 |
English
|
正體中文
|
简体中文
|
Post-Print筆數 : 27 |
Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50932184
Online Users : 966
|
|
|
Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/84127
|
| Title: | 從學脈、宗派到宗族──《四書大全》徵引元儒之學術系譜考察 |
| Other Titles: | From Thread of Schools, Sects, to Clans—Survey of the Academic Pedigree of Yuan Scholars in Encyclopaedia of the Four Books |
| Authors: | 陳逢源 |
| Contributors: | 中國文學系 |
| Keywords: | 朱熹;四書;四書大全;理學;元儒
Zhu Xi;The Four Books;Encyclopaedia of the Four Books;The Philosophy of Principle (lixue);Yuan Scholars |
| Date: | 2012 |
| Issue Date: | 2016-04-11 17:10:27 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 四書成為經典，有賴朱熹完成《四書章句集注》，但就影響層面而言，明代科舉定制才是四書「官學化」發展最重要推手，尤其明成祖敕撰《四書大全》，挾其皇權威勢，一改士人成學方式，四書先於五經，成為儒學的核心所在。檢覈其中，刊落歧異，整合前說，形成朱熹、門人、元儒一系相承的經說體系，建構朱熹昂然挺出的宗主地位，內容承襲倪士毅《四書輯釋》為多，但實際比對內容，改動增補之處，重構脈絡，一窺建構體系的訴求。只是《四書大全》一方面從新安一系承繼元儒注解四書的成果，但另一方面也回應新安一系學人與饒魯一系爭奪詮釋朱學宗主地位的主張，宋元之際，學脈日分，由學脈、宗派而及於宗族情懷，轉為捍衛朱熹學術的信念，成為《四書大全》最核心的訴求，細節之間，必須進一步釐清元儒四書詮釋的學術系譜，以及朱熹以下複雜的四書傳衍過程，元儒著作多已亡佚，線索模糊，於今重加整理，比對其中，期以有更清楚的觀察。
Zhu Xi’s work, The Exegesis of the Collections of Texts from the Four Books (Sishu zhangju jizhu), made the Four Books become canons, while the establishment of the official examination system in Ming Dynasty was the main cause of officializing the Four Books. Above all, Yongle Emperor (Chengzu of Ming Dynasty) decreed to compile Encyclopaedia of the Four Books. With the imperial authority, scholars changed their way of pursuing studies when the Four Books transcended the Five Classics and became the core of the Confucian Philosophy. Basing on the substitution of canons, the derived system of classic from Zhu Xi, his disciples, to Yuan scholars construct Zhu’s predominant position. Encyclopaedia of the Four Books mostly continued and succeeded Ni Shi-Yi’s Collected Annotation of the Four Books. However, through comparing the contents as well as the additions and deletions in these two works, I reconstruct the context and find out the object of the system of construction. On one hand, Encyclopaedia of the Four Books passed on the achievement of Yuan scholars’ annotation in Xinan system, and on the other hand, it responded Xinan scholars’ argument which contended against Raolu system in order to get the predominant position of interpreting Zhu’s study. In the connection between Song and Yuan, threads of schools have divided increasingly, and then threads of schools, sects, and affections of clan were all transformed into a belief of defending Zhu’s study, which was the central object of Encyclopaedia of the Four Books. Here I must go one step further to make the academic pedigree of Yuan scholars’ interpretation of the Four Books and the complex process of inheritance clean because many Yuan scholars’ works were lost and the clue was indistinct. In order to achieve this goal, I will reorganize the documents and compare the texts in this paper. |
| Relation: | 計畫編號 NSC101-2410-H004-107-MY2 |
| Data Type: | report |
| Appears in Collections: | [中國文學系] 國科會研究計畫
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 101-2410-H004-107-MY2.pdf | | 1249Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 508 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.
2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
