| Reference: | 一、中文部份
王政彥(民79). 以CIPP橫式評鑑當前的教育視導.教育研究， 15 ，45-51.
江文雄(民67). 我國地方教育視轉制度之研究. 臺北市:教育部國民教育司.
行政院研究發展考核委員會(民75). 長中程計畫作業要領. 臺北:行政院研究發展考核委員會.
李緒武(民79). 教育評鑑的意義與發展，現代教育， 7(19) , 3-14.
李祖壽(民68) 教育視導與教育輔導.臺北:黎明文化事業公司.
邱兆偉(民81). 教育績效責任:美國經驗的啟示.駝鈴集Ⅲ，臺中:臺灣省政府教育廳國民教育輔導團， 114-127.
邱錦昌(民77). . 臺灣地區國民中學教學視導工作之研究.國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文(:未出版) ?
邱錦昌(民80). 教育視導之理論與實際.臺北:五南圖書公司.
吳定等人(民79). 行政機關生產力衡置模式之研究. 臺北:行政院研究發展考核委員、會.
吳清山(民81) 。學校效能研究. 臺北:五南圖書出版公司.
吳清基(民79) 。精緻教育的理念. 臺北:師大書苑.
吳堯峰(民82). 如何提昇地方公務員服務品質. 載於銓敘部主編:行政管理論文選輯，第七輯. 臺北:考試院銓敘部
呂愛珍(民63) 我國地方教育視導人員任務研究.國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版) .
林武(民79) .各國教育視導制度比較.彰化:復文書局.
林新發(民82) 。教育機會均等與教育品質.博雅教育文集，第三輯. 臺北:國立臺北師範學院， 27-42.
郭為藩(民76)，精緻教育的概念規準.中國教育學術研討會講詞.
孫邦正(民55). 教育視導大綱.臺北:臺灣商務書局.
馬信行(民79). 論教育評鑑指標之選擇.現代教育，7(19)，39-54.
高孔廉(民78). 如何化計畫評估作業，行政計畫的理論與實務.臺北:行政院研究發展考核委員會編印.
徐善德(民67). 臺灣省縣市教育局組織與職構之研究.國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文， (未出版)。
陳英豪(民82) 教育元導人員的角色.教育廳八十二學年度第一學期第一次視導工作會報紀錄.臺中:臺灣省政府教育廳.
陳倬民(民79). 開創教育視導輔導的新境界.革新、實踐、開創教育新境界.臺中:臺灣省政府教育廳.
陳偉民(民80) 。教育視導人員的角色. .臺灣省八十學年度地方教育視導暨教學輔導人員座談會實錄. 臺中:臺灣省政府教育廳.
張鈿富(民81 ). 有教無類、因材施教之實施與成效. 教育研究，24，14-23.
張清濱(民77) 。學校行政.臺北:臺灣書店.
張清濱(民79). 教育的良醫一開創教育視導的新境界.師友月刊，274.38-39.
張潤書(民79) 。組織行為與管理.臺北:五南圖書出版公司.
黃昆輝(民71 ).教育行政與教育問題.臺北:五南圖書出版公司.
黃振球(民79). 學校管理與績效.臺北:師大書苑.
黃振球(民80). 績效學校因素初探.教育資料文摘，159，58-88.
黃麗莉、李茂興合譯(民80)，組織行為:管理心理學理論與實施.
臺北:揚智文化事業股份有限公司.
楊百世(民78). 國民小學校長教學視導之研究.國立高雄師純學
院教育研究所碩士論文(未出版) .
雷國鼎(民56) 。教育行政. 臺北:正中書局.
臺灣省政府(民46). 臺灣省政府公報‘春字第62期.
臺灣省政府人事處(民80). .臺灣省人事行政法規及釋例彙騙，第
七編.南投中興新村:臺灣省政府人事處，17-18.
臺灣省政府教育廳(民63). 革新教育注意事項 總統訓詞.臺中:
臺灣省政府教育廳.
臺灣省政府教育廳(民79). 視導人員的角色與定位. .臺灣省教育
通訊.8.2-3.
臺灣省政府教育廳(民80). . 臺灣省教育視導人員手冊. 臺中:臺
灣省政府教育廳
臺灣省政府教育廳(民81) 陳英豪廳長提示七項工作重點. 臺灣
省教育通訊， 33 ， 1.
臺灣省政府教高廳(民82). 臺灣省政府教育廳單位預算.臺中:
臺灣省政府教育廳
臺灣省國民學校教師研習會(民67). 縣市督學基本能力研究報告.
臺北:臺灣省國民學校教師研習會.
蔡振生譯(民81) .學校組織行為分析. 臺北:五南圖書出版公司.
劉春榮(民82) .國民小學組織結構、組織承諾與學校效能關係研
究.國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文. (:未出版) .
劉真(民59) .教育行政.臺北:正中書局.
劉興漢(民79). 開放社會中學校行政的新趨勢.開放社會中教師
的新形象，第19輯. 臺中: 臺彎省政府教育廳. 156-177.
賴士葆〈民78). 政府機關生產力衡量橫式之建立，載於行政機關
生產力衡量模式研討會議文集.臺北:行政院研究發展考
核委員會.269.
謝文全(民78). 教育行政-理論與實務，增四版.臺北市:文景書局.
薛光祖〈民65). 六十四學年度教育視導工作研討報告. 臺中: 臺
灣省政府教育廳.
簡茂發、楊國樞等編(民71) .信度與效度.社會行為科學研究法
(上冊) . 臺北:東華書局.
關永實(民81) 。目標管理與績效評估，載於銓敘部編=行政管理
論文選輯，第六輯，臺北:考試院銓敘部. 409-434.
二、英文部分
Alfonso. R.J., Firth, G.R. and Neville. R.F.(1975).
Instructional supervision: A behavioral system.
Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Bales, R.F. (1950). Interaction-process analysis: A
method for the study of small groups. Reading,
Boston. MA: Addison-Wesley.
Barnard. C.I. (1938). The functions of the executive.
MA: Harvard University Press.
Barr, A.S., Burton. W.H .? and Brueckner. L.J. (1947).
Supervision. democratic leadership in the
improvement of learning. New. York: AppletonCentury-
Crofts.
Barrilleaux, L.E. (1972). Accountability through
performance objectives. National Association of
Secondary School Principal Bulletin, May.
103-110.
Bingham, R.D., Heywood, J.S. & White. S.B. (1991).
Evaluating schools and teachers bqsed on student
performanec: Testing an alternative methodolog~.
Evaluation Review. 15. 191-218.
Blanchard, T., Lovell, B .? & Vi lIe. N. (1989). Managing
fiance in schools. London: Cassell Educational
Limited.
Bobb itt, F. (1913). Some genera I pr inc ip I es of management
app lied to the prob I ems of city schoo I systems. In
Twelfth year book of the National Society fur the
Study of Educat i on. Part I. Ch i cago: Un i vers i ty of
Chicago Press. 7.
Bolin. F.S. & Panaritis, P.(1992). Searching for a common purpose: A perspective on the history of supervision. In C.D. Glickman (Ed.). Supervision in transition. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. 30~43.
Borg, M.G. 8. Riding, R . .I. (1993). Occupational stress, and job satisfaction among schooladrninistrators. Journal of Educational Administration. 31(1). 4-21.
Bouckaert. G. (1992). Productivity analysis in the public sector: The fire service. International Review of ·
Bridge. R.G .. Charles. M.J. & Moock. P.R. (1979). The . determ~nants or educational outcomes: The impact of famili~s.peers. teachers. And schools. New York: . BalI inge ..
Campbell. R.F. (1980). The organization and control · of amer-ican schools (4th ed). Columbus. Ohio: ‘ Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co. 5.
Carnpbell. R.F .. Corbally. J.E. & Nystrand, R.O. (1983). · Introduction to ~ducational administration (6th). Baston: Allyn & Bacon. Inc. 221.
Carman. B. (1970). Roles and responsibilities in general supervision of instruction. Unpublished doctoral . dissertation.
Cassidy. M.F.; Schimmel. B.S. & Brady. K.A.(1993). 1 ldentirYing expectations for service quality in training and education through process needs assessment. Performance Improvement Quarterly. 6 (2). 3-16.
Child. J. (1985). Organization: A guide to problem
and practice. London: Harper & Row.
Climaco. C. (1992). Getting to know schools using
performance indicators: criteria. indicators and
processes. Educational Review, 44(3), 297.
Cogan, M.L. (1973). Clinical supervision. Boston:
Houghton Mifflin Company.
Conley, D.T. (1987). Critical attributes of effective
evaluation systems. Educational Leadership, 44(7)
60-64.
Curtin, J. (1964). Supervision in today-s elementary
schools. New York: Macmillan.
Department of Education & Sciences(1977). Ten good
schools. London: HMSO.
Dimmock, C. (1990). Managing for quality and accountability
in western australian education. Educational
Review. 42(2), 197-206.
Downton. D. (1987). Primary head teachers: sources of
stress and ways of coping with it. Head Teachers
Review, 12-22.
Doyle, W. (1987). Research on teaching effects as a
resource for improving instruction,. in Wideen.
M. & Andrews. I. (eds.). Staff Development for
School Improvement. Lewes: Palmer Press.
Dull. L.W. (1981). Supervision: School leadership
handbook. Columbus: Charles E. Merrill Publishing
Company.
Edmonds. R.R. (1979). Effective schools for the urburn
poor. Educatio~al Leadership, 37, 15-27.
Edmonds. R.R. (1981). Making public school effective. .’ SocIal Policy, 12. 28-32.
Lsbree. W.S .. McNally. H.J. & Wynn. R. (1967). Elementary school administration and supervision. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhod Co .. 14-18.
Eye. G.G·.Netzer, L.A .. ‘& Krey. R.D.(1971). Superision of instruction. New York: Harper & Row. ..,
Fiedler”. B. (198”9).” Staff appraisal-theory. Concepts and experience in other organizations an~ problems of . adaptation to education. In C. Riches. &.C. Mnrg~n r (eds.) Human resourcemanagement in education. New York:-“ Open”University Presso 190-207. ,.”
Fiedler. F.E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fitzgerald. J.H. (1993). Management practices: A profile . of district-level supervisory activity in one school d istrict. Journal of· Curricul um and Supervision. . 8 (2). 128-139.
Fitz-Gibbon,’c. T. (1990) .- Performance indicators. Clevedon:- Multilingual –Matters.
Franseth, J. (1955). Super-vision in rural schools. _ . Washington. D.C.: United States Office of Education.
Fraser. K.P. (1990). Supervisor behavior and teacher satisfaction. The Journ~l of Educational Administra-tion. 18. 224-231.
Fullan. M. (1985). Change processes and strategies at the local leve”l. The Elementary School Journal. 85 (3), 391-421. .
George, P.S. (1987). Performance management in education.
Educational Leadership, 44(7), 32-39.
Getzels, J.H. & GuJ::)a, E.G. (957). Social behavIor and
the administrative process. School Review, 65, 429.
Getzels, J.W., Lipham, J.M., & Campbell, R.E. (968).
Educational administration as a social process.
N.V.: Harper & Row. Publishers.
Glickman, C.D. (990). Supervision of instruction: A
developmental approach (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn &
Bacon.
Good, C.V. (1959). Dictionary of education (2nd ed.).
New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company. Inc. 539.
Gray. J. (1990). The quality of schooling: Frameworks
for judgement. British Journal of Educational
Studies, 38(3). 204-223.
Griffiths, D.E. (1959). Administrative theory, New York:
Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Gulick. L. & Urwick. L. (1937). Papers on the science of
administration. New York: Institute of Public
Administration. Columbia University.
Halpin, A. W. (1956). The behavior of leaders, Educational
Leadership. 14, 172-76.
Hargreaves. D.H. & Hopkins. D. (1991). The empowered
school: The management and practice of development
planning. London: Cassell Educational Limited.
Harris, B.M. (1985) .. Supervisory behavior in education
(3rd. ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall,
Inc.
Harris. B. & Bessent. W. (1969). In-service education: A suide to better practice. Englewood Cliffs. N.J.: Prentice-Hall
Heffron. F. (1989). Organizational theory a~d public J organi~ations: The political conneetion. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Printice Hall.
Hellweg. S. A. & PhIllips. S. L. (1980). Communication and productivity in organizations: A state-of-the-art . review. In Proceedinss of the 40th Annual Academy .of Management Conference. Detroit. Michigan. 189-92.
Herzberg. F. (1959). The motivation to work. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Howsam. R. B. (1973). Current issues in eva luat ion. The . - . National Elementary Principal. 52. No.5,12-17.
Hoy. W.K. & Niskel. E.G. (1987). Educational administra-tion: Theory. Research and practice (3rd ed.). New York: Random House ….
Huber. J. (1974). Accepting accountability. The Clearing House. 48. 518.
Jennings. H.H. (1950). Leadership and isolation (2nd ed.). New York: Longman, Inc. .
Kast. F.E. et al. (1979). Organization and management. New York: McGraw Hill.
Kerr. E.A .. Schriesheim. C.J .. Murphy. And R.M. Stoogdill (1974). Toward a contingency theory of leadership based upon the consideration and initiating structure literature. Organizational Behavior and Human . Performanc.e, 62-82.
Knutton, S. & Mycroft, A. (1986). Stress and the deputy . head. School Organization, 6(1), 49-59.
Krajewski. R.J. (1976) Clinical supervision: To facilitate
teacher self-improvement. Journal of Research and
Development in Education. 9, 58-66.
Linn, R., E. Baker, and S. Dunbur(1991). Complex performance
based assessment: Expectations and validation
criteria. Educational Research, 20, 8:15-21.
Lunenburg, F.C. & Ornstein, A.C. (1991). Educational
administration: Concepts and practices. Belmont, Cal.
Wadsworth Publishing Company, P.439.
Hanatt, R. P.O 992).研討會論文.臺中:臺灣省中等學校教師研習會編印。
Maslow, A.H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New
York: Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc.
Mauriel, J.J. (1989). Strategic leadership for schools:
Creating and sustaining productive change . San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New
York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
McKenna, B.H. (1973). Teacher evaluation-some implications.
Today-s Education, 55.
Meyer, C.A. (1992). What-s the difference between
authentic and performance assessment? Educational
Leadership, 49, 39-40.
Heyer, H.H. (1980). Self-appraisal of job performance.
Personnel Psychology, 33, 291-95.
Mi ller, W. (1972). Accountabi 1 ity demands improvement,
Educational Leadership, 29.
Mondy. R.W .. Sharp!in. A .. and Premezux. S.R. (1990). Supervision (2nd ed.). Baston: Allyn and Bacan, 298-317. ,
Monk. D. H.(1992). Educat i on productivity research: An
update and assessment of its role in education
finance reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy
Analysis. 14(4). 307-332.
Montgomery. D. & Hadfield. N. (1989). Practical teacher
appraisal. Guildford. England: Kogan Page Ltd. 23.
Moore. T: (1987). Personality tests are back.Fortune,
March, 74-82.
Moorer, S.H. (1952). The Keystone to educational progress.
Tallahassee: Florida State Department of Education.
Moreno, J.L. (1947). Contributions of sociometry to
research methodology in sociology. American
Sociological Review, 12, 287-92.
Mort i more, P. (1992). Qua 1 i ty contro lin educat i on and
schools. British Journal , of Educational Studies,
40(1), 23-37.
Mortimore, P. et al. (1988). School Matters. London:
Open books.
Mosher, R. & Purpel . D. (1972). Supervision: The
reluctant profession. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin .
. Murphy, J., Ha11inger, P.·, & Mesa, R. R. (Summer, 1985).
School effectiveness: Checking progress and assumptions
and developing a role for state and federal
government. Teachers College Record, 86(4), 616-641.
National Education Association(1948). The yardstick of a
profession. Washington, D.C.: NEA.
Neagley, R.L. & Evans, N.D. (1980). Handbook for effective
supervision of instruction (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs,
New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Inc.
Nhundu. T.J. (1992). The relationship between self and
supervisor appraisals with role clarity and job
satisfaction. Journal of Educational Administration.
30 (1). 29-41.
Oliva. P.F. (1976). Supervision for today`s schools.
N.Y. :Harper & Row. Publisher. Inc.
01 i ver. N. (1993). QuaIity. costs and changing strategies
of control in universities in the UK. Journal of
Educational Administration. 31(1). 41-52.
Owens. R.O. (1987). Organizational behavior in education
(3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Pajak. E.F. (1992). A view from the central office.
Supervision in transition. in Glickman. C.D. (ed.).
Association for Supervision and Curriculum
Development.
Perry. J.L. & Wise. L.R. (1990). The motivational bases
of public service. Public Administration Review.
50, 367-82.
Pfeiffer. I.L. and Dunlap. P.B. (1982). Supervision of
teachers: A guide to improving instruction. Phoenix:
Oryx Press.
Porter. L.W. & Lawler. E.E. (1968). Managerial attitudes
and performance. Homewood. Ill.: Richard Irwin.
Purkey. S. and Smith. M. (1983). Effective schools:
A review. The Elementary School Journal. 83(4).
427-52.
Quinn. R.E. (1978). Productivity and the process of
organizational improvement: Why we cannot talk to
each other? Public Administrative Review. 38(1). 42.
Ravitch. D. (1993). Launching a revolution in standards and assessments. Phi Delta Kappan. 74. 767-72. .
Robbins .S.P.(1989). Organizational behaveor: concepts. Controversies. And applications (4th ed.)「中譯本:黃麗莉、李茂興譯(民81).組織行為:管理心理學理論與實務.台北:揚智文化事業股份有限公司.」
Roeth lisberger, E. J. & D ickson. W. J. (1939). Management .
And the worker. Cambridge. M:A: Harvard University . Press.
Rutter. M. et al. (1979). Fifteenthousand hours.,London: Open Books.
Secretary of_State for_Education(1988)_ .Speech to the· . SEO. London: DES Press office.
Seldin. P. (1988). Evaluating and developing administrative performance: a peactical guide for academic . leaders. San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publ ishers.
Serg iovanni, T. J. (1977). Handbook for effective leadership. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Sergiovanni, T.J. & Starratt, R.J.(1979). Supervision: human perspectives(2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
Simon, H. A. (1960). The new science of management . decision. New York: Harper & Row
Snyde, K.& Gielfa,M.(1988). Managing Productive . programs: Training in readiness modules. Tampa. F1.: Pedamorphosis. Inc
Spears. H. (19S3). ‘Improving the supervision of·
Instruction. Englewood Cliffs. N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Stronge, J.H. & Helm, V.M. (1992). A performance
evaluation system for professional support
peresonnel. Educational Evaluation and Policy
Analysis, 14(2), 175-180.
Stufflebeam, D.L. (1983). The CIPP model for program
evaluation, In Evaluation Models. Boston: KluwerNijhoff
Publishing. 17.
SziIagyi; A. D. (1984`). Management and performance
(2nded.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Scott
Foresman and Company. 31.
Taylor, F. (1911). The principles of scientific management.
New York: Harper & Row. Publishers, Inc. 8.
Thomas, H. (1990). Education costs and performance: A
cost-effectiveness analysis. London: Cassell.
Travers, A. W. (1988). Supervision: Techniques and n`ew
dimensions. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 185-199.
Van Velzen. W. (1985). Making school improvement
work. Leuven. Belgium: ACCO.
Weick, K.E. (1974). Middle range theories of social
systems. Behavioral Science, 19(6), 357-67.
Wilcox, B. (1989). Inspection and its contribution to
practical evaluation. Educational Research, 31"(3),
163-175.
Wiles, K. (1950). Supervision for better schools
Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Wiles. K. (1967). Supervision for better schools (3rd.
ed. ). Eng 1 ewood Cliffs, N. J .: Prentice-Ha11.
Wiles. J. & Bondi, J. (1991). Supervision: A guide to
practice (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing
Company.
Wiles, K. and Lovell, J.F.(1975). Supervision for
better schools (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:
Prentice-Hall.Wilson. B.L. & Corcoran. T.B. (1988). Successful secondary schools: Visions of excellence in american public education. New York: The Fslmer Presso
Windham, D.M. & Chapman, D.W. (1990). The evaluation-of
educational efficiency: Constraints, issues and
policies. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press Inc.
Witte, J.F. & Walsh, D.J. (1990). A systematic test of
the effective schools model. Educational Evaluation
and Policy Analysis, 12, 188-212.
Wolf, D.P., Lemahieu. P.G., and Eresch, J. (1992). Good
measure: Asessment as a tool for educational reform.
Educational Leadership, 49, 8-13.
Wolman, B. (1956). Leadership and group dynamics. Journal
of Social Psychology, 43, 11-25. |
