Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37293
|
Title: | 框架為本之分類詞分析:以台灣華語為例 A Frame-based Approach to Classifiers:A Case Study of Taiwan Mandarin |
Authors: | 謝禎田 Hsieh, Chen tien |
Contributors: | 何萬順 Her, One soon 謝禎田 Hsieh, Chen tien |
Keywords: | 框架理論 顯影概念 名物框架 frame profiling N-frame |
Date: | 2008 |
Issue Date: | 2009-09-19 13:04:17 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 本篇論文從認知語意學的角度來探討分類詞的本質,並且結合了Fillmore (1975) 的框架 (frame) 理論和Langacker (1987) 的顯影(profiling) 概念,作為分析的理論基礎,說明語言如何透過分類詞機制來凸顯名詞在認知上的某些語意特徵。本論文所嘗試提出的理論架構最終目的在於解釋所有的分類詞語言,但為提昇語料的可信度,語料來源以台灣華語中的分類詞為主。 研究分析主要建構於名物框架 (N-frame) 的認知基礎上,進而檢視台灣華語中不同類別之名詞藉由不同之分類詞所彰顯的語意特徵 (feature),同樣重要的是不同的語意特徵在台灣華語分類詞系統中的優先排序。最後我們從其他的分類詞語言中,如閩南語及日語,論證名物框架系及彰顯機制統的普遍性;唯不同的分類詞語言或不同方言中所選擇顯影的語意特徵以及其優先排序都可能有所不同,分類詞系統也因此呈現複雜多樣的面貌。 On the basis of the theory of Frame, proposed by Fillmore (1975), and the models of profile and base segregation, proposed by Langcker (1987), this thesis aims at a cognitive approach to explain how languages manifest certain cognitive features of a noun by means of classifiers. In addition, the theoretical framework tries to explain all the known classifier languages and to foster a greater accountability and reliability of the data, this study focuses on Taiwan Mandarin. The data analysis is based on the cognitive foundation of an N-frame, whereby it is found that Taiwan Mandarin categorizes nouns by profiling different features of nouns through the use of different classifiers. A hierarchy or ranking of classifier features in Taiwan Mandarin is also provided. Finally, in all known classifier languages, such as Southern Min and Japanese, it is found that the application of the use of an N-frame is consistent and universal in human cognition. The only thing that varies is the profiling system that each language employs and the hierarchy of features it selects. Thus, the use of classifiers manifests varied and complex aspects. |
Reference: | Adams, K. and Nancy F. Conklin. (1973). Toward a theory of natural classification. Papers from the 9th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. pp. 1-10. Ahren, Kathleen. (1994). Classifier production in nominals and aphasics. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 22:203-247. Alexandra, A. Y. (2000). Classifier: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Allan, K. (1977). Classifier. Language 53:285-311. Biq, Yung-O. (2004). Construction, reanalysis, and stance: ‘V yi ge N’ and variations in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1655–1672. Chao, Y. R. (1968). A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of Calofornia Press. Cheng, L. R. (1985). A comparison of Taiwanese, Taiwan Mandarin, and Peking Mandarin. Language 61.2: 352-377. David, Bostock. (1994). Aristotle Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press ; New York : Oxford University Press. Evans, Vyvyan and Melanie Green Edinburgh. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh University. Fillmore, Charles. (1982). Frame Semantics, in Linguistic Society of Korea. Linguistics in the Morning Calm, ed. by Linguistic Society of Korea: 111-137. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing. Gorard, S. (2003). Quantitative Methods in Social Science. London : Continuum. Her, O., in press. Language and Group Identity: On Taiwan Mainlanders` Mother Tongue and Taiwan Mandarin. To appear in Language and Linguistics. Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi and Friederike Hunnemeyer (1991). Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Hong, Z. (2007). Numeral classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 16 (1): 43-59. Hsu, Hui-ju. (2006). Some Aspects of Phonological Leveling in Taiwan Mandarin. Ph.d Dissertation, National Taiwan Normal University. Hu, Q. (1993). The Acquisition of Chinese Classifiers by Young Mandarin-speaking Children. Ph.D. Dissertation, Boston University. Lakkoff, George. (1986). Classifiers as a reflection of mind. in Craig (1986), 13-51. Langacker, Ronald W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. Li, C. & Thompson, S. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press. Li, Wendan. (2000). The pragmatic function of numeral- classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language Studies 32 (8): 1113-33. Liang, Y-C. (2006). Nominal Phrases in English and Japanese Speakers’ L2 Mandarin Grammars. Ph.D. Dissertation. Cambridge. Lien, Chinfa & Wang, Pengying. (1999). Shape classifiers in Mandarin and Taiwanese - A psycholinguistic perspective. The Biological Basis of Language, ed by Ovid J. L. Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph. 13:189-221. Project on Linguistic Analysis, University of California at Berkeley. Loke, Kit-Ken. (1997). The grammaticalization and regrammaticalization of Chinese numeral classifier morphemes. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 25:1-20. Loke, Kit-Ken. (1996). Norms and realities of Mandarin shape classifiers. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 31(2), 1–22. Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky. (1993). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Manuscript, Rutgers University and University of Colorado, Boulder. Rosch, Eleanor. (1987). Principles of categorization. Cognition and Categorization, ed. by Eleanor Rosch & Barbara B. Lloyd, 27-48. Hillsdale, NJ; NY: Lawrence Erlbaum. Shi, Yuzhi & Li, Charles N. (2002). The establishment of the classifier system and the grammaticalization of the morphosyntactic particle de in Chinese. Language Sciences 24 (1): 1-15. Sommer, F. (1959). The ordinary language tree. Mind 68: 160- 185. Sommer, F. (1971). Structural ontology. Philosophia 1: 21- 42. Tai, J. H.-Y. (2003). Cognitive relativism: resultative construction in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 4 (2): 301-16. Tai, J. H.-Y. & Wang, L. (1990). A semantic study of the classifier Tiao. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 25 (1), 35–56. Tamly, Leonard. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 3, ed. by Timothy Shoper. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 36-149. Tang, C.-C. J. (1990). A note on the DP analysis of the Chinese noun phrase. Linguistics 28: 337-354. Tang, C.-C. J. (2005). Nouns or classifiers: A non-movement analysis of classifiers in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 6 (3): 431-72. Taylor, John. (1995). Linguistic Categorization, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Tien, Yi-Min, Tzeng, Ovid J. L. & Hung, Daisy L. (2002). Semantic and cognitive basis of Chinese classifiers: A functional approach. Language and Linguistics 3 (1): 101-32. Ungerer, Friedrich & Hans-Jorg Schmid. (2006). An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. New York: Longman. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (1958). Philosophische Untersuchungen, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe as Philosophical Investigations, 3rd edn. 1999. Harlow, London: Prentice Hall. Yu, Jiyuan. (2003). The Structure of Being in Aristotle`s Metaphysics. The New Synthese Historical Library, vol. 52. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 黃宣範 (1993) 社會、語言與族群意識:台灣語言社會學的研究。台北:文鶴。 張麗麗、黃居仁,陳克健,賴慶雄編 (1997) 國語日報量詞典。國語日報出版。 何杰 (2000) 現代漢語量詞硏究。北京 : 民族。 賴慶雄 (2007) 實用量詞詞典。板橋市 : 螢火蟲出版。 韓楷檉 (1995) 常用量詞手册。臺北市 : 教育部。 松村明編 (2006) 大辞林。東京都 : 三省堂。 網路資源 Taiwan Google: http://www.google.com.tw/ 北京大學漢語語言學研究中心語料庫:http://ccl.pku.edu.cn/Yuliao_Contents.Asp |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 語言學研究所 95555012 97 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095555012 |
Data Type: | thesis |
Appears in Collections: | [語言學研究所] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|