 |
English
|
正體中文
|
简体中文
|
Post-Print筆數 : 27 |
全文筆數/總筆數 : 116200/147236 (79%)
造訪人次 : 59713547
線上人數 : 711
|
|
|
資料載入中.....
|
請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/81046
|
| 題名: | 休謨是契約論者嗎？對高提也的“David Hume Contractarian”之批判性反思 |
| 其他題名: | Is Hume A Contractarian? A Critical Reflection on David Gauthier`s ＂David Hume, Contractarian＂ |
| 作者: | 陳建綱
Chen, Brian Chien-Kang |
| 貢獻者: | 政治系 |
| 關鍵詞: | 休謨;正義;社會契約;親社會性;效益
David Hume;Justice;Social Contract;Sociability;Utility |
| 日期: | 2015-12 |
| 上傳時間: | 2016-02-02 10:01:47 (UTC+8) |
| 摘要: | 晚近以來，越來越多的研究者主張休謨的正義理論立基於社會契約的概念上，這與休謨以批判社會契約論著稱的傳統形象相去甚遠。為評估此研究趨勢是否有助於釐清休謨的正義理論，本文聚焦於高提也的＂David Hume, Contractarian＂。該文的主要涵義為：第一，休謨的效益原則不同於效益主義所捍衛的公共福祉，反而與位居契約論核心的互惠更為相符。其次，高提也強調休謨思想的保守性，否定休謨具備分配正義的關懷。本文指出，休謨眼中的人性並非僅以追求自我之私利為滿足；相反地，人類與生俱來的親社會性在休謨的理論中發揮了關鍵的作用。其次，休謨並非僅關注財產制度之穩定性的資產階級代言人，在其經濟論文中，他表達了對社會不平等問題的重視，尤其是對奴隸制度的譴責。
There is a trend that forms lately in the study of David Hume`s political thought, namely an increasing number of scholars now regard Hume`s theory of justice as founded on the idea of social contract. This view deviates from Hume`s conventional image which proposed significant criticism of social contract theory. To evaluate this interpretive perspective, this article focuses on David Gauthier`s ＂David Hume, Contractarian＂. Gauthier`s essay has two implications. First, Gauthier argues that whereas Hume`s theory of justice is founded on a principle of utility, utility for Hume does not reveal the general welfare of society as what utilitarianism defends, but mutual advantage compatible with a contractarian account of morality. Second, Gauthier emphasizes the conservative tendency of Hume`s political thought, and he rejects that there is a concern for distributive justice in it. This article argues that, unlike Gauthier`s view, Hume thinks that human nature may not be reduced to the psychology of selfishness. On the contrary, men`s natural sociability and sympathy are crucial to Hume`s theory of justice. Moreover, if Gauthier took Hume`s economic essays more seriously, he would have found Hume`s criticism of slavery and oppressions. On that account, it seems not fair to depict Hume as a conservative indifferent to social inequality. |
| 關聯: | 政治與社會哲學評論, 55, 1-49. |
| 資料類型: | article |
| DOI 連結: | http://dx.doi.org/10.6523/168451532015120055001 |
| DOI: | 10.6523/168451532015120055001 |
| 顯示於類別: | [政治學系] 期刊論文
|
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 |
描述 |
大小 | 格式 | 瀏覽次數 |
|---|
| 149.pdf | | 2055Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 932 | 檢視/開啟 |
|
在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.
|
著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.
2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
