 查詢日期2016年3月28日。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    政治學系
    101252007
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1012520071
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[政治學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    007101.pdf2267KbAdobe PDF22811View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback