政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/65116
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113324/144300 (79%)
造访人次 : 51151807      在线人数 : 868
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/65116


    题名: 南韓自由派政府的北韓政策:從金大中到盧武鉉-新自由主義理論之分析(1998年-2008年)
    Kim, Dae-Jung and Roh, Moo-Hyun Government`s Policy toward North Korea- From the Perspective of Neoliberalism
    作者: 洪詩涵
    贡献者: 李明
    洪詩涵
    关键词: 金大中
    盧武鉉
    北韓政策
    新自由主義
    日期: 2013
    上传时间: 2014-04-01 11:22:53 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 回顧南韓歷史,自 1948 年建國以來,南韓一直都是保守派執政。在面對國
    家分裂的處境時,保守派政府之施政方向是將北韓視為首要敵人,目的在於併吞
    北韓並且統一朝鮮半島。進入 1970 年代後,隨著美蘇和解、中國與美國關係邁
    向正常化等時代巨變,南韓政府意識到美國支持必然不復以往,必須隨之調整對
    北韓以及對共產國家的對立態度。朴正熙政府透過紅十字會終於開啟與北韓間對
    話協商,盧泰愚推動北方政策,致力與共產國家改善關係,拓展經貿往來。南北
    韓也透過紅十字會會談、總理會談開始交流。雖然兩韓互動逐漸活絡,南韓政府
    仍以併吞北韓、統一韓國為其政策思想。

    1998 年金大中當選總統,他不僅是有史以來第一位自由派的總統就任,也
    代表南韓之北韓政策出現大幅度改變。1990 年德國統一,許多問題與代價逐漸
    浮現。如收入、文化與生活型態的落差。這也使得南韓對於兩韓統一秉持較為實
    際的態度,至少在經濟方面應該先採取漸進式的整合。金大中提出「陽光政策」
    的交往政策路線,對北韓政策上帶來激烈的改變,因為它打破了半世紀以來的南
    韓對北韓的對峙狀態。陽光政策的目標是追求和平共存、緩和兩韓的緊張局勢。
    而繼任的盧武鉉政府則延續金大中的陽光政策,提出「和平與繁榮政策」,在前
    任政府的基礎上深化兩韓交往。兩任政府為期十年的北韓和解政策,扭轉了「對
    抗北韓」的政策方向,其目的皆是希望透過和平、和解與合作來改善南北韓關係,
    具有濃厚的自由主義色彩。

    本論文從新自由主義理論中的「國際制度」與「互賴」的觀點分析金大中與
    盧武鉉政府為期十年的北韓政策。金大中與盧武鉉政府著眼於兩韓共同利益,透
    過兩韓關係制度化以促進溝通與合作、降低軍事緊張;藉由經貿互賴關係之深化
    以增進互信。兩人在任內積極拓展人道、政治、軍事領域的對話;推動金剛山觀
    光、開城工業園區以及京義線鐵路等各項經濟合作計畫;更在 2000 年以及 2007
    推動兩次南北高峰會,促成兩韓領導人的直接會面。自由派政府的北韓政策將兩
    韓關係從保守推向開放、從對立邁向和解。多領域的對話機制增進南北韓的相互
    理解與互信;經濟合作計畫促進兩韓人員交流、加深兩韓經貿互賴關係,在降低
    朝鮮半島緊張情勢、減少兩韓衝突,以及促進兩韓關係的和解與合作方面,皆有
    有正面的影響。
    參考文獻: 一、中文部分
    (一)專書
    李明,南北韓政經發展與東北亞安全。台北:五南出版公司,1998年。
    孫冀,韓國的朝鮮政策。北京:中國社會科學出版社,2011年。
    高佩珊,美中強權博弈:互賴理論之分析。新竹:國立交通大學,2012年。
    張少文,韓國外交與對外關係。台北市:臺灣商務印書館,2009年。
    簡江作,韓國歷史。台北:五南出版公司,1998年。

    (二)中文期刊
    朱松柏,「南北韓的軍備競賽與區域安全」,問題與研究,第35卷第4期,1996
    年4月,頁17-27。
    朱松柏,「朝鮮半島四邊會談的構想與實際」,問題與研究,第36卷第8期,1997
    年8月),頁19-28。
    朱松柏,「南韓金大中執政之路及挑戰」,問題與研究,第37卷第4期,1998年,
    頁37-46。
    朱松柏,「南北韓新政府的統一政策及其進展」,問題與研究,第38卷第11期,
    1999年11月,頁19-30。
    朱松柏,「南北韓高峰會的意義與前景」,問題與研究,第39卷第10期,2000
    年10月,頁45-57。
    朱松柏,「兩岸交流與兩韓關係之比較」,問題與研究,第40卷第6期,2001年,
    頁1-12。
    朱松柏,「兩韓和解與東北亞新秩序」,問題與研究,第40卷第1期,2001年,
    頁1-13。
    朱松柏,「現階段南北韓統一政策之比較」,問題與研究,第41卷第5期,2002
    年,頁1-11。
    112

    朴炳光,「北韓核武問題之未來展望」,全球政治評論,第38期,2012年,頁21-24。
    吳家興,「南北韓經貿合作的發展現況及展望」,經濟研究,第2期,2002年3
    月,頁287-306。
    宋學文,「議題聯結與兩岸關係之研究」,問題與研究,第37卷第2期,1998年,
    頁21-90。
    李大中,「歐巴馬政府之東北亞政策分析」,全球政治評論,第31期,2010年,
    頁19-26。
    李庚嬉,「朴槿惠能否主導北韓核武問題?」,海峽評論,第268期,2013年,
    頁18-21。
    李明,「兩韓第二次高峰會後的東北亞局勢」,展望與探索,第5卷第11期,2007
    年11月,頁11-15。
    李明,「歐巴馬政府的朝鮮半島政策(2009-2012年)」,遠景基金會季刊,第
    14卷第2期,2013年,頁1-52。
    林文謙,「調解者與北韓核武危機」,東亞研究,第42卷第1期,2011年,頁85-126。
    林文謙和傅恆德,「失敗國家、國際衝突與信心建立措施:朝鮮半島危機之研究」,
    遠景基金會季刊,第13卷第2期,2012年,頁1-45。
    金克宜,「韓國在北方政策下的經濟活動」,經濟前瞻,第19期,1990年,頁95-98。
    河凡植,「兩韓國會交流的發展與限制(1985-2013)」,國際關係學報,第36期,
    2013年7月,頁61-104。
    徐淑敏,「互賴理論中「敏感性與脆弱性」概念應用於兩岸互動關係的操作化分
    析」,遠景基金會季刊,第5卷第4期,2004年10月,頁189-217。
    張福昌,「歐盟在朝鮮半島的安全角色:從KEDO 的功能論之」,國際關係學
    報,第30期,2010年7月,頁15-54。
    陳麒安,「新自由主義與後冷戰時期北約的存續:安全治理的觀點」,全球政治
    評論,第43期,2013年7月,頁111-134。
    紀舜傑,「韓國民主化與國家認同-美國、核武、與統一」,臺灣國際研究季刊,
    第6期第4卷,2010年,頁93-110。
    游智偉和洪銘德,「中國東北亞安全政策的本質與目的:以六方會談爲例」,東
    亞研究,第41期第1卷,2010年,頁77-117。
    楊仕樂,「中國威脅?經濟互賴與中國大陸的武力使用」,東亞研究,第35卷第
    113

    2期, 2004年7月,頁107-142。
    楊永明,「國際限武裁軍機制與規範的發展:國際關係理論與國際法規範之檢驗」,
    問題與研究,第43卷第3期,1994年,頁77-96。
    葉泉宏,「韓國金剛山旅遊的歷史淵源與現狀 」,亞洲研究,第40期,2001年9
    月,頁257-273。
    廖小娟,「中共與北韓的雙邊關係:以兩次核武危機的處理檢視」,展望與探索,
    第3卷第5期,2005年5月,頁34-47。
    廖文義,「北韓核問題與「六方會談」:回顧、分析與展望」,通識研究期刊,
    第14期,2008年12月,頁31-56。
    劉德海,「變遷中的南韓中國政策」,台灣國際研究季刊,第5卷第2期,2009
    年,頁1-35。
    劉德海,「近期東北亞安全局勢中的南韓角色」,全球政治評論,第31期,2010
    年,頁1-6。
    鄭端耀,「國際關係「新自由制度主義」理論之評析」,問題與研究,第36卷第
    12期,1997年12月,頁1-23。
    盧業中,「論國際關係理論之新自由制度主義」,問題與研究,第41卷第2期,
    2002年3月,頁43-67。
    鍾京佑,「全球治理與國際建制:行為主體與行為模式 」,國際關係學報,第
    21期,2006 年 1 月,頁113-139。

    (三)專書篇章
    宋學文,「新自由制度主義之過去、現在與未來」,收於包宗和主編,國際關係
    理論(台北:五南圖書公司,2011年),頁139-174。
    陳欣之,「新自由制度主義、社會建構主義及英國學派」,收於張亞中主編,國
    際關係總論(台北:揚智文化,2009年),頁73-116。

    (四)研討會論文
    石忠山,「當代韓國政黨政治之發展與挑戰」,發表於「瞭解當代韓國民主政治」
    學術研討會(台灣國際研究學會主辦,2010年9月17日)。
    朱立熙,「戰後南韓的民主轉型──以光州事件為分水嶺」,發表於「瞭解當代
    114

    韓國民主政治」學術研討會(台灣國際研究學會主辦,2010年9月17日)。
    李明,「信心建立措施在朝鮮半島:實踐與成效」,發表於信心建立措施(CBMs)
    與國防研討會(台北:臺灣綜合研究院戰略與國際研究所主辦,1999年6
    月)。

    (五)網站資料
    「南北韓統計資料」,南韓統一部,
    <http://www.unikorea.go.kr/index.do?menuCd=DOM_000000105006003000
    > (2013年10月20日)。
    「南北就國軍戰俘和被北綁架者問題未能縮小分歧」,朝鮮日報中文網,
    <http://chn.chosun.com/big5/site/data/html_dir/2007/04/13/20070413000017.
    html> (2007年4月13日)。
    「聯合國大會決議 A/RES/112(II),朝鮮獨立問題」,聯合國網站,
    <http://www.un.org/zh/focus/korea/112.shtml>
    「跨越38度線 兩韓鐵路貨運下月開通」,自由時報,
    <http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2007/new/nov/17/today-int3.htm> (2007年
    12月17日)。
    「北韓軍方宣佈7項措施回應南韓對朝制裁」,人民網,
    <http://big5.china.com.cn/international/txt/2010-05/27/content_20129954.htm
    > (2010年5月27日)。
    「朝威脅關閉開城工業區將自食其果」,朝鮮日報,
    <http://cn.chosun.com/big5/site/data/html_dir/2013/02/08/20130208000015.ht
    ml> (2013年2月8日)。
    「朝鮮有意重啟金剛山旅遊區」,
    http://news.sina.com.tw/article/20130819/10441387.html> (2013年8月19
    日)。
    李明,「南北韓爆發黃海軍事衝突與影響」,海峽評論,
    <http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/241-8051.html> (2010年12月19日)。
    馬仲可,「兩韓高峰會專輯:平壤「通美封韓」政策轉向」,中時電子報,
    <http://forums.chinatimes.com.tw/report/korea/diplomacy/89041404.htm>
    (2000年4月14日)。
    閻紀宇,「都羅山車站 兩韓希望之地」,中國時報,
    115

    <http://forums.chinatimes.com/report/bush/02022102.htm> (2002年2月21
    日)。

    二、英文部分
    (一)專書
    Bedeski, Robert E. The transformation of South Korea: Reform and Reconstruction in
    the Sixth Republic under Roh Tae Woo, 1987-1992. London: Routledge, 1994.
    Crescenzi, Mark. Economic Interdependence and Conflict in World Politics. Lanham:
    Lexington Book, 2005.
    Pollins, Brian and Edward D. Mansfield. eds. Economic Interdependence and
    International Conflict: New Perspectives on an Enduring Debate. Michigan:
    University of Michigan Press, 2003.
    Doyle, Michael. Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism, and Socialism. New
    York: W. W. Norton &Company, 1997.
    Huh, Moon-Young. North Korea`s Negotiation Behavior toward South Korea:
    Continuities and Changes in the Post Inter-Korean Summit Era. Seoul: Korea
    Institute for National Unification, 2006.
    Huntington, Samuel P. The Solder and the State. Cambridge, Massachusetts: the
    Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1957.
    Keohane, Robert. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political
    Economy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press 1984.
    Kim, Byoung-Lo Philo. Two Koreas in Development. New Brunswick: Transaction
    Publishers, 1992.
    Kim, Hak-Joon. The Unification Policy of South Korea and North Korea: A
    Comparative Study, 1948-1976. Seoul: Seoul University, 1977.
    Koh, Byung-Chul. The Foreign Policy Systems of North and South Korea (United
    States of America: University of California Press, 1984.
    Lew, Young-Ick. Brief History of Korea- A Bird`s Eyeview. New York: The Korean
    Society, 2000.
    Noland, Marcus and Stephan Haggard. Engaging North Korea: The Role of Economic
    116

    Statecraft. Hawaii: East-West Center, 2010.
    Nye, Joseph S and Rober O. Keohane. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in
    Transition. Boston: Little Brown, 1977.
    Young, Oran. International Cooperation: Building Regimes for Natural Resources
    and the Environment. London: Cornell University Press, 1989.
    Roehrig, Terence. Korean Dispute over the Northern Limit Line: Security, Economics,
    or International Law. Baltimore: University of Maryland School of Law,
    2008.
    Tromp, Hylke and James N. Rosenau. Interdependence and Conflict in World Politics.
    England: Avebury, 1989.
    Seth, Michael. A History of Korea: From Antiquity to the Present. Lanham: Rowman
    & Littlefield, 2011.

    (二)期刊
    Bae, Jong-Yun. “South Korean Strategic Thinking toward North Korea: The
    Evolution of the Engagement Policy and Its Impact upon U.S.-ROK Relations.”
    Asian Survey, vol. 50, no. 2, 2010, pp. 335-355.
    Beck, Peter. “Beyond Balancing: Economic Cooperation on the Korean Peninsula.”
    International Journal of Korean Unification Studies, vol. 8, 1999, pp. 95-117.
    Blank, Stephen. “Rethinking the Six Party Process on Korea.” International Journal
    of Korean Unification Studies, vol. 20, no. 1, 2011, pp. 88-123.
    Cha, Victor D. “Politics and Policy in the New Korean State: From Roh Tae-Woo to
    Kim Young-Sam.” The Journal of Asian Studies, vol. 55, no. 2, 1996, p. 474.
    Chae, Kyung-Suk. “The Future of the Sunshine Policy: Strategies for Survival.” East
    Asian Review, vol. 14, no. 4, 2002, pp. 3-17.
    Chun, Simone B. “In Search of a Perpetual Peace in the Korean Peninsula.” Korea
    Observer, vol. 39, no. 4, winter 2008, pp. 657-674.
    Chung, Chien-Peng. “Democratization in South Korea and Inter-Korean Relations.”
    Pacific Affairs, vol. 76, no. 1, 2003, pp. 9-35.
    Copeland, Dale C. “Economic Interdependence and War: A Theory of Trade
    Expectations.” International Security, vol. 20, no. 4, 1996, pp. 5-41.
    117

    Feffer, John. “North Korea and the Politics of Engagement.” Peace Review, vol. 11,
    no. 3, 1999, pp. 415-422.
    Foley, James A. “&quot;Sunshine&quot; or Showers for Korea`s Divided Families.” World
    Affairs, vol. 165, no. 4, 2003, pp. 179-184.
    Greenberg, Jonathan. “Divided Lands, Phantom Limbs: Partition in the Indian
    Subcontinent, Palestine, China, and Korea,” Journal of International Affairs,
    vol. 57, no. 2, 2004, pp. 7-27.
    Gurtov, Mel. “South Korea`s Foreign Policy and Future Security: Implications of the
    Nuclear Standoff.” Pacific Affairs, vol. 69, no. 1, 1996, pp. 8-31.
    Hahm, Sung-Deuk and Dong Seong Lee. “Leadership Qualities and Political Contexts:
    Evaluation of the Roh Moo-Hyun Administration in South Korea, 2003-2008.”
    Korea Observer, vol. 39, no. 2, 2008, pp. 181-213.
    Halloran, Richard. “The Two Koreas: A Contemporary History: Korea`s Place in the
    Sun: A Modern History.” Parameters, vol. 27, no. 4, 1997, pp. 177-180.
    Han, Sung-Joo. “South Korea`s Policy Options in a Changing World.” The Korean
    Journal of National Unification, vol. 1, 1992, pp. 9-25.
    Heiskanen, Markku. “The Roh Administration`s Peace and Prosperity Policy and
    International Cooperation: The Eurasian Dimension, Catalyst for the Korean
    Renunciation Process.” International Journal of Korean Unification Studies,
    vol. 12, no. 1, 2003, pp. 1-28.
    Hong, Yong-Pyo. “North Korea`s Strategic Culture and Threat Perception:
    Implications for Regional Security Cooperation.” Korea Observer, vol. 24,
    2011, pp. 95-114.
    Izumikawa, Yasuhiro. “South Korea`s Nordpolitik and the Efficacy of Asymmetric
    Positive Sanctions.” Korea Observer, vol. 37, no. 4, 2006, pp. 605-641.
    Jervis, Robert. “Cooperation under the Security Dilemma.” World Politics, vol. 30, no.
    2, 1978, pp. 167-214.
    Jervis, Robert. “From Balance to Concert: A Study of International Security
    Cooperation.” World Politics, vol. 38, no. 1, 1985, pp. 58-79.
    Jervis, Robert. “Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate.”
    International Security, vol. 24, no. 1, 1999, pp. 42-63.
    Joo, Seung-Ho and Euikon Kim. “Beyond the &quot;Sunshine&quot; and &quot;Mutual Benefits and
    118

    Common Prosperity&quot; Policies: GRIT as the Viable Alternative.” Korea
    Observer, vol. 42, no. 2, 2011, pp. 255-280.
    Kamiya, Fuji. “The Korean Peninsula after Park Chung Hee.” Asian Survey, vol. 20,
    no. 7, 1980, pp. 744-753.
    Kang, David. “Between Balancing and Bandwagoning: South Korea`s Response to
    China.” Journal of East Asian Studies, vol. 9, no. 1, 2009, pp. 1-28..
    Kastner, Scott L and Miles Kahler. “Strategic Uses of Economic Interdependence:
    Engagement Policies on the Korean Peninsula and Across the Taiwan Strait.”
    Journal of Peace Research, vol. 43, no. 5, 2006, pp. 523-541.
    Keohane, Robert and Robert Axelrod. “Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy:
    Strategies and Institutions.” World Politics, vol. 38, no. 1, 1985, pp. 226-254.
    Keohane, Robert. “The Demand for International Regimes.” International
    Organization, vol. 36, no. 2, 1982, pp. 325-355.
    Kihl, Young-Whan. “Unification Policies and Strategies of North and South Korea.”
    International Journal of Korean Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, 1997, pp. 231-244.
    Kihl, Young Whan. “Towards Korean Reconciliation: Socio-Cultural Exchanges and
    Cooperation.” Pacific Affairs, vol. 81, no. 3, 2008, pp. 481-483.
    Kil, Jeong-Woo. “Building Peace on the Korean Peninsula: In Search of a
    Multi-Dimensional Approach.” The Korean Journal of National Unification,
    vol. 1, 1992, pp. 45-62.
    Kil, Jeong-Woo. “The Kim Young Sam Government`s Unification Policy Phase Two.”
    Korea and World Affairs, vol. 18, no. 3, 1994, pp. 473-485.
    Kim, Choong-Nam. “The Roh Moo Hyun Government`s Policy Toward North Korea.”
    East-West Center Working Papers, vol. 11, 2005.
    Kim, Choong Nam. “The Sunshine Policy and Its Impact on South Korea`s Relations
    with Major Powers.” Korean Observer, vol. 35, no. 4, 2004, pp. 581-616.
    Kim, Choong Nam. “Leadership for Nation Building: the Case of Korean Presidents.”
    International Journal of Korean Studies, vol. XI, no. 1, 2007, pp. 113-143.
    Kim, Kyu-Ryoon. “Establishment of the South-North Economic Community: A South
    Korean Perspective.” International Journal of Korean Unification Studies, vol.
    9, no. 1, 2000, pp. 71-96.
    119

    Kim, Tae-Ho. “The View from South Korea.” Joint US-Korea Academic Studies, vol.
    23, 2012, pp. 113-126.
    Kim, Yongho. “The Kim Young Sam Government`s North Korea Policy and its
    Domestic Variants.” International Journal of Korean Unification Studies, vol.
    8, 1999, pp. 225-245.
    Kim, Young-Geun. “Reciprocity in South Korean Security Policy Vis-à-vis North
    Korea and the United States.” Asian Perspective, vol. 37, no. 2, 2013, pp.
    183-208.
    Kim, Young-Ho. “The Sunshine Policy and its Aftermath.” Korea Observer, vol. 34,
    no. 4, Winter 2003, pp. 691-706.
    Kim, Yun-Tae. “Neoliberalism and the Decline of the Developmental State.” Journal
    of Contemporary Asia, vol. 29, no. 4, 1999, pp. 441-461.
    Kirk, Donald. “The Death of the Sunshine Policy.” Far Eastern Economic Review,
    vol. 172, no. 5, 2009, pp. 33-36.
    Koh, Yu-Hwan. “Two Years of the Roh Moo-Hyun Administration`s North Korea
    Policy.”
    세종정책연구
    , vol. 1, no. 2, 2005, pp. 201-219.
    Kim, Kook-Shin. “The Kim Dae-jung Government and Inter-Korean Exchanges and
    Cooperation.” The Korean Journal of National Unification, vol. 7, 1998, pp.
    7-24.
    Krasner, Stephen. “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as
    Intervening Variables in International Regimes.” International Organization,
    vol. 36, no. 2, 1982, pp. 185-205.
    Ku, Yangmo. “International Reconciliation in the Postwar Era, 1945-2005: A
    Comparative Study of Japan- ROK and Franco-German Relations.” Asian
    Perspective, vol. 32, no. 3, 2008, pp. 5-37.
    Kurt, Ü mit. “Europe of Monnet, Schumann and Mitrany: A Historical Glance to the
    EU from the Functionalist Perspective.” European Journal of Economic and
    Political Studies, vol. 2, no. 2, 2009, pp. 41-60.
    Lipson, Charles. “International Cooperation in Economic and Security Affairs.”
    World Politics, vol. 37, no. 1, 1984, pp. 1-23.
    Milner, Helen. “International Theories of Cooperation among Nations: Strengths and
    Weaknesses,” World Politics, vol. 44, no. 3, 1991, pp. 466-496
    120

    Moon, Chung-In. “Diplomacy of Defiance and Facilitation: the Six Party Talks and
    The Roh Moo Hyun Government.” Asian Perspective, vol. 32, no. 4, 2008, pp.
    71-105.
    Nye, Joseph and Robert Keohane. “Transgovernmental Relations and International
    Organizations.” World Politics, vol. 27, no. 1, 1974, pp. 39-62.
    Oye, Kenneth A. “Explaining Cooperation under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies.”
    World Politics, vol. 38, no. 1, 1985, pp. 1-24.
    Powell, Robert. “Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations Theory.” The
    American Political Science Review, vol. 85, no. 4, 1991, pp. 1303-1320.
    Roehrig, Terence. “Creating the Conditions for Peace in Korea: Promoting
    Incremental Change in North Korea.” Korea Observer, vol. 40, no. 1, 2009, pp.
    201-232.
    Ruggie, John. “International Responses to Technology: Concepts and Trends.”
    International Organization, vol. 29, no. 3, 1975, pp. 557-583.
    Seliger, Bernhard. “Regional Integration in the East Asia and Perspectives for
    Economic Transformation in North Korea-Lesson from Europe.” The Journal
    of Korean Unification Studies, vol. 12, no. 1, 2003, pp. 139-164.
    Sigal, Leon. “Hand in Hand for Korea: A Peace Progress and Denuclearization.”
    Asian Perspective, vol. 32, no. 2, 2008, pp. 5-19.
    Simmons, Beth and Stephan Haggard. “Theories of International Regimes.”
    International Organization, vol. 41, no. 3, 1987, pp. 491-517.
    Smith, Hazel. “How South Korean Means Support North Korean Ends: Crossed
    Purposes in Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation.” International Journal of
    Korean Unification Studies, vol. 14, no. 2, 2005, pp. 21-51.
    Snidal, Duncan. “Relative Gains and the Pattern of International Cooperation.” The
    American Political Science Review, vol. 85, no. 3, 1991, pp. 701-726.
    Stein, Arthur. “Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in an Anarchic World.”
    International Organization, vol. 36, no. 2, 1982, pp. 299-324.
    Steinberg, David and Myung Shin. “Tensions in South Korean Political Parties in
    Transition: From Entourage to Ideology.” Asian Survey, vol. 46, no. 4, 2006,
    pp. 517-537.
    Ko, Sung-Bin. “South Korea`s Search for an Independent Foreign Policy.” Journal of
    121

    Contemporary Asia, vol. 36, no. 2, 2006, pp. 258-273.
    Yang, Dae-Kyu and Moon-Soo Yoon. “Inter- Korean Economic Cooperation for
    North Korean Development: Future Challenges and Prospects.” Asian
    Perspective, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 5-30.
    Yoon, Tae-Ryong. “Learning to Cooperate not to Cooperate: Bargaining for the 1965
    Korea-Japan Normalization.” Asian Perspective, vol. 32, no. 2, 2008, pp.
    59-91.
    Young, Oran. “International Regimes: Toward a New Theory of Institutions.” World
    Politics, vol. 39, no. 1, 1986, pp. 104-122.
    Zhu, Feng. “Flawed Mediation and a Compelling Mission: Chinese Diplomacy in the
    Six-Party Talks to Denuclearize North Korea.” East Asia: An International
    Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 3, 2011, pp. 191-218.
    Zhu, Zhiqun. “Small Power, Big Ambition: South Korea`s Role in Northeast Asian
    Security under President Roh Moo-Hyun.” Asian Affairs, vol. 34, no. 2, 2007,
    pp. 67-86.

    (三)官方出版刊物
    Five Years of the Kim Dae-Jung Administration (Seoul: Ministry of Unification
    Republic of Korea, 2003).
    White paper on Korean Unification 2010 (Seoul: Ministry of Unification,
    Republication of Korea, 2010).
    Peace and Cooperation: White Paper on Korean Unification 1996 (Seoul: Ministry of
    National Unification, Republic of Korea, 1996).
    Peace and prosperity: the White Paper on Korean Unification 2005 (Seoul Ministry
    of Unification, Republication of Korea, 2005).

    (四)網站資料
    “Establishment of Military Trust in South-North Relations,” Ministry of National
    Defense Republic of Korea,
    <http://www.mnd.go.kr/mbshome/mbs/mnd_eng/subview.jsp?id=mnd_eng_0
    20200000000> (December 13, 2013).
    122

    “Joint Statement of the Fourth Round of the Six-Party Talks,” U.S. Department of
    State, http://www.state.gov/p/eap/regional/c15455.htm (2005).
    “North Korean test missile flies over Japan into Pacific,” CNN,
    <http://edition.cnn.com/WORLD/asiapcf/9808/31/nkorea.missile.02/>
    (August 31, 1998).
    “White Paper on Korean Unification 2001,” Ministry of Unification, Republication of
    Korea,
    <http://eng.unikorea.go.kr/CmsWeb/viewPage.req?idx=PG0000000538>
    Herman, Luke and Jason Kim. “War and Peace in the East Sea: Reducing Tension
    Along the Northern Limit Line ” Pacific Forum CSIS,
    <http://csis.org/program/pacific-forum-csis> (December, 2012).
    Rousseau, David L. “The Perception of Gains from Cooperation in International
    Relations: Comparing Japanese and American Responses,”
    <http://www.albany.edu/~dr967231/papers/Japan2.PDF> (August, 1999).
    The Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization,
    <http://www.kedo.org/index.asp> (August, 2013).
    Yun, Sarah, “SAIS U.S.-Korea Yearbook 2009- Kaesong Industrial Complex: Is It
    Changing the DPRK? ,” U.S.-Korea Institute at SAIS,
    http://uskoreainstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/2009_Yearbook_Yun.
    pdf (2009).

    三、韓文部分
    (一)專書
    大韓民國統一部,盧武鉉政府的和平繁榮政策(首爾:大韓民國統一部,2003年)。
    李元炯,韓國外交의戰略 – 盧武鉉政權의國家戰略(首爾:傳英社,2003年)。
    洪淳鎬,韓國國際關係史理論(首爾:大旺社,1993年)。
    이상우,북한정치:신정체제의 진화와 작동원리(서울:나남,2008年)。
    통일부통일연구원,2012통일문제이해(통일부통일연구원,2012年)。
    북한대학원, 경남대학교,남북한 관계론(서울:한울아카데미,2005年)。

    123


    (二)網站資料
    「북한의주요통계지표」,대한민국통계청,<http://kosis.kr/bukhan/> (2014年1
    月6日)。
    「납북자·국군포로문제」,南韓統一部,<http://www.uniedu.go.kr/uniedu/BbsA
    rticleHome.do?articleDTO.bbsCd=NSREL&articleDTO.searchValue=&articl
    eDTO.searchKey=title&cmd=readArticle&curPage=4&articleDTO.atclSn=16
    226> (2010年1月6日)。
    「2013 북한의 주요통계지표」,국가통계포털
    <http://kosis.kr/ups/ups_01List01.jsp?grp_no=1001&pubcode=IF&type=F>
    (2014年1月8日)。
    「제2차 북남인민무력부장급회담이
    끝났다」,조선통신,<http://www.kcna.co.jp/index-k.htm>
    (2007年11月30日)。
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    外交研究所
    99253013
    102
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0992530131
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[外交學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    013101.pdf2347KbAdobe PDF2341检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈