政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/58899

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/58899

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113392/144379 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51211087 線上人數 : 891

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 外國語文學院 > 語言學研究所 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/58899

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/58899

題名:	語言與手勢之溝通動態性 Communicative Dynamism in Language and Co-speech Gesture
作者:	楊婉君 Yang, Wan Chun
貢獻者:	徐嘉慧 Chui, Kawai 楊婉君 Yang, Wan Chun
關鍵詞:	溝通動態手勢手勢特徵資訊狀態主題連續性 communicative dynamism co-speech gesture gestural features information status topic continuity
日期:	2012
上傳時間:	2013-07-22 10:01:38 (UTC+8)
摘要:	本研究探討溝通動態與手勢之關係。本研究相較於過去的研究提供了中文口語語料的量化結果，除了檢視語言上的溝通動態值與手勢出現、手勢類型的關係以外，並加入手勢特徵進而檢視。語言上的溝通動態值分別以「資訊狀態」與「主題連續性」來決定溝通動態值之高低，並且將手勢所伴隨的語詞依詞性分開分為名詞與動詞，檢視是否手勢上會依循語碼原則（the coding principle）：當溝通動態值越高，所使用的代碼材料便越多；當溝通動態值越低，所使用的代碼材料越少。結果發現，以決定溝通動態值的標準來看，資訊狀態較主題連續性更能依語碼原則反應溝通動態值。原因是因為資訊狀態反應訊息的新舊差異性，而主題連續性反應的是舊訊息當中的不同的「舊」的程度差異，因此前者較能反應溝通動態與手勢之關係；而以手勢伴隨的語詞而言，動詞較名詞更能依語碼原則反應溝通動態值。因為動詞相較於名詞而言，在語言上無完整的語碼系統以反應溝通動態值之高低，因此倚賴手勢出現與手勢特徵來反應語言上的溝通動態值之高低。 The study investigates the correlation between communicative dynamism (CD) and gesture. Different from the previous studies, the present study provides quantitative analysis based on Chinese conversational data. The study examines the correlation between CD in language and the occurence of gestures, gestural types and gestural features. The various degrees of CD are deteremined by two separate criteria, namely “information status” and “topic continuity”. Morover, the study also distinguishes between the nominal affiliates of gesture and the verbal counterparts. The study found that gestures occur at the two extremities of CD. Gestures tend to co-occur with linguistic elements bearing the highest or the lowest CD. In addition, based on the criterion of “information status”, stroke duration and handedness were found to reflect the various degrees of CD. On the other hand, based on the criterion of “topic continuity”, all gestural features including stroke duration, gestural space, handedness and stroke frequency have no correlation with CD.
參考文獻:	中文書目李曉婷（2008）。Firbas的動態交際理論評述。語言學研究，6：33-39。封宗信（2001）。Theories and Schools of Modern Linguistics。載於胡壯麟（主編），語言學教程（392—459頁）。北京：北京大學出版社。錢軍（1996）。布拉格學派近況與現狀。國外語言學，4：11-21。錢軍（1995）。捷克語言學家Jan Firbas。國外語言學，4：36-39。胡壯麟（1991）。功能主義縱橫談。外國語，3：3-10。英文書目 Chafe, W. L. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: the flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Chafe, W. L. (1987). Cognitive constraints on information flow. In R.S. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and Grounding in discourse, 21-52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Chafe, W.L. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Li, E. N. (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp.25-55). New York: Academic. Chui, Kawai and Lai, Huei-ling. (2009). The NCCU Corpus of Spoken Chinese, Hakka, and Southern Min. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 6.2:119-144. Chui, Kawai. (2003). Is the correlation between grounding and transitivity universal? Studies in Language 27(2):221-244. Chui, Kawai. (2002). Categorization of gestures in communication. In Lily I-wen Su, Chinfa Lien, and Kawai Chui (eds.), Form and function: Linguistic studies in honor of Shuanfan Huang, 105-129. Taipei: Crane Publishing. Chui, Kawai. (2001). Topic Chain and Grounding in Chinese Discourse. Taipei: Crane Publishing. Danes̆, Frantis̆ek. (1974). Functional Sentence Perspective and the Organization of the Text. In Danes̆, F. (Ed.) Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective. Prague : Academia. Firbas, Jan. (1999). Communicative Dynamism. In Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert & Christ Bulcaen (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publ. Co. Firbas, Jan. (1992). Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Firbas, Jan. (1987). On the delimitation of the theme in functional sentence perspective. In Driven, Ren and Vilem Fried. (Eds.) Functionalism in Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Firbas, Jan. (1986). On the dynamics of written communication in the light of theory of functional sentence perspective. In Cooper, C. & Greenbaum (Eds.) Studying writing: Linguistic approaches (1): 40-71. Brouly Hills: Sage Publications. Firbas, Jan. (1974). Some Aspects of the Czechoslovak Approach to Problems of Functional Sentence Perspective. In Danes̆, F. (Ed.) Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective. Prague : Academia. Firbas, Jan (1959). Thoughts on the Communicative Function of the verb in English, German and Czech. Brno Studies in English. 1: 39-65. Firbas, Jan. (1961). On the Communicative Function of the Verb in English. Brno Studies in English. 3: 79-102. Ekman, P. & Friensen, W. (1969). The Repertoire of Nonverbal Behavior: Categories, Origins, Usage and Coding. Semiotica, 1(1):49-98. Givón, T. (1990). Syntax: a functional-typological introduction. Vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Givón, T. (1985). Iconicity, isomorphism and non-arbitrary coding in syntax. In Haiman, J. (Ed.), Iconicity in Syntax. 187-219. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Givón, T. (ed.) 1983. Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study, vol.3 of Typological Studies in Language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Givón, T. (1979). On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press. Givón, T. (1976). Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement. In Li (Ed.) Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press. Halliday, M.A.K. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold. Kendon, Adam. (2004). Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kendon, A. (1988). Sign Languages of Aboriginal Australia: Cultural, Semiotic and Communicative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Krauss, R.M. (1998). Why do we gesture when we speak? Current Directions in Psychological Science 7 (2): 55-60. Lan, Li-mei. (2008). Thematic Progression and Cohesive Devices: An Approach to English Reading. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan. LaPolla, R. J. (1995). Pragmatic relations in word order in Chinese. In Dowing P. & Noonan M. (Eds.), Word Order in Discourse, 297-329. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. LaPolla, R. J. (1993). Arguments against ‘Subject’ and ‘Direct Object’ as Viable Concepts in Chinese. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philosophy, 63: 759-813. Levinson, S. C. (2006). Cognition at the heart of human interaction. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 85-93. doi:10.1177/1461445606059557. Levy, E.T. & McNeill, D. (1992). Speech, Gesture, and Discourse. Discourse Processes, 15: 277-301. Mathesius, V. (1939). O tak zvanem aktualnim cleneni vetnem. [On the so-called functional sentence perspective]. Slovo a Slovestnost, 5: 234-242. McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and Thought. Chicago: Chicago University Press. McNeill, D; Levy, E.T. & Pedelty, L.L. (1998) Gestures and speech. In Hammond, G.R., Advances in psychology: Cerebral control of speech and limb movements, 203-256. Amsterdam: Elsevier/ North Holland Publishers. McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: the University of Chicago Press. Prince, E.F. (1992). Subjects, definiteness, and information-status. In Mann, W.C. & Thompson, S.A., (Eds), Discourse description: diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text, 295-326. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Prince, E.F. (1986). On the syntactic marking of presupposed open propositions. In A. Farley et al., (Eds), Papers from the parasession on pragmatics and grammatical theory at the 22nd regional meeting. CLS, 208-222. Prince, E. F. (1981). Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Cole, P. (eds), Radical pragmatics, 223-255. New York: Academic Press. Sgall, Petr. (1995). Functional Sentence Perspective. In Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman & Jan Blommaert(eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publ. Co. Sloetjes, H., & Wittenburg, P. (2008). Annotation by category - ELAN and ISO DCR. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008). Stephens, D. (1983). Hemispheric language dominance and gesture hand preference. Ph.D. dissertation., Department of Behavioral Sciences, University of Chicago. Svoboda, Ales̆. (1974). On Two Communicative Dynamisms. In Danes̆, F. (Ed.) Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective. Prague : Academia. Taylor, A. and S. Pintzuk. (to appear). The Effect of Information Structure on Object Position in the History of English, to appear in Los, B., Lopez-Couso, M.J. and Meurman-Solin, A. (eds.), Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English , (Oxford Studies in the History of English, Vol.1). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Thompson, S. A. & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2005). The clause as a locus of grammar and interaction. Discourse Studies. 7 (4-5): 481-505. Tsao, Feng-Fu. (1979). A functional study of topic in Chinese: the first step toward discourse analysis. Taipei: Student Book Company. Van Valin Jr, R.D. and LaPolla R.J. (1997). Syntax. Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
描述:	碩士國立政治大學語言學研究所 99555003 101
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0995550032
資料類型:	thesis
顯示於類別:	[語言學研究所] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	描述	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
003201.pdf		1402Kb	Adobe PDF2	679	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋