政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/33401
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113392/144379 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51220600      線上人數 : 918
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33401


    題名: 漢語親子假裝遊戲中之後設溝通
    Metacommunication in Mandarin Mother-Child Pretend Play
    作者: 邱康雯
    Qiu, Kang Wen
    貢獻者: 黃瓊之
    Huang, Chiung Chih
    邱康雯
    Qiu, Kang Wen
    關鍵詞: 假裝遊戲
    後設溝通
    pretend play
    metacommunication
    日期: 2006
    上傳時間: 2009-09-17 16:29:08 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本篇論文主要在探討漢語親子假裝遊戲 (pretend play) 中的後設溝通(metacommunication)，研究問題如下：1. 不同年齡的幼兒使用哪些後設溝通策略(metacommunicative strategies) 來架構其假裝遊戲？2. 在幼兒所使用的策略中有哪些語言表徵 (linguistic features)？3. 不同年齡的幼童使用後設溝通策略時是否會有發展上的差異？研究結果發現不同年齡的幼兒後設溝通策略的運用的確呈現發展上的差異，年齡較大的孩童在運用後設溝通策略架構假裝遊戲的技巧比年齡較小的孩童來的熟練與複雜，而這些策略運用上的不同則可能是因為語言及認知發展上的差異導致而成 ◦
    This thesis aims to investigate how children with different age initiate, maintain, and terminate pretend play through metacommunication. There are three research questions proposed: first, what metacommunicative strategies are used to organize children’s pretend play? Second, what are the linguistic features of these metacommunicative statements? Finally, does children’s use of metacommunication display a developmental trend? Participants included in the present study are two Mandarin-speaking children. Both are female. One aged two years and nine months old and the other is four years and five months old. Analytic framework adopted in this thesis is mainly derived from Giffin’s model. Giffin (1990) advanced a framework comprising seven metacommunicative strategies: enactment, ulterior conversation, underscoring, storytelling, prompting, implicit pretend structuring, and overt proposals to pretend. Results indicate that there are six metacommunicative strategies adopted by children during pretend play: enactment, ulterior conversation, underscoring, prompting, implicit pretend structuring, and overt proposals to pretend. Both children show a strong bias in favor of within-frame metacommunication during pretend play. In addition, there are linguistic features observed in these metacommunicative strategies. These linguistic features display children’s discrepancies in language development before and after three years old. Besides, how children with different age organize their pretend play through metacommunication is quite different. It has been observed that a four-year-old adopts ulterior conversation and overt proposals to pretend to initiate pretend play. On the other hand, a two-year-old child uses ulterior conversation and implicit pretend structuring as her play initiation strategies. As for play maintaining, older children develop various sub-plots or recapitulate the action format in order to sustain their play. Unlike older children, younger children’s ability to maintain pretend play is limited. However, it is observed that children as young as two years old are able to re-introduce the play theme into the dialogue after play partner’s interruption or digression. Furthermore, a four-year-old gives some concluding statements to end her pretend play while a two-year-old does not. As a result, the overall organization of older children’s pretend play is more complete than younger children’s. Our findings reveal the developmental trend of children’s use of metacommunication in pretend play and this developmental trend is closely related to children’s language and cognitive development.
    參考文獻: Auwärter, M. (1987). Development of communicative skills: The construction of fictional reality in children’s play. In J. Cook-Gumperz, W. A. Corsaro, & J. Streeck (Eds.), Children’s world’s and children’s language. BerL: Mouton de Gruyter.
    Bateson, G. (1955). A theory of play and fantasy. Psychiatric Research Reports, 2, 39-51.
    Bateson, G. (1956). The message “this is play.” In B. Schaffner (Ed.), Group processes: transactions of the second conference. New York: Macy Foundation.
    Bloom, L., Margulis, C., Tinker, E., & Fujita, N. (1996). Early conversations and word learning: Contributions from child and adult. Child Development, 67, 3154-3175.
    Bornstein, M. H. & Tamis-LeMonda, C. S. (1995). Parent-child symbolic play: Three theories in search of an effect. Developmental Review, 15, 382-400.
    Boyd, B. J. (1991). Metacommunication in young children’s pretend play: An instrument development study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Georgia.
    Carrick, N. & Quas, J. A. (2006). Effects of discrete eMions on young children’s ability to discern fantasy and reality. Developmental Psychology, 42, 1278-1288.
    Dunn, J. & Wooding, C. (1977). Play in the home and its implications for learning. In B. Tizard & D. Harvey (Eds.), Biology of play (pp. 45-58). Spastics International Medical Publications. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
    Einsiedler, W. (1985). Fantasy play of preschoolers as a function of toy structures. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Symposium of the Netherlands in the Social Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
    Elder, J. L. & Pederson, D. R. (1978). Preschool children’s use of objects in symbolic play. Child Development, 49, 500-504.
    Farver, J. A. & Wimbarti, S. (1995). Indonesian children’s play with their Mhers and older sibLgs. Child Development, 66, 1493-1503.
    Fein, G. G. & Apfel, N. (1979). The development of play: style, structure, and situation. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 99, 231-250.
    Fein, G. G. (1981). Pretend play in childhood: An integrative review. Child Development, 52, 1095-1118.
    Fein, G., Moorin, E. R., & Enslein, J. (1982). Pretense and peer behavior: An intersectoral analysis. Human Development, 25, 392-406.
    Fenson, L., Kagan, J., Kearsley, R. B., & Zelazo, P. R. (1986). In A. W. Gottfried & C. C. Brown (Eds.), Play interactions: The contribution of play materials and parental involvement to children’s development. (pp. 53-66). Lexington, MA: Heath.
    Freud, A. (1974). The ego and the mechanisms of defense. New York: International Universities Press.
    Garvey, C., & Berndt, R. (1975). The organization of pretend play. Paper presented at the Symposium, Structure in Play and Fantasy, American Psychological Association, Chicago, September.
    Garvey, C. (1977). Play. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    Garvey, C. (1982). Communication and the development of social role play. In D. Forbes & M. Greenberg (Eds.), New directions in child development (pp. 81-101). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Garvey, C. (1993). Diversity in the conversational repertoire: the case of conflicts and social pretending. Cognition and instruction, 11: 3 & 4, 251-264.
    Giffin, H. (1984). The coordination of meaning in the creation of a shared make-believe reality. In I, Bretherton (Ed.), Symbolic play (pp. 73-100). Academic Press.
    Giffin, H. (1990). To say and not to say: skills of dramatic play. Youth Theatre Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, 14-20.
    Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: an essay of the organization of experiences. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    Göncü, A. (1987). Toward an interactional model of developmental changes in social pretend play. In L. Katz (Ed.), Current topics in early childhood education (Vol. 7, pp. 108-125). Norwood NJ: Ablex.
    Göncü, A., & Kessel, F. (1988). Preschoolers’ collaborative construction in planning and maintaining imaginative play. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 11: 3, 327-344.
    Göncü, A. (1993). Development of intersubjectivity in social pretend play. Human Development, 36, 185-98.
    Groos, K. (1901). The play of man. Trans. Elizabeth L. Baldwin. London: William Heinemann.
    Jackowitz, E. R., & Watson, M. W. (1980). Development of object transformations in early pretend play. Developmental Psychology, Vol. 16, No, 6, 543-49.
    King, N. R. (1979). Play: The kindergarteners’ perspective. Elementary School Journal, 80, 81-87.
    Kreidler, C. W. (1998). Introducing English Semantics. London: Routledge.
    McKimmey, M. A. (1993). Child’s play is serious business. Children Today, Vol. 22, No. 2, 14-15.
    McLoyd, V. C., Thomas, E. A. C., & Warren, D. (1984). The short-term dynamics of social organization in preschool triads. Child Development, 55, 1051-1070.
    Monighan-Nourot, P. (1987). Conversations with the real and imagined. In L. G. Katz, P. G. Wagemaker, & K. Steiner (Eds.), Looking at children’s play. New York: Columbia University Press.
    Nicolich, L. M. (1978). Symbolic play: Sequences of development. Paper presented at the southeastern regional meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Atlanta, April.
    O’Connell, B., & Bretherton, I. (1984). Toddler’s play, alone and with Mher: the role of maternal guidance. In I. Bretherton (Ed.), Symbolic play (pp. 337-368). Academic Press.
    Patrick, G. T. W. (1916). The psychology of relations. New York: Houghton-MiffL.
    Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams, and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton.
    Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.
    Rubin, K. H., Fein, G. G., & Vandenberg, B. (1983). Play. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.) Handbook of child psychology: Volume 4. Socialization, personality, and social development, 4th Ed., 693-774. New York: Wiley.
    Sachs, J., Goldman, J., & Chaille, C. (1984). Planning in pretend play: Using language to coordinate narrative development. In A. D. Pellegrini & T. Yawkey (Eds.), The development of oral and written language in social contexts (pp. 119-128). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    Sawyer, K. (1993). The pragmatics of play: Interactional strategies during children’s pretend play. Pragmatics: Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association, Vol. 3, No. 3, 259-282.
    Sawyer, R. K. (1997). Pretend play as improvisation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Schwartzman, H. (1978). Transformations: The anthropology of children’s play. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Smith, P. K., & Vollstedt, R. (1985). On defining play: An empirical study of the relationship between play and various play criteria. Child Development 56, 1042-1050.
    Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., & Bornstein, M. H. (1993). Play and its relations to other mental functions in the child. In M. H. Bornstein , & A. W. O’Reilly (Eds.), The role of play in the development of thought. No. 59. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
    Umek, L. M., Musek, P. L., & Kranjc, S. (2001). Communication in symbolic play. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal. Vol. 9, No. 1. 87-101.
    Verba, M. (1993). Construction and sharing of meanings in pretend play among young children. In M. Stambak, & H. Sinclair (Eds.), Pretend play among 3-year-olds (pp. 1-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Vygotsky, L. S. (1976). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. In J. S. Bruner, A. Jolly, & K. Sylva (Eds.), Play: Its role in development and evolution (pp. 537-554). New York: Basic Books.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    語言學研究所
    92555002
    95
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0925550022
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[語言學研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    55002201.pdf44KbAdobe PDF2707檢視/開啟
    55002202.pdf14KbAdobe PDF2805檢視/開啟
    55002203.pdf13KbAdobe PDF2612檢視/開啟
    55002204.pdf106KbAdobe PDF2894檢視/開啟
    55002205.pdf65KbAdobe PDF2850檢視/開啟
    55002206.pdf17KbAdobe PDF2899檢視/開啟
    55002207.pdf16KbAdobe PDF2830檢視/開啟
    55002208.pdf22KbAdobe PDF2887檢視/開啟
    55002209.pdf85KbAdobe PDF21320檢視/開啟
    55002210.pdf78KbAdobe PDF2751檢視/開啟
    55002211.pdf226KbAdobe PDF2838檢視/開啟
    55002212.pdf29KbAdobe PDF2820檢視/開啟
    55002213.pdf16KbAdobe PDF2761檢視/開啟
    55002214.pdf40KbAdobe PDF21507檢視/開啟
    55002215.pdf16KbAdobe PDF2632檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋