政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/33391

政大典藏 > College of Foreign Languages and Literature > Graduate Institute of Linguistics > Theses > Item 140.119/33391

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33391

Title:	A Study of Factors for Senior High English Teachers in the Greater Taipei Area in Textbook Selection 大台北地區高中英文老師選擇教科書考量因素之研究
Authors:	柯宗明 Ko,Tsung-ming
Contributors:	林伯英 Lin,Bo-ying 柯宗明 Ko,Tsung-ming
Keywords:	英文教科書教材選擇內在因素外在因素公私立學校老師城鄉學校老師資深與年輕老師教科書編撰者 English textbook textbook selection internal factors external factors public and private school teachers urban and rural school teachers senior and young teachers textbook compilers
Date:	2004
Issue Date:	2009-09-17 16:27:44 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本研究旨在探討大台北地區（台北縣與台北市）高中英語科教師在選擇教材時，可能會考量到的因素，其研究重點在於了解不同學校類型（公、私立，與城、鄉學校）以及資深與年輕老師在選擇教材時，是否有其不同的考量因素。本研究主採問卷調查，佐以訪談方式進行。除就大台北地區二十七所公、私立高中英語科教師做抽樣調查外，並針對十位教師及六位教科書編撰者進行深入訪談，希望藉此進一步了解教師們與教科書編撰者所考量的因素為何，並探討兩者所考量的因素是否有其相關性。本研究最後歸納出結論如下： 1. 學生的英語程度與學習需求以及英語文的正確與自然度是老師與教材編撰者共同考量的因素。 2. 選擇教材時，公立高中的英文老師重視經銷人員的服務態度與售後服務以及教材的配套完整。而私立高中的英文老師重視大學聯考的導向以及學校教育政策。 3. 選擇教材時，任教於城市的高中英文老師重視經銷人員的服務態度與售後服務、溝通式教學法的理念以及教科書所涵蓋的文化層面。而任教於鄉鎮的高中英文老師重視老師本身多重職務角色之扮演（教學、導師或其他行政職務）、教學信念跟語文能力以及教材的價格是否合宜。 4. 選擇教材時，資深與年輕老師所考量的因素並沒有很大的差異。整體來說，在選擇教材時，內在因素例如英語文的正確性、教材的編輯原理與組織架構仍是老師們最主要的考量。然而外在因素例如學生的英語程度、大學聯考的導向、學校教育政策、以及經銷人員的服務態度，亦是老師在選擇教材時所會考量到因素。因此本研究建議出版社在編撰教科書時也應考量到外在因素，使其教科書更趨於完善，更能符合老師與學生的需求。然而在此同時，老師們也應加強自己的專業知識，使其在選擇教材時能做出最正確的判斷。 The present study was aimed at investigating what factors English teachers of senior high schools in greater Taipei area took into consideration when selecting textbooks, with particular focus on the comparison of differences between public and private schools, urban and rural schools, and senior and young teachers. Meanwhile, textbook compilers’ considerations were also explored to see if their concerns were in accordance with those of teachers. The questionnaire survey was the main research method of the present study. Moreover, the interview method was also conducted to probe further information. In total, 10 English teachers and 6 textbook compilers were interviewed in the present research. Based on the findings of the present study, four crucial points were concluded as suggested. 1. Most students’ English proficiency and learning needs as well as accurate and proper English were the primary concerns of the general English teachers and textbook compliers. 2. When selecting textbooks, public school teachers emphasized salespersons’ service and the textbook’s intact package, whereas private school teachers considered Joint College Entrance Examination, and school’s leadership more. 3. Likewise, urban school teachers took salespersons’ service, Communicative Approach and cultural component into more account than rural school teachers who were more concerned about teachers’ various roles such as teachers, mentors or administrative personnel, their own English proficiency, and textbooks’ price. 4. However, no significant differences were found between senior teachers and young teachers. Generally speaking, internal factors such as appropriateness, naturalness of English, and rationale, organization of the textbook were the primary concerns for senior high English teachers in textbook selection. However, English teachers of senior high schools were also concerned about external factors such as English proficiency and learning needs, Joint College Entrance Examination, school’s leadership, and salespersons’ service. Therefore, it is suggested that publishing companies should take external factors into more consideration to ensure that textbook being compiled can be more comprehensive in all aspects and be related to needs of both teachers and students. Meanwhile, teachers should take a firm stance based on their updated professional knowledge in making any sound judgments related to textbook selection and evaluation.
Reference:	Brown, D. J. (1995). Elements of language curriculum: A systematic approach to program development. New York: Heinle & Heinle. Byrd, P. (1995). Introduction. In Byrd, P. (Ed.), Material writers guide (pp.7-11). New York: Newbury House. Carey, J., and L. Briggs. (1977). Team as designers. In Briggs L. (Ed.), Instructional design: Principles and applications (pp.261-310). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications. Cunningsworth, A. (1984). Evaluating and Selecting EFL Materials. Oxford: Heinemann. Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing Your Coursebook. Oxford: Heinemann. Garinger, D. (2001). Textbook evaluation. Download, 8/19/2004 [on-line]. Available: http://www.teflweb-j.org/v1n1/garinger.html Grant, N. (1987). Making the most of your textbook. New York: Longman. Hutchinson, T. and Eunice T. (1994). The textbook as agent of change. ELT Journal, 48 (4), 315-328. Jolly, D. and R. Bolitho (1998). A framework for material writing. In B. Tomlinson. (Ed.), Material development in language teaching (pp.90-115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Laime, J.M. (1999). Making the textbook more communicative. Download, 7/22/2004 [on-line]. Available: http:www.aitech.ac.jp/~itesl/Articles/Laime-Textbooks.html Macian, J. L. (1986). An analysis of state adopted foreign language textbook used in first and third year high school Spanish classes. Foreign Language Annals, 19(2), 103-118. McDonough, J., & Shaw, C. (1993). Materials and methods in ELT: A teacher’s guide. London: Blackwell. Richards, J. C. (2001). The role of textbooks in a language program. Download, 10/09/2004 [on-line]. Available: http://www.cambridge.org.br/articles/articles_21.htm Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Shavelson R., & P. Stern (1981). Research on teachers’ pedagogical thoughts, judgments, decision, and behavior. Review of Educational Research 51: 455-498. Sheldon, L. E. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42(4), 237-246. Skierso, A. (1991). Textbook selection and evaluation. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp.432-453). Boston: Heinle and Heinle. Tomlinson, B. (2002). Materials development. In Carter, R., and Nunan, D. (Ed.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (pp.66-71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Tucker, C. Allen (1975). Evaluating beginning textbooks. English Teaching Forum, 13 (3), 355-361. Williams D. (1983). Developing criteria for textbook evaluation. ELT Journal, 37 (3), 251-255. Woods, D. (1996). Teacher cognition in language teaching: Beliefs, decision-making and classroom practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Wright, T. (1990). Reviews on ELT textbooks and materials: problems in evaluation and development. ELT Journal, 44 (4), 343-346. 王家貞 (民93年)。台南市幼教英語教師對學前英語教科書的看法與使用現況。高雄師範大學英語學系研究所碩士論文。李宗月 (民88年)。教材選擇的不二法門。敦煌英語教學雜誌。第21期: 21-23頁。李筱晴 (民92年)。國中英語教科書之預測性評估,使用,及回顧性評估: 台北地區個案。台灣師範大學英語學系研究所碩士論文。林素娥 (民93年)。英語科95暫行綱要-新舊綱要比較。英文新天地。第10期: 14-16頁。馬玲玲 (民91年)。現行台灣國小英語教科書評估：以九年一貫英語教科書為例。輔仁大學語言學研究所碩士論文。吳思葶 (民91年)。現行國中英語教科書之評估。政治大學語言學研究所碩士論文。曾俊傑 (民92年)。挑選英文教材：原則與評鑑。敦煌英語教學雜誌。[on-line]. Available: http://cet.cavesbooks.com.tw/htm/m0120150.htm 施玉惠（民89）。國小英語教材之評審─資格審 VS 選用審。《第十七屆中華民國英語文教學研討會論文集》。臺北：文鶴。施玉惠（民87）。高中英文科新課程標準的特色。英語教學。22卷3期：43-47頁。陳貞廷（民91）。現行大台北地區高中英語教科書之選用。台灣師範大學英語學系研究所碩士論文。陳秋蘭 (民88)。探討兒童美語教師選擇教材的考量因素。課程與教學。第2卷3期：37-50頁。鄭玓玲 (民92年)。國中英語教科書編輯歷程與內容編寫之個案研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系研究所碩士論文。蘇郁涵 (民87年)。工職英文之需求調查與教材評估準則。政治大學語言學研究所碩士論文。謝秀美 (民87年)。我國高工英文教科書使用現況及教師意見調查之研究。彰化師範大學工業教育學系研究所碩士論文。鍾鎂媜 (民92年)。高中英文教師教材選編用信念之研究。彰化師範大學英語學系研究所碩士論文。
Description:	碩士國立政治大學語言學研究所 915550011 93
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0915550011
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Graduate Institute of Linguistics] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
55001101.pdf	49Kb	Adobe PDF2	1082	View/Open
55001102.pdf	52Kb	Adobe PDF2	1090	View/Open
55001103.pdf	45Kb	Adobe PDF2	1435	View/Open
55001104.pdf	21Kb	Adobe PDF2	1376	View/Open
55001105.pdf	19Kb	Adobe PDF2	1778	View/Open
55001106.pdf	86Kb	Adobe PDF2	1574	View/Open
55001107.pdf	161Kb	Adobe PDF2	7107	View/Open
55001108.pdf	90Kb	Adobe PDF2	1369	View/Open
55001109.pdf	382Kb	Adobe PDF2	1211	View/Open
55001110.pdf	272Kb	Adobe PDF2	1320	View/Open
55001111.pdf	67Kb	Adobe PDF2	1944	View/Open
55001112.pdf	1425Kb	Adobe PDF2	1795	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...