政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/33366

政大典藏 > College of Foreign Languages and Literature > Graduate Institute of Linguistics > Theses > Item 140.119/33366

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33366

Title:	母語音韻覺識在英文拼字與讀字上所扮演的角色 The Role of L1 Phonological Awareness in English Word Spelling and Reading
Authors:	詹益智 Chan, I-Chih
Contributors:	胡潔芳萬依萍 Hu, Chieh-fang Wan, I-ping 詹益智 Chan, I-Chih
Keywords:	外語習得表音文字表意文字母語音韻覺識聲母—韻母覺識音位覺識字音對應知識英文拼字能力英文讀字能力 foreign language acquisition alphabetic orthography logographic orthography L1 phonological awareness onset-rime awareness phonemic awareness letter-sound knowledge English word spelling ability English word reading ability
Date:	2003
Issue Date:	2009-09-17 16:23:54 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	傳統上認為以中文為母語的孩童並不具有「音位覺識能力」(phonemic awareness)，本研究以實驗方式直接測量以中文為母語孩童的「音位覺識能力」，同時探討孩童「音位覺識能力」及「聲母—韻母覺識能力」(onset-rime awareness) 在英文拼字與讀字上所扮演的角色。在本研究中，一百九十二位國小四年級的孩童參與二項「母語音韻覺識測驗」，包括「聲母/韻母異音測驗」(onset/rime oddity test) 和「韻腹/韻尾異音測驗」(nucleus/coda oddity test)。根據上述二項測驗的成績，將孩童分為三組：第一組孩童(共29人)，其「聲母—韻母覺識能力」和「音位覺識能力」皆佳；第二組孩童(共29人)，其「聲母—韻母覺識能力」佳，但「音位覺識能力」差；第三組孩童(共26人)，其「聲母—韻母覺識能力」和「音位覺識能力」皆差。我們接著利用「拼英文假字測驗」和「讀英文假字測驗」來測量三組孩童的英文拼字與讀字的能力，在施測之前，孩童們有八次的機會學會「拼字」與「讀字」兩項測驗所需具備的「字音對應規則」。結果顯示，雖然孩童的「音位覺識能力」在程度上有所不同，但以中文為母語的孩童已具備「音位覺識能力」。此外，在考慮了孩童們「記憶廣度」(digit span)與「英文聽話字彙」 (English receptive vocabulary)的差異後，「聲母—韻母覺識能力」和「音位覺識能力」皆佳的孩童，在拼字的表現上優於「聲母—韻母覺識能力」佳，但「音位覺識能力」差的孩童來，接著「聲母—韻母覺識能力」佳，但「音位覺識能力」差的孩童的拼字表現優於「聲母—韻母覺識能力」和「音位覺識能力」皆差的孩童。最後，「音位覺識能力」佳的的孩童，在讀字的表現上優於「音位覺識能力」差的的孩童，此外，並無證據顯示「聲母—韻母覺識能力」在孩童的讀字能力上扮演著重要的角色。整體而言，本研究的結果支持其他研究的看法，這些研究認為以中文為母語的孩童在母語習得過程中所發展出來的「音韻覺識能力」對於其英文拼字與讀字的能力上有著一定的貢獻，此外，本研究更進一步顯示，這種貢獻會隨著「音韻覺識」程度的不同而有所改變。 It has been conventionally assumed that Chinese-speaking children do not have phonemic awareness. In this study, Chinese-speaking children’s phonemic awareness was empirically tested and its role, relative to onset-rime awareness, in the acquisition of English spelling and reading abilities was examined. Two L1 phonological awareness tests (i.e., an onset/rime oddity test and a nucleus/coda oddity test) were administered to a total of 192 Chinese-speaking fourth-graders. The children were selected and categorized based on their performances on the two L1 phonological awareness tests: 29 children with good onset-rime awareness and good phonemic awareness, 29 children with good onset-rime awareness but poor phonemic awareness, and 26 children with poor onset-rime awareness and poor phonemic awareness. The three groups of children were then tested on their abilities to spell and read English pseudowords. Before taking the English pseudoword spelling and reading tasks, the children were provided with eight opportunities to master the requisite letter-sound knowledge for the success in spelling and reading the pseudowords. The results showed that Chinese-speaking children demonstrated phonological awareness at the phonemic level, though varying in degree. Considered along with individual differences in digit span and English receptive vocabulary, children with better phonological awareness at both the onset-rime level and the phonemic level performed better in English pseudoword spelling than children with better onset-rime awareness but poorer phonemic awareness, who in turn, performed better than children with poorer phonological awareness at both levels. Finally, children with better phonemic awareness outperformed the other two groups of children with poorer phonemic awareness in pseudoword reading. Onset-rime awareness did not seem to play a significant role in pseudoword reading. These results support and extend other studies suggesting that the acquisition of English spelling and reading abilities in Chinese-speaking children benefits from the phonological awareness obtained during the course of first language acquisition and that the beneficial effect varies with the levels of phonological awareness.
Reference:	Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Ao, B. (2001). The non-uniqueness condition and the syllable medial in Chinese phonology. Proceedings of the 7th International and the 19th National Conferences on Chinese Phonology (pp. 204-217). Taipei: National Cheng-chi University. Bertelson, P., de Gelder, B., van Zon, M. (1997). Explicit speech segmentation and syllabic onset structure: Developmental trends. Psychological Research, 60, 183-191. Bowey, J. A. (1995). Socioeconomic status differences in preschool phonological sensitivity and first grade reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 476-487. Bowey, J. A., Vaughan, L., & Hansen, J. (1998). Beginning readers’ use of orthographic analogies in word reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 68, 108-133. Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419-421. Brady, S., & Shankweiler, D., (Eds.). (1991). Phonological processes in literacy. Hillsdale, NH: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Bryant, P. E., MacLean, M., Bradley, L. L., & Crossland, J. (1990). Rhyme, alliteration, phoneme detection, and learning to read. Developmental Psychology, 26, 429-438. Campbell. R. (1985). When children write nonwords to dictation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 40, 133-151. Chaney, C. (1992). Language development, metalinguistic skills, and print awareness in 3-year-old children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 485-514. Chao, Y.-R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Chard, D. J., Simmons, D. C., & Kameenui, E. J. (1998). Word recognition: Curricular and instructional implications for diverse learners (pp.61-127). In D. C. Simmons & E. J. Kameenui (Eds.). What reading research tells us about children with diverse learning needs: Bases and basics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Cheng, C.-C. (1973). A synchronic phonology of Mandarin Chinese. The Hague, Paris: Mouton. Cheng, R.-L. (1966). Mandarin phonological structure. Journal of Linguistics, 2:2, 135-262. Cheung, H., Chen, H.-C., Lai, C. Y., Wong, O. C., & Hills, M. (2001). The development of phonological awareness effects of spoken language experience and orthography. Cognition, 81, 227-241. Chung, L.-S. 鍾露昇。(1975)。《國語語音學》。台北市：語文出版社。 Chung, W.-L. (2003). The relationship between phonological awareness and foreign word learning. NSC912815C133002H. Co, H.-W., & Lee, J.-R. 柯華葳 & 李俊仁。(1996a)。<初學識字成人語音覺識與閱讀能力的關係>。《國立中正大學學報社會科學分冊》7:1, 29-47。 Co, H.-W., & Lee, J.-R. 柯華葳 & 李俊仁。(1996b)。<國小低年級學生語音覺識能力與認字能力的發展：一個縱貫的研究>。《國立中正大學學報社會科學分冊》7:1, 49-66。 Comeau, L., Comier, P., Grandmaison, E□., & Lacroix, D. (1999). A longitudinal study of phonological processing skills in children learning to read in a second language. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91:1, 29-34. Dell, G. (1984). The representation of serial order in speech: Evidence from the repeated phoneme effect in speech errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10, 222-233. Dinklage, K. (1971). Inability to learn a foreign language. In G. Blaine & C. McArthur (Eds.), Emotional problems of the student. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Downey, D. R., & Snyder, L. E. (2000). College students with LLD: The phonological core as risk for failure in foreign language classes. Topics in Language Disorders, 21, 82-92. Duanmu, S. (1990). A formal study of syllable, tone, stress, and domain in Chinese languages. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT. Duanmu, S. (2000). The phonology of standard Mandarin. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Durgunoglu, A. Y., Nagy, W. E., & Hancin-Bhatt, B. J. (1993). Cross-language transfer of phonological awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 453-365. Fox, B., & Routh, D. K. (1975). Analyzing spoken language into words, syllables and phonemes: A developmental study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 4, 331-342. Fromkin, V. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterance. Language, 47, 27-52. Ganschow, L., & Sparks, R. (1991). A screening instrument for the identification of foreign language problems. Foreign Language Annals, 24, 383-397. Ganschow, L., Sparks, R., & Javorsky, J. (1998). Foreign language learning difficulties: A historical perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 248-258. Ganschow, L., Sparks, R., Javorsky, J., Pohlman, J., & Bishop-Marbury, A. (1991). Identifying native language difficulties among foreign language learners in college: A “foreign” language learning disability? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 530-541. Gao, M., & Shi, A. (1963). Yuyanxue gailun [Introduction to linguistics]. Beijin: Zhonghua Shuju. Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Arnold. Goswami, U. (1988). Children’s use of analogy in learning to spell. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6, 21-33. Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. E. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Gough, P. B., Juel, C., & Griffith, P. L. (1992). Reading, spelling, and orthographic cipher (pp. 35-48). In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & Treiman, R. (Eds.). Reading acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Hatcher, P. J., & Hulme, C. (1999). Phonemes, rhymes, and intelligence as predictors of children’s responsiveness to remedial reading instruction: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 130–153. Hayes, B. (1989). Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry, 20:2, 253-306. Ho, C. S.-H., & Bryant, P. (1997a). Development of phonological awareness of Chinese children in Hong Kong. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26:1, 109-126. Ho, C. S.-H., & Bryant, P. (1997b). Phonological skills are important in learning to read Chinese. Developmental Psychology, 33:6, 946-951. Horwitz, E., Horwitz, M., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. Modern Language Journal, 70, 125-132. Howie, J. (1976). An acoustic study of Mandarin tones and vowels. London: Cambridge University Press. Hsiao, Y.-C. 蕭宇超。(1997)。<從現代音韻學角度看華語注音符號的缺失>。《第五屆世界華語文教學研討會論文集：語文分析組》。世界華語文教育學會。 Hu, C.-F. 胡潔芳。(2001)。<從語言學習的本質探討外語學習能力的差異>。《教育研究月刊》89, 66-74。 Hu, C. F. (2003). Phonological memory, phonological awareness, and foreign language word learning. Language Learning, 53, 429-462. Hu, C.-F. (2004). Learning to spell with poor phonological awareness. English Teaching and Learning, 28:3, 31-52. Hu, C.-F., & Catts, H. W. (1998). The role of phonological processing in early reading ability: What we can learn from Chinese. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2:1, 55-79. Huang, H.-S., & Hanely, J. R. (1994). Phonological awareness and visual skills in learning to read Chinese and English. Cognition, 54, 73-98. Hulme, C. (2002). Phonemes, rimes, and the mechanisms of early reading development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 58–64. Hulme, C., Hatcher, P. J., Nation, K., Brown, A., Adams, J., & Stuart, G. (2002). Phoneme awareness is a better predictor of early reading skill than onset-rime awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 2-28. Hulme, C., Muter, V., & Snowling, M. (1998). Segmentation does predict early progress in learning to read better than rhyme: A reply to Bryant. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 39-44. Jiang, T., & Peng, D.-L. 姜濤 & 彭聃齡。(1999)。<漢語兒童的語音意識特點及閱讀能力高低讀者的差異>。《心裡學報》31:1, 60-67。 Kamhi, A., & Catts, H. (Eds.). (1989). Reading disabilities: A developmental perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Kirtley, C., Bryant, P. E., MacLean, M., & Bradley, L. (1989). Rhyme, rime and onset of reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 224-245. Laing, E., & Hulme, C. (1999). Phonological and semantic processes influence beginning readers’ ability to learn to read words. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 183–207. Lalonde, R., & Gardner, R. (1984). Investigating a causal model of second language acquisition: Where does personality fit? Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 16, 224-237. Laubstein, A. S. (1987). Syllable structure: The speech error evidence. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 32, 339-363. Lee, P.-F. (2000). Chinese bilingual children’s word definition skill. Unpublished mater’s thesis. National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. Leong, C. K., & Tan, L. H. (2002). Phonological processing in learning to read Chinese: In search of a framework. In E. Helmquist & C. von Euler (Eds.). Dyslexia and literacy (pp. 126-150). London: Whurr Publishers. Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1976). The acquisition of tone in Mandarin-speaking children. Journal of Child Language, 4, 185-199. Lin, M., & Yan, J. (1988). The characteristic features of the final reduction in the neutral-tone syllable of Beijin Mandarin. Phonetic Laboratory Annual Report of Phonetic Research (pp. 37-51). Beijin: Phonetic Laboratory, Institute of Linguistics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. Lin, Yen.-Huei. (1989). Autosegmental treatments of segmental process in Chinese phonology. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Texas at Austin. Lin, Yu.-Huei. (2001). Syllable simplification strategies: A stylistic perspective. Language Learning, 51:4, 681-718. Lou, C.-J. 羅肇錦。(1990)。《國語學》。台北市：五南。 Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M., & Taylor, S. (1998). Segmentation, not rhyming, predicts early progress in learning to read. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 3-27. Nation, K., & Hulme, C. (1997). Phonemic segmentation, not onset-rime segmentation, predicts early reading and spelling skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 154-167. Norris, J. A., & Hoffman, P. R. (2002). Phonemic awareness: A complex developmental process. Topics in Language Disorders, 22:2, 1-40. Oakhill, J., & Kyle, F. (2000). The relation between phonological awareness and working memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 75, 152-164. Oxford, R. (1989). Use of language learning strategies: A synthesis of studies with implications for strategy training. System, 17, 235-247. Perfetti, C. A., & Zhang, S. (1995). Very early phonological activation in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 24-33. Perin, D. (1983). Phonemic segmentation and spelling. British Journal of Psychology, 74, 129-144. Read, C. (1986). Children’s creative spelling. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Klatt, D. (1979). The limited use of distinctive features and markedness in speech production. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 3, 41-55. Snyder, L., & Downey, D. (1995). Serial naming in children with reading disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 31-50. Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1991). Foreign language learning difficulties: Affective or native language aptitude differences. Modern Language Journal, 75, 3-16. Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Javorsky, J., & Pohlman, J.(1989). Linguistic coding deficits in foreign language learners. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 179-195. Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Javorsky, J., Pohlman, J., & Patton, J. (1992). Identifying native language deficits in high- and low-risk foreign language learnwrs in high school. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 403-418. Stahl, S. A., & Murry, B. A. (1994). Defining phonological awareness and its relationship to early reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 221-234. Stanovich, K. (1986). Explaining the variance in reading ability in terms of psychological processes: What have we learned? Annals of Dyslexia, 36, 67-96. Treiman, R., Berch, D., & Weatherston, S. (1993). Children’s use of phoneme-grapheme correspondences in spelling: Roles of position and stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85:3, 466-477. Treiman, R., & Bourassa, D. C. (2000). The development of spelling skill. Topics in Language Disorders, 20:3, 1-18. Tzeng, S.-J. 曾世杰。(1999)。<國語文低成就學童之工作記憶、聲韻處理能力與唸名速度之研究>。學童閱讀困難的鑑定與診斷研討會。國立台灣師範大學。 Uhry, J. K., & Ehri, L. C. Ease of segmenting two- and three-phoneme words in kindergarten: Rime cohesion or vowel salience? Journal of Educational Psychology, 91:4, 594-603. Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and ts causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192-212. Walley, A. C. (1993). The role of vocabulary development in children’s spoken word recognition and segmentation ability. Developmental Review, 13, 286-350. Walton, P. D. (1995). Rhyming ability, phoneme identity, letter-sound knowledge and the use of orthographic analogy by prereaders, Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 587-597. Wan, I.-P. (1999). Mandarin phonology: Evidence from speech errors. PhD. dissertation. University of New York at Buffalo. Wan, I.-P., & Jaeger, J. (2003). The phonological representation of Taiwan Mandarin vowels: A psycholinguistic study. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 12, 205-257. Wang, H. S. 王旭。(1997)。<漢語音標謅議>。第一屆台灣語言發展學術研討會論文講稿。國立新竹師範學院。 Wang, M., & Geva, E. (2003). Spelling performance of Chinese children using English as a second language: Lexical and visual-orthographic processes. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 1-25. Wang, M., Koda, K., & Perfetti, C. A. (2003). Alphabetic and nonalphabetic L1 effects in English word identification: A comparison of Korean and Chinese English L2 learners. Cognition, 87, 129-149. Wang, T.-F. 王天昌。 (1984)。《漢語語音學研究》。台北市：國語日報。 Wanzek, J., & Haager, D. (2003). Teaching word recognition with blending and analogizing. Teaching Exceptional Children, 36:1, 32-38. Wood, C. (2000). Rhyme awareness, orthographic analogy use, phonemic awareness and reading: an examination of relationships. Educational Psychology, 20:1, 5-15. Wu, Y. (1994). Mandarin segmental phonology. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Torondo.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學語言學研究所 90555002 92
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090555002
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Graduate Institute of Linguistics] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
55500201.pdf	35Kb	Adobe PDF2	870	View/Open
55500202.pdf	17Kb	Adobe PDF2	800	View/Open
55500203.pdf	152Kb	Adobe PDF2	1386	View/Open
55500204.pdf	113Kb	Adobe PDF2	1057	View/Open
55500205.pdf	16Kb	Adobe PDF2	782	View/Open
55500206.pdf	38Kb	Adobe PDF2	1300	View/Open
55500207.pdf	136Kb	Adobe PDF2	3154	View/Open
55500208.pdf	55Kb	Adobe PDF2	987	View/Open
55500209.pdf	82Kb	Adobe PDF2	882	View/Open
55500210.pdf	77Kb	Adobe PDF2	940	View/Open
55500211.pdf	117Kb	Adobe PDF2	1100	View/Open
55500212.pdf	22Kb	Adobe PDF2	875	View/Open
55500213.pdf	19Kb	Adobe PDF2	760	View/Open
55500214.pdf	57Kb	Adobe PDF2	667	View/Open
55500215.pdf	10Kb	Adobe PDF2	755	View/Open
55500216.pdf	6Kb	Adobe PDF2	732	View/Open
55500217.pdf	6Kb	Adobe PDF2	722	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...