English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 111300/142217 (78%)
Visitors : 48262957      Online Users : 277
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 教育學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/54721
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54721


    Title: 知識創新學習環境量表之編製
    The development of the knowledge building environment scale
    Authors: 林奎宇
    Lin, Kuei Yu
    Contributors: 洪煌堯
    Hong, Huang Yao
    林奎宇
    Lin, Kuei Yu
    Keywords: 知識創新
    學習環境
    競爭模式
    複核效化
    knowledge building
    learning environment
    competing models
    cross-validation
    Date: 2011
    Issue Date: 2012-10-30 11:33:19 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在編製「知識創新學習環境量表」,以瞭解學習環境中知識創新氛圍的程度。透過三個獨立樣本A、B及C,分別進行探索性因素分析、驗證性因素分析及複核效化分析。樣本A(332人)以探索性因素分析獲得因素成份,結果顯示此份量表有三個因素,分別命名為「想法因素」、「自主學習者因素」及「社群因素」。其次,透過建立本量表的一系列競爭模式,以樣本B(536人)進行驗證性因素分析之評鑑,結果顯示二階單因素模式為最簡效模式,並且量表具有良好之信、效度。而樣本C(536人)則作為複核效化之分析,結果顯示二階單因素模式具有穩定性與預測力。希冀本量表能提供相關單位做為教學及研究之應用。
    The purpose of this study was to develop the Knowledge Building Environment Scale (KBES). Three independent samples was used to validte the reliability and validity of the scale. Firstly, sample A (n=332) was used to generate the factors through exploratory factor analysis. It resulted in a scale of three factors which contains ‘idea’ factor, ‘agent’ factor and ‘community’ factor. Secondly, a series of competing models was established and evaluated by confirmatory factor analysis through sample B (n=536). Comparing with several competing models, hierarchical model was found to be the most efficient model with good reliability and validity. Finally, the cross-validation was tested by sample C (n=536) for hierarchical model to confirm the stability and predictive power of this model. The KBES can provide relevant institutions as a tool for evaluating learning environments.
    Reference: 王博賢(2010)。知識翻新教學對小學生科學探究活動與科學合作概念之影響。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式:SIMPLIS 的應用。臺北市:高等教育。
    余民寧、李仁豪(2008)。調查方式與議題熟悉度對問卷回收率與內容的影響。教育學刊,30,101-140。
    吳佳蓉(2010)。學習社群在電腦支援合作學習環境中的知識共構—以自然科學史為例。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    李仁豪、余民寧(2010)。網路與紙本調查方式、網路問卷長短、網路問卷議題熟悉度高低的DIF分析及潛在平均數差異。教育與心理研究,33(2),111-139。
    林生傳(1988)。新教學理論與策略。臺北市:五南。
    邱皓政(2011)。結構方程式模式—LISREL/SIMPLIS原理與應用 (第二版)。臺北市:雙葉。
    侯駿廉(2007)。國小學童學習態度、頓悟思考能力及其對教師教學風格感知之研究。臺北市立教育大學創造思考暨資賦優異教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    張宇慧(2010)。以想法為中心的知識翻新學習對團隊創造力之影響。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    張景媛(1988)。教學類型與學習類型適配性研究暨學生學習適應理論模式的驗證。國立台灣師範大學心理輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    陳木金(2009)。認知風格理論對有效學習策略的啟示。國立政治大學教學發展中心電子報。取自 http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/38177
    游森期、余民寧(2006)。網路問卷與傳統問卷之比較:多樣本均等性方法學之應用。測驗學刊,53(1),103-128。
    黃芳銘(2007)。結構方程模式—理論與應用。臺北市:五南。
    楊曼歆(2010)。金門縣國小學童知覺教師教學風格、班級創意氛圍及其與創造力之關係。國立臺北教育大學教育學系學位論文,未出版,台北市。
    Anderson, J., & Gerbing, D. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
    APEC (2000). Towards knowledge-based economies in APEC. Singapore: APEC Secretariat.
    Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural squation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74–94.
    Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. J. C. (1993). EQS/windows user’s guide. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software Incorporated.
    Bereiter, C. (1994). Constructivism, socioculturalism, and Popper`s world 3. Educational researcher, 23(7), 21–23.
    Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2003). Learning to work creatively with knowledge. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. van Merriënboer (Eds.), Powerful learning environments: Unraveling basic components and dimensions (pp. 55–68). Oxford, England: Elsevier Science.
    Brophy-Herb, H. E., Lee, R. E., Nievar, M. A., & Stollak, G. (2007). Preschoolers` social competence: Relations to family characteristics, teacher behaviors and classroom climate. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28(2), 134-148.
    Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning.Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
    Chai, C. S., & Khine, M. S. (2006). An analysis of interaction and participation patterns in online community. Education Technology and Society, 9(1), 250–261.
    Chan, C. K. K. (2011). Bridging research and practice: Implementing and sustaining knowledge building in Hong Kong classrooms. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(2), 1–40.
    Chan, C. K. K., & Chan, Y. (2011). Students’ views of collaboration and online participation in Knowledge Forum.Computers and Education, 57(2), 1445–1457.
    Charles, E. S., & Shumar, W. (2007). Creativity, collaboration and competence: Agency in online synchronous chat environment. Proceedings of the 8th iternational conference on computer supported collaborative learning. New Brunswick, NJ: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
    Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Conti, G. J. (1978). Principles of adult learning scale: An instrument for measuring teacher behavior related to the collaborative teaching-learning mode. Ed.D. diss., Northern Illinois University, DeKalb.
    Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw Judy A. (2000). Introducing LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated. London, England: Sage Publications.
    Diaz, R. M., Neal, C. J., & Amaya-Williams, M. (1990). The social origins of self-regulation. In Moll, L. C. (ed.), Vygotsky and Education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology(pp. 127–154), New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Drucker, P. (1969). The age of discontinuity: Guidelines to our changing society. New York: Harper & Row.
    Dunn, R. S.; Dunn, K. L. & Perrin, J. (1994). Teaching young children through their individual learning styles. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    Dunn, R.S. & Dunn, K.J. (1979). Learning styles/teaching styles: should they...can they...be matched? Educational Leadership, 36, 238-244.
    Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
    Fischer, B. B. & Fischer, L. (1979). Styles in teaching and learning. Educational Leadership, 36, 245-254.
    Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.
    Gilbert, N., & Driscoll, M. (2002). Collaborative knowledge building: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(1), 59–80.
    Gorsuch, R. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
    Grasha, A. F., & Reichmann, M. (1975). Student learning styles. In W. H. Berquist and S. R. Phillips (eds.), A handbook for faculty development. Washington, DC: The council for the advancement of small colleges.
    Gregorc, A. F. (1979). Learning/teaching styles: Their mature and effects. In J. W. Keefe (Ed.), Students learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs (pp. 19-26). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
    Griselli, E. E., Campbell, J. P., & Zedeck, S. (1981). Measurement theory for the behavioral sciences.San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
    Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
    Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6thed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice–Hall.
    Hargreaves, D. H. (1999). The knowledge‐creating school. British journal of educational studies, 47(2), 122–144.
    Hong, H.-Y., & Lin, S.-P. (2010). Teacher-education students` epistemological belief change through collaborative knowledge building. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(1), 99–110.
    Hong, H.-Y., & Sullivan, F. R. (2009). Towards an idea-centered, principle-based design approach to support learning as knowledge creation.Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(5), 613–627.
    Hong, H.-Y., Chen, F.-C., Chai, C.-S., & Chan, W.-J. (2010). Teacher-education students’ views about knowledge building theory and practice. Instructional Science,39(4), 467–482.
    Hong, H.-Y., Scardamalia, M., & Zhang, J. (2010). Knowledge society network: Toward a dynamic, sustained network for building knowledge. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1), 1–29.
    Hong, H.-Y., Scardamalia, M., Messina, R., & Teo, C. L. (2008). Principle-based design to foster adaptiveuse of technology for building community knowledge.In G. Kanselaar, V. Jonker, P. A. Kirschner, &F. J. Prins (Eds.), International perspectives in the learning sciences: Creaing a learning world. Proceedings of the 8th international conference for the learning sciences. Utrecht, the Netherlands: International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.
    Jöreskog, K. G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 294−316). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7 user`s reference guide. Chicago: SPSS Publications.
    Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language.Chicago: Scientific Software.
    Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rded.). New York: Guilford Press.
    Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
    Kraetzig, G. P. & Arbuthnott, K. D. (2006). Perceptual learning style and learning proficiency: a test of the hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 1, 238–246.
    Lai, M., & Law, N. (2006). Peer scaffolding of knowledge building through collaborative groups with differential learning experiences. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35, 123–144.
    Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1999). Legitimate peripheral participation in the communities of practice. In McCormick, R. & Paechter, C. (Eds.), Learning and knowledge(pp. 21–35), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Lee, C. (2010). Generating synergy between conceptual change and knowledge building.Human Development, 53, 134–152.
    Leinonen, T., Virtanen, O., & Hakkarainen, K. (2002). Collaborative discovering of key ideas in knowledge building. Proceedings of the computer support for collaborative learning 2002 conference, Boulder, CO.
    Lin, K.-Y., Hong, H.-Y., & Chai, C.-S. (2011). “Exploring college students’perceptions of classroom learning in a knowledge building environment”. Proceedings of the 19th international conference of computer in education, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
    Lujan, H. L. & DiCarlo, S. E. (2006). First-year medical students prefer multiple learning styles. Advances in Physiology Education, 30, 13–16.
    MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., Mar, C. M., & Reith, J. V. (1994). Alternative strategies for cross-validation of covariance structure models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 1–32.
    Murphy, P. K. (2007). The eye of the beholder: The interplay of social and cognitive components in change. Educational Psychologist , 42, 41–53.
    Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2008). The role of knowledge, beliefs, and interest in the conceptual change process: A synthesis and meta-analysis of the research. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 583–618). New York: Routledge.
    Noar, S. M. (2003). The role of structural equation modeling in scale development. Role of Structural Equation Modeling, 10(4), 622–647.
    Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.
    O’Neil, B.(2001). Improving learning for underachievers. The Clearing House, 74(5), 236-237.
    Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1996). The Knowledge-Based Economy. Paris, OECD.
    Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2002). Epistemological foundations for CSCL: A comparison of three models of innovative knowledge communities. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer-supported collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community (pp. 24–32). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
    Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 557–576.
    Papert, S. (2000). What’s the big idea? Toward a pedagogy of idea power. IBM Systems Journal, 39(3.4), 720–729.
    Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2009). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/documents/P21_Framework.pdf
    Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. London, England: Oxford University Press.
    Rowe, E. W., Kim, S., Baker, J. A., Kamphaus, R. W., & Horne, A. M. (2010). Student personal perception of classroom climate: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(5), 858-879.
    Russell, A. (2002). The role of epistemic agency and knowledge building discourse to foster interprofessional practice in a Canadian hospital. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, IN. Retrieved from http://ikit.org/fulltext/2002AERAAnn.pdf
    Sawyer, R. K. (2007). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. New York: Basic Books.
    Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago: Open Court.
    Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge-building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. The Journal of the Learning Sciences,1(1), 37–68.
    Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283.
    Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building. In J. W. Guthrie (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education (pp. 1370–1373). New York: Macmillan Reference.
    Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–119). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., McLean, R. S., Swallow, J., & Woodruff, E. (1989). Computer-supported intentional learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5(1), 51–68.
    Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.
    Singh, G., Hawkins, L., & Whymark, G. (2007). An integral model of collaborative knowledge building. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3, 85–104.
    Stahl, G. (2000). A model of collaborative knowledge-building. Proceedings of 4th international conference of the learning sciences (ICLS 2000), Ann Arbor, MI.
    Stump, G. S., Hilpert, J. C., Husman, J., Chung, W.-T., & Kim, W. (2011). Collaborative learning in engineering students: Gender and achievement. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(3), 475-497.
    Trilling, B., & Hood, P. (1999). Learning technology and education reform in the knowledge age or "We`re wired, webbed and windowed, now what?", Educational Technology, 39(3), 5-18.
    Tu, C. (2004). Online collaborative learning communities: Twenty-one designs to building an online collaborative learning community. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
    UNESCO. (2005). Towards knowledge societies. New York: UNESCO Publishing.
    van Aalst, J., & Chan, C. K. K. (2007). Student-directed assessment of knowledge building using electronics portfolios. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), 175-220.
    Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
    Wheatley, M. J. (2002). Finding our way. San Francisco: Berrett–Koehler.
    Whitehead, A. N. (2011). Science and the modern world. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R. & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47, 1-64.
    Wothke, W. (1993). Nonpositive definite matrices in structural modeling. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 256–293). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Yukawa, J. (2006). Co-reflection in online learning: Collaborative critical thinking as narrative. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(2), 203–228.
    Zapalska, A. M. & Dabb, H. (2002). Learning styles. Journal of Teaching International Business, 13, 77–97.
    Zhang, J., & Sun. Y. (2011). Reading for idea advancement in a Grade 4 knowledge building community. Instructional Science, 39, 429–452.
    Zhang, J., &Chan, C. K. K. (2008). Examining the growth of community knowledge in an online space. Paper presented at the International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE), Taipei, Taiwan.
    Zhang, J., Hong, H.-Y., Scardamalia, M., Teo, C. L., & Morley, E. A. (2011). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 262–307.
    Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7–44.
    Zhou, N. (2009). Question co-construction in VMT chats. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying VirtualMath Teams. New York: Springer Press.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    教育研究所
    99152002
    100
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099152002
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[教育學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    200201.pdf3981KbAdobe PDF21269View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback