| Reference: | 1. 方萬全，1991，〈第一人稱與翻譯的不確定說〉，《分析哲學與語言哲學論文集》，香港，中文大學(排印中)。
2. ───，1987，〈戴維森的意義理論與語意現象的解釋〉，《美國研究》六月，台北，中研院歐美所，頁1~35。
3. 涂紀亮(編譯)，1986，《語言哲學名著選讀》，北京，三聯。
4. 陳中人(譯)，1990，《從邏輯的觀點看》(原稿為W.V. Quine, Form a Logical Point of View)，台北，結構群。
5. 黃宣範，1983，《語言哲學》，台北，文鶴。
1.Bohnert, Herbert G. “Quine on Analyticity,” in L.E. Hahn and P.A.Sch-lipp(ed.), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine (La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986)PP.49-72.
2.Boorse, Christopher “The Origins of the Indeterminacy Thesis.” Journal of Philosophy 72 (1975):PP.369-387.
3.Carnap, Rudolf “Semantics, Empiricism, and Ontology.” Revue Intern-ationale de Philosophie 11(1950): PP.208-228.
4.Chomsky, Noam “Quine’s Empirical Assumptions,” in D. Davidson and J. Hintikka (ed.), Words and Objections: Essays on the Work of W.V. Quine(Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel, 1969)PP. 53-68
5.Davidson, Donald “Radical Interpretation,” Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation(New York, Oxford, 1984)PP.125-141.
6.────”Truth and Meaning,” Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation(New York, Orford, 1984)PP.17-36.
7.Field, Hatry “Tarski’s Theory of Truth.” Journal of Philosopy 69(1972)PP.347-375.
8.Follesal, Dagfinn “Essentialism and Reference,” in L.E. Hahn and P.A. Schlipp(ed.), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine(La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986)PP.97-113.
9.────”indeterminacy and Mental States,” in R.B. Barrett and R.F. Gibson(ed.), Perspectives on Quine(Cambridge,Mass.:Basil Blackwell, 1990)PP.98-109.
10.────”Indeterminacy of Translation and Underdetermina-tion for the Theory of Nature.” Dialectica 27(1973) PP.289-301.
11.Frege, Gottlob “On Sense and Meaning,” in B. McGuinness(ed.), Col-lected Papers on Mathmatics, Logic, and Philosophy(Oxford, New York: Basil Blackwell, 1984)PP.157-177.
12.Gemes, Ken “The Indeterminacy Thesis Reformulated.” Journal of Philosophy88 (1991)PP.91-108.
13.Gibson, Roger F., Jr. “Indeterminacy, Underdetermination, and Facts of the Matter,” Enlightened Empiricism(Tampa, Florida: Univer-sity of South Florida, 1988)PP.102-131.
14.Grice, Paul and Peter F. Strawson “In Defense of a Dogma,” in James F. Harris, Jr. and Richard H. Severens (ed.), Analyicity (Chicago, IL: Quadrangle Books, 1970)PP.54-74.
15.Grice, Paul “Further Notes on Logic and Conversation,” Studies in the Way of Words(Cambridge, Mass.: Havard University, 1989) PP.41-57.
16.Harman, Gilbert “Quine’s Grammar,” in L.E. Hahn and P.A. Schlipp(ed.), The Philosophy of W.V.Quine(La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986)PP.165-180.
17.Hookway, Christopher Quine: Language, Experience and Reality (Oxford, New York: Polity, 1988).
18.Jaggar, Alison “On One of the Reasons for the Indeterminacy of Translation.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 34(1973), PP.257-265.
19.Kirk, Robert Translation Determined(Oxford, New York: Clanendon, 1986).
20.Nozick, Robert “Experience, Theory, and Language,” in L.E. Hahn and P.A. Schlipp (ed.), The Philosophy of W.V. QUine(La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986)PP.339-363.
21.Putnam, Hilary “Meaning Holism,” in L.E. Hahn and P.A. Schlipp (ed.), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine(La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986)pp. 405-426.
22.────”Is Semantics Possible?” in H.E.Kieferand M.K.Munitz (ed.), Language, Belief, and Metaphysics(Albay: State Univer-sity of New York, 1970) pp.50-63.
23.────”The Refutation of Conventionalism,” Mind, Language and Reality(London: Cambridge University, 1975).
24.Quine, Willard van Orman “Comment on Follesdal, “in R.B. Barrett and R.F. Gibson (ed.), Perspectives on Quine(Cambridge, Mass.: Basil Blackwell, 1990)P.110.
25.────”Comment on Stroud,” in R.B. Barrett and R.F. Gibson (ed.), Perspectives on Quine (Cambridge, Mass: Basil Blackwell, 1990)PP.334-335.
26.────”Five Milestones of Empiricism,” in Theories and Things(Cambridge, Mass.: Havard niversity, 1981)PP.67-72.
27.────”On Empirically Equivalent System of the World.” Erkenntnis9(1975)PP.313-328.
28.────”On the Reasons for the Indeterminacy of Translation.” Journal of Philosophy67(1970)PP.178-183.
29.────Ontological Relativity and Other Essays(New York: Columbia Univesity,1969).
30.────”On What There Is,” in From a Logical Point of View 2d.(Cambridge, Mass.: Havard University, 1980)PP.1-19.
31.────”Relativism and Absolutism.” Monist67(1984)PP.293-296.
32.────”Reply to Dagfinn Follesdal,” in L.E. Hahn and P.A. Schlipp (ed.), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine(La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986)PP.114-116.
33.────”Reply to Gilbert Harman,” in L.E. Hahn and P. A. Schlipp (ed.), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine(La Salle, IL: Open court, 1986)PP.181=188.
34.────”Reply to Herbert G. Bohnert.” In L.E. Hahn and P.A. Schlipp (ed.), The Philosoply of W.V. Quine(La Salle, IL: Open court, 1986)PP.93-96.
35.────”Reply to Hilary Putnam,” in L.E. Hahn and P.A. Schlipp(ed.), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine(La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986)PP.427-432.
36.────”Reply to Paul A. Roth,” in L.E. Hahn and P.A. Schlipp(ed.), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine (La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986)PP.459-462.
37.────”Reply to Robert Nozick,” in L.E. Hahn and P. A. Schlipp (ed.), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine(La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986)PP.364-368.
38.────”Reply to Roger F. Gibson, Jr.,” in L.E. Hahn and P.A. Schlipp(ed.), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine(La Sall e, IL: Open Court, 1986)PP.155-158.
39.────”Things and Their Place in Theories,” in Theories and Things (Cambridge, Mass. : Havard University,1981)PP.1~23.
40.────”Two Dogmas of Empiricism” in From a Logi-cal Point of View 2d, (Cambridge, Mass.: Havard University, 1980)PP. 20-46.
41.────Word and Object(Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 1960).
42.Rorty, Richard “Indeterminacy of Translation and of Truth”, Synthese 23(1972) PP.443-462.
43.Roth, Paul “Semantics without Foundations,” in L.E. Hahn and P.A. Schlipp(ed), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine(La Salle, IL: Open Court. 1986)PP.433-458.
44.Stroud, Barry “Quine’s Physicalism,” in R.B. Barrett and R.F. Gibson (ed.), Perspectives on Quine(Cambridge, Mass.: Basil Blackwell,1990)PP.321-333.
45.White, Morton G. “Analytic and Synthetic: an Untenable Dualism,” in J. F. Harris and R. H. Severens(ed.), Analyticity(Chicago, IL: Quad-rangle Books, 1970)PP.75-91.
46.Zabludowski, Andrzej “On Ouine’s Indeterminacy Doctrine.” Philosophical Review98(1989)PP.35-63. |
