政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/34520
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51276295      線上人數 : 848
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34520


    題名: 從重商主義到自由貿易-英國航海法與穀物法的政治經濟分析
    作者: 朱雯琪
    Chu, Wen-chi
    貢獻者: 何思因
    Ho, Szu-yin
    朱雯琪
    Chu, Wen-chi
    關鍵詞: 重商主義
    自由貿易
    航海法
    穀物法
    反穀物法聯盟
    穀物法聯盟
    日期: 2005
    上傳時間: 2009-09-19 15:43:29 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本文主要以制度為分析架構，討論英國在1651年航海法通過，以及1846年穀物法廢除的因素。主要是從國際經濟情勢的改變如何影響到國內利益團體的互動，以及國內利益團體的互動，以及包含利益團體在內的制度性因素如何影響到政策的產出。以航海法和穀物法作為研究的個案。
    當國際間的經濟情勢勢必會影響到一國的國家利益，此時國家最緊要的方針就是制定對自己有利的經濟政策，向來有貿易自由化和重商主義兩種選擇。但是這種政策的抉擇是考量國內與國際因素後所做出的決定，也就是國際關係學者所稱的雙層博奕(two levels game)。就國內的因素而言，政策的制定往往是國內社會經濟制度和政治制度交互影響的結果。
    本文研究發現，1651航海法通過時，英國處於國際經濟情勢上的劣勢，因此對於主政者而言，經濟上的保護主義對英國才是有好處的，加上當時英國國王與商人之間特殊的依存關係，國際政治上現實主義的氛圍，使得重商主義成為當時的必然。在實施以航海法為主的重商主義之後，英國開始超越荷蘭，成為歐洲第一經濟強國，此時以重商主義為主的政策反過來影響國內的制度。
    18世紀英國開始轉強，國內出現了新的工商團體還有新的政治思潮。這些社會經濟制度的轉變使得新的利益團體逐漸要求政治上的權力。透過公共制度的變化，國會逐漸分享國王的權力，使得重商主義政策變得窒礙難行，貿易自由化成為當時英國最有利的選擇，首當其衝的是穀物法的廢除。
    參考文獻: Abbott, P. U. 1928. “The Growth of English Shipping.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 42(3): 465-478. 　
    Albrecht-Carrie, R. 1967. Europe: 1500-1848. New York: Littlefield, Adams.
    Aydelotte, W. O. 1967. “The Country Gentlemen and the Repeal of the Corn Laws.” The English Historical Review 82(322): 47-60.
    Bailey, C. S. 1991. “Lessons in Lobbying for Free Trade in 19th-Century Britain: To Concentrate or Not.” The American Political Science Review 85(1): 37-58.
    Barbour, V. 1963. Capitalism in Amsterdam in the 17th Century. Mich.: University of Michigan Press.
    Barbour, Violet. 1930. “Dutch and English Merchant Shipping in the Seventeenth Century.” The Economic History Review 2(2): 261-290.
    Brenner, Robert. 1972. “The Social Basis of English Commercial Expansion, 1550-1650.” The Journal of Economic History 32(1): 361-384.
    Cable, J. 1998. ThePpoliticalIinfluence of Naval Force in History. New York: St. Martin`s Press.
    Christopher, H. 1966. The Century of Revolution 1603-1714. New York: W. W. Norton ＆ Company, Inc.
    Clapham, J. H. 1910. “The Last Years of the Navigation Acts (Continued).” The English Historical Review 25(100): 687-707.
    Clapham, J. H.1910. “The Last Years of the Navigation Acts.” The English Historical Review 25(99): 480-501.
    Clark, G. K. 1951.“The Repeal of Corn Laws and the Politics of the Forties.” The Economic History Review 4(1): 1-13.
    Clark, G. K. 1953. “Hunger and Politics in 1842” The Journal of Modern History 25(4): 355-374.
    Clark, G. K. 1953.“Hunger and Politics in 1842.“ The Journal of Modern History 25(4): 355-374.
    Close, D. 1969. “The Formation of a Two-Party Alignment in the House of Commons between 1832 and 1841.” The English Historical Review 84: 257-277.
    Crosby, Travis L. 1976.“Sir Robert Peel`s administration, 1841-1846.” Newton Abbot: David and Charles; Hamden, Conn. : Archon,
    Davis, R. 1973. English OverseasTtrade, 1500-1700. London: Macmillan.
    Davis, Ralph. 1956. “Merchant Shipping in the Economy of the Late Seventeenth Century.” The Economic History Review 9(1): 59-73.
    De Vries, Jan. 1997. The First Modern Economy : success, failure, and perseverance of the Dutch economy, 1500-1815. New York : Cambridge University Press.
    Douglas, A. I. 1996. Against the Tide: An Intellectual History of Free Trade. Princeton: New Jersey.
    Doyle, W. 1992. The Old European Order, 1660-1800. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Dukes, P. 1985. A history of Europe, 1648-1948: the arrival, the rise, the fall. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
    Ekelund, R. B. and R. D. Tollison. 1981. Mercantilism as a Rent-Seeking Society: Economic Regulation in Historical Perspective. College Station, Tex.: Texas A&M University Press.
    Evans, P. B., H. K. Jacobson, and R. D. Putnam. 1993. Double-edged Diplomacy: international bargaining and domestic politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Fairlie, S. 1965.“The Nineteenth-Century Corn Law Reconsidered.” The Economic History Review 18(3): 562-575.
    Farnell, J. E. 1964. “The Navigation Act of 1651, the First Dutch War, and the London Merchant Community.” The Economic History Review 16(3): 439-454.
    Farnell, J. E. 1964. “The Navigation Act of 1651, the First Dutch War, and the London Merchant Community.” The Economic History Review 16(3): 439-454.
    Fay, C. R. 1921. “Corn Prices and the Corn Laws, 1815-1846.”The Economic Journal 31(121): 17-27.
    Fay, C. R. 1928. “The Significance of the Corn Laws in English History.” The Economic History Review 1(2): 314-318.
    Ferguson, W. K. 1969. A Survey of European Civilization. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    Fisher, F. J. 1940. “Commercial Trends and Policy in Sixteenth Century.” England Economic History Review 2(10): 95-117.
    Fisher, F. J. 1940. “Commercial Trends and Policy in Sixteenth-Century England.” The Economic History Review 10(2): 95-117.
    Fisher, F. J. Trade, Government, and Economy in Pre-industrial England: essays presented to Fisher, F. J. London : Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1976.
    Gambles, A. 1998.“Rethinking the Politics of Protection: Conservatism and the Corn Laws, 1830-52.” The English Historical Review 113(453): 28-952.
    Garrett, G. and Lange, P. 1996. “Internationalization, Institution and Political Change.” In Internationalization and Domestic Politics, eds. Keohane, R. O. and Milner, H. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Gilpin, R. 2000. The Challenge of Global Capitalism: the world economy in the 21st century. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
    Gilpin, R. 2001. Global Political Economy: understanding the international economic order. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
    Hall, Michael G. 1957. “The House of Lords, Edward Randolph, and the Navigation Act of 1696.” The William and Mary Quarterly 14(4): 494-515.
    Hill, J. R. and Ranft, B. 1995. The Oxford illustrated History of the Royal Navy. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Hirschman, A.O. 1945. National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade. University of California Press.
    Hoscox, M. J. 2002. International Trade and Political Conflict: Commerce, Coaliation, and Mobility. Princeton University Press.
    Irvine, I.J. 1989. Dutch Primacy in World Trade, 1585-1740. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Jordan, H. D. 1927.“The Political Methods of the Anti-Corn Law League.” Political Science Quarterly 42(1): 58-76.
    Krueger, Anne O. 1974. “The Political Economy of Rent Seeking.” American Economic Review, 64(3), 291-303.
    Lloyd, T. H. 1991. England and the German Hanse, 1157-1611: a study of their trade and commercial diplomacy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Loades, D. M. 1992. The Tudor Navy: an administrative, political and military history. England: Scholar Press.
    Loschky, David J. 1973. “Studies of the Navigation Acts: New Economic Non-History?” The Economic History Review 26(4): 689-691.
    Lusztig, M. 1995.“Solving Peel`s Puzzle: Repeal of the Corn Laws and Institutional Preservation.” Comparative Politics 27(4): 393-408.
    Lusztig, Michael. “Solving Peel`s Puzzle: Repeal of the Corn Laws and Institutional Preservation.” Comparative Politics 27(4): 393-408.
    Magnusson, L. 1993. Mercantilist Economics. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    McGovney, Dudley Odell. 1904. “The Navigation Acts as Applied to European Trade.” The American Historical Review 9(4): 725-734.
    McKeown, T. J. 1989.“The Politics of Corn Law Repeal and Theories of Commercial Policy.”British Journal of Political Science 19(3): 353-380.
    McLean, I. 1990.“The Politics of Corn Law Repeal: A Comment.” British Journal of Political Science 20(2): 279-281.
    Mitchell, B. R. 1962. British historical statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Mitchell, B. R. 1975. European historical statistics, 1750-1970. New York: Columbia University Press.
    Moore, D. C. 1965. “The Corn Laws and High Farming.” The Economic History Review 18(3):354-366.
    Mosse, G. L. 1947.“The Anti-League: 1844-1846.”The Economic History Review 17(2): 134-142.
    Mun,T. 1977. “A Discoverse of Trade, from England to the East Indies: Answering to Diurse Objection which are visually made against the same.” 收編於 周憲文 編譯：《重商主義論》，台北：臺灣銀行。
    Mun,T. 1977. “A Petition and Remonstrance of the Governor and Company of the Merchant of London, Trading to East Indies, Exhibited to the Honorable the House of Commons assembled in Parliament.” 收編於 周憲文 編譯：《重商主義論》，台北：臺灣銀行。
    Mun,T. 1977. “England’s Treasure by Foreign Trade.” 收編於 周憲文 編譯：《重商主義論》，台北：臺灣銀行。
    Munro, J. H. A. 1994. Textiles, Towns and Trade: essays in the economic history of late-medieval England and the Low Countries. Aldershot, Hampshire, Great Britain; Brookfield, Vt. : Variorum.
    Nettels, Curtis P. 1952. “British Mercantilism and the Economic Development of the Thirteen Colonies.” The Journal of Economic History 12(2): 105-114.
    Neustadt, R. E. 1986. Thinking inTime: the uses of history for decision-makers. New York: Free Press.
    Newbould, I. 1983. “Sir Robert Peel and the Conservative Party, 1832-1841: A Study in Failure? ” The English Historical Review 98(388): 529-557.
    North, D. C. 1968. “Sources of Productivity Change in Ocean Shipping, 1600-1850,” Journal of Political Economy 76(5): 953-970.
    North, D. C. 1973. The Rise of the Western world: a new economic history. Cambridge: University Press.
    North, D.C. and B. R. Weingast “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutional Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England.”The Journal of Economic History 49(4): 803-832.
    Phillips, J. A. and C. Wetherell. 1995. “The Great Reform Act of 1832 and the Political Modernization of England.” The American Historical Review 100(2): 411-436.
    Pickering, P. A. 1986. “Class without Words: Symbolic Communication in the Chartist Movement.” Past and Present 112: 144-162.
    Postan, M. M., E. E. Rich, and C. H. Wilson. 1989. The Cambridge Economic History of Europe. 6 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Prest, John. 1996. “A Large amount or a Small? Revenue and the Nineteenth-Century Corn Laws.” The Historical Journal 39(2): 467-478.
    Prestwich, Menna. 1950. “Diplomacy and Trade in the Protectorate.” The Journal of Modern History 22(2): 103-121.
    Prothero, I. J. 1971.“London Chartism and the Trades.” The Economic History Review 24(2): 202-219.
    Ransom, Roger L. 1968. “British Policy and Colonial Growth: Some Implications of the Burden from the Navigation Acts.” The Journal of Economic History 28(3): 427-435.
    Riker, W. 1986. The Art of Political Manipulation. New Heaven.
    Rogowski, R. 1989. Commerce and Coalitions: how trade affects domestic political alignments. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
    Rostow, W. W. 1941. “Business Cycles, Harvests, and Politics: 1790-1850. The Journal of Economic History 1(2): 206-221.
    Sawers, Larry. 1992. “The Navigation Acts Revisited.” The Economic History Review 45(2): 262-284.
    Schmidt, Gerhard. 1947. “Mediterranean Elements in the British Navigation Act.“ Speculum 22(3): 342-357.
    Schuyler, R. L. 1917. “British Imperial Preference and Sir Robert Peel” Political Science Quarterly 32(3): 429-449.
    Smart, W. 1909.“The Antecedents of the Corn Law of 1815” The English Historical Review 24(95): 470-489.
    Stone, Lawrence. 1947. “State Control in Sixteenth-Century England.” The Economic History Review 17(2): 103-120.
    Stradling, R. A. 1992. The Armada of Flanders: Spanish Maritime Policy and European War, 1568-1668. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Tancred, M. L. 1960.“The Anti-League and the Corn Law Crisis of 1846”The Historical Journal 3(2): 162-183.
    Thomas, J. A. 1929. “The Repeal of the Corn Laws, 1846.” Economica 25: 53-60.
    Viner, J. 1951 International Economics: studies. Glencoe: Free Press.
    Vries, J., Woude, A. V. 1997. The First Modern Economy Success, failure, and Perseverance of the Dutch economy, 1500-1815. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Wadsworth, A. P. 1999. The CottonIindustry: its growth and impact, 1600-1935. Tokyo: Kyokuto Shoten.
    Ward, J. T. 1966. “West Riding Landowners and the Corn Laws.”
    The English Historical Review 81(319): 256-272.
    Willan, T. S. 1937. “The River Navigation and Trade of the Severn Valley, 1600-1750.” The Economic History Review 8(1): 68-79.
    Braudel, F. 著，施康強、顧良 譯：《十五至十八世紀的物質文明、經濟資本主義》，台北：貓頭英出版社，1999。
    Court, W. H. B. 著，周憲文 譯：《英國近代經濟史》，台北：台灣銀行，1977。
    Evans, E. J. 著，吳夢峰 譯：《英國的政黨》，台北：麥田出版社，2000。
    Keynes, J. N. 著，黨國英、劉惠 譯：《政治經濟學的範圍與方法》，北京：華夏出版社，2001。
    McCleland, J. S. 著，彭懷棟 譯：《西洋政治思想史》，台北：商周出版社，2000。
    Moore, B. 著，蕭純美 譯：《民主獨裁的社會起源Ⅰ》，台北：遠流出版社，1992。
    Sabine, G. H. 著，李少軍、尚新建 譯：《西方政治思想史》，台北：商周出版社，1937。
    Smith A. 著，謝宗林、李華夏 譯：《國富論》，台北：先覺出版社，2000。
    Thompson, E. P. 著，賈士蘅 譯：《英國工人階級的形成》，2001，台北：麥田出版社，。
    Weber, M. 著，康樂 編譯：《經濟與歷史：韋伯選集 》，臺北：遠流出版社，1980。
    何思因：〈金融制度與近代國家建立的影響〉，中國政治學會年會，台北：台灣大學，2001。
    林鐘雄：《西洋經濟思想史》，台北：三民出版社，2004。
    夏炎德：《歐美經濟史》，上海三聯書店，1988。
    張漢裕：《西洋經濟思想史概要》，台北：台大法學院經濟學系， 1962。
    張漢裕：《英國重商主義要論》，台北，台大法學院經濟學系，1957。
    http://personal.lse.ac.uk/schonhar/introcornlaws.htm
    http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.asp?compid=4209
    http://www.cccc.org.uk/uk_chinese.html
    http://www.dialspace.dial.pipex.com
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    政治研究所
    90252015
    94
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0902520151
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[政治學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    52015101.pdf100KbAdobe PDF21023檢視/開啟
    52015102.pdf40KbAdobe PDF2979檢視/開啟
    52015103.pdf67KbAdobe PDF2967檢視/開啟
    52015104.pdf352KbAdobe PDF21016檢視/開啟
    52015105.pdf261KbAdobe PDF22300檢視/開啟
    52015106.pdf536KbAdobe PDF29186檢視/開啟
    52015107.pdf307KbAdobe PDF26212檢視/開啟
    52015108.pdf357KbAdobe PDF22880檢視/開啟
    52015109.pdf107KbAdobe PDF21141檢視/開啟
    52015110.pdf107KbAdobe PDF21257檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋