English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51022959      Online Users : 924
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/68314


    Title: 社會創新的師徒傳承關係:以賴青松和黃聲遠的兩個個案為例
    Mentoring Processes in Social Innovation: Two Cases from Taiwan
    Authors: 朱思年
    Contributors: 吳靜吉
    朱思年
    Keywords: 社會創新
    師徒關係
    傳承
    social innovation
    mentoring relationship
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2014-08-06 11:57:05 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 社會創新是將舊有的智慧與新穎的點子創意結合之後,創造新的問題解決方案,經由創新執行的過程產生影響力,達到促進社會變遷的目的,是社會未來發展的重要驅動力。以社會創新為使命的社會創業家,在創新和創業的過程中都需要累積的經驗與專業知識的引導和心理社會的支持,而師徒關係(包含同儕師徒關係與反向師徒關係)的建立與維持可以提供社會創業家所需的支持與引導,擁有師徒關係協助的社會企業家,樂於承先啟後擔任年輕人的導師,因此師徒關係亦為有效培育社會創業家的方法。
    本研究嘗試回答的問題是:(1)社會創業家的社會創新來源、社會創新類型、社會影響力和其解決的未滿足社會需求為何? (2)社會創新中的師徒關係屬於何種發展網絡類型? (3)社會創新中的師徒關係具備何種師徒關係的功能?。為回答上述問題,本研究選擇擁有師徒傳承關係和社會影響力的社會創業家為研究對象,因此選擇兩組個案:穀東俱樂部創辦人賴青松和田中央聯合建築師事務所創辦人黃聲遠為研究對象,藉由文獻探討、個案訪談和參與觀察,探討賴青松和黃聲遠兩位社會創業家的社會創新和兩組師徒的師徒關係內涵。
    本研究發現穀東俱樂部的社會創新融合「風險共同分擔的委託種植」、「預約訂購」和「共同購買」的概念以及創辦人的創意,而提供新商業模式和新平台兩類型的社會創新,解決小農耕種的困境,為有志歸農者鋪設歸農道路,前後吸引超過一千五百人成為穀東,其中更吸引了年輕人學習農耕,創組宜蘭小田田計畫,並且透過社群創造社會影響力,帶來農村文化的復興。
    黃聲遠亦吸引許多年輕人加入他的團隊,每年開放實習機會給各校學生,有些人透過實習機會成為團隊成員,於2012年改制更名為田中央聯合建築師事務所。田中央的創新,融合建築設計的創意、在地特色和社會關懷,創造出一個個獲獎無數的社會創新,而田中央的組織創辦精神與運作方式也都充滿社會性目的,提供新產品、新的組織形式和新流程三種類型的社會創新。
    賴青松的師徒關係特徵符合導師來源富多樣性且關係緊密的「創業型發展網絡,在創業過程中獲得「職涯」、「心理社會」和「角色楷模」的師徒關係功能,為創業過程中的關鍵助力。宜蘭小田田可視為賴青松的徒弟,他們之間的師徒關係則兼具「傳統型發展網絡」和「創業型發展網絡」的特性。
    黃聲遠的師徒關係也符合「創業型發展網絡」的特色,從中獲得「職涯」、「心理社會」和「角色楷模」功能,帶給他深遠的影響。本研究在他的眾多學生中選擇洪于翔與劉黃謝堯為代表,黃聲遠和他們的師徒關係則符合「傳統型發展網絡」和「創業型發展網絡」的特性。賴青松和黃聲遠都擁有良師益友的同儕師徒關係與向下學習的反向師徒關係,並且他們都將自己領受到的師徒關係特性同樣的傳承給徒弟們。
    在政府推動青年返鄉創業和整個社會鼓勵社會創新的今天,這兩個個案的社會創意、創新、創業過程,以及其師徒關係值得參考學習。

    關鍵字:社會創新、師徒關係、傳承
    Society’s ability to solve its most pressing problems is largely dependent on social innovation. By combining new ideas with old methods and knowledge, the solutions and changes brought about by social innovation make it the driving force behind future development. A social entrepreneur is someone who has taken social innovation as a core mission, and this requires support in the forms of experience, professional knowledge, and psychosocial acceptance. Mentoring relationships (including peer relationships and reverse mentoring) are one source of the support and navigational guidance a social entrepreneur needs. Further, social entrepreneurs who have benefited from the assistance of a mentoring relationship tend to become mentors in turn. Thus mentoring is an effective way to train future social entrepreneurs.
    This research seeks to answer the following questions: 1) For social entrepreneurs, where do their social innovations originate? What are the typologies of social innovations? What are their impacts, and what are the social needs left unresolved?; 2) Which developmental network typology does a social innovation mentoring relationship fall under?; 3) What kinds of mentoring functions are present among social innovators? To answer these questions, this study adopts a case study method based on two social entrepreneurs who have both had significant social impact and been engaged in mentoring relationships: 1) the GuDong Club founder Qing-Song Lai, and 2) Fieldoffice Architects founder Sheng-Yung Huang. The analysis and study was informed by an extensive literature review, and data gathered via in-depth interviews and participant observation.
    Regarding the GuDong Club, this study reveals that the source of their innovation is a combination of mutual risk sharing through commissioned planting, advanced purchasing, cooperative purchasing, and the creativity of its founders. Two social innovation typologies emerged from the analysis, including a new business model and new platform. Their innovations have helped generate solutions to challenges faced by small farmers, while providing guidance to future farmers, generating a customer base of over 1500 consumers over the past decade, and encouraging young people to study and pursue agriculture. Among those is a group that founded the Yilan Xiao Tian Tian (literally “little field”) program. Using community to create social impact, the GuDong Club has helped to revive agricultural village culture.
    Sheng-Yung Huang also utilizes the power of youth, attracting many young people to join his team. Fieldoffice Architects, a name adopted in 2012, offers an annual student internship program, through which some participants eventually become full team members. Their social innovations emerge from a combination of creative architecture, local features, and social concern, and the results have garnered substantial praise and acclaim. With a strong sense of social purpose at the core of Fieldoffice Architects’ values and operations, this case provides three typologies of social innovations: new products, new processes, and new organizational forms.
    In terms of mentoring relationships, results of both case studies provide evidence for the importance of mentoring in social innovation. Lai’s mentoring relationship is built on the procurement and sharing of diverse information through strong ties, and therefore can be considered an entrepreneurial development network. This provides professional career, psychosocial, and role modeling functions. Yilan Xiao Tian Tian can be viewed as a descendent of Lai’s, whereby the mentoring relationship can be characterized as both an entrepreneurial development network and traditional development network.
    Huang’s mentoring relationships can also be characterized as being within an entrepreneurial development network, providing similar professional career, psychosocial, and role modeling functions. Selecting two of his students, Yu-Xiang Hong and Huang-Xie-Yao Liu, as representative examples, the mentoring relationships can be seen as both part of an entrepreneurial development network and traditional development networks. Overall, Lai and Huang both receive support from peer and reverse mentoring relationships, in addition to passing on their mentoring relationship characteristics on to mentees.
    With governments around the world encouraging social innovation and youth entrepreneurship, the creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurial processes revealed in these two cases, along with the characteristics of the mentoring relationships central to these social innovation processes, are worth learning from.

    Keywords: social innovation, metoring relationship
    第一章 緒論 1
    第一節 研究背景與動機 1
    第二節 研究目的與研究問題 4
    第三節 研究流程 5
    第二章 文獻檢閱 8
    第一節 社會創新 8
    第二節 師徒關係 25
    第三章 研究方法 54
    第一節 研究設計 54
    第二節 研究對象 57
    第三節 資料蒐集與分析 64
    第四章 個案介紹 66
    第一節 賴青松之師徒關係 66
    第二節 黃聲遠之師徒關係 146
    第五章 研究分析與結果 233
    第一節 穀東俱樂部之社會創新 233
    第二節 田中央之社會創新 239
    第三節 賴青松之社會創新發展因素 245
    第四節 黃聲遠之社會創新發展因素 252
    第五節 賴青松之向上向下師徒關係 257
    第六節 黃聲遠之向上向下師徒關係 265
    第七節 賴青松的兩代師徒關係功能 271
    第八節 黃聲遠的兩代師徒關係功能 278
    第六章 討論、結論與建議 287
    第一節 研究限制與討論 287
    第二節 結論 291
    第三節 建議 297
    參考文獻 301
    Reference: 英文文獻
    Alsop, R. (2014, March 12). Young mentors teach ‘old dogs’ new tricks, BBC News. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/capital/story/20140311-meet-your-mentor-hes-just-24
    Babbie, E. (2013). The basics of social research: Cengage Learning.
    Bates, S. (2012). The social innovation imperative: McGraw-Hill, New York.
    Bennis, W. (1999). The end of leadership: Exemplary leadership is impossible without full inclusion, initiatives, and cooperation of followers. Organizational Dynamics, 28(1), 71-79.
    Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010, Winter
    Winter 2010). DESIGN THINKING FOR SOCIAL INNOVATION. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 8, 31-35.
    Burt, R. S. (1993). The social structure of competition. Explorations in economic sociology, 65, 103.
    Burt, R. S., Minor, M. J., & Alba, R. D. (1983). Applied network analysis: A methodological introduction: Sage Publications Beverly Hills, CA.
    Caulier-Grice, J., Davies, A., Patrick, R., & Norman, W. (2012). Defining Social Innovation. A deliverable of the project:“The theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe”(TEPSIE), European Commission–7th Framework Programme, Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.
    Charan, R. (2007). Leaders at all levels: Deepening your talent pool to solve the succession crisis (Vol. 252): John Wiley & Sons.
    Chaudhuri, S., & Ghosh, R. (2012). Reverse Mentoring A Social Exchange Tool for Keeping the Boomers Engaged and Millennials Committed. Human resource development review, 11(1), 55-76.
    Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (2005). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies: Random House.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. HarperPerennial, New York.
    Dannar, P. (2012, June 18). MENTORSHIP as leader development Examiner.com. Retrieved from http://www.examiner.com/article/mentorship-as-leader-development
    Dees, J. G. (1998). The meaning of social entrepreneurship.
    Dees, J. G., Emerson, J., & Economy, P. (2002). Enterprising nonprofits: A toolkit for social entrepreneurs (Vol. 186): John Wiley & Sons.
    Dreher, G. F., & Ash, R. A. (1990). A comparative study of mentoring among men and women in managerial, professional, and technical positions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 539.
    Drucker, P. F. (2007). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles: Routledge.
    Dunning, D. (2000). Leadership in the Millennium. New Horizons for Learning. Web site accessed March, 3, 2000.
    Eby, L. T. d. T., Allen, T. D., Hoffman, B. J., Baranik, L. E., Sauer, J. B., Baldwin, S., . . . Evans, S. C. (2013). An interdisciplinary meta-analysis of the potential antecedents, correlates, and consequences of protégé perceptions of mentoring. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 441-476. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029279
    Florida, R. L. (2002). The rise of the creative class: and how it`s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life: Basic books.
    Frumkin, P. (2009). On being nonprofit: A conceptual and policy primer: Harvard University Press.
    Godin, S. (2008). Tribes: We need you to lead us: Penguin.
    Goodyear, M. (2006). Mentoring: A learning collaboration. Educause Quarterly, 29(4), 52.
    Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology, 1360-1380.
    Greengard, S. (2002). Moving Forward with Reverse Mentoring. Workforce, Vol. 81, No. 3.
    Higgins, M. C. (2001). Changing careers: The effects of social context. Journal of organizational behavior, 22(6), 595-618.
    Higgins, M. C., & Kram, K. E. (2001). Reconceptualizing mentoring at work: A developmental network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 264-288.
    Kahn, R. L., & Cannell, C. F. (1957). The dynamics of interviewing; theory, technique, and cases.
    Kaye, B., & Jacobson, B. (1995). Mentoring: A group guide. Training and Development, 49(4), 23-27.
    Kram, K. E. (1988). Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life: University Press of America.
    Kram, K. E. (1996). A relational approach to career development. The career is dead–Long live the career, 132-157.
    Kram, K. E., & Isabella, L. A. (1985). Mentoring alternatives: The role of peer relationships in career development. Academy of management Journal, 28(1), 110-132.
    Leadbeater, C. (1997). The rise of the social entrepreneur: Demos.
    Logan, D., King, J., & Fischer-Wright, H. (2008). Tribal leadership: Collins.
    Marcinkus Murphy, W. (2012). Reverse mentoring at work: Fostering cross‐generational learning and developing millennial leaders. Human Resource Management, 51(4), 549-573.
    Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2010). Designing qualitative research: Sage.
    Meister, J. C., & Willyerd, K. (2010). Mentoring Millennials. Harvard Business Review, 88(5), 68-72.
    Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover (Vol. 153): Academic Press New York.
    Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. innovations, 1(2), 145-162.
    Mulgan, G., & Landry, C. (1995). The other invisible hand: Remaking charity for the 21st century: Demos.
    Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali, R., & Sanders, B. (2007). Social innovation: what it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated.
    OECD. (2003). The Non-profit Sector in a Changing Economy Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264199545-en
    Patton, M. Q. (2005). Qualitative research: Wiley Online Library.
    Pratt, M. G. (1998). To be or not to be: Central questions in organizational identification: Sage Publications, Inc.
    Pullins, E. B., Fine, L. M., & Warren, W. L. (1996). Identifying peer mentors in the sales force: An exploratory investigation of willingness and ability. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(2), 125-136.
    Russell, J. E., & Adams, D. M. (1997). The changing nature of mentoring in organizations: An introduction to the special issue on mentoring in organizations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51(1), 1-14.
    Scandura, T. A. (1992). Mentorship and career mobility: An empirical investigation. Journal of organizational behavior, 13(2), 169-174.
    Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (Vol. 55): Transaction Publishers.
    Seidman, I. (2012). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences: Teachers college press.
    Shaw, E. (2004). Marketing in the social enterprise context: is it entrepreneurial? Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 7(3), 194-205.
    Sjodin, T., & Wickman, F. (1996). Mentoring: The Most Obvious Yet Overlooked Key to Achieving More in Life than You Ever Dreamed Possible: New York: McGraw Hill Trade.
    Wagner, T. (2012). Creating innovators: The making of young people who will change the world: Simon and Schuster.
    Weijman, G. (2013). Benefits and impact of mentoring for entrepreneurs: the entrepreneur`s perspective. International journal of himan resource studies, Vol.3, No.4, 194-204.
    Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods: Sage publications.
    Zey, M. G. (1984). The mentor connection: Strategic alliances in corporate life: Transaction Publishers.
    Zielinski, D. (2000). Mentoring up. Training, 37(10), 136-140.


    中文文獻
    吳芝儀、李奉儒 (譯)(2008)。質性研究與評鑑(原作者:Patton, M. Q)。嘉義市:濤石文化。(原著出版年:2002)
    李政賢 (譯)(2006)。質性研究:設計與計畫撰寫(原作者:Marshall C. & Rossman G.B.)。台北市:五南。
    李政賢 (譯)(2009)。訪談研究法(原作者:Seidman I.)。台北市:五南。
    蔡毓智、邱泯科,陳佳穎,姜馨彥 (譯)(2013)。研究方法:基礎理論與技巧 (原作者:Earl Babbie)。台北市:新加坡商聖智學習。(原著出版年: 2013)
    周海濤、李永賢、張蘅(譯)(2009)。個案研究設計與方法(原作者:Yin R. K.)。台北市:五南。(原著出版年:2003)
    吳靜吉 (2012)。青年的四個大夢。台北市:遠流。
    杜明城 (譯) (1998)。創造力 (原作者:Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi)。台北市:時報文化。
    陳以禮 (譯) (2013)。哈佛教育學院的一門青年創新課 (原作者:Tony Wagner)。台北市:時報文化。(原著出版年:2012)
    李碧芬 (譯) (1998)。成功,有師為伴 (原作者:Floyd Wickman & Teri Sjodin)。台北市:麥格羅希爾。(原著出版年:1997)
    郭恆祺 (2012)。零秒出擊!:林書豪熱血沸騰的人生演義。台北市:商周出版。
    賴青松 (2002)。從廚房看天下:日本女性「生活者運動」30年傳奇。台北市:遠流。
    賴青松 (2007)。青松e種田筆記:穀東俱樂部。台北市:心靈工坊文化。
    諶淑婷、黃世澤 (2013)。有田有木,自給自足。台北市:果力文化。
    李芳齡 (譯) (2008)。領導梯隊:全面打造各級領導人。台北市:天下雜誌。
    林文祥 (譯) (2008)。部落領導學。台北市:商智文化。
    愛荷 (譯) (2009)。部落:一呼百應的力量。台北市:先覺。
    王萬里 (1992)。師徒經驗與事業成就間關係之研究(碩士論文)。輔仁大學,台北市。
    李欣龍 (2006)。兩岸企業員工的師徒關係比較研究(博士論文)。廈門大學,廈門市。
    楊大毅 (2005)。「在地實踐」:黃聲遠在宜蘭的建築作品意涵初探(以1994-2004為例)(碩士論文)。取自台灣博碩士論文系統。
    蕭詔文(2004)。高中資優生師徒關係及其相關因素之研究~數理生、藝術生與一般生之對照(碩士論文)。政治大學,台北市。
    黃亞琪 (2013)。《看見台灣》票房破億背後兩窘境。商業周刊,1364。取自:http://www.businessweekly.com.tw/KWebArticle.aspx?ID=53072&pnumber=1

    盧智芳、沈倖如 (2003)。七年級來了!最矛盾的世代,首度進入職場。Cheers雜誌,34。取自http://new.cwk.com.tw/cgi-bin2/Libo.cgi?
    吳靜吉 (2013)。角色對換的師徒關係。今周刊,863。取自:https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article-content-80447-93232
    倪葆真 (2006)。新農業運動─漂鳥計畫。農政與農情,170。取自:http://www.coa.gov.tw/view.php?catid=11510
    鄭勝分 (2007)。社會企業的概念分析。政策研究學報,7,65-107。
    黃惠如 (2008)。賴青松、賴樹盛 做自己生命的英雄。康健雜誌,118。2014年3月25日,取自:http://www.commonhealth.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5026873&page=1
    張舒懿 (2007)。何金富 種出無得失心的人生。人生雜誌,288。2014年4月11日,取自:http://www.ddc.com.tw/epaper/C/2007/20070807.htm#03

    柯曉翔 (2012)。不只看頒獎 還要體驗宜蘭的文化活力。遠見雜誌,317,346-348。
    非常人語 (2007)。野孩子蓋房子黃聲遠。台灣壹周刊,A078。
    陳德愉 (2012)。專蓋怪怪的建物 黃聲遠形塑宜蘭新風貌。時報周刊,1778。取自:http://mag.chinatimes.com/mag-cnt.aspx?artid=13161&page=2
    吳昭怡 (2004)。讓宜蘭變成悠遊城市。天下雜誌,310,165-166。
    萬蓓琳 (2004)。城市改造:它接受建築奇想落腳 享受慢工出細活之美。今周刊,394。
    黃國治 (2008)。【案例三】東海讓我左傾─黃聲遠。台灣光華雜誌,取自:http://www.taiwanpanorama.com/tw/show_issue.php?id=200829702080c.txt&cur_page=1&table=1&distype=&h1=&h2=&search=&height=&type=&scope=&order=&keyword=&lstPage=&num=&year=2008&month=02
    羅時瑋 (2003)。建築向度04~東海建築人物思潮及作品(二)。田園城市文化。
    馬岳琳 (2009)。林懷民 V.S. 黃聲遠 大聲說出別人的夢。天下雜誌,427,230-234。
    施禔盈 (2014)。追尋30、40、50的幸福人生方程式 敢變,就有路。今周刊,893,86-95。
    楊齡媛 (2005)。宜蘭建築夢想家:黃聲遠。台灣光華雜誌,取自:http://www.taiwan-panorama.com/tw/show_issue.php?id=2005129412112c.txt&cur_page=4&table=1&distype=&h1=6YCP6KaW6LKh57aT&h2=5YWs5YWx5bu66Kit&search=&height=&type=&scope=&order=&keyword=&lstPage=&num=&year=2005&month=12
    王俊雄、王增榮、黃聲遠、郭文豐 (1998)。其實,不必所有的事情都準備妥當才可以開始的!。台灣建築報導雜誌,83,40-49。
    楊永妙 (2002)。黃聲遠 築夢宜蘭。遠見雜誌,195。取自:http://www.gvm.com.tw/Boardcontent_6749_2.html

    沈婉玉 (2014)。看見台灣做公益 3月巡迴放映。中時電子報。取自: http://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20140218005422-260401
    陳炳宏 (2014年4月14日)。諾貝爾獎尤努斯、雲門林懷民─大師對談/青年要當創造者 為新社會努力。自由時報。取自http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/paper/770383
    爆橘 (2013年12月1日)。比爾蓋茲:世界需要更多的創新革命 來改善窮困人們的生活。科技報橘。取自http://techorange.com/2013/12/01/bill-melinda-gates-foundation/
    賴秉均 (2014年6月21日)。三星鄉 率先號召農青返鄉。中時電子報。取自:http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20140621000409-260107
    嘉恆 (2007年10月31日)。台北觀摩之旅。米果電子報。取自:http://www.kskk.org.tw/OrganicFarm/epaper/epaper20071031.html

    吳淑君 (2013年8月19日)。一畝田的夢 宜蘭版農地銀行開張。聯合報。2014年4月25日,取自:http://vision.udn.com/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=1051

    吳淑君 (2013年3月8日)。老農挺小農 供地種阿公的米。聯合報。取自:http://udndata.com/library/
    吳淑君 (2013年8月6日)。老農挺小農 種出香Q阿公米。聯合報。取自:http://udndata.com/
    蔡永彬 (2013年11月10日)。青年創設農村學校 邀小朋友下田耕作。蘋果日報。取自:http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20131110/290104/
    金城 (2014年2月18日)。黃聲遠的宜蘭。21世紀經濟報導。
    王輝 (2013年10月14日)。黃聲遠:”上山下鄉”的叛逆建築師。華爾街日報中文版。取自:http://tw.wsj.com/big5/20131014/inn072054.asp
    李清志 (2010年10月4日)。建築的惑星/田中央。聯合新聞網。取自:http://mag.udn.com/mag/reading/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=274862
    劉楷南 (2009)。堅持腳踏實地在土地上創作的農夫─賴青松【新聞群組】。創意ABC。2014年4月11日,取自:http://www.ncafroc.org.tw/abc/man-content.asp?ser_no=219

    賴青松 (2013)。宜蘭小田田之農青進香團。Yahoo!奇摩新聞 Young觀點【新聞群組】。取自:https://tw.news.yahoo.com/blogs/young-opinion/%E5%AE%9C%E8%98%AD%E5%B0%8F%E7%94%B0%E7%94%B0%E4%B9%8B%E8%BE%B2%E9%9D%92%E9%80%B2%E9%A6%99%E5%9C%98-075758519.html

    李威寰 (2012)。記「宜蘭小田田」半年心路:This is the 農村!【新聞群組】。取自:http://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/15081/
    吳佳玲 (2013)。用身體感受,才能了解農民─宜蘭小田田的未來計畫【新聞群組】。取自:https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/22730/
    何欣潔 (2013)。讓田陪著我:專訪「宜蘭小田田」農事管理員吳佳玲【新聞群組】。取自:http://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/33380/
    宜蘭小田田 (2013)。尋求在地的永續之道:小田田的地理環境介紹!【新聞群組】。取自:https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/30814/
    林慧貞 (2013)。觀光客擅闖農田 農民籲尊重土地【新聞群組】。取自:http://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/38595/
    宜蘭小田田 (2013)。陳阿公與宜蘭小田田的相遇【新聞群組】取自:https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/30003/
    有田有米 (2014)。有田有米,加倍務農─2014穀東招募【新聞群組】。取自:http://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/44880/
    趙如璽 (2012)。自由激發無限 用真心打造在地宜蘭厝【新聞群組】。取自:http://www.forgemind.net/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=25687
    宜蘭縣教育支援平台 (2012年5月31日)。FP6講者介紹【部落格文字資料】。取自:http://blog.ilc.edu.tw/blog/blog/11078/post/58561/300852
    Joel FUKUZAWA (2013年1月30日)。都會逃兵卻建了幸福基地 賴青松的新農夫世代【部落格文字資料】。2014年3月19日,取自:http://news.housefun.com.tw/fukuzawa/article/10188521235
    賴青松 (2010)。青松的來時路【部落格文字資料】。取自:http://blog.roodo.com/sioong/archives/14268703.html
    賴青松 (2005)。加入穀東(2006版) 【部落格文字資料】。取自:http://blog.roodo.com/sioong/archives/1533427.html
    賴青松 (2008)。「青松米」--一個未竟的歸農故事【部落格文字資料】。取自:http://blog.roodo.com/sioong/archives/7095061.html
    賴青松 (2014)。半農興村,展望下一個十年【部落格文字資料】。取自:http://blog.roodo.com/sioong/archives/27606270.html

    Springtree (2007年1月7日)。歸農碩士‧賴青松【部落格文字資料】。取自:http://mypaper.pchome.com.tw/balimaymay/post/1277723648
    宜蘭小田田 (2012)。來去宜蘭種小田田【部落格文字資料】。取自:http://two-little-field.blogspot.tw/
    章思偉 (2012)。小田田,心農青【部落格文字資料】。取自:http://rural-practice.blogspot.tw/2012/03/blog-post_26.html

    宜蘭小田田 (2012)。小田田插秧囉【部落格文字資料】。取自:http://two-little-field.blogspot.tw/2012/03/30-2012-3250930-0945-1000-1010-1210.html

    宜蘭小田田 (2013)。除草工作坊【部落格文字資料】。取自:https://www.facebook.com/littlesweetfields/photos/a.402633843080727.101637.376487592362019/550865071590936/?type=1&ref=nf

    宜蘭小田田 (2013)。小田田通訊 (立夏) 【部落格文字資料】。取自:http://two-little-field.blogspot.tw/2013/05/blog-post.html
    宜蘭小田田 (2012)。小田田本季日程【部落格文字資料】。取自:http://two-little-field.blogspot.tw/2012/03/2011-1225-2012-0118-0218-0221-0227-0306.html
    屠乃瑋 (2012)。民意大講堂(三十五):宜蘭小田田 青年進鄉種田計畫。公共電視台。取自:http://ngoview.pts.org.tw/2012/11/blog-post_179.html
    TEDxTaipei (2011)。田中央設計群:建築和土地。取自:http://tedxtaipei.com/talks/2011-field-office/
    若水國際。關於若水。取自http://www.flow.org.tw/about/about

    社企流。關於社企流。取自http://www.seinsights.asia/about
    社會創新人才培育網。ENSIT簡介。取自http://www.ensit.tw/?page_id=798
    青年圓夢及創業網。青創貸款簡介。取自:http://sme.moeasmea.gov.tw/SME/main/loan/ARM01.PHP
    The Big Issue Taiwan官方網站。關於The Big Issue Taiwan。取自:http://www.bigissue.tw/about
    美體小舖官方網站。品牌精神。取自:http://shop.thebodyshop.com.tw/column_content.php?column_content_sn=8
    維基百科官方網站。維基百科。取自:http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%BB%B4%E5%9F%BA%E7%99%BE%E7%A7%91
    上下游News&Market。認識我們。取自:https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/aboutus/
    青年發展署 (2013年11月10日)。宜蘭小田田農村學校,青年與農村相遇。台北市:教育部。取自:http://www.edu.tw/news1/detail.aspx?Node=1088&Page=21704&Index=1&WID=55980425-7154-4860-9daf-1ea4cf169d37
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理與智慧財產研究所
    100359008
    102
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100359008
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2506View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback