English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113313/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50947498      Online Users : 963
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33372


    Title: 中文節拍手勢之研究
    Gestural Beats in Chinese Narrative Discourse
    Authors: 謝雅惠
    Hsieh, Ya Huei
    Contributors: 徐嘉慧
    Chui,Kawai
    Kawai Chui
    謝雅惠
    Hsieh, Ya Huei
    Keywords: 節拍手勢
    前後景
    新/舊訊息
    音調
    聲音強度
    節律模式
    Gestural Beats
    Grounding
    Information State
    Pitch
    Intensity
    Rhythmic Patterns
    Date: 2007
    Issue Date: 2009-09-17 16:24:44 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文旨從語用和語音方面,來探討中文「敘述性」言談(narrative discourse)對話中,說話者自然產生的節拍手勢。在語用方面,主要是觀察說話者使用節拍手勢表達前後景(Grounding)和新/舊訊息(Information state)的關係。研究結果發現,說話者較常使用節拍手勢來傳達前景(foreground)的新訊息,以提示聽話者注意。此外,說話者在敘述的過程中,常使用節拍手勢來預示前後景訊息的轉換。在語音方面,主要探討說話者使用節拍手勢時,其所對應的語句之音調高低及說話能量強度的關係。研究發現,語句的音高和強度無法預測這類手勢的產生;但是,當傳達前景的新訊息時,這類手勢的出現常伴隨著較強的語氣。此外,研究結果也顯示,說話者使用節拍手勢通常是有規律性的。
    This thesis investigates gestural beats in Chinese narrative discourse at both pragmatic and acoustic levels. The relationship among grounding, information state and beat gestures is examined at the pragmatic level, and at the acoustic level, the relationship among pitch, intensity, and gestural beats is analyzed. Moreover, whether there is a rhythmic pattern for beat gestures is further studied. The subjects were four undergraduates who were asked to view an animated color cartoon episode and then to immediately recount the events in it to a listener. The subjects were audio-video taped. They were not informed of the particular interest of the study. 291 beats were transcribed and analyzed. The audio data was analyzed on Praat and a Kay’s Model 4100. The continuous beats were further analyzed to investigate the rhythmic patterns and were annotated in Anvil, a video annotation tool. Gestural beats, narrative data, and the annotations were statistically analyzed and five phenomena for beat gestures were explored. First, gestural beats can appear in both foregrounded and backgrounded clauses. Second, the occurrence of beat gestures signals shifts between levels of the narrative structure. Third, speakers usually incline to utter new information in foregrounded clauses in Chinese narrative discourse with accompanying beats. Fourth, neither intensity nor pitch changes can predict and correlate with the occurrence of gestural beats in the relationship between beats and two acoustic factors. However, when grounding and the information state of the associated referents are considered, beats are produced for new information in foregrounded clauses with greater intensity. Finally, there is a rhythmic pattern in the production of continuous beats and the regularity of the patterns correlates with the clause boundary. A close relationship is revealed between speech and gestures in this thesis. The findings provide some linguistic details that may help explore the performance of gestural beats and speech in Chinese narrative discourse.
    Reference: Bavelas, Janet Beavin, Nicole Chovil, Douglas A. Lawrie, and Allen Wade. 1992. Interactive gestures. Discourse Processes 15.4.469-89.
    Boersma, Paul. 2001. PRAAT, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 5.9/10.341-345.
    Bolinger, Dwight. 1983. Intonation and Gesture. American Speech 58.2.156-174.
    Chafe, Wallace. 1976. Givenness, Contrastiveness, Definiteness, Subjects, Topics, and Point of View. Subject and Topic, ed. by Charles N. Li, 26-55. New York: Academic Press.
    Chafe, Wallace.1987. Cognitive Constraints on Information Flow. Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, ed. by Russell S. Tomlin, 21-51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    Chui, Kawai. 2001. Topic chain and grounding in Chinese discourse. Taipei: Crane Publishing.
    Chui, Kawai. 2003. Categorization of gestures in communication. Form and Function: Linguistic Studies in Honor of Shuanfan Huang, ed. by Lily I-wen Su, Chinfa Lien, and Kawai Chui, 105-129. Taipei: Crane Publishing.
    Chui, Kawai. 2005a. Temporal patterning of speech and iconic gestures in conversational discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 37.871-887.
    Chui, Kawai. 2005b. Topicality and gestures in Chinese conversational discourse. Language and Linguistics 6.4.635-654.
    Clark, Herbert H., and Susan E. Haviland. 1977. Comprehension and the Given-New Contract. Discourse Production and Comprehension, ed. by R. Freedle, 1-40. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Crystal, David. 2000. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
    De Ruiter, Jan Peter. 2000. The production of gesture and speech. Language and Gesture, ed. by David McNeill, 284-311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Du Bois, John W., Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Susanna Cumming, and Danae Paolino. 1993. Outline of discourse transcription. Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research, ed. by Jane A. Edwards and Martin D. Lampert, 45-89. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Efron, D. 1972 [1941]. Gesture, Race and Culture. The Hague: Mouton. [First printed as Gesture and Environment. New York: King`s Crown Press, 1941].
    Givón, Talmy. 1990. Syntax: a functional-typological introduction. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    Holliday, M. A. K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
    Hopper, Paul J. 1979a. Aspect and Foregrounding in Discourse. Syntax and Semantics: Discourse and Syntax, vol. 12, ed. by T. Givón, 213-41. New York: Academic Press.
    Hopper, Paul J. 1979b. Some Observations on the Typology of Focus and Aspect in Narrative Language. Studies in Language 3.1.37-64.
    Hopper, Paul J., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. Language 56.251-99.
    Kendon, Adam. 1972. Some relationships between body motion and speech. Studies in dyadic communication, ed. by Aron Wolfe Siegman and Benjamin Pope, 177-210. Elmsford, N.Y.: Pergamon.
    Kendon, Adam. 1980. Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. The Relationship of Verbal and Nonverbal Communication, ed. by Mary Ritchie Key, 207-227. The Hague: Mouton.
    Kendon, Adam. 1983. Gesture and speech: how they interact. Nonverbal Interaction, ed. by John Wiemann and Randall Harrison, 13-45. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
    Kendon, Adam. 1984. Some uses of gesture. Perspectives on Silence, ed. by D.Tannen and M. Saville-Troike, 215-234. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
    Kendon, Adam. 2000. Language and gesture: Unity or duality. Language and Gesture, ed. by David McNeill, 47-63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Kipp, Michael. 2001. Anvil-A Generic Annotation Tool for Multimodal Dialogue. Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Speech and Technology (Eurospeech), 1367-1370. Aalborg, Denmark.
    Levy, Elena T., and David McNeill. 1992. Speech, gesture, and discourse. Discourse Processes 15.277-301.
    Loehr, Daniel P. 2004. Gesture and Intonation. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Georgetown University, Washington D.C.
    McClave, Evelyn. 1994. Gestural Beats: The Rhythm Hypothesis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 23.1.45-66.
    McClave, Evelyn. 1998. Pitch and manual gestures. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 27.69-89.
    McNeill, David. 1985. So you think gestures are nonverbal? Psychological Review 92.350-71.
    McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and Mind – What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    McNeill, David, and Elena T. Levy. 1993. Cohesion and gesture. Discourse Processes 16.363-386.
    McNeill, David. (ed.) 2000. Language and Gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Prince, Ellen F. 1981. Toward a Taxonomy of Given-New Information. Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 223-255. New York: Academic Press.
    Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1984. On some gestures’ relation to talk. Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 266-296. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan, Marian Shapley, and Elizabeth G. Weber. 1991. Units of Intonation in Discourse: A Comparison of Acoustic and Auditory Analyses. Language and Speech 34.3.207-234.
    Tuite, Kevin. 1993. The production of gesture. Semiotica 93.83-105.
    Zeng, Hui-ling. 1997. Gestural contextualization in Chinese conversation. National Chengchi University, Taipei: Unpublished M.A. Thesis.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    語言學研究所
    93555002
    96
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093555002
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[語言學研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    55500201.pdf61KbAdobe PDF21183View/Open
    55500202.pdf14KbAdobe PDF2995View/Open
    55500203.pdf17KbAdobe PDF21236View/Open
    55500204.pdf25KbAdobe PDF2953View/Open
    55500205.pdf61KbAdobe PDF21253View/Open
    55500206.pdf15KbAdobe PDF21066View/Open
    55500207.pdf99KbAdobe PDF21278View/Open
    55500208.pdf56KbAdobe PDF21265View/Open
    55500209.pdf148KbAdobe PDF21369View/Open
    55500210.pdf1988KbAdobe PDF21233View/Open
    55500211.pdf123KbAdobe PDF21092View/Open
    55500212.pdf83KbAdobe PDF21172View/Open
    55500213.pdf29KbAdobe PDF21619View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback