English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50929654      Online Users : 934
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/56204


    Title: 歐盟與東協的比較：一個多面向的研究
    Other Titles: Comparative Analysis of EU and Asean: A Multidimentional Research
    Authors: 湯紹成
    Contributors: 行政院國家科學委員會
    政治大學國際關係研究中心
    Keywords: 歐洲聯盟;東南亞國家協會;比較分析;歐盟與東協雙邊關係;價值與認知
    European Union ASEAN comparative analysis EU-ASEAN bilateral relations value and perception
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2012-11-30 15:06:03 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 歐盟與東協兩大組織在全球以及地區層面都有相當的影響力，但是其組織結構與發展路徑差別甚大，這主要就基於亞歐雙方的歷史背景、外在環境與價值取向、認知方式等等的差異所致。歐洲久經戰亂，二戰後讓渡主權以期和平的意願極高，區域意識抬頭，但是東南亞則仍被殖民者所統治，毫無區域整體意識可言。繼之，在歐洲整合的過程中，其機制日漸建立，效果日益發揮，而東協則始終處於合作階段，不願讓渡主權，其整體意志難以形成，效果較差。歐盟雖然機制相對嚴謹，但是會員的擴張導致憲法條約的擱淺，東協的機制鬆散，雖效果不彰，但是運作尚稱順利。近來在結合外國（東協加三），其地位與作用更為加強。在歐盟與東協的雙邊關係方面，至今仍頗不對稱。雙方都有相當的共同利益，除政治與安全方面，其中尤以經貿為甚，但是人權問題還是差異甚大，這些都是亞歐之間在價值與認知方面差異的最佳表徵。
    Because of the distinction of historic background, outer surrounding, value orientations and perceptions the EU and ASEAN, both significant regional actors are much different in their structure and development. After long time of war and conflict the Europeans are willing to surrender parts of their sovereignty in order to build a mechanism for promoting peace. By that time these East Asian nations were still subject of the colonial rule. There was no sense of regionalism in that area. During the development of the European integration process a functioning mechanism is built which comes up with rather satisfactory results. But ASEAN still remains a cooperation network with less achievements because the member states are not willing to surrender their sovereignty and the sense of unity is weak. Although the EU has a rather well-functioning mechanism they are facing enormous problems by the ratification of the constitution by the enlargement. The ASEAN is rather lose organized but has overcome the problem of enlargement. The recent cooperation with China, Japan and Korea has improved its image a lot. The bilateral relations between the EU and the ASEAN are asymmetry. Besides the political and security issues the trade interests are the most important. But still the human rights issue remains an obstacle due to differences in value and perception
    Relation: 基礎研究
    學術補助
    研究期間:9508~ 9607
    研究經費:455仟元
    行政院國家科學委員會
    計畫編號NSC95-2414-H004-036
    Data Type: report
    Appears in Collections:[國際關係研究中心] 國科會研究計畫

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    report18.pdf577KbAdobe PDF21057View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback