政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/77115
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51083514      線上人數 : 920
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/77115


    題名: 近義詞「買賣」、「交易」、「貿易」的共現與語意韻律研究
    Near-Synonyms of Transaction Words in Mandarin Chinese: An Investigation of their Collocation and Semantic Prosody
    作者: 陳怡婷
    Chen, I Ting
    貢獻者: 賴惠玲
    Lai, Huei Ling
    陳怡婷
    Chen, I Ting
    關鍵詞: 近義詞
    共現現象
    語意韻律
    near-synonyms
    collocation
    semantic prosody
    日期: 2015
    上傳時間: 2015-08-03 13:11:28 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本文旨在探討現代漢語近義詞「買賣」、「交易」、「貿易」的異同,透過它們的搭配現象以及語意韻律的表現來進行討論。本文的語料來自「中央研究院漢語平衡語料庫」,根據搭配詞本身與「買賣」、「交易」、「貿易」的句法及語意關係來做為搭配詞的判斷,接著對於搭配詞的句法行為、語意功能以及框架要素再去做近一步的探討。
    「買賣」、「交易」、「貿易」的前後搭配詞在句法上經常做名詞使用,在語意功能及框架要素方面,「買賣」及「交易」經常呈現交換者(exchanger)以及交換品(theme)兩個要素,「貿易」主要凸顯的是交換者(exchanger)。在語料裡,大部分的框架要素都呈現在前置搭配詞,主要有交換者(exchanger)、交換品(theme)、處所(location)、時間(time)、方式(manner)、頻率(frequency);後置搭配詞有交換者(exchanger)、交換品(theme)、處所(location)、時間(time)、方式(manner)、頻率(frequency)、組織(organization)、條例(regulation)。在語意韻律方面,「買賣」及「交易」傾向和負面語意的前置搭配詞出現,而「貿易」則是有較多負面的後置搭配詞。透過共現行為及語意韻律的分析,本文系統性地呈現了「買賣」、「交易」、「貿易」的相似與相異處。
    This thesis explores three near-synonymous transaction words in Mandarin Chinese, maimai, jiaoyi, and maoyi. These three words are defined in a circular manner in the dictionary, and their meanings are not distinguishable. The present study aims to detect the similarities and differences among them via the examination of their collocational behaviors and semantic prosody. The data are extracted from Sinica Corpus, and the left-sided and right-sided collocates based on their syntactic and semantic relation to the node words are identified. Then, the collocated words are discussed in terms of their syntactic behaviors, semantic functions, and frame elements.
    The collocates of maimai, jiaoyi, and maoyi frequently function as nouns on both sides. The semantic functions and frame elements of both maimai and jiaoyi frequently express exchanger and theme in their instances, while for maoyi, exchanger and manner make up the majority of its frame elements. Most frame elements are profiled in the collocates. On the left side, there are exchanger, theme, location, time, manner and frequency. On the right side, there are exchanger, theme, location, time, manner, frequency, organization, and regulation. As for semantic prosody, most collocates are neutral. The left-sided collocates of maimai and jiaoyi tend to be negative words. Regarding the right-sided collocates, maoyi has more negative collocates than maimai and jiaoyi. With the collocational behaviors and semantic prosody analyzed, the study presents the similarities and differences of the three synonymous words in a systematic way.
    參考文獻: Bednarek, M. (2008). Semantic preference and semantic prosody re-examined.Corpus linguistics and linguistic theory, 4(2), 119-139.
    Chief, L. C., Huang, C. R., Chen, K. J., Tsai, M. C., & Chang, L. L. (2000). What can near synonyms tell us. International Journal of Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing, 5(1), 47-60.
    Chung, Siaw-Fong (2011). A Corpus-based Analysis of "Create" and "Produce". Chang Gung Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(2), 399-425.
    Fillmore, C. J. (1977). Topics in lexical semantics. In R. Cole, (Eds.), Current issues in linguistic theory (pp. 76-138). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    Fillmore, C. J. (1982). Frame semantics. In Linguistics Society of Korea (Eds.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111-137). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company.
    Fillmore, C. J., & Atkins, B. T. (1992). Toward a frame-based lexicon: The semantics of RISK and its neighbors. In Lehrer, A. & Kittay, E.F (Eds.) Frames, fields, and contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organization (pp.75-102). Hillsdale: Lawerence Erlbaum Associates.
    Firth, J. R. (1957). Modes of meaning. In Firth, J. R. (Eds.) Papers in Linguistics 1934-1951 (pp. 190-215). London: Oxford University Press.
    Hoey, M. (1991). Patterns of lexis in text. London: Oxford University Press.
    Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. Psychology Press.
    Hsu, You-Fen & Chung, Siaw-Fong. 2012. A Corpus-Based Study of Mandarin Soaking Verbs PÀO and JÌN. International Journal of Computer Processing of Languages (IJCPOL), 24(1), 17-36, (CSA).
    Huang, C. R., Ahrens, K., Chang, L. L., Chen, K. J., Liu, M. C., & Tsai, M. C. (2000). The module-attribute representation of verbal semantics: From semantics to argument structure. Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing, 5(1), 19-46.
    Leech, G. (1974). Semantics. Harmondsworth : Penguin.
    Lin, Po-Chung (2009). Patterns of Profiling of the (In)convenience Frame in Mandarin Chinese (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Liu, Mei-chun (2002). Corpus-based Lexical Semantic Study of Verbs of Doubt: HUAIYI and CAI in Mandarin. Concentrics, 28(2), 43-56.
    Liu, Mei-chun, Chiang, Ting-yi & Chou, Ming-Hui (2006). A Frame-based Approach to Polysemous Near-synonymy: The Case with Mandarin Verbs of Expression. Journal of Chinese Language and Computing, 15(3), 137-148.
    Liu, Yue-hua, Pan, Wen-yu, Gu wei (2001). Shiyong xiandai hanyu yufa (zengding ben) [Modern Chinese Gammar]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    Louw, B. (1993). Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In Baker, M., Francis, G. & Tognini-Bonelli, E. (Eds.) Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair (pp. 157-176). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    Lyons, J. (1981). Language, Meaning, and Context. London: Fontana.
    Packard, J. L. (2000). The morphology of Chinese: A linguistic and cognitive approach. Cambridge University Press.
    Partington, A. (1998). Patterns and meanings:using corpora for English language research and teaching [Vol. 2]. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    Partington, A. (2004). " Utterly content in each other`s company": Semantic prosody and semantic preference. International journal of corpus linguistics, 9(1), 131-156.
    Petruck, M. R. (1996). Frame semantics. In Verschueren, J., Ostman, J., Blommaert, J. & Bulcaen, C. (Eds.) Handbook of pragmatics (pp.1-13). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    Sardinha, T. (2000). Semantic prosodies in English and Portuguese: A contrastive study. Cuadernos de Filología Inglesa, 9(1), 93-110.
    Sinclair, J. M. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford University Press.

    Sinclair, J. M. (Ed.). (1987). Looking up: An account of the COBUILD project in lexical computing and the development of the Collins COBUILD English language dictionary. Collins Elt.
    Stubbs, M. (1995). Collocations and semantic profiles: on the cause of the trouble with quantitative studies. Functions of language, 2(1), 23-55.
    Stubbs, M. (2001). Words and Phrases. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Tsai, Mei-chi, Huang, Chu-ren & Chen, Keh-jiann (1996). You jinyici bianyi biaozhun kan yuyi, jufa zhi hudong [From near-synonyms to the interaction between syntax and semantics]. paper presented at IsCLL-5, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Xiao, R., & McEnery, T. (2006). Collocation, semantic prosody, and near synonymy: A cross-linguistic perspective. Applied linguistics, 27(1), 103-129.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    語言學研究所
    100555009
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100555009
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[語言學研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    500901.pdf1641KbAdobe PDF2766檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋