政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/51371
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51599296      Online Users : 567
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51371


    Title: 權力與協作規劃：灣寶永續社區及公民環境主義的觀察與反思
    Power and collaborative planning : WanBao sustainable communy and civic environmentalism observation and reflection
    Authors: 吳貞儀
    Contributors: 白仁德
    吳貞儀
    Keywords: 後龍科技園區
    灣寶社區
    權力規劃
    協作規劃
    公民環境論
    慢城治理
    農村永續社區
    Date: 2010
    Issue Date: 2011-10-05 14:47:14 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究主要透過縣政府提出後龍科技園區土地開發案的規劃過程中，首先，企圖從規劃典範的不同思考範疇背後的規劃價值進行對話，縣政府與民眾之間價值立場的不同，並詮釋不同規劃選擇價值的發展脈絡，進一步分析縣政府與灣寶社區之資訊與權力的關係，提出現今規劃制度和實際狀況可能面臨瓶頸和課題。其次，從民間社會的角度和立場，「為真實而規劃」的規劃價值核心，重視保留公眾決定「開放的討論」、問題與議題「框架」的界定，而不全然由規劃者(開發單位)決定議程與議題。因此透過協作規劃操作、慢城治理，以及公民環境論的架構之下，重新審思灣寶社區規劃趨向農村永續社區發展的可能。最後，在行動研究的動態過程中，依據研究者的行動研究結果和協作規劃的模式，提供灣寶永續社區的可行途徑，俾利提供永續社區發展其規劃的實踐和方向，總整所述：(一)、縣府在不同權力的展現方式與資訊誤導的面向，構成不同的障礙與限制，突顯在規劃過程的參與者不僅因錯誤資訊被誤導、溝通扭曲的現象，甚至受到政治力量的操縱，這個部分尚須要有嚴謹的監督機制應對和公民積極參與規劃方案，在溝通過程避免官僚術語並協助民眾解析規劃的重要課題，以及鼓勵公眾參與規劃方案進行評估和辯論，使規劃過程更民主和公開。(二)、「灣寶可以的未來」透過公民環境論之「參與者過程」、「社區規劃」、「環境教育」、「生態產業」、「環境正義」、「場域」等六個構面來引導灣寶社區的規劃藍圖和想像，有別於由上而下和技術主義為中心，以有限的權力下放，並強調公民有資訊和詢問政策的權利，顯現由下而上的協作規劃方式賦於社區多元治理模式，並結合慢城治理探索灣寶社區的多元性價值，提適合農村發展的另類社區治理模式，符合現今快速變遷社會和環境的挑戰。(三)、規劃是一種「動態、政治、空間、社會改革」的過程，在規劃教育過程應重視和重新認識整體真實社會的發展，將多元價值納入規劃的評估和考量，並尊重和學習認同在地的真實聲音，透過協作的合作模式一起思考規劃未來社區的藍圖。
    Reference: 一、中文文獻
    John Forester 著、江明修、劉梅君譯，1995，『面對權力的規劃』，臺北：
    五南。
    Petrini C.著、林欣怡、陳裕鳳譯，2009，『慢食新世界』，台北：商周出版。
    Shiva V.著、陳思穎譯，2009，『大地，非石油』，台北：綠色陣線協會。
    李承嘉、陳詩薇、林余真、林伯青、歐陽榆，2005，「鄉村仕紳化之研究─以宜蘭縣三星鄉三個村落發展為例」，論文發表於<第三屆土地學術研討會>，逢甲大學等聯合主辦：臺中。
    李承嘉，2007，「戰後臺灣鄉村體制轉變之研究：從農業生產論走向農業後生產論」，論文發表於<第五屆土地研究學術研討會>，臺北大學等聯合主辦：臺北。
    李承嘉、徐世榮、陳奉瑤、黃金聰、戴政新，2006，「微型農地利用規劃之研究：溝通式規劃之應用與問題初探」，論文發表於<第四屆土地研究學術研討會>，文化大學等聯合主辦：臺北。
    李承嘉，2005，「行動者網絡理論應用於鄉村發展之研究—以九份聚落1895-1945年發展為例」，『地理學報』，39: 1-30。
    李永展，1999，『永續發展：大地反撲的省思』，台北：巨流。
    吳鋼立，1998，「規劃思潮與公共利益概念的演變--建構一個新的規劃典範來尋找公共利益」，『人與地』，179/180：74-86。
    吳綱立，2007，「永續社區理念之社區營造評估體系建構之研究：以台南縣市社區營造為例」，『住宅學報』，16(1)：21-55。
    林國慶、邱皓伶，1998，「農地釋出方案執行成效分析」。『台灣土地金融季刊』，35(1)：1-22。
    林佩璇，2009，「課程行動研究的實踐論述：從自我到社會文化」，『教育實踐與研究』，22(2)：95-122。
    邢幼田，1990，「進步式規劃進步嗎？－國家體制內的進步規劃師〉」，『台灣社會研究季刊』，3：95-111。
    周志龍，1999，「規劃理論的論爭與發展」，『都市與計劃』，26(2)：
    張景森，1991，「臺灣現代城市規劃：一個政治經濟史的考察 (1895-1988)」，國立臺灣大學土木工程研究所博士論文：臺北。
    張天寶、蘇琇鳳、吳淑玲，2003，『後龍灣寶，咱庄頭的故事』，苗栗縣文化局。
    夏清林等譯，2000，行動研究方法導論：教師動手做研究。台北：遠流。
    陳惠邦，1998，教育行動研究。台北：師大書苑。
    黃源協、蕭文高、劉素珍，2009，「從“社區發展”到“永續社區” - 台灣社區工作的檢視與省思」，『台大社會工作學刊』，13：87-132。
    蔡清田，2000，『教育行動研究』，台北：五南。
    賴守誠，2008，「食物的文化經濟與農鄉發展：義大利慢食運動及台灣客家飲食運動的個案比較」，『農業推廣學報』，24:45-72。
    魏光莒，2001，「『溝通理性』與多元規畫理論：社區規畫方法初探」，『環境與藝術學刊』，2：1-11。
    闌廷娟，2001，『人•環境與永續發展』，北京：北京航空航天大學出版社。
    二、外文文獻
    Alison Cook and Mee Kam NG, 2001, Building Sustainable Communities：The Wanchai Experiment, Hong Kong：The Centre of Urban Planning and Environmental Management.
    Agyeman, J., and Angus, B., 2003, “The Role of Civic Environmentalism in the Pursuit of Sustainable Communities”, Environmental Planning & Management, 46( 3):345-363.
    Adams, D. and Tiesdell, S., 2010, “ Planners as market actors: rethinking state-market relations in land and property”, Planning Theory and Practice,11(2):187-207.
    Alexander, E.R., 2001, “A transaction costs theory of land use planning and development control: towards an institutional analysis of public planning”, Town Planning Review, 72:45–75.
    Atweh,B.,Kemmis,S., and Weeks,P. (Eds.), 1998, Action research in practice. New York:Routledge.
    Allmendinger, P. and Mark Tewdwr-Jones, eds., 2002, Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 44-62.
    Allmendinger, P., 2001, Planning in Postmodern Times. London: Routledge.
    Allmendinger, P., 2002, Planning Theory, New York: Palgrave.
    Alexander, E.R., 2010, “Introduction: Does planning theory affect practice, and if so, how? ”,Planning Theory, 9: 99-107.
    Blake, J., 1999, “Overcoming the ‘value-action gap’ in environmental policy: tensions between national policy and local experience”,Local Environment, 4(3):257–278.
    Borja, J and Castells, M., 1997, Local and Global: Management of Cities in the Information Age, London: Earthscan Publication.
    Beauregard, Robert A., 1978, “Planning in an advanced capitalist state”, in Planning theory in the 1980’s：A search for future directions, Edited by Robert W. Burchell and George Sternlieb, New Brunswick:The State University of New Jersey.
    Buckland, J., 1998, “Social capital and sustainability of NGO intermediated development projects in Bangladesh”, Community Development Journal, 33(3):236-248.
    Bhuiyan, S. H., and Evers, H. S., 2005, “Social capital and sustainable development:Theories and concepts ” (Working Paper) , Bangladesg: Center for Development Research, University of Bonn.
    Brocklesby, M. A., and Fisher, E., 2003, “Community development in sustainable livelhoods approach – An introduction”, Community Development Journal, 38(3):185-198.
    Booher, D. E. and J. E. Innes, 2001. ‘Network Power in Collaborative Planning’, Journal of Planning Education and research, 21(3):221-236.
    Campbell, S. ,1996, “Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development”, American Planning Association, 3:296–312.
    Castells, M. ,1993, The City and Grassroots, Berkeley: University of California Press.
    DETR (Department of Transport, Environment and the Regions), 2000, Quality of life counts, Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions, London: HMSO.
    DTER (Department of Transport, Environment and the Regions) ,1998, Sustainable Local Communities for the 21st Century, London:DTER.
    Davies, J., 2004, “Can’t hedgehogs be foxes, too? Reply to Clarence N. Stone”, Journal of Urban Affairs, 26(1):27–33.
    Elliott,J. ,1991,.Action research for educational change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
    Eric N. ,1981, On the Autonomy of the Democratic State, (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press) :15.
    Fishman, R., 1996,“in Reading in planning theory” , in Urban Utopias：Ebenezer Howard and Le Corbusier, Edited by Scott Campbell and Susan S. Fainstein, Cambridge, MA：Blackwell.
    Friedmann, J., 1987, Planning in The Public Domain：From Knowledge To Action, West Sussex：U.K. Princeton University.
    Faludi, A., 1973, Planning Theory, Oxford：Pergamon.
    Foucault, M. 1988. The Ethic of Care for the Self as a Practice of Freedom. In The Final
    Forester, J., 1982,“Planning in the face of power,”in Journal of the American Planning Association，No.49.Hall, P. ,2002, Urban and Regional Planning, USA and Canada：Routledge.
    Fischler, C., 1988, ‘‘Food, Self and Identity’’ , Social Science Information , 27(2): 275- 292.
    Fujino, J., Hibino, G., Ehara, T., Matsuoka, Y., Masui, T., Kainuma, M., 2008, “Back-casting analysis for 70% emission reduction in Japan by 2050”, Climate Policy, 8:108-124.
    Fulton, William.,1989, Reaching consensus in land-use negotiations.Chicago: American Planning Association.
    Giddens, A., 2003, Runaway world: how globalization is reshaping our lives, NY：Routledge.
    Gottlieb, R. and Fisher, A., 1998, “Community food security and environmental justice: Converging paths toward social justice and sustainable communities” ,Community Food Security News, 4–5.
    Green, G. P., and Haines, A., 2008, Asset building & community development, London:SAGE.
    Gray, Barbara. 1989. Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Hamstead, M. P., and Quinn, M. S., 2005, “Sustainable community development and ecological economics: Theoretical convergence and practical implications”, Local Environment,10(2):141-158.
    Mayer, H. and Paul K., 2006, “Slow Cities: Sustainable Places in a Fast World”, Journal of Urban Affairs, 28(4): 321-334.
    Imbroscio, D., 1998, “Reformulating urban regime theory: The division of labor between state and market reconsidered”, Journal of Urban Affairs, 20(3):233–248.
    Kollmuss, A. and Agyeman, J., 2002, “Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? ” ,Environmental Education Research, 8(3):239–260.
    Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (Eds.) ,1988,. The action research planner. Victoria: Deakin University.
    Keen, M., T. Bruck, and R. Dyball. ,2005, “Social learning: a new approach to environmental management.” Pages 3-21 in M. Keen, V. Brown, and R. Dyball, editors. Social learning in environmental management: towards a sustainable future. Earthscan, London, UK.
    Layzer, J., 2002, Science, Citizen Involvement, and Collaborative Environmental Policymaking, A research proposal for Tufts University (Middlebury, Vermont).
    Leitner, H., and Sheppard, E, 1999, “Transcending interurban competition: Conceptual issues and policy alternatives in the European Union”, pp.227–246 in The urban growth machine:Critical perspectives two decades later, Edited by A. E. G. Jones and D. Wilson, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
    Lewin, K.,1952/1988, Group decision and social change. In Deakin University ProductionUnit (Ed.), The action research reader (pp.47-62). Victoria: Deakin University.
    Lowry, Kem, Peter Adler, and Neal Milner.,1997, Participating thepublic: Group process, politics, and planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research 16 (3): 177-87.
    McKenzie-Mohr, D. and Smith, W., 1999, Fostering Sustainable Behavior: An Introduction to Community-Based Social Marketing, Gabriola Island, Canada:New Society.
    Mel, E., and Jenny, O., 2007, “Social capital and sustainability in a community under threat”, Local Environment, 12(1):17-30.
    Matsuoka, Y., 2007, “How to link modelling and practical steps to achieve a low-carbon society”, in: DEFRA (ed), Achieving a Low-Carbon Society: Symposium and Workshop, 13–15 June 2007, DEFRA, London.
    Minichiello V., Aroni R., Timewell E. & Alexander L., 1995, In-depth Interviewing, Second Edition, South Melbourne: Longman.
    Noorman, K. J., W. Biesiot, & A. J. M. Schoot Uiterkamp, 1998, “ Household Metabolism in the Context of Sustainability and Environmental Quality”, in Green Households? Domestic Consumers, Environment and Sustainability, Edited by Noorman K. J. & T. S. Uiterkamp, London: Earthscan.
    NIES(National Institute for Environmental Studies, 2006, Developing Visions for Low-Carbon Society (LCS) through Sustainable Development, Tsukuba, Japan available at http://2050.nies.go.jp/material/2050WS-WorkshopSummary_Final.pdf.
    ODPM (The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister), 2004, The Egan Review: Skill for Sustainable Communities, London: ODPM.
    Owens, S., 2000, “Engaging the public: information and deliberation in environmental policy”, Environment and Planning A, 32(7):1141–1148.
    Pollard, A., 2002,. Reflect teaching: Reflective and evidence-informed professional practice, London: Continuum.
    Peat, K. ,2007, “The ideal of a sustainable community”, in Towards understanding community: People and place,97-110, Edited by C. J. Clay, M. Madden, & L. Potts, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Rittel, Horst W. J. and Melvin M. Webber, 1973,“Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning”,Policy Sciences, 4:155-169.
    Shiva V., Ashok Emani and Afsar H. Jafri, 1999, “Globalisation and Threat to Seed Security: Case of Transgenic Cotton Trials in India” , Economic and Political Weekly,34(10/11):601-613.
    Sandercock, L., 1998,“The Death of Modernist Planning：Radical Praxis for a Postmodern Age”, in Cities for Citizens-Planning and the rise of civil society in a global age, Edited by Mike Douglass and John Friedmann, West Sussex：John Wiley and Sons.
    Stone, C. N. and Sanders, H. T., 1987, The Politics of Urban Development, Lawrence, Kan : University Press of Kansas.
    Stone, C., 2004a, “It’s more than the economy after all: Continuing the debate about urban regimes”, Journal ofUrban Affairs, 26(1):1–20.
    Stone, C., 2004b, “Rejoinder: Multiple imperatives, or some thoughts about governance in a loosely coupled but stratified society”, Journal of Urban Affairs, 26(1):35–42.
    Shutkin, W.A., 2000, The Land That Could Be: Environmentalism and Democracy in the Twenty-First Century , Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press.
    Somekh, B., 1995,“The contribution of action research to development in social behaviours: A position paper on action research methodology”, British Educational Research Journal, 21(3) :339-356.
    Skaburskis, A. and Mok, D., 2006, “Cities as Land Markets”, pp.86-102 in Canadian Cities in Transition: Local through Global Perspectives, Edited by T. Bunting and P. Filion, Ontario：Oxford University Press.
    Skea, J. and Nishioka, S., 2008, “Policies and Practices for a Low-Carbon Society”, Climate Policy, 8(Supplement): 5-16.
    Stephen K. ,1978, Defending the National Interest (Princeton: Princeton University Press) :26.
    Taylor, N., 1998, Urban Planning Theory Science 1945, London: SAGE Publications.
    Tayor S.J. & Bogdan R., 1984, Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods, Second Edition. London:Wilsy.
    UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme), IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature; since 1990: World Conservation Union) WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature), 1991, Caring for the Earth: A Strategy for Sustainable Living. London: Earthscan.
    WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development), 1987, Our Common Future, New York: Oxford University Press.
    Zeichner, K. (1995). Action research: Personal renewal and social reconstruction.Educational Action Research, 1(2), 199-219.
    三、網路資料
    苦勞網，2010.05.15，「要科技園區 苗縣政治動作頻頻，灣寶農民北上護良田 政院仍踢皮球」，查閱日期：2010.09.25，http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/52085。
    苦勞網，2010.07.16，「台灣人民挺農村 717凱道守夜行動行前記者會採訪通知」，查閱日期：2011.02.23，http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/53206。
    新頭殼，2010.06.29，「當怪手開進稻田」苗栗大埔事件登上CNN，查閱日期：2010.12.25，http://m990110.pixnet.net/blog/post/31394952
    Cittaslow, Retrieved October 31, 2010, from http://cittaslow.blogspot.com/.
    NAACP, 2000, August 9, NAACP President suspends Dallas branch President over anti-semitic Remarks. Retrieved September 1, 2010 from NAACP on the World Wide Web: http://www.naacp.org/dallas.htm.
    Slowfood, Retrieved September 1, 2010, from slowfood on the World Wide Web: http://www.slowfood.com/.
    朱淑娟，2009.05.23，「反對苗栗縣政府「鴨霸」徵收農地 後龍鎮灣寶里、海寶里農民反對後龍科技園區」，查閱日期：2011.2.1，http://shuchuan7.blogspot.com/2009/05/blog-post_25.html。
    朱淑娟，2009.04.06，「後龍科技園區政策說明會 農民抗議縣府黑箱作業、反對祖先農地被徵收」，查閱日期：2011.2.1，http://shuchuan7.blogspot.com/2009/04/blog-post_06.html
    朱淑娟，2010.06.04，「「後龍科技園區」區委會再審 委員一致認為應駁回 中央介入讓苗栗縣還可補件」，查閱日期：2011.2.5，http://shuchuan7.blogspot.com/2009/04/blog-post_06.html
    政治中心，2010.07.22，「劉政鴻牽拖小英？批大埔事件選舉操弄」，頭條新聞，查閱日期：2011.5.10，http://www.nownews.com/2010/07/22/11490-2628715.htm。
    單厚之、羅融、管婺媛、江慧真，2010.07.18，「農民反圈地 吳揆：地方處理不周」，中國時報，查閱日期：2011.2.1，http://blog.roodo.com/lchintwnews/archives/13073401.html。
    鍾麗華、彭健禮，2009.05.13，「老農不肯賣地 被當死要錢」，自由時報，查閱日期：2011.2.1。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政研究所
    98257005
    99
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098257005
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Land Economics] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    700501.pdf8000KbAdobe PDF23423View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback