English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113325/144300 (79%)
Visitors : 51158913      Online Users : 908
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35981


    Title: 客語打類、忍類及促類動詞中動力學之體現
    Force-Dynamic Manifestations of Verbs of Hitting, Refraining, and Urging in Hakka
    Authors: 強舒媺
    Shu-mei Chiang
    Contributors: 賴惠玲 博士
    Dr. Huei-ling Lai
    強舒媺
    Shu-mei Chiang
    Keywords: 動力學
    客語
    打類動詞
    忍類動詞
    促類動詞
    force-dynamics
    Hakka
    verbs of hitting
    verbs of refraining
    verbs of urging
    Date: 2002
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 16:41:11 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本論文「客語打類、忍類及促類動詞中動力學之體現」從物理學中之動力學觀點來審視語言之現象,以Lai (2000)針對客語打類動詞詞彙化類型之研究以及Gao (2001), Gao & Cheng (2002)針對中文與英語中肢體接觸類動詞之研究為基礎,並進一步修正及採用Talmy (2000a)所提出之動力學架構來加以分析客語打類、忍類及促類三類近義動詞。客語之打類動詞涉及內在心理意圖與外在肢體接觸,亦即同時牽涉到心理層面與肢體層面中「力」的作用,忍類動詞中「力」的衝突發生於內在心理層面,亦即本我與自我之間產生衝突,而促類動詞則表現出交互心理層面中「力」的相對關係,亦即藉由溝通等方式與他人產生「力」的對抗。因此,本論文藉由分析此三類動詞,將得已呈現心理肢體(psychophysical),內在心理(intrapsychological)以及交互心理(interpsychological)三個不同層面中動力學之體現,並能夠進一步檢視語意內涵「力」與此三類動詞之句法表現間之相互關係。
    Based on Lai’s (2000) study of verbs of hitting in Hakka and Gao’s (2001) and Gao & Cheng’s (2002) studies of verbs of physical action by impact in English and Mandarin Chinese, this study modifies the force-dynamic model proposed by Talmy (2000a) to analyze Hakka hitting verbs in psychophysical domain, Hakka refraining verbs in intrapsychological domain, and Hakka urging verbs in interpsychological domain. The analysis proposes that two force-dynamic patterns can be generalized from these three groups of verbs, one ONSET CAUSATION pattern, and the other ONSET DESPITE pattern.
    Moreover, the correlation between the semantic component FORCE and the syntactic manifestation has been examined. This force-dynamic opposition is manifested in syntax as demonstrated by resultative complements, BUN-constructions, LAU-constructions, the potential mode and verb-copying constructions along with the adverbs of duration. In addition, the confirmation of the speaker’s expectation can be achieved by adverbs of evaluation and adverbs of justification. The well-formedness of these syntactic structures and the felicity of the usage of the adverbs depend heavily on the interaction of the Antagonist’s force and the Agonist’s force.
    Reference: References
    -Bei, Guqin, and Zuetao Zhang (eds.) 1988. Hanzi pindu tongji---Sucheng shidu youzuan biao <Statistics of Chinese word frequency---A first priority list for quick literacy reading>. Beijing: Dianzi Gongye Chubanshe <Electronics Industry Publishing House>.
    -Chang, Li-li, Chen, Keh-jiann, and Huang, Chu-Ren. 2000. A lexical-semantic analysis of Mandarin Chinese verbs: Representation and methodology. International Journal of Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing 5:1. 1-18.
    -Chomsky, Noam. 1988. Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures. Cambridge MIT Press.
    -Dixon, R. M. W. 1991. A new approach to English grammar, on semantic principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    -Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67:3. 547-619.
    -Gao, Hong. 2001. The physical foundation of the patterning of physical action verbs. Lund University.
    -Gao, Hong, and Ching-Chuang, Cheng. 2002. Verbs of contact by impact in English and their equivalents in Chinese. Proceedings of the Third Chinese Lexical Semantics Conference. 29-40. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
    -Hakka Dictionary. 1992. Miaoli: Cathay Hakka News.
    -Hakka Dictionary of Words. 1998. Taipei: Yongguang.
    -Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi, and Friederike Hunnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    -Jackendoff, R. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    -Johnson, Mark. 1987. Gestalt structure as a constraint on meaning. The body in the mind. 41-64. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    -Labov, W. 1973. The boundaries of words and their meanings. New ways of analyzing variation in English, eds. By C. J. Bailey and R. Shy, 340-73. Washington D. C.
    -Lai, Huei-ling. 2000. The lexicalization patterns of verbs of hitting in Hakka. Proceedings of the 2000 NCCU Teachers’ Conference on Linguistics Research. 200-11. Taipei: NCCU.
    -Lai, Huei-ling. 2001. On Hakka BUN: A case of polygrammaticalization. Language and Linguistics 2:2. 137-53.
    -Lai, Huei-ling. 2002. Hakka LAU constructions: A semantic analysis. Taipei: Crane.
    -Lai, Huei-ling. 2003. Hakka LAU constructions: A constructional approach. Language AND Linguistics 4:2. 353-78.
    -Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    -Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    -Lien, Chinfa. 2002. Interface between construction and lexical semantics: A case study of the polysemous word kek4激 and its congeners tin3佯, chng1裝 and ke2假 in Taiwanese Southern Min. Language AND Linguistics 3:3. 569-88.
    -Lin, J. W., and J. C. C. Tang, 1995. Modals as verbs in Chinese: A GB perspective. Collection of Sinica Academia 66. 53.
    -Random House Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary. 1998. 2nd edition. New York: Random House.
    -Rosch, E. 1978. Principles of categorization. Cognition and categorization, eds. By E. Rosch and Lloyd B. B., 27-48. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
    -Sweetser, Eve E. 1982. Root and epistemic modals: Causality in two worlds. Berkeley Linguistics Society 8. 484-507.
    -Sweetser, Eve E. 1984. Semantic structure and semantic change: A cognitive linguistic study of modality, perception, speech acts, and logical relations. Ph. D. dissertation. Berkeley: University of California.
    -Sweetser, Eve E. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
    -Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, ed. By T. Shopen, 57-149. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
    -Talmy, Leonard. 1991. Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Berkeley Linguistics Society 17. 480-519.
    Talmy, Leonard. 2000a. Toward a cognitive semantics I: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    -Talmy, Leonard. 2000b. Toward a cognitive semantics II: Volume in typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    -Tuomela, Raimo. 1977. Human action and its explanation: A study on the philosophical foundations of psychology. Dordrecht and Boston: D. Reidel Publishing.
    -Tuomela, Raimo. 1995. The importance of Us: A philosophical study of basic social notions, Stanford series in philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    語言學研究所
    89555009
    91
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0089555009
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[語言學研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2481View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback