政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/66444

政大典藏 > College of Social Science > Department of Political Science > Periodical Articles > Item 140.119/66444

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/66444

Title:	總理總統制與政治穩定：以烏克蘭、羅馬尼亞爲例
Other Titles:	Premier-Presidentialism and Political Stability: Comparing Romania with Ukraine
Authors:	蔡榮祥;石鵬翔 Tsai,Jung-Hsiang;Shih,Peng-Hsiang
Contributors:	政治系
Keywords:	總理總統制;政治穩定;執政聯盟;烏克蘭;羅馬尼亞 Premier-Presidentialism;Political Stability;Ruling Coalition;Romania;Ukraine
Date:	2011-03
Issue Date:	2014-06-04 11:26:50 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	比較憲政工程的傳統智慧認爲半總統制的次類型總理總統制比另一次類型總統國會制運作更爲穩定，並且援引法國或葡萄牙等總理總統制國家運作成功的個案作爲相關的佐證。然而，一些總理總統制的新興民主國家，其運作上卻出現政治不穩定的現象。本文的目的在於探究爲何這些總理總統制國家會出現不穩定的原因和模式以及透過這些反面個案(negative cases)來搜尋總理總統制成功運作的關鍵因素。過去的研究認爲在總理總統制的運作當中，國會的政黨組成情況對於政治穩定有關鍵性的影響，同時也論證如果總統黨能夠進入國會的多數執政聯盟，對於政治穩定會有正面的幫助。本文針對東歐的總理總統制國家烏克蘭、羅馬尼亞之憲政運作進行分析，探討國會的政黨組成情況對於政治穩定的影響。本文觀察兩個案例後發現，即使總統黨進入多數的執政聯盟後，還必須觀察總統黨在多數聯盟內部是否具有主導地位才能進一步判斷國會的政黨組成情況對於政治穩定的影響。如果總統黨無法在執政聯盟內部取得領導的地位，而是由總理黨取得主導地位，則總統權力可能會受到較大的制約，容易引發總統和總理之間的衝突，政治運作較爲不穩定。反之，當總統黨能主導執政聯盟，則總統權力受到制約的情況較小，總統與總理較不易發生衝突，政治運作較爲穩定。 The conventional wisdom on comparative constitutional engineering argues, on the basis of the successful experiences of France and Portugal, that the operation of premier-presidentialism (one subtype of semi-presidentialism) has been more stable than the operation of president-parliamentarism (the other subtype of semipresidentialism). However, some newly democratized countries which have chosen premier-presidentialism have witnessed political instability. This paper aims to explore why these countries have suffered from political instability and to identify the crucial factors which facilitate the democratic workability of premierpresidentialism, by way of analyzing these negative cases.Past research claims that the constellation of political parties in the parliament is the key factor affecting political stability and also suggests that if the president`s party is included in the ruling coalition, then it can substantially contribute to the political stability of premier-presidentialism. After delving into the cases of Romania and Ukraine, this paper further argues that not only do we need to observe whether the president`s party is in the coalition, but we also need to examine whether the president`s party has a dominant position in the coalition. If the prime minister`s party, rather than the president`s party, takes the helm in the coalition, presidential power and authority may be constrained, thereby leading to the clashes between the president and prime minister and sometimes to serious political instability. In contrast, when the president`s party leads the coalition, conflicts between the president and prime minister are less likely, leading to greater political stability.
Relation:	政治科學論叢,47,65-106
Data Type:	article
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Political Science] Periodical Articles

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
65-106.pdf		405Kb	Adobe PDF2	393	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...