English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50799332      Online Users : 617
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/70241


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/70241


    Title: 工程承攬契約之重大變更
    Other Titles: The Cardinal Change of Construction Contract
    Authors: 黃立
    Hwang, Li Hwang
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 契約原則;變更命令;採購契約要項;國際工程師協會;土木工程標準契約條款;紅皮書;美國建築師協會;工程變更;施工變更指示;二○○六年工程定作之採購與契約規範;重大變更原則;廢棄契約原則
    Altering the content of an obligation to be based on contract;Change orders;Standard procurement contracts;Federation internationale des ingenieurs-conseils;FIDIC;Conditions of contract for works of civil engineering construction;Red book;The American institute of architects;Changes in the work;Construction change directive;German general terms of contract for works (VOB/B) 2006;Doctrine of cardinal change;Doctrine of abandonment of contract
    Date: 2010.08
    Issue Date: 2014-09-30 17:50:31 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 債法上的權利與義務，原則上只能以契約建立、變更或解除；單獨行為通常是不夠的。可是在工程承攬契約卻有所不同，為了要使工作之進行能把握時效，順利進行，當工作環境與預想不同時，必須給予定作人片面變更契約之權限。只不過此種片面變更契約權限，並非基於法律的規定，而是由於契約之約定。實務上最高法院也承認定作人片面變更契約之權限。本文從比較法角度觀察，說明此種片面變更權在範圍上應有所限制，並以我國發生的實際案例說明問題的解決方式。
    According to Art. 311, (1) of the German Civil Code: “Unless otherwise stipulated by statute, a contract between the parties is necessary in order to create an obligation by legal transaction or to alter the content of an obligation.” Though Taiwan’s Civil Law does not have a similar regulation, we still have to take the same attitude toward this issue. However, in a contract for work, we have to give the owner the right to issue Change Orders, i.e., the right to change the content of the contract without the consent of the contractor, when the working conditions are not the same as planned, in order to expedite the work. This right is based on contract terms, not on Civil Law. This article analyzes the issue of Change Orders from an international perspective and through cases having occurred in Taiwan; it elaborates the limit of Change Orders and the problem of Cardinal Changes. The author tries to find a solution to the cases which have occurred in Taiwan.
    Relation: 法學評論 , 116, 1-45
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文
    [政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    1-45.pdf719KbAdobe PDF23387View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback