政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/52706
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113311/144292 (79%)
造访人次 : 50937126      在线人数 : 984
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/52706


    题名: 台灣以中文為母語的小孩的誘發過度泛化現象
    Priming overextensions in Taiwan Mandarin children
    作者: 陳采君
    Chen, Tsai Chun
    贡献者: 萬依萍
    Wan, I Ping
    陳采君
    Chen, Tsai Chun
    关键词: 誘發
    過度泛化
    語言發展
    幼兒
    中文
    詞彙
    Priming
    overextension
    language development
    children
    Mandarin Chinese
    lexicon
    日期: 2011
    上传时间: 2012-04-17 09:05:34 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本篇研究的目的是要去比較中文跟英文小孩的誘發過度泛化現象的不同之處。誘發過度泛化現象指的是小孩子因為受到之前誘發過的字的影響進而造成對物品過度泛化現象的情況而稱之。Gershkoff-Stowe et al. (2006) 認為Dell (1986) 提出的擴散激活機制 (spreading activation mechanisms) 可用來解釋小孩的三種泛化錯誤類型: 類別錯誤 (category errors) 、語用錯誤 (pragmatic errors) 跟提取錯誤 (retrieval errors)，此三種泛化錯誤的基底機制應該都是同樣的。另外，他們也認為最近激活跟形狀的類似對小孩的命名應該都扮演了很重要的角色。年紀較大的小孩也應該會擁有比較成熟的心理詞彙所以會比起年紀較小的小孩比較不容易受到之前提取過的字的影響。因為中文跟英文心理詞彙的不同，我們想去檢視是否一樣的理論也可套用在中文小孩身上。實驗方法沿用了Gershkoff-Stowe et al. (2006)的相同實驗法，做了與他相同的兩個實驗。第一個實驗是熟悉物與不熟悉物的命名，兩歲小孩要做六次的試驗，然後我們是用三張圖片做為誘發圖片，然後請小孩去命名一個真實的物品。第二個實驗是虛構物品命名，我們在這個實驗裡比較兩歲小孩跟四歲小孩的不同表現。實驗過程跟實驗一是一樣的，只是實驗二是看虛構物品不是真實物品，且有八個試驗機會而不是六個。結果顯示有一個跟英文大致上類似的結果。然而我們仍有發現一些不同之處。第一，我們發現熟悉物在中文裡比起英文似乎有更強的力量。第二個則是兩個語言不同的構詞法可能會對於比較成熟的心理詞彙造成不一樣的誘發方式。
    This purpose of this study is to compare the difference of priming overextension phenomena between Mandarin Chinese children and English children. Priming overextension means that children overextend some words due to the effects of the previously primed words. Gershkoff-Stowe et al. (2006) found that spreading activation mechanisms (Dell, 1986) should be the underlying mechanisms of three types of children’s overextension errors, i.e., category errors, pragmatic errors, and retrieval errors. Moreover, they thought that recent activation and perceptual similarity both play an important role on children’s object naming. Besides, older children should have a more mature mental lexicon and thus less susceptible to previously retrieved words than younger children. Due to the difference of the lexicon networks between Mandarin Chinese and English, we want to examine whether the same theory also could apply to Mandarin children. Two experiments which followed Gershkoff-Stowe et al. (2006) were conducted. The first one was familiar or unfamiliar object naming. 2-year-old Children underwent six trials and were primed by three pictures and then were asked to name a real object. The second experiment was novel object naming. We compared the performances of children aged 2 and aged 4 together. The procedure was the same as the experiment 1 despite the fact that children in experiment 2 named novel objects rather than real ones and they underwent 8 trials rather than six. And results showed a generally similar finding with English. However, there are still something different between these two languages. First, we found that familiar objects should have stronger strengths in Mandarin than in English. Second, different morphology in two languages may result in different priming way for more mature mental lexicons.
    參考文獻: References
    Anglin, J. M. (1977). Word, object, and conceptual development. New York: W. W.
    Norton and Co.
    Baldwin, D. A. (1989). Priorities in children’s expectations about object label
    reference: Form over color. Child Development, 60, 1291 – 1306.
    Baldwin, D. A. (1992). Clarifying the role of shape in children’s taxonomic
    assumption. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54, 392 – 416.
    Barrett, M. D. (1986). Early semantic representations and early word usage. In Stan A.
    Kuczaj II and Martyn D. Barrett (eds.), The development of word meaning:
    progress in cognitive development research (pp. 39-67). Berlin and New York:
    Springer.
    Barrett, M., Harris, M., & Chasin, J. (1991). Early lexical development and maternal
    speech: a comparison of children’s initial and subsequent uses of words. Journal
    of Child Language, 18, 21-40.
    Bates, E., Bretherton, I., & Snyder, L. (1988). From first words to grammar:
    Individual differences and dissociable mechanisms. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge
    University Press.
    Benedict, H. (1979). Early lexical development: Comprehension and production.
    Journal of Child Language, 6, 183-200.
    Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image
    understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115 – 147.
    Billow, R. (1981). Observing spontaneous metaphor in children. Journal of
    Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 430-445.
    Bloom, L. (1973). One word at a time: The use of single word utterances before
    syntax. The Hague: Mouton.
    Bowerman, M. (1978). The acquisition of word meaning: an investigation of some
    current conflicts. In Natalie Waterson and Catherine E. Snow (eds.), The
    development of communication (pp. 263-287). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
    Braunwald, S. R. (1978). Context, word and meaning: toward a communicational
    analysis of lexical acquisition. In Andrew Lock (ed.), Action, gesture and
    symboll: the emergence of language (pp. 487-527). London: Academic Press.
    Carey, S. (1982). Semantic development: the state of the art. In E. Wanner & L. R.
    Gleitman (eds), Language acquisition: the state of the art. New York:
    Cambridge University Press.
    Carlson, P., & Anisfeld, M. (1969). Some observations on the linguistic competence
    of a two-year-old child. Child Development, 40, 565-575.
    Charles-Luce, J., & Luce, P. A. (1990). Similarity neighborhoods of words in young
    children’s lexicons. Journal of Child Language, 17, 205-215.
    Clark, E. V. (1973). What’s in a word? On the child’s acquisition of semantics in his
    first language. In T. E. Moore (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of
    language (pp.65-110). New York: Academic Press.
    Clark, E.V. (1983). Meanings and concepts. In Handbook of child psychology, vol. 3:
    Cognitive development, ed. J. Flavell and E. Markman. New York: Wiley.
    Clark, E. V. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.
    Cohen, L. & Dehaene, S. (1998). Competition between past and present : assessment
    and interpretation of verbal perseverations. Brain 121(9), 1641–59.
    Corrigan, R. (1978). Language development as related to Stage 6 object permanence
    development. Journal of Child Language, 5, 173-189.
    Dapretto, M. & Bjork, E. L. (2000). The development of word retrieval abilities in
    the second year and its relation to early vocabulary growth. Child Development
    71(3),635–48.
    Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.
    Psychological Review 93(3), 283–321.
    Dell, G. S., Burger, L. K. & Svec, W. R. (1997). Language production and serial
    order : a functional analysis and a model. Psychological Review 104(1), 123–47.
    Dore, J. (1978). Conditions for the acquisition of speech acts. In I. Marikowa (Ed.),
    The social context of language (pp. 87-111). New York: Wiley.
    Dromi, E. (1987). Early lexical development. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge
    University Press.
    Feson, L., Dale, P., Reznick, S., Bates, E., Thal, D., Reilly, J., & Harthung, J. (1990).
    MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories: Technical Manual. San
    Diego: San Diego State University.
    Forster, K. I. & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of
    Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627-635.
    Forster, K. I. (1990). Lexical processing. In D. N. Osherson & H. Lasnik (Eds.),
    Language: An invitation to cognitive science (Vol. 1, pp. 95-131). Cambridge,
    MA: MIT Press.
    Fremgen, A., & Fay, D. (1980). Overextensions in production and comprehension: A
    methodological clarification. Journal of Child Language, 7, 205-211.
    Fromkin, V., Rodman, R. & Hyams, N. (2003) An introduction to language (7th ed.).
    United States: Michael Rosenberg.
    Gelman, S. A., Croft, W., Fu, P., Clausner, T. & Gottfried, G. (1998). Why is a
    pomegranate an apple? The role of shape, taxonomic relatedness, and prior
    lexical knowledge in children’s overextensions of apple and dog. Journal of
    Child Language, 25(2), 267–91.
    Gentner, D. (1983a). Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus
    natural partitioning. In S. Kuczaj (Ed.), Language development: Vol. 2.
    Language, thought, and culture (pp. 301-334). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Gentner, D. (1983b). Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy.
    Cognitive Science 7(2), 155–70.
    Gershkoff-Stowe, L. (2001). The course of children’s naming errors in early word
    learning. Journal of Cognition & Development 2(2), 131–55.
    Gershkoff-Stowe, L., Connell, B. & Smith, L. (2006). Priming overgeneralizations in
    two-and four-year-old children. Journal of child language 33, 461-486.
    Gershkoff-Stowe, L. & Smith, L. B. (1997). A curvilinear trend in naming errors as a
    function of early vocabulary growth. Cognitive Psychology 34(1), 37–71.
    Gershkoff-Stowe, L. & Smith, L. B. (2004). Shape and the first hundred nouns. Child
    Development, 75(4), 1098-1114.
    Goldfield, B. A., & Reznick, J. S. (1990). Early lexical acquisition: Rate, content, and
    the vocabulary spurt. Journal of Child Language, 17, 171-183.
    Goldin-Meadow, S., Seligman, M. E., & Gelman, R. (1976). Language in the
    two-year-old. Cognition, 4, 189-202.
    Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. (1987). The development of categorization in the second
    year and its relation to other cognitive and linguistic developments, Child
    Development, 58, 1523-1531.
    Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of
    language. London: Edward Arnold.
    Hoek, D., Ingram, D. & Gibson, D. (1986). Some possible causes of children’s early
    word overextensions. Journal of Child Language 13(3), 477–94.
    Huang, S. (1998). Chinese as a headless language in compounding morphology. In J.
    L. Packard(Ed.), New approaches to Chinese word formation: Morphology,
    phonology and the lexicon in modern and ancient Chinese (pp. 261_284). New
    York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    Hudson, J., & Nelson, K. (1984). Play with language: Overextensions as analogies.
    Journal of Child Language, 11, 337-346.
    Huttenlocher, J. (1974). The origin of language comprehension. In R. L. Solso (ed.),
    Theories in cognitive psychology – The Loyola Symposium. Potomac, MD:
    Erlbaum.
    Huttenlocher, J. & Kubicek, L. F. (1983). The source of relatedness effects on naming
    latency. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory & Cognition
    9(3), 486–96.
    Imai, M., Gentner, D., & Uchida, N. (1994). Children’s theories of word meaning: the
    role of shape similarity in early acquisition. Cognitive Development, 9, 45-75.
    Ingram, D. (1978). Sensorimotor intelligence and language development. In A. Lock
    (Ed.), Action, gesture, and symbol. New York: Academic Press.
    Johnson, C. J., Paivio, A. & Clark, J. M. (1996). Cognitive components of picture
    naming. Psychological Bulletin 120(1), 113–39.
    Jones, S. S., Smith, L. B., & Landau, B. (1991). Object properties and knowledge in
    early lexical learning. Child Development, 62, 449 – 516.
    Khami, A. G. (1986). The elusive first words: the importance of the naming insight for
    the development of referential speech. Journal of Child Language, 13, 155-161.
    Landau, B., Smith, L. B., & Jones, S. S. (1988). The importance of shape in early
    lexical learning. Cognitive Development, 3, 299-321.
    Landau, B., Smith, L. B., & Jones, S. S. (1998). Object shape, object function, and
    object name. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 1-27.
    Lifter, K., & Bloom, L. (1989). Object knowledge and the emergence of language.
    Infant Behavior and Development, 12, 395-423.
    Martin, N., Weisberg, R. W. & Saffran, E. M. (1989). Variables influencing the
    occurrence of naming errors : implications for models of lexical retrieval.
    Journal of Memory & Language 28(4), 462–85.
    McShane, J. (1980). Learning to talk. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
    Mok, L. W. (2009). Word superiority effect as a function of semantic transparency of
    Chinese bimorphemic compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(7), 1039-1081.
    Naigles, L. & Gelman, S. (1995). Overextensions in comprehension and production
    revisited : preferential-looking in a study of dog, cat, and cow. Journal of Child
    Language, 22(1), 19–46.
    Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the
    Society for Research in Child Development, 38 (Serial No. 149).
    Nelson, K. (1974). Concept, word and sentence: interrelations in development.
    Psychological Review, 81(4), 267–85.
    Nelson, K. (1985). Making sense: The acquisition of shared meaning. New York:
    Academic Press.
    Nelson, K., Rescorla, L., Gruendel, J., & Benedict, H. (1978). Early lexicons: What
    do they mean? Child Development, 49, 960-968.
    Rapp, B. & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word
    production. Psychological Review 107(3), 460–99.
    Reich, P. A. (1976). The early acquisition of word meaning. Journal of Child
    Language, 3, 117-123.
    Rescorla, L. A. (1980a). Overextension in early language development. Journal of
    Child Language, 7, 321-335.
    Rescorla, L. A. (1980b). Category development in early language. Journal of Child
    Language, 8, 225-238.
    Samuelson, L. K., & Smith, L. B. (1999). Statistical regularities among count/mass
    syntax, solidity, and category structure in early noun vocabularies. Cognition, 73,
    1 – 33.
    Samuelson, L. K. & Smith, L. B. (2005). They call it like they see it : spontaneous
    naming and attention to shape. Developmental Science 8(2), 182–98.
    Smith, L. B. (1989). A model of perceptual classification in children and adults.
    Psychological Review, 96(1), 125-144.
    Smith, L. B. (2005). From the lexicon to expectations about kinds: a role for
    associative learning. Psychological Review, 112(2), 347-382.
    Smith, L. B., & Heise, D. (1992). Perceptual similarity and conceptual structure. In B.
    Burns & et al. (Eds.), Percepts, concepts and categories: The representation and
    processing of information. (pp. 233-272). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-
    Holland.
    Smith, L. B., Jones, S. S., & Landau, B. (1992). Count nouns, adjectives, and
    perceptual properties in children’s novel word interpretations. Developmental
    Psychology, 28, 273 – 289.
    Soja, N., Carey, S., & Spelke, E. S. (1991). Ontological categories guide young
    children’s inductions of word meanings: Object terms and substance terms.
    Cognition, 38, 179 – 211.
    Stemberger, J. P. (1989). Speech errors in early child language production. Journal of
    Memory and Language, 28, 164–88.
    Thomson, J. R., and Chapman, R. (1977). Who is ‘Daddy’ revisited: the status of
    two-year-olds’ over-extended words in use and comprehension. Journal of Child
    Language, 4, 359-375.
    Tomikawa & Dodd (1980). Early word meaning: Perceptually or functionally based?
    Child Development, 51, 1103-1109.
    Toyoda, E. & Scrimgoeour, A. (2009). Common and script-specific awareness in
    relation to word recognition in English and Chinese. Language Awareness, 18(1),
    61-73.
    Vitkovitch, M., Humphreys, G. W., & Lloyd-Jones, T. J. (1993). On naming a giraffe a
    zebra: Picture naming errors across different object categories. Journal of
    Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 243-259.
    Vosniadou, S., & Ortony, A. (1983). The emergence of the literal-
    metaphorical-anomalous distinction in young children. Child Development, 54,
    154-161.
    Wally, A. C. (1993). The role of vocabulary growth in children’s spoken word
    recognition and segmentation ability. Developmental Review, 13, 286-350.
    Winner, E. (1979). New names for old things: The emergence of metaphoric language.
    Journal of Child Language, 6, 469-491.
    Winner, E. (1988). The point of words : children’s understanding of metaphor and
    irony. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    語言學研究所
    97555011
    100
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097555011
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[語言學研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    501101.pdf1608KbAdobe PDF21097检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈