政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/33409

政大典藏 > College of Foreign Languages and Literature > Graduate Institute of Linguistics > Theses > Item 140.119/33409

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33409

Title:	漢語中的字彙產出:以連續話語中的縱向聚合詞誤為例 Word Production in Mandarin Chinese: Evidence from paradigmatic errors in spontaneous speech
Authors:	陳慧盈 Chen,Huei ying
Contributors:	萬依萍 Wan,I Ping 陳慧盈 Chen,Huei ying
Keywords:	漢語語言生成模型連接模型語誤縱向聚合詞誤 Mandarin speech production model connectionist model speech error paradigmatic lexical error
Date:	2007
Issue Date:	2009-09-17 16:30:37 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本研究旨在探討如何將漢語中詞彙的產出，建構在過去的語言生成模型(speech production model)之上。在過去文獻中，語言生成模型主要有兩大流派：序列模型(serial-ordering model)主張各階段的激活過程只能單向進行，而連接模型(connectionist model)則允許各階段之間有雙向互動。此外，兩大模型闡述綜合性詞誤 (同時在語意及語音方面相關的詞誤)的生成也略有不同：序列模型認為綜合性詞誤起因於功能層次(functional level)與位置層次(positional level)同時發生錯誤，但若綜合性語誤的比例顯著高於機率，則較不支持此說法；連接模型則認為綜合性詞誤來自音系層(phonological stage)和詞條層(lemma stage)間的交互作用，倘若大部分的縱向聚合詞誤(paradigmatic errors)皆具有語音相似度，此說法較能得到驗證。因此，為估算漢語詞彙選擇中語音的相似度，本研究分析了421個在自然語境中收集的單音節縱向聚合詞誤，結果發現綜合性語誤所佔的比例顯著偏高，此外，所有詞誤在字首、語音特徵、韻母、音節結構和聲調各方面的效應都達到顯著，這說明了語音和語意的確會同時影響詞彙的選擇，這也表示連接模型可能較接近中文的語言生成過程。另外，語料分析的結果也顯示出漢語詞彙產出的特性。第一、在詞彙提取的過程中，字首比語音特徵和韻母扮演了更重要的角色，這同時也支持音節結構應以字首(C)和韻母劃分(CV/CVC)的假設；第二、聲調效應的顯著顯示聲調應存在於字彙的底層結構，因此聲調的促發應先於詞彙結的激化；第三、目標詞彙(target)的音節結構應在音系層的初期就已指定，因此有相同音節結構的詞彙結容易勝出。綜合以上可知，漢語的生成過程較傾向連接模型的架構，唯聲調和音節結構等語言特色宜納入模型討論。 This study aims to investigate the process of word production in Mandarin, to see how it can be structured in previous models. Speech production models have two primary sects—the serial-ordering model versus the connectionist model—arguing for uni-directional and bi-directional activation respectively. Besides, between these two models, the generation of both semantically- and phonologically-related lexical errors (mixed errors) is different. On the one hand, the serial-ordering model (Garrett, 1988) interpreted mixed errors as malfunctions occur at both functional and positional level. It may not be favored if mixed errors occur more than chance in the corpus. On the other hand, the connectionist model (Dell, 1986) explained it as the feedback activation from the phonological level back to the lemma level. It would be supported if most paradigmatic substitutions show phonological similarities. Therefore, in order to facilitate the phonological similarities in lexical substitutions, 421 single-syllable paradigmatic (non-contextual) lexical errors collected in natural settings are examined. It is found that the percentage of mixed errors is significantly higher. Moreover, in the corpus the initialness, similarity, rhyme, syllable structure and tone effects are all prominent, which proves the joint effect of semantic and phonology in word selection. In other words, the connectionist network might better account for the processing of Mandarin. In addition, the analysis reveals certain issues of word-production in Mandarin. First, initials are primary activation units in word retrieval, rather than phonetic features or rhymes. It also supports the division of hierarchical syllable structure as an onset (C) and rhyme (VC/CVC). Secondly, the significance of tone effect suggests that tone may be stored in the underlying phonological organization of lexicons and thus is prior in word-activation. Thirdly, the syllable structure of the target is assigned at the beginning of phonological stage and thus lexical nodes with the same syllable structure tend to be selected. In conclusion, the analysis proves that the connectionist model could be applied to Mandarin Chinese if the status of tone and syllable structure is included.
Reference:	Aitchison, J. & Straf, M. (1982). Lexical storage and retrieval: a developing skill? In A. Cutler (Ed.), Slips of the tongue and language production (pp. 197-241). Mouton. Baars, B. J., Motley, M. T. & Mackay, D. (1975). Output editing for lexical status from artificially elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Behavior 14, 382-391. Beckman, M. (1986). Stress and Non-stress Accent. Foris Publications. Berg, T. (1991). Phonological processing in a syllable-timed language with pre-final Stress: Evidence from Spanish speech error data. Language and Cognitive Processes 6, 265-301. Boomer, D. S. & Laver, J. D. M. (1968). Slips of the tongue. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 3, 2-12. Butterworth, B. L. (1982). Speech errors: Old date in search of new theories. In A. Cutler (Ed.), Slips of the tongue and language production. Amsterdam: Mouton. Chen, J.-Y. (1993). 一些國語的自然語誤及其分類，華文世界 69, 26-41. (A corpus of speech errors in Mandarin Chinese and their classification. The World of Chinese Language 69, 26-41.) Chen, J.-Y. (1999). The representation and processing of tone in Mandarin Chinese: Evidence from slips of the tongue. Applied Psycholinguistics 20, 289-301. Chen, J.-Y., Chen, T.-M. & Dell, G. S. (2002). Word-form encoding in Mandarin Chinese as assessed by the implicit priming task. Journal of Memory and Language 46, 751-781. Cheng, C.-C. (1973). A Synchronic Phonology of Mandarin Chinese. The Netherlands: Mouton. Cohen, A. (1966). Errors of speech and their implication for understanding the strategy of language users. Zeitschrift fur Phonetik 21(1/2), 177-181. Cutler, A. (1982). The reliability of speech error data. In A. Cutler (Ed.), Slips of the Tongue and Language Production (pp. 7-28). Mouton. Cutting, J. C. & Ferreira, V. S. (1999). Semantic and phonological information flow in the production lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognitions 25(2), 318-344. Dell, S. G. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review 93(3), 283-321. Dell, S. G. (1988). The retrieval of phonological forms in production: Tests of predictions from a connectionist model. Journal of Memory and Language 27, 124-142. Dell, S. G. & Juliano, C. (1996) Computational models of phonological encoding. In T. Dijkstra & K. de Smedt (Eds.) Computational psycholinguistics: AI and connectionist models of human language processing (pp. 328-359). Taylor & Francis. Dell, S. G. & O’Seaghdha, P. G. (1992). Stages of lexical access in language production. Cognition 42, 287-314. Dell, S. G. & Reich, P. A. (1981). Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20, 611-629. Duanmu, S. (2000). The Phonology of Standard Chinese. Oxford University Press. Fay, D. & Culter, A. (1977). Malapropisms and the structure of the mental lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 8(3), 505-520. Fromkin, V. (1971). The nonanomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Linguistics 4, 47-68. Fromkin, V. & Emmonrey, K. D. (1988). The mental lexicon. In F. J. Newmeyer (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey. Volume III Language: Psychological and biological aspects (pp. 124-149). Cambridge University Press. Fromkin, V. & Ratner, N. B. (1998). Speech production. In J. B. Gleason & N. B. Ratner (Eds.), Psycholinguistics (pp. 309-346). California: Wadsworth. Gandour, J. (1977). Counterfeit tones in the speech of Southern Thai bidialectals. Lingua 41, 125-143. Garrett, M. F. (1980a). The limits of accommodation: arguments for independent processing levels in sentence production. In V. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand (pp. 263-271). New York: Academic Press. Garrett, M. F. (1987). Meaning and form in word retrieval: substitutions errors within semantic fields. MIT Center for Cognitive Science Occasional paper No. 41. Garrett, M. F. (1988). Processes in language production. In F. J. Newmeyer (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey III. Language: Psychological and biological aspects (pp. 69-96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Harley, T. A. (1984). A critique of top-down independent levels models of speech production: Evidence from non-plan-internal speech errors. Cognitive Science 8, 191-219. Harley, T. A. (1993). Phonological activation of semantic competitors during lexical access in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes 8(3), 291-309. Hockett, C. F. (1967). Where the tongue slips, there slip I. In V. Fromkin (Ed.), Speech errors as linguistic evidence (pp. 93-119). Netherlands: Mouton, the Hague. Hotop, W. H. N. (1980). Semantic similarity as a factor in whole-word slips of the tongue. In Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand (pp. 97-109). New York: Academic Press. Huang, C.-T. James, Li, Y.-H. Audrey & Li, Y. (2007). The Syntax of Chinese. Cambridge University Press. Johnson, N. F. (1980). Part-whole relationships in word processing: psycholinguistics in the eyeball. Paper presented to the Midwestern Psychological Associations, St. Louis. Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition 14, 41-104. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge: MIT Press. Levelt, W. J. M. (1991). Accessing words in speech production. In W. J. M. Levelt (Ed.), Lexical access in speech production (pp. 1-22). MA: Blackwell. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A. & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, 1-75. Levitt, A. G. & Healy, A. F. (1985). The roles of phoneme frequency, similarity, and availability in the experimental elicitation of speech errors. Journal of Memory and Language 24, 717-733. Li, C. N. & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. The Crane Publishing Co., Ltd. Mackay, D. G. (1970). Spoonerisms: The structure of errors in the serial order of speech. Neuropsychologia 8, 323-350. Mackay, D. G. (1972). The structure of words and syllables: Evidence from errors in speech. Cognitive Psychology 3, 210-227. Martin, N., Saffran, E, M. & Weisberg, R. W. (1989). Variables influencing the occurrence of naming errors: Implications for models of lexical retrieval. Journal of Memory and Language 28, 462-485. Martin, N., Gagnon, D. A., Schwartz, M. F., Dell, G. S. & Saffran, E. M. (1996). Phonological facilitation of semantic errors in normal and aphasic speakers. Language and Cognitive Processes 11(3), 257-282. McClelland, J. L. & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 88(5), 375-407. Meringer, R. & Mayer, K. (1895). Versprechen und Verlesen: eine psychologisch-linguistische Studie. Stuttgart: Goschense Verlagsbuchhandlung. Morsella, E. & Miozzo, M. (2002). Evidence of a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28(3), 555-563. Nooteboom, S. G. (1969). The tongue slips into patterns. Leyden Studies in Linguistics and Phonetics. The Hague: Mouton. Peterson, R. P. & Savoy, P. (1998). Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 24, 539-557. Rapp, D. N. & Samuel, A. G. (2002). A reason to rhyme: Phonological and semantic influences on lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28(3), 564-571. Roelofs, A. (1996). Computational models of lemma retrieval. In T. Dijkstra & K. de Smedt (Eds.) Computational Psycholinguistics: AI and connectionist models of human language processing (pp. 308-327). Taylor & Francis. Rouibah, A., Tiberghien, G. & Lupker, S. J. (1999). Phonological and semantic priming: Evidence for task-independent effects. Memory and Cognition 27, 422-437. Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S. & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language 29, 86-102 Sevald, C. A. & Dell, G. S. (1994). The sequential cuing effect in speech production. Cognition 53, 91-127. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1979). Speech errors as evidence for a serial ordering mechanism in sentence production. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walkers (Eds.), Sentence processing (pp. 295-342). Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1986). The representation of phonological information during speech production planning: Evidence from vowel errors in spontaneous speech. Phonology Yearbook 3, 117-149. Stemberger, J. P. (1985a). The reliability and replicability of naturalistic speech error data: A comparison with experimentally induced errors. Research on Speech Perception Progress Report 11, 235-261. Stemberger, J. P. (1985b). An interactive activation model of language production. In W. E. Andrew (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (pp. 143-186). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd., Publishers. Stemberger, J. P. (1989). Speech errors in early child language production. Journal of Memory and Language 28, 164-188. Stemberger, J. P. & Treiman, R. (1986). The internal structure of word-initial consonant clusters. Journal of Memory and Language 25, 163-180. Van den Broecke, M. P. R. & Goldstein, L. (1980). Consonant features in speech errors. In V. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand (pp.47-66). New York: Academic Press. Wan, I. P. (1999). Mandarin phonology: Evidence from speech errors. Ph D. Dissertation. Wan, I. P. (2002). Alignments of Prenuclear Glides in Mandarin. Taipei: Crane. Wan, I. P. (2007a). On the phonological organization of Mandarin tone. Lingua 117, 1715-1738. Wan, I. P. (2007b). A Phonological Investigation in Speech Errors and Aphasic Speech in Mandarin. Taipei: Crane. Wan, I. P. & Jaeger, J. (1998). Speech errors and the representation of tone in Mandarin Chinese. Phonology 15(3), 417-461. Wan, I. P. & Jaeger, J. (2003). The phonological representation of Taiwan Mandarin vowels: A psycholinguistic study. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 12, 205-257. Wang, H. S. & Chang, C. L. (2001). On the status of the prenucleus glide in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Linguistics 2(2), 243-260. Zhou, X. & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1995). Morphological structure in the Chinese mental lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10(6), 545-600.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學語言學研究所 93555010 96
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0935550101
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Graduate Institute of Linguistics] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
010101.pdf	49Kb	Adobe PDF2	764	View/Open
010102.pdf	116Kb	Adobe PDF2	1331	View/Open
010103.pdf	36Kb	Adobe PDF2	792	View/Open
010104.pdf	83Kb	Adobe PDF2	906	View/Open
010105.pdf	43Kb	Adobe PDF2	967	View/Open
010106.pdf	222Kb	Adobe PDF2	3374	View/Open
010107.pdf	110Kb	Adobe PDF2	979	View/Open
010108.pdf	319Kb	Adobe PDF2	847	View/Open
010109.pdf	41Kb	Adobe PDF2	814	View/Open
010110.pdf	64Kb	Adobe PDF2	1342	View/Open
010111.pdf	104Kb	Adobe PDF2	846	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...