政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/81046
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113478/144464 (79%)
Visitors : 51488552      Online Users : 736
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/81046


    Title: 休謨是契約論者嗎?對高提也的“David Hume Contractarian”之批判性反思
    Other Titles: Is Hume A Contractarian? A Critical Reflection on David Gauthier`s "David Hume, Contractarian"
    Authors: 陳建綱
    Chen, Brian Chien-Kang
    Contributors: 政治系
    Keywords: 休謨;正義;社會契約;親社會性;效益
    David Hume;Justice;Social Contract;Sociability;Utility
    Date: 2015-12
    Issue Date: 2016-02-02 10:01:47 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 晚近以來,越來越多的研究者主張休謨的正義理論立基於社會契約的概念上,這與休謨以批判社會契約論著稱的傳統形象相去甚遠。為評估此研究趨勢是否有助於釐清休謨的正義理論,本文聚焦於高提也的"David Hume, Contractarian"。該文的主要涵義為:第一,休謨的效益原則不同於效益主義所捍衛的公共福祉,反而與位居契約論核心的互惠更為相符。其次,高提也強調休謨思想的保守性,否定休謨具備分配正義的關懷。本文指出,休謨眼中的人性並非僅以追求自我之私利為滿足;相反地,人類與生俱來的親社會性在休謨的理論中發揮了關鍵的作用。其次,休謨並非僅關注財產制度之穩定性的資產階級代言人,在其經濟論文中,他表達了對社會不平等問題的重視,尤其是對奴隸制度的譴責。
    There is a trend that forms lately in the study of David Hume`s political thought, namely an increasing number of scholars now regard Hume`s theory of justice as founded on the idea of social contract. This view deviates from Hume`s conventional image which proposed significant criticism of social contract theory. To evaluate this interpretive perspective, this article focuses on David Gauthier`s "David Hume, Contractarian". Gauthier`s essay has two implications. First, Gauthier argues that whereas Hume`s theory of justice is founded on a principle of utility, utility for Hume does not reveal the general welfare of society as what utilitarianism defends, but mutual advantage compatible with a contractarian account of morality. Second, Gauthier emphasizes the conservative tendency of Hume`s political thought, and he rejects that there is a concern for distributive justice in it. This article argues that, unlike Gauthier`s view, Hume thinks that human nature may not be reduced to the psychology of selfishness. On the contrary, men`s natural sociability and sympathy are crucial to Hume`s theory of justice. Moreover, if Gauthier took Hume`s economic essays more seriously, he would have found Hume`s criticism of slavery and oppressions. On that account, it seems not fair to depict Hume as a conservative indifferent to social inequality.
    Relation: 政治與社會哲學評論, 55, 1-49.
    Data Type: article
    DOI link: http://dx.doi.org/10.6523/168451532015120055001
    DOI: 10.6523/168451532015120055001
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Political Science] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    149.pdf2055KbAdobe PDF2767View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback