政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/94815
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113325/144300 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51159025      線上人數 : 912
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94815


    題名: 影響子公司間競爭合作關係之研究-以美商M公司在台子公司為例
    作者: 羅紹渝
    貢獻者: 黃國峯
    羅紹渝
    關鍵詞: 子公司
    競爭
    合作
    競合關係
    自主權
    日期: 2008
    上傳時間: 2016-05-09 11:55:46 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 台灣自一九九零年代末期極力發展消費性電子產品代工以來，面臨人工成本過高而需要將生產線外移到大陸，連帶很多上下游的零組件製造廠，與供應鏈相關的產業都需要到大陸設廠。以多國企業在台灣的子公司之立場來看，以往客戶與經銷方式都是在台灣進行，理當全部由台灣子公司管理並負業績成長之責。但是當開始有客戶移往大陸設廠時，連帶需要將材料供應到大陸，進行生產線成品或半成品的製造，這樣的趨勢使得多國企業之材料供應商因為台商客戶產地的移轉，也慢慢的擴及至中國大陸。此時多國企業在台灣子公司的供應鏈管理與客戶關係管理等營運策略，都會與純粹「台灣供應，台灣生產」的模式迥然不同。

    本研究將整理近年文獻中對多國企業子公司間競爭合作的狀態與原因，輔以子公司的自主權高低對競爭合作的影響，透過文獻中對子公司間競爭合作整合模式的架構，探討美商M公司各子公司之間的競爭合作個案，其競爭合作模式為何？競爭與合作的目的為何？並站在母公司的角度檢視何種情況會讓母公司主導子公司之間合作？何種情況會讓母公司放任子公司之間競爭？影響母公司決策的決定性因素是否與文獻中相同？其協助合作或競爭的配套措施又與文先中所提有何差異？以什麼方式展現其配套？

    在合作能為公司帶來最大利益的情況下，母公司會主動要求子公司以合作方式進行，或是子公司間會相互協商，共同為同類產品與相近的市場狀況主動的合作，為母公司與子公司帶來共贏的局面，以期求取獲利的最大化。若考量到面臨外部競爭者的介入時，會讓子公司之間存在一種競爭狀況，即是內部競爭是屏除外部競爭者介入的一種很有效的方法：當各子公司為了鞏固勢力而緊密的跟客戶往來、提供服務，多方進行的良好客勤關係，會讓外部競爭者沒有存在的空間，加上公司品牌知名度與強力的技術支援，母公司的產品事業群較不容易在該市場失去佔有率。

    在這種母公司可能主導合作又有機會放任競爭的氣氛下，子公司該是「為各子公司的業績目標考量」？亦或是「為母公司的總體利益」？此一現象是市場結構的使然，母公司面對此一課題時應回歸市場面，以市場導向為著眼，全面的以長期市場利益做為解決此一爭議的方法，並思考市場結構的差異，訂定適切且合理的年度目標！
    第一章 緒論 1
    第一節 研究背景 1
    第二節 研究動機與目的 1
    第三節 研究問題 2
    第四節 研究限制 3
    第二章 文獻探討 4
    第一節 多國企業子公司經營之理論研究 4
    第二節 子公司對子公司之間的關係 15
    第三節 小結 24
    第三章 研究架構與研究方法 25
    第一節 研究對象 25
    第二節 研究方法 25
    第三節 研究流程 25
    第四節 研究架構 27
    第四章 多國企業美商M公司母子公司簡介 28
    第一節 美商M公司全球簡介 28
    第二節 美商M公司子公司對母公司與區域總部之關係 37
    第三節 影響美商M公司子公司的價值活動與自主權 40
    第五章 美商M公司個案分析與討論 44
    第一節 美商M公司子公司間的內部合作 44
    第二節 子公司間的內部競爭 50
    第三節 子公司合作與競爭的目的 60
    第四節 影響母公司放任競爭或主導合作的因素 63
    第五節 競爭或合作的配套措施 66
    第六章 結論與建議 69
    第一節 主要命題與貢獻 69
    第二節 研究意涵 71
    第三節 研究建議與未來的研究方向 73
    參考文獻 75
    參考文獻: 1. 曾志弘(2000)，多國籍企業子公司自主權與主導行為影響因素之研究以多國籍企業在台子公司為例，國立中山大學企業管理研究所未出版博士論文。
    2. 曾紀幸、司徒達賢和于卓民 (1997)，「環境特性與公司特性對多國籍企業網路關係之影響－在台外商公司之實證研究」，管理學報，第十四卷，第二期， pp155-176。
    3. 曾紀幸、司徒達賢和于卓民 (1998)，「多國籍企業網絡組織類型與管理機制選擇之關係─在台外商公司之產品交易實證研究」，管理學報，第15卷，第一期，pp1-26。
    4. 龔書哲(2005)，資訊廠商跨領地的整合經營模式，台大商學研究所碩士論文。
    5. 陳麒元(2006)，多國籍企業子公司自主權影響因素之研究，中山大學企管研究所碩士論文。
    6. 陳克名(2001)，在台外商子公司自主權之研究，台大商學所碩士論文。
    7. 余明助(2000)，多國籍企業組織、策略與控制關係之研究-以台商海外子公司為例，成大企管所博士論文。
    8. 蕭仲成(2003)，從外部網絡與母子公司間之互動觀點探討-----多國籍企業海外子公司之經營績效，銘傳大學國際企業學系碩士班。
    9. 翁良杰(2004)，多國籍企業在大中華區域策略研究:以兩岸子公司間關係為焦點，中山大學企管所博士論文。
    10. 李穎貞(2004)，多國企業區域化型態之調整與組織改變，政大企管所碩士論文。
    11. 黃家齊、洪國堅(2003)，台灣大陸母子公司間知識移轉與吸收影響因素之研究，中原企管評論,第一卷第一期。
    12. 莊正民、趙必孝、陳穎峰 (1999)，國際企業海外研發的動機、策略與管理，中山管理評論，第十卷第一期。
    13. 廖明坤 (2001) ，多國企業子公司決策自主權影響因素之研究，2001全球化經營策略論壇研討會，政治大學。





    外文資料

    1. Anderson, E., Gatignon, H. (1986), Modes of foreign entry: a transaction cost analysis and propositions, Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3):1-26.
    2. Bartlett, C.A., & Ghosal S. (1986), Tap Your Subsidiaries for Global Reach. Harvard Business Review, 64(6): 87-94.
    3. Bartlett, C.A., & Ghoshal, S. (1989), Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    4. Bartlett, C.A., & Ghoshal, S. (1990), The Multinational Corporation as an Inter-organizational Network, Academy of Management Review.
    5. Bartlett, C.A. & Ghoshal, S. (1992), What is a Global Manager? Harvard Business Review, 70(5):124-132.
    6. Bird, A. , S. Taylor & S. Beechler, (1998) Organizational Learning in Japanese MNCS: Four Affiliate Archetypes. In Birkinshaw & Hood (eds.), Multinational Corporate Evolution and Subsidiary Development. London: MacMillan Books.
    7. Birkinshaw, J.(1995), Entrepreneurship in Multinational Corporations: The Initiative Process in Canadian Subsidiaries, Unpublished Doctorial Dissertation, Western Business School, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.
    8. Birkinshaw, J.(1998), Corporate Entrepreneurship in Network Organizations: How Subsidiary Initiative Drives Internal Market Efficiency, European Management Journal, 16(3): 355-365.
    9. Birkinshaw & Hood.(1998)，Multinational Subsidiary Evolution: Capability and Charter Change in Foreign-Owned Subsidiary Companies.。Academy Management Review, 23(4): 773-795.
    10. Birkinshaw, J., N. Hood, & S. Jonsson (1998)，Building Firm-Specific Advantages in Multinational Corporations: The Role of Subsidiary Initiative。Strategic Management Journal , 19: 221-241.
    11. Birkinshaw,J. & N. Hood (1997), An Empirical Study of Development Process in Foreign-owned Subsidiary in Canada and Scotland, Management International Review, 37: 339-364.
    12. Birkinshaw,J.M. & A.J. Morrison (1995),Configurations of Strategy and Structure in Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations, Journal of International Business Studies, 26(4): 729-753.
    13. Birkinshaw,J.M. (1997), Entrepreneurship in Multinational Corporations: The Characteristics of Subsidiary Initiative, Strategic Management Journal, 18: 207-229.
    14. Birkinshaw,J.M. (2000), Characteristics of Foreign Subsidiaries in Industry Clusters, Journal of International Business Studies. 31(1),:141-154.
    15. Birkinshaw, J. M., & N. Hood (1998), Multinational Subsidiary Evolutions: Capability and Charter Change in Foreign-owned Subsidiary Companies, Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 773-795.
    16. Birkinshaw, J.M., & N. Hood (2001), Unleash Innovation in Foreign Subsidiaries, Harvard Business Review, 79(3): 131–138.
    17. Birkinshaw, J . & Ridderstrale, J . (1999), Fighting the Corporate Immune System: A Process Study of Subsidiary Initiatives in Multinational Corporations. International Business Review, 2:149-180.
    18. Brazeal D., Herbert T (1999), The Genesis of Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 23.
    19. Brandt, W., J. Hulbert & R. Richers (1980), Pitfalls in Planning for Multi-national Operations, Long Range Planning, 13(6) : 23-31. Managing the Multinational Subsidiary.
    20. Burgelman, R. A. (1983), Corporate Entrepreneurship and Strategic Management: Insights from a Process Study, Management Science 23 : 1349-1363.
    21. Caruth, B. D. , & T. A. Pressley (1984), Key factors in positive delegation, Supervisory Management, 29(7): 6-11
    22. Fong, C.M. & H.L. Ho (2007), The Intersubsidiary competition in an MNE：Evidence for the greater China region, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 24(1).
    23. Child, J. (1973), Predicting and understanding organization structure, Administrative Science Quarterly, 18(2), pp.168-185.
    24. D`Cruz, J. (1986) Strategic Management of Subsidiaries. Managing the Multinational Subsidiary, London: Groom Helm.
    25. Doz Y.L. & Prahalad, C.K. (1981), An Approach to Strategic Control in MNCs, Sloan Management Review, Summer, 5-29.
    26. Doz, Y.L., & Prahalad, C.K. (1981), Headquarter influence and strategic control in MNC’s, Sloan Management Review, 22(4):15-29.
    27. Doz, Y.L. & Prahalad C.K. (1987), An Aging Interdependencies Across Business. The Multinational Mission, NY: The Free Press.
    28. Dunning, J. (1988), The Electic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and Some Possible Extension, Journal of International Business Studies, 19:1-31.
    29. Delany, E. (2000), Strategic Development of the Multinational Subsidiary through Subsidiary Initiative-taking, Long Range Planning ,33 : 220-244.
    30. Edwards, R., A. Ahmad, & S. Moss (2002), Subsidiary Autonomy: The case of multinational subsidiaries in Malaysia, Journal of International Business Studies, 33(1): 183-191.
    31. Evan, W.M. ,& Black, G. (1967), Innovation in Business Organization: Some Factors Associated with Success or Failure, Journal of Business, 40:519-530.
    32. Evans P. , Y. Doz & A. Laurent (1989) Human Resource Management in International Firms. London Macmillan Press, 1.
    33. Forsgren, M. (1989), Managing the Internationalization Process, The Swedish Case, Routledge, London.
    34. Forsgren, M., Holm, U., Johanson, J. (1995), Divisional Headquarters Go Abroad ? A Step in the Internationalization of the MNC, Journal of Management Studies, 32: 475-91.
    35. Forsgren, M., Johanson, J. & Sharma, D., (2000), Development of MNC centers of excellence, in Holm, U. & Pedersen, T., (eds.) The emergence and Impact of MNC Centers of Excellence ? A Subsidiary Perspective, McMillan, London, 45-67.
    36. Forsgren M., U. Andersson & Holm U. (2002), The Strategic Impact of External Networks: Subsidiary Performance and Competence Development in the Multinational Corporation, Strategic Management Journal, 23(11): 979- 996.
    37. Gate,S.R., & Egelhoff, W.G. (1986), Centralization in headquarters-subsidiary relationships, Journal of International Business Studies, summer: 71-92.
    38. Garnier, G. H. (1982), Context and Decision Making Autonomy in Foreign Affiliates of U.S. Multinational Corporations, Academy of Management Journal, 25(4): 893-908.
    39. Ghauri, Pervez N. (1992), New Structures in MNCs Based in Small Countries: A Network Approach, European Management Journal, 10 (3): 357-364.
    40. Gupta, A. & V. Govindarajan.(1991), Knowledge Flows and The Structure of Control Within Multinational Corporations, Academy of Management Review, 16:768-792.
    41. Gupta,A.K., Govindarajan, V., & Malhotra A.(1999), Feedback-seeking behavior within multinational corporations, Strategic Management Journal,20, 205-222.
    42. Ghoshal, S., & Nohria, N. (1989), Internal Differentiation within Multinational Corporations, Strategic Management Journal, 10(4): 323-337.
    43. Hage, F. & Aiken, M. (1967), Relationship of Centralization to Other Structural Properties, Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), pp. 72-92.
    44. Hakansson, H. (1989) Corporate Technological Behavior : Cooperation and Networks, John Wiley, New York.
    45. Hedlund, G. (1981), Autonomy of Subsidiaries and Formalization of Headquarters-subsidiary Relations in Swedish MNCs. In L. Otterbeck (Ed.), The Management of Headquarters-subsidiary Relations in Multinational Corporations. Aldershot, UK: Gower.
    46. Hedlund, G. (1994), A Model of Knowledge Management and the N-form Corporation, Strategic Management Journal, 15: 73-90
    47. Hood N. & Taggart J. H. (1999), Subsidiary development in German and Japanese Manufacturing Subsidiaries in the British Isles, Reg. Studies 33, 513-528.
    48. Jarillo C., & J. Martinez (1990), Different roles for subsidiaries: the case of multinational corporations in Spain Strategic Management Journal, 11: 501 – 512
    49. Johanson, J. & J. E. Vahlne.(1977), The Internationalization Process of the Firm-A model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitment, Journal of International Business Studies, 8:23-32
    50. Johnson, J.H. Jr. (1995), An Empirical Analysis of the Integration-responsiveness Framework: U.S. Construction Equipment Industry Firm in Global Competition. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(3), 621-635.
    51. Kim, L. (1980), Organizational Innovation and Structure. Journal of Business Research, 8:225-245.
    52. Kim & Mauborgne , (1993) Procedural Justice, Attitudes and Subsidiary Top Management Compliance with Multinational`s Corporate Strategic Decisions
    53. Kobrin, S.J., 1991. An Empirical Analysis of the Determinants of Global Integration, Strategic Management Journal 12: 17–31.
    54. Luo, Yadong (2005), Toward Coopetition within a Multinational Enterprise: A Perspective from Foreign Subsidiaries, Journal of World Business, 40(1): 71-90
    55. Malnight, T. W. (1996), The Transition from Decentralized to Network-based MNC structures: An Evolutionary Perspective, Journal of International Business Studies, 27(1), pp.43-65.
    56. Nobel R., J. Birkinshaw (1998), Innovation in Multinational Corporations: Control and Communication Petterns in International R&D Operations, Strategic Management Journal, 19(5): 479-496.
    57. O’Donnell, S. W. (2000), Managing Foreign Subsidiaries: Agents of Headquarters, or An Interdependent Network? Strategic Management Journal, 21: 525-548.
    58. Paterson, S.L. & Brock, D.M. (2002), The Development of Subsidiry-management Research: Review and Theoretical Analysis, International Business Review, 11(2): 139-163.
    59. Quelch, J.A. & Hoff, E.J., (1986), Customizing global marketing, Harvard Business Review, 64(3):59–68
    60. Quelch, J.A. (1993), The new country manager, The McKinsey Quarterly, 4(1), 155-165.
    61. Paterson, S.L. & D. M. Brock (2002)The Development of Subsidiary-management Research: Review and Theoretical Analysis.
    62. Porter, M. E.(1986), Competition in Global Industries: A Conceptual Framework, in M E. Porter (ed.) Competition in Global Industries, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    63. Randoy, T. & J. Li. (1998), Global Resource Flows and MNE Network Integration in Development, in Birkinshaw, J. and N. Hood.（Eds.）Multinational Subsidiary Evolution and Subsidiary Development, New York/ London: Macmillan/ St. Martins Press.
    64. Roth, K., Schweiger, D. M., & Morrison, A. J. (1991), Global strategy implementation at the business unit level: Operational capabilities and administrative mechanisms. Journal of International Business Studies, Third Quarter, 369-402.
    65. Roth, K. & A.J. Morrison (1992), Implementing Global Strategy: Characteristics of Global Subsidiary Mandates. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4): 715-735.
    66. Steiner, G.A. & Steiner, J.F. (1994),Business, Government, and Society: A Managerial Perspective, Text and Cases, New York, McGraw-Hill, 357.
    67. Taggart, J.H. (1997), Autonomy and procedural justice: A Framework for Evaluating Subsidiary Strategy, Journal of International Business Studies, 28(1):51-76.
    68. Taggart, J.H. (1998), Strategy Shifts in MNC Subsidiaries. Strategic Management Journal, 19(7): 663-681.
    69. Taggart, J.H. & Hood., N.(1995) Perspectives on Subsidiary Strategy in German Companies Manufacturing in the British Isels, Conference Proceedings. Academy of International Business, Bradford England.
    70. Taggart, J. H. & N. Hood (1999), Determinants of Sutonomy in Multinational Corporation Subsidiaries, European Management Journal, 17(2): 226-236.
    71. Vachani, S. (1999), Global Diversification’s Effect on Multinational Subsidiaries’ Autonomy, Journal of International Business Studies, 8:535-560.
    72. Vernon, R.(1966). International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80: 190-207.
    73. White, R.E. & Poynter, T.A. (1984), Strategies for Foreign-Owned Subsidiaries in Canada. Business Quarterly, 49(2), 59-69.
    74. Young, S., N. Hood., & E. Peters.(1994). Multinational Enterprises and Regional Economic Development, Regional Studies, 28: 657-677.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    管理碩士學程(AMBA)
    94932326
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094932326
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[管理碩士學程/商管專業學院碩士學位學程 AMBA] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML2513檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋