English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51027435      Online Users : 821
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54978


    Title: 聲調在中文口語字彙觸接的時序處理:眼動研究之證據
    Temporal processing of lexical tone in lexical access of Chinese spoken characters: an eyetracking study
    Authors: 許媛媜
    Syu, Yuan Jhen
    Contributors: 蔡介立
    Tsai, Jie Li
    許媛媜
    Syu, Yuan Jhen
    Keywords: 聲調
    眼動
    口語辨識
    lexical tone
    eye-tracking
    spoken character
    visual world paradigm
    Date: 2011
    Issue Date: 2012-10-30 14:33:06 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文主要探討中文聲調在口語字彙觸接過程中所扮演的角色。實驗一藉由眼動實驗中的Visual World Paradigm作業,觀察中文聲調影響口語字彙辨識的時序歷程。受試者在聽到指導語和目標字之後,用滑鼠在螢幕上點選聽到的目標字,例如,螢幕上出現的字包含一個目標字:「摸」、一個競爭字(與目標字只有聲調相同:「挖」或是與目標字只有音段相同:「抹」),以及兩個聲調與音段和目標字完全不同的無關字:「怒」、「菊」。為了觀察目標字、競爭字及無關字在口語字彙處理時的競爭,我們會計算各個字彙的凝視比例。實驗一中由於聲調與目標字相同的競爭字與目標字的第一個音段就開始產生差異,因此未觀察到聲調早期介入的影響。實驗二透過與實驗一相同的實驗程序及方法,操弄目標字和競爭字中聲調和前兩個音段(Cohort)的異同以探測更早期的聲調影響。螢幕呈現包含一個目標字「湯」、一個競爭字(前兩個音段和聲調皆與目標字相同:「胎」,或是只有前兩個音段相同但聲調與目標字不同:「泰」),以及兩個聲調與音段和目標字完全不同的無關字「剖」、「痕」。結果顯示,聲調在語音訊息前兩個音段時就會產生影響,也就是聲調的影響在語音結束前即有作用。再者,本文發現聲調無法單獨且獨立地對於語音辨識產生影響,此看法與聲調表徵需以“toneme” node獨立地存在於the modified TRACE model的看法不盡相同 (Malins & Joanisse, 2010; Ye & Connine, 1999; Zhao, Guo, Zhou, & Shu, 2011)。
    The present study aims to examine the role of tonal information during Mandarin Chinese spoken character recognition. Two eye-tracking experiments were conducted with the visual world paradigm, which participants heard a Chinese monosyllabic character and used a mouse to click on the corresponding character in a visual array of 4 characters on the screen. Experiment 1 manipulated the relationship between the spoken target characters and written characters on the screen, including a target (e.g., /mɔ1/‘touch’), a tonal competitor (the tone was the same as target except segment: e.g., /wa1/‘dig’) or a segmental competitor (the segmental structure was the same with the target except tone: e.g., /mɔ3/ ‘wipe’), and two unrelated distractors (the segments and tone were different from target: e.g., /nu4/ ‘anger’, and /tɕy2/ ‘chrysanthemum’). The fixation proportions on target, competitors and the unrelated distractors were computed during the unfolding of the auditory target stimuli. The results showed tonal difference was detected before the end of auditory stream. However, no early involvement of tonal information was found, which may due to the tonal competitor and target shared no segment from the first phoneme. In order to examine the earlier tonal processing, Experiment 2 manipulated two types of cohort competitors sharing the initial two segments with the target (e.g., /tʰɑŋ1/ “soup”), a cohort-tone competitor, e.g., /tʰaj1/ “fetus” (both tone and initial two segments are the same with target) and a cohort-only competitor e.g., /tʰaj4/ “peaceful” (initial two segments is the same with the target but with different tone). Result showed that tone affected spoken character recognition while processing the two initial segments. In addition, tone could not affect spoken character processing independently, which might be inconsistent with the assumption that tone is a separate level of representation, called “toneme” node, in the modified TRACE model (Malins & Joanisse, 2010; Ye & Connine, 1999; Zhao et al., 2011).
    Reference: Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition Using Eye Movements: Evidence for Continuous Mapping Models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38(4), 419-439. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2558
    Carroll, D. W. (2008). Psychology of language: Thomson/Wadsworth.
    Chang, C.-Y. (2010). Dialect Differences in the Production and perception of Mandarin Chinese Tones. Ohio State University.
    Cole, R. A., & Scott, B. (1974). Toward a theory of speech perception. Psychological Review, 81(4), 348-374. doi: 10.1037/h0036656
    Cooper, R. M. (1974). The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology, 6(1), 84-107. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(74)90005-x
    Cutler, A. (1986). Forbear is a homophone: lexical prosody does not constrain lexical access. [Article]. Language & Speech, 29(3), 201-220.
    Cutler, A., & Chen, H. C. (1997). Lexical tone in Cantonese spoken-word processing. Perception&Psychophysics, 59(2), 165-179.
    Cutler, A., & Clifton, C. (1984). The use of prosodic information in word recognition. In H. B. D. G. Bouwhuis (Ed.), Control of language processes : (proceedings of the tenth international symposium on attention and performance (pp. 183~196). Venlo, the Netherlands,: London : Lawrence Erlbaum associates.
    Cutler, A., Dahan, D., & van Donselaar, W. (1997). Prosody in the Comprehension of Spoken Language: A Literature Review. [Article]. Language & Speech, 40(2), 141-201.
    Dahan, D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2001). Time Course of Frequency Effects in Spoken-Word Recognition: Evidence from Eye Movements. Cognitive Psychology, 42(4), 317-367. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0750
    Epstein, W. (1961). The Influence of Syntactical Structure on Learning. The American Journal of Psychology, 74(1), 80-85.
    Foss, D. J., & Hakes, D. T. (1978). Psycholinguistics: an introduction to the psychology of language: Prentice-Hall.
    Frauenfelder, U. H., & Tyler, L. K. (1987). Spoken word recognition: MIT Press.
    Fry, D. B., Abramson, A. S., Eimas, P. D., & Liberman, A. M. (1962). The identification and discrimination of synthetic vowels. [Article]. Language & Speech, 5(4), 171-189.
    Gandour, J. (1984). Tone dissimilarity judgments by Chinese listeners. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 12(2), 235-261.
    Garman, M. (1990). Psycholinguistics: Cambridge University Press.
    Gleason, J. B., & Ratner, N. B. (1998). Psycholinguistics: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
    Grosjean, F., & Gee, J. P. (1987). Prosodic structure and spoken word recognition. Cognition, 25(1–2), 135-155. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(87)90007-2
    Huettig, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2007). The tug of war between phonological, semantic and shape information in language-mediated visual search. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(4), 460-482. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.02.001
    Jongman, A., Wang, Y., Moore, C. B., & Sereno, J. A. (2006). Perception and Production of Mandarin Chinese Tones. In L. H. T. E. Bates, and O.J.L Tzeng (Ed.), Handbook of Chinese Psycholinguistics: Cambridge University Press.
    Jusczyk, P. W., & Luce, P. A. (2002). Speech perception and spoken word recognition: past and present. Ear and Hearing, 23(1), 2-40. doi: citeulike-article-id:6136467
    Ladefoged, P. (2005). Vowels and consonants: an introduction to the sounds of languages: Blackwell Pub.
    Lai, Y., & Zhang, J. (2008). Mandarin Lexical Tone Recognition: The Gating Paradigm. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, 30.
    Lass, N. J. (1976). Contemporary issues in experimental phonetics: Academic Press.
    Lee, C. Y. (2007). Does Horse Activate Mother?Processing Lexical Tone in Form Priming. Language and Speech, 50(1), 101-123.
    Lee, C. Y. (2009). Identifying isolated, multispeaker Mandarin tones from brief acoustic input: A perceptual and acoustic study. [Article]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(2), 1125-1137. doi: 10.1121/1.3050322
    Leena, M. (2012). Prosodic Features for Speaker Recognition. In A. Neustein & H. A. A. Patil (Eds.), Forensic Speaker Recognition (pp. 365-388): Springer New York.
    Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., Hoffman, H. S., & Griffith, B. C. (1957). The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54(5), 358-368.
    Lin, H.-B., & Repp, B. H. (1989). Cues to the perception of Taiwanese tones. Language and Speech, 32, 25--45.
    Liu, S., & Samuel, A. G. (2007). The role of Mandarin lexical tones in lexical access under different contextual conditions. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(4), 566-594. doi: 10.1080/01690960600989600
    Lyn, F. (1987). Structure in auditory word recognition. Cognition, 25(1–2), 157-187. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(87)90008-4
    Malins, J. G., & Joanisse, M. F. (2010). The roles of tonal and segmental information in Mandarin spoken word recognition: An eyetracking study. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(4), 407-420. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.02.004
    Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition, 8(1), 1-71. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(80)90015-3
    Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10(1), 29-63. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(78)90018-x
    McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18(1), 1-86. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0
    McMurray, B., Clayards, M. A., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2008). Tracking the time course of phonetic cue integration during spoken word recognition. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 15(6), 1064-1071.
    McMurray, B., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2002). Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access. Cognition, 86(2), B33-B42. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00157-9
    Myers, T., Laver, J., & Anderson, J. M. (1981). The Cognitive representation of speech: North-Holland Pub. Co.
    Roca, I., & Johnson, W. (1999). A course in phonology: Blackwell Publishers.
    Schirmer, A., Tang, S., Penney, T. B., Gunter, T. C., & Chen, H. (2005). Brain responses to segmentally and tonally induced semantic violations in Cantonese. J Cogn Neurosci, 17(1), 1-12.
    Shannon, R. V., Zeng, F.-G., Kamath, V., Wygonski, J., & Ekelid, M. (1995). Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science, 270(5234), 303-303.
    Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1976). speech perception. In N. J. Lass (Ed.), Contemporary issues in experimental phonetics (pp. 243-293). New York: Academic Press.
    Taft, M., & Chen, H.-C. (1992). Judging Homophony in Chinese: The Influence of Tones. In C. Hsuan-Chih & J. L. T. Ovid (Eds.), Advances in Psychology (Vol. Volume 90, pp. 151-172): North-Holland.
    Tanenhaus, M., Magnuson, J., Dahan, D., & Chambers, C. (2000). Eye Movements and Lexical Access in Spoken-Language Comprehension: Evaluating a Linking Hypothesis between Fixations and Linguistic Processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(6), 557-580. doi: citeulike-article-id:789099
    Tanenhaus, M. K. (2007). Eye movements and spoken language processing. In M. H. F. Roger P.G. Van Gompel, Wayne S. Murray and Robin L. Hill (Ed.), Eye movements: a window on mind and brain: Elsevier.
    Tsang, Y.-K., Jia, S., Huang, J., & Chen, H.-C. (2011). ERP correlates of pre-attentive processing of Cantonese lexical tones: The effects of pitch contour and pitch height. Neuroscience Letters, 487(3), 268-272. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.10.035
    Tyler, L. (1984). The structure of the initial cohort: Evidence from gating. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 36(5), 417-427. doi: 10.3758/bf03207496
    Uli H, F., & Tyler, L. K. (1987). The process of spoken word recognition: An introduction. Cognition, 25(1-2), 1-20. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(87)90002-3
    van Donselaar, W., Koster, M., & Cutler, A. (2005). Exploring the role of lexical stress in lexical recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(2), 251-273. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000927
    Whalen, D. H. (1991). Subcategorical phonetic mismatches and lexical access. Perception And Psychophysics, 50(4), 351-360.
    William D, & Marslen-Wilson. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25(1–2), 71-102. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(87)90005-9
    Ye, Y., & Connine, C. M. (1999). Processing Spoken Chinese: The Role of Tone Information. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 609-630. doi: 10.1080/016909699386202
    Zhao, J., Guo, J., Zhou, F., & Shu, H. (2011). Time course of Chinese monosyllabic spoken word recognition: Evidence from ERP analyses. Neuropsychologia, 49(7), 1761-1770. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.054
    吳聲弘. (2012). 音韻組成與中文口語感知. 碩士論文, 國立交通大學, 新竹.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    語言學研究所
    98555015
    100
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0985550153
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[語言學研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    015301.pdf2666KbAdobe PDF2907View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback