政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/58771

政大典藏 > College of Commerce > Department of Accounting > Theses > Item 140.119/58771

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/58771

Title:	吹哨者保護制度對外部審計影響之賽局分析 The effect of Whistleblower protection system on external auditors using game theoretic analysis
Authors:	林邑軒 Lin, I Hsuan
Contributors:	邱士宗戚務君林邑軒 Lin, I Hsuan
Keywords:	吹哨行為吹哨者保護制度外部審計賽局理論 Whistlebolwing Whistleblower protection system External auditors Game theory
Date:	2012
Issue Date:	2013-07-11 16:26:47 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本研究探討吹哨者保護制度對公司、員工與會計師產生之影響。模型結果顯示，完善的吹哨者保護制度可以提升員工的吹哨意願，進而使公司傾向誠實表達；完善的吹哨者保護制度可能增加或減少會計師的審計成本，會計師若預期公司因員工吹哨意願提高而傾向誠實表達，可降低審計成本，惟公司若不實表達且會計師並未經由查核發現時，會因為員工吹哨而產生商譽等重大損失。因此會計師於不同資本規模、客戶數量、事務所文化、員工素質等狀況下，會產生相異之審計成本變化。 This study discusses the effect of Whistleblower protection system on firms, employees, and external auditors. Results of the models show that, a perfect Whistleblower protection system can motivate employees to blow the whistle and thus make the firm present honestly. A perfect Whistleblower protection system may increase or decrease external auditors’ audit costs. External auditors may decrease audit costs if they expect the firm will present honestly due to the enthusiasm of employees to blow the whistle, while external auditors may increase audit costs if they can’t afford the loss of goodwill when they couldn’t find the misstatement and the employee blowed the whistle. Therefore, external auditors have different changes in audit costs under different conditions, such as capital scale, number of clients, office culture and staff quality.
Reference:	一、國內文獻王松柏，2010，英國法律對於勞工揭露工作所得資訊的規範，玄奘法律學報。汪聖芬，1995，舉發行為理論探究與個案分析，東海大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。周原，2011，請別叫我「爪耙子」：台灣吹哨者的故事，台灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文。林良榮，2010，論企業內部告發(揭發)之勞工保護-以日本「公益通報者保護法」為中心，公益揭發(揭弊)保護學術與實務研討會論文集。林雅如，2008，內部稽核人員舉發行為之研究：不當行為者地位與個人文化信念影響之探討，彰化師範大學會計學系碩士論文。林意玟，2011，我國公司治理與吹哨者保護，交通大學科技法律研究所碩士論文。徐念慈，2011，公務員揭弊行為與洩密罪責之衝突與調和─國家實驗研究院國家太空中心案例分析，台灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文。陳一銘，2007，內部人通報機制之建構與公司治理-以勞工通報為中心，台北大學法學系碩士論文。陳一銘與李智仁，2008，公司治理與公益通報者保護法制，萬國法律。陳文智，2007，試論「吹哨者保護法制」之引進，全國律師。張清浩，2010，從國內勞動法案例看公益揭發保護實務，公益揭發(揭弊)保護學術與實務研討會論文集。張維迎，2001，賽局理論與信息經濟學，茂昌圖書有限公司。黃宏森，2007，弊端揭發行為的因素與影響：以能力分班、檢察一體、生技園區開發案為例，中正大學政治學系博士論文。黃銘傑，2005，組織內部不法資訊揭露法制之研究，行政院研考會研究計畫。楊戊龍，2008，英國公益揭發法概述，人事行政。簡玉聰，2010，日本行政與內部通報相關法律問題研討：以公益通報者保護制度為中心，公益揭發(揭弊)保護學術與實務研討會論文集。二、國外文獻 Bowie N. 1983. Business Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, N. J. : Prentice-Hall: 143. Elliston, F. A. 1982. Civil disobedience and whistleblowing: A comparative appraisal of two forms of dissent. Journal of Business Ethics, 1(1): 23-28. Hirschman A. O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States. Cambridge. Mass: Harvard University Press: 15-16. Miceli, M. P. and Near, J. P. 1984. The relationships among beliefs, organizational position and whistle-blowing status: A discriminate analysis, Academy of Management Journal 27: 687-705. Miceli, M. P. and Near, J. P. 1985. Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing. Journal of Business Ethics:1-16. Miceli, M. P. and Near, J. P. 1992. Blowing the Whistle：The Organization and Legal Implication for Companies and Employees. New York: Lexington Books:33;137. Rowe M. P. 1988. Organizational response to assessed risk: complaint chamels, Boston：Professional Program Session Recoral, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Watson J. 2008. Strategy: An Introduction to Game Theory. W.W.Norton & Company.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學會計研究所 100353032 101
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100353032
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Accounting] Theses

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

社群 sharing

Loading...