政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/49900
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113392/144379 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51214163      線上人數 : 908
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49900


    題名: 論中文範域論旨角色
    On the thematic role extent in mandarin Chinese
    作者: 謝依庭
    Xie, Yi Ting
    貢獻者: 何萬順
    Her, One Soon
    謝依庭
    Xie, Yi Ting
    關鍵詞: 範域論旨角色
    複合角色
    心理動詞
    詞彙映照
    論元體現
    Extent
    composite
    psychological verb
    lexical mapping
    argument realization
    日期: 2009
    上傳時間: 2010-12-09 12:34:55 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 範域 (Extent)這個論旨角色在漢語中是個常見卻鮮少被研究的論旨角色 (Halliday, 1964; Teng, 1975; Dowty, 1991; Huang, 1993; Her, 2009)，本研究旨在探討漢語中的範域論旨角色並且為以客體(Theme)，感受者(Experiencer)，以及範域(Extent)三個論旨角色為論元的句子提出合理的解釋，例如 “一本書寫了他三年”此類句子。
    本篇論文的第一部份探討漢語中的數量詞(number expression)以及時間詞(duration)並且指出在漢語中他們經常被指派為範域論旨角色(Extent)。接著探討 “一本書寫了他三年”此類句子，並且提出活動動詞(activity verb)以及達成動詞(accomplishment verb)會模仿心理動詞(psych verb)因此產生此類句型，也就是客體(Theme)在主詞位置，而感受者(Experiencer)以及範域(Extent)為受詞。由於動詞 ‘寫’模仿了心理動詞，而且此類句型著重在受詞受到動詞的影響，因此原本的主事者(Agent) ‘他’成為主事者和感受者的複合角色(composite role)，但是只有感受者參與詞彙照映(lexical mapping)。論文最後一部份為“一本書寫了他三年”此類句子進行詞彙照映(lexical mapping)，本篇論文參照Zaenen (1993)的混合解釋方法(mixed account)以及Her (1999, 2003, 2007)的統一映照理論(unified mapping principle)成功的解釋了此類句子的論元體現(argument realization) 。
    Extent (Dowty, 1991; Her, 2009) is also referred to as Range (Halliday, 1964; Teng, 1975) or Domain (Huang 1993). It is a less studied yet commonly seen thematic role in Mandarin Chinese. This thesis aims to investigate the thematic role Extent in Mandarin Chinese, and to propose an explanation for the sentence where the verb has three arguments as Theme, Experiencer and Extent, such as yi4ben3 shu1 xie3le5 ta1 san1 nian2 ‘It took him three years to write a book’.
    In the first part, this thesis explores the thematic role Extent in Mandarin Chinese, and it is proposed that number expression and duration be considered as Extent. Then, the sentences having three arguments such as in the sentence yi4ben3 shu1 xie3le5 ta1 san1 nian2 ‘It took him three years to write a book’ are investigated. It is proposed that activity verb and accomplishment verb model the syntactic behavior of psych verb so that they can have Theme in the subject position and Experiencer and Extent as two complements. Since the activity verb xie3 ‘write’ models the psych verb and the sentence structure focuses on the [affected] feature of the object, the Agent ta1 ‘he’ becomes a composite role of Agent and Experiencer, but only the Experiencer can participate in the lexical mapping. In the last part of the thesis, the lexical mapping of the sentence yi4ben3 shu1 xie3le5 ta1 san1 nian2 ‘It took him three years to write a book’ is demonstrated. This thesis adopts Zaenen’s (1993) mixed account and Her’s (1999, 2003, 2007) unified mapping principle (UMP) to successfully account for the argument realization of the sentence.
    參考文獻: Ackerman, Farrell, and Moore, John. 2001. Proto-properties and Argument Encoding: a Correspondence Theory of Argument Selection. Stanford, California: CSLI Publications.
    Andrews, Avery. 1985. The Major Functions of the Noun Phrase. Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. I: Clause Structure, ed. by Timothy Shopen, 62-154. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Belletti, Adriana and Luigi Rizzi. 1988. Psych-Verbs and Θ-Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 291-352.
    Bresnan, Joan (ed.). 1982. The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
    Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical-Functional Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
    Bresnan, Joan and Kanerva, Jonni. 1989. Locative Inversion in Chichewa: A Case Study of Factorization in Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 1-50.
    Dowty, David. 1988. On the Semantic Content of the Notion “Thematic Roles”. Properties, Types and Meaning. Vol. II: Semantic Issues, ed. by Gennaro Chierchia, Barbara Partee and Raymond Turner, 69-131. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic Proto-roles and Argument Selection. Langue 67(3), 574-619.
    Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
    Her, One-soon. 1999. Interaction of Thematic Structure and Syntactic Structures: On Mandarin Dative Alternations. Chinese Languages and Linguistics V: Interaction of Form and Function, ed. by Y. Yin et al, 373-412. Academia Sinica.
    Her, One-soon. 2003. Chinese Inversion Constructions within a Simplified LMT. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, Monograph Series Number 19: Lexical-functional Grammar Analysis of Chinese, edited by Adams Bodomo and Kang Kwong Luke, 1-31.
    Her, One-soon. 2007. Argument-function Mismatches in Mandarin Chinese: A Lexical Mapping Account. Lingua 117(1), 221-246.
    Her, One-soon. 2009. Apparent Subject-Object Inversion in Chinese. Linguistics 47(5), 1143-1181.
    Huang, Chu-ren. 1993. Mandarin Chinese and the Lexical Mapping Theory: A Study of the Interaction of Morphology and Argument Changing. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 62(2), 337-388.
    Huang, C.-T. J., Li, Y.-H. A., and Li, Y. 2009. The Syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
    Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic Structure. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
    Jackson, Howard. 1990. Grammar and Meaning: A Semantic Approach to English Grammar. New York: Longman.
    Kelling, Carmen. 2003. French Psych Verbs and Derived Nouns. Nominals: Inside and Out, ed. by Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King, 151-179. Leland Stanford Junior University: CSLI Publications.
    Kim, Young-joo, and Richard Larson. 1989. Scope Interpretation and the Syntax of Psych-Verbs. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 681-688.
    Landau, Idan. 2009. The Locative Syntax of Experiencers. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
    Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Li, Yafei. 1995. The Thematic Hierarchy and Causativity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13, 255-282.
    Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 1990. Order and Constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 1998. Argument Determiner Phrases and Number Phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 29(4), 693-702.
    Lin, Jimmy. 2004. Event Structure and the Encoding of Arguments: The Syntax of the Mandarin and English Verb Phrase. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    Liu, Meichun. 2010. Emotion in Lexicon and Grammar: Lexical-constructional Interface of Mandarin Emotional Predicates. Paper presented at the workshop of the Institute of Linguistics at National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan, 8 April.
    Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
    Sybesma, Rint. 1999. The Mandarin VP. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Tenny, Carol. 1998. Psych Verbs and Verbal Passives in Pittsburghese. Linguistics 36(3), 591-597.
    Teng, Shou-hsin. 1975. A Semantic Study of Transitivity Relations in Chinese. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
    Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and Times. The Philosophical Review 66(2), 143-160.
    Van Voorst, Jan. 1992. The Aspectual Semantics of Psychological Verbs. Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 65-92.
    Wu, Xiu-zhi. 1993. Psychological Predicates in Chinese. MA Thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan.
    Zaenen, Annie. 1993. Unaccusativity in Dutch: Integrating syntax and lexical semantics. Semantics and the Lexicon, ed. by James Pustejovsky, 129-161. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    語言學研究所
    95555013
    98
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095555013
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[語言學研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    501302.pdf404KbAdobe PDF21162檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋