政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/33363
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113392/144379 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51216760      線上人數 : 890
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33363


    題名: Cognitive-Semantic Mechanisms Behind Heart Idioms
    英文中"Heart"成語之認知語意機制
    作者: 王信斌
    Wang,Hsin-pin
    貢獻者: 賴惠玲
    王信斌
    Wang,Hsin-pin
    關鍵詞: 隱喻
    換喻
    成語
    心
    認知語意學
    metaphor
    metonymy
    idiom
    heart
    Cognitive Semantics
    日期: 2003
    上傳時間: 2009-09-17 16:23:30 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本論文從認知語意學的角度來探討英文中 “Heart” 成語所牽涉到的認知語意機制，並以Lakoff (1993)所提出的當代隱喻理論、Kövecses & Radden (1998)從認知語言學角度針對換喻所做的研究以及Ruiz de Mendoza (2003)所提出來的隱喻和換喻的三個交互模式為基礎，進一步探討 “Heart” 成語的字面語意如何透過這些機制衍生出其象徵語意。此外，本論文也對收集到的七十七個 “Heart” 成語進行重新分類以修正Niemeier’s (2003)在 “Heart” 成語分類上所產成的謬誤。
    研究分析發現七十七個 “Heart” 成語所牽涉的認知語意機制包括Lakoff (1993)提出的五種隱喻類型以及Kövecses & Radden (1998)提出的十五種換喻類型其中的六種，而七十七個 “Heart” 成語的字面語意與其象徵語意之間的連結則無法僅僅透過Ruiz de Mendoza (2003)所提出來的隱喻和換喻的三個交互模式進行建立，而必須加上本研究另外發現的四個新的交互模式才能完整建立起七十七個 “Heart” 成語的字面語意與其象徵語意之間的連結。
    Based on the contemporary theory of metaphor by Lakoff (1993), a cognitive view toward metonymy by Kövecses & Radden (1998), and models of how metaphor can interact with metonymy by Ruiz de Mendoza (2003), this thesis makes an effort in exploring the cognitive-semantic mechanisms behind the 77 heart idioms collected for this research. Although Niemeier (2003) has tried to explore the metaphorical and metonymic bases for the heart idioms in English, her analysis is not satisfactory and can not meet the goal of this current research. A recategorization of heart idioms is therefore performed to encompass all the features exhibited by them before the cognitive-semantic analysis is proposed.
    The analysis of heart idioms discovers that a full explanation of their figurative meanings requires the activation of all the five types of metaphor proposed by Lakoff (1993) and six out of the 15 types of metonymy-producing relationships proposed by Kövecses & Radden (1998). Furthermore, to fully account for the figurative meanings of heart idioms, the analysis also proposes six interaction models of between metaphor and metonymy, two of which are proposed in Ruiz de Mendoza (2003) and four of which are discovered by the current study.
    參考文獻: A Dictionary of Current English Phrases and Idioms. 1993. The
    Crane Publishing.
    Carter, R. and M, McCarthy. 1988. Vocabulary and Language
    Teaching. London: Longman.
    Chafe, W. 1970. Meaning and the Structure of Language,
    University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
    Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press,
    Cambridge, Massachusetts.
    Chomsky, N. 1980. Rules and Representations, Columbia
    University Press, New York.
    Clore, G. L., A, Ortony., and M, A, Foss. 1987. The
    Psychological Foundations of the Affective Lexicon. Journal
    of Personality and Social Psychology. 53. 751-766.
    Fraser, B. 1970. Idioms Within a Transformational Grammar.
    Foundations of Language 6, 22-42.
    Geeraerts, D. 1995. Specialization and Reinterpretation in
    Idioms. In Idioms: Structural and psychological perspectives,
    M. Everaert, E.-J. van der Linden, A. Schenk and R. Schreuder
    (eds), 57 -74. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Gibbs, R. W., Jr. 1990. "Psycholinguistic Studies on the
    Conceptual Basis of Idiomaticity." Cognitive Linguistics. 1
    (4):417-451.
    Gibbs, R. W., Jr. 1995. Idiomaticity and Human Cognition. In
    Idioms: Structural and psychological perspectives, M. Everaert, E.-J. van der Linden, A. Schenk and R. Schreuder
    (eds), 97-116. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Heine, B. 1997. Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. Oxford:
    Oxford UP.
    Johnson-Laird, P. N. and K, Oatley. 1989. Basic Emotions,
    Rationality, and Folk Theory. Cognition and Emotion. 6, 201-
    223.
    Johnson-Laird, P. N. and K, Oatley. 1992. The Language of
    Emotions: An Analysis of a Semantic Field. Cognition and
    Emotion. 3, 81-123.
    Katz, J. 1973. Compositionality, Idiomaticity, and Lexical
    Substitution. In S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky, eds., A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New
    York.
    Kövecses, Z. 1990. Emotion Concepts. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
    Kövecses, Z. and G, Radden. 1998. Metonymy: Developing a
    cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics 9: 37-77.
    Kövecses, Z. and P, Szabó. 1996. Idioms: A view from cognitive
    semantics. Applied Linguistics 17(3). 326-355.
    Lakoff, G. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In
    Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and Thought. 2nd edition.
    Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 202-251.
    Lakoff, G., and M, Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By.
    Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Lakoff, G. and M, Turner. 1989. More Than Cool Reason: A Field
    Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago
    Press.
    Niemeier, S. 2003. Straight from the Heart — Metonymic and
    Metaphorical Explorations. In Metaphor and Metonymy at the
    Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. Antonio Barcelona (eds),
    195-213. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, S.
    Nunberg, G., I, A, Sag., and T, Wasow. 1994. Idioms. Language
    70, 491-538.
    Oatley, K. and P, N, Johnson-Laird. 1987. Towards a cognitive
    theory of emotions. Cognition and Emotion. 1, 29-50.
    online Cambridge Dictionary of American English. Cambridge
    University Press, 2004. <http://dictionary.cambridge.org/>
    Radden, G. 2003. How Metonymic are Metaphors? In Metaphor and
    Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. Antonio
    Barcelona (eds), 93-108. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter,
    S.
    Ruiz de Mendoza Ib&aacute;&ntilde;ez, F. J. 2003. The Role of Mappings and
    Domains in Understanding Metonymy. In Metaphor and Metonymy
    at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. Antonio Barcelona
    (eds), 109-132. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, S.
    TheFreeDictionary.com. Farlex, Inc. Huntingdon Valley, PA,
    2004. <http://www.thefreedictionary.com/>
    The Origins of Famous Sayings.
    <http://www.screamingmonkeylabs.com/sayings.html >
    Webster’s New World Dictionary. 1990. 3rd edition; Hungry
    Minds, Inc.
    Wittgenstein, L. 1978. Philosophical Investigations. Translated
    by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    Yu, N. 2003. Chinese metaphors of thinking. Cognitive
    Linguistics 14(2/3), 141–165. 2003.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    語言學研究所
    89555002
    92
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0089555002
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[語言學研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    55500201.pdf39KbAdobe PDF21576檢視/開啟
    55500202.pdf43KbAdobe PDF23427檢視/開啟
    55500203.pdf42KbAdobe PDF21786檢視/開啟
    55500204.pdf49KbAdobe PDF22167檢視/開啟
    55500205.pdf53KbAdobe PDF26145檢視/開啟
    55500206.pdf84KbAdobe PDF22595檢視/開啟
    55500207.pdf83KbAdobe PDF23819檢視/開啟
    55500208.pdf119KbAdobe PDF22707檢視/開啟
    55500209.pdf49KbAdobe PDF22442檢視/開啟
    55500210.pdf54KbAdobe PDF21655檢視/開啟
    55500211.pdf46KbAdobe PDF23671檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋