English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113324/144300 (79%)
Visitors : 51136096      Online Users : 885
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/30005
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30005


    Title: 認知年齡與品牌年齡一致性對不同產品類型品牌偏好程度之影響
    The effects of congruence between cognitive age and brand age on brand preference under different product types
    Authors: 黃昭蕙
    Huang, Chao-hui
    Contributors: 別蓮蒂
    黃昭蕙
    Huang, Chao-hui
    Keywords: 認知年齡
    一致性
    中介效果
    品牌偏好
    功能型產品
    享樂型產品
    象徵型產品
    Cognitive Age
    Congruence
    Mediating Effect
    Brand Preference
    Functional Product
    Hedonic Product
    Symbolic Product
    Date: 2008
    Issue Date: 2009-09-11 17:02:13 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   本研究之目的是探討消費者自我認知年齡 (Cognitive Age) 與品牌年齡之一致性程度,對其品牌偏好的影響。為使研究結果具一般性之參考價值,本研究不以單一產品為研究標的,而是將產品依其所滿足之消費者需求的不同,區分為功能型產品 (Utilitarian Product)、享樂型產品 (Hedonic Product) 與象徵型產品 (Symbolic Product) 三類,以產品類型做為調節變數,了解在不同產品類型下,消費者自我認知年齡與品牌年齡之一致性,對其品牌偏好之關係會有何種程度之變化。
      有鑑於國內並未有類似之研究探討,本研究分兩階段進行,先透過次級資料探討確定消費者認知年齡與品牌年齡之差距,對消費者在品牌偏好度上之可能關係,在次級資料之研究結果與研究方向一致時,正式進行第二階段的調查,驗證研究假說。
      研究結果顯示消費者之認知年齡確實不同於真實年齡,兩者間呈現正向相關之特性,顯示真實年齡高者,其認知年齡也會較高。在研究主效果上,消費者真實年齡與品牌年齡之一致性,以及消費者認知年齡與品牌年齡之一致性,都與消費者之品牌偏好度呈現正向影響關係,但其中以認知年齡之影響較為明顯,支持認知年齡對真實年齡與品牌偏好間之關係具中介效果。結果發現,消費者認知年齡與品牌年齡之一致性對品牌偏好度之關係,在象徵型產品上最為強烈,其次是享樂型產品,功能型產品最弱。
      整體而言,認知年齡較傳統行銷所使用之真實年齡更能反映消費者之自我概念與品牌偏好,特別是對象徵型與享樂型產品。因此,若能妥善將認知年齡與其他人口統計變數搭配使用,將有助於行銷者掌握消費特性,擬定契合之品牌策略。此外,本研究建議象徵型產品廠商在其品牌管理上尤應注重目標消費者之認知年齡,諸如品牌年齡定位與代言人的選擇,都應配合其目標消費族群之認知年齡。
    The purpose of this study is to discuss the congruency of consumer’s cognitive age and perceived brand age on brand preference. In order to maximize the contri-bution of the study, this study examines 3 product types, namely functional, hedonic, and symbolic rather than choosing a single product. By using product types as mod-erator, the study shows the effect of consumer’s cognitive age and perceived brand age on brand preference changes under different types of products.
    Because there’s no similar study in Taiwan before, the study uses secondary da-ta to explore the relationship between a consumer’s brand preference and cogni-tive-brand age gap (the disparity between the consumer’s cognitive age and brand age). A second stage of investigation was conducted to verify the research assump-tions once the secondary data study and the results were found to be consistent.
    According to the results, the gap between consumer’s cognitive age and actual age actually exists, and the two of them are positively related, implying that older people have higher cognitive age. On the main effect, although “the congruency of consumer’s actual age and brand age” and “the congruency of consumer’s cognitive age and brand age” both have a positive relationship with brand preference, the relationship between “the congruency of consumer’s actual age and brand age” and “brand preference” is stronger, indicating that cognitive age has a mediating effect on the relationship between actual age and brand preference. Furthermore, the relationship between “the congruency of consumer’s cognitive age and brand age” is much more salient for symbolic products than hedonic products, while functional product consumer choices are the least affected by this relationship.
    To sum up, cognitive age tells us more about consumer self-image and brand preference than the traditional marketing variable, actual age. This is especially true for symbolic and hedonic products. Therefore, if marketers could combine cognitive age with other demographic variables, they will learn more about consumers and draw up the most appropriate strategy for their brand. Furthermore, this study re-commends that firms marketing symbolic products should take into account con-sumers’ cognitive age, when determining brand age positioning. The selection of ad-vertising actors should also be aligned with the target consumer’s cognitive age.
    Reference: 李吉彬 (2004)。自我形象一致性對真實與虛擬產品購買意願之影響-功能型、享樂型與象徵型產品之比較分析。國立政治大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    陸姵如 (2004)。高齡者認知年齡與探索性購買行為之研究。長庚大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    楊玉婷 (2003)。中年與老年人消費行為因果模式與世代差異之研究。淡江大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    溫曉盼 (2004)。女性心理年齡影響因素之研究:以化妝保養品之品牌態度為例。國立政治大學廣告學系碩士論文。
    顏月珠 (1996)。統計學,第五版。台北:三民書局股份有限公司。
    Ang, Swee Hoon & Elison Ai Ching Lim (2006). “The Influence of Metaphors and Product Type on Brand Personality Perceptions and Attitudes.” Journal of Adver-tising, 35 (2), 39-53.
    Ball A. Dwayne & Lori H. Tasaki (1992). “The Role and Measurement of Attachment in Consumer Behavior.” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1 (2), 155-172.
    Barak, Benny (1987). “Cognitive Age: A New Multidimensional Approach to Measur-ing Age Identity.” International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 25 (2), 109-125.
    Barak, Benny (1998). “Inner-Ages of Middle-Aged Prime Lifers.” International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 46 (3), 189-228.
    Barak, Benny, Anil Mathur, Keun Lee, & Yong Zhang (2001). “Perceptions of Age-Identity: A Cross-Cultural Inner-Age Exploration.” Psychology and Marketing, 18 (10), 1003-1029.
    Barak, Benny & Barbara B. Stern (1985). “Women’s Age in Advertising: An Examina-tion of Two Consumer Age Profiles.” Journal of Advertising Research, 25 (6), 38-47.
    Barak, Benny & Barbara B. Stern (1986). “Subjective Age Correlates: A Research Note.” The Gerontologist, 26 (5), 571-578.
    Barak, Benny, Barbara B. Stern, & Stephen Gould (1988). “Ideal Age Concept: An Ex-ploration.” Advances in Consumer Research, 15, M. Huston, ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 146-152.
    Barak, Benny, & Don R. Rahtz (1990). “Cognitive Age: Demographic and Psycho-graphic Dimensions.” Journal of Ambulatory Care Marketing, 3 (2), 51-65.
    Barak, Benny, & Don R. Rahtz (1999). “Perceived Youth: Appraisal and Characteriza-tion.” International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 49 (3), 231-257.
    Barak, Benny & Stephen Gould (1985). “Alternative Age Measures: A Research Agen-da.” Advances in Consumer Research, 12, E. Hirschman and M. Holbrook, ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 53-58.
    Barak, Benny & Leon G. Schiffman (1981). “Cognitive Age: A Nonchronological Age Variable.” Advances in Consumer Research, 8, K. Monroe, ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 602-606.
    Batra, Rajeev & Olli T. Ahtola (1990). “Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Sources of Consumer Attitudes.” Marketing Letters, 2 (2), 159-170.
    Baum, Steven K. & Russell L. Boxley (1983). “Age Identification in the Elderly.” The Gerontologist, 23 (5), 532-537.
    Bei, Lien-Ti & Chiao Yu-Ching (2002). “An Eploratory Study of The Cognitive Age ver-sus Chronological Age of Teens and Adults in Taiwan.” Society for Consumer Psychology Conference, New Orleans, L.A.
    Belk, Russell W. (1988). “Possessions and the Extended Self.” Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (2), 139–168.
    Berry, Norman C. (1998). “Revitalizing Brands.” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 5 (3), 15-20.
    Birdwell, Al E. (1964). “Influence of Image Congruence on Consumer Choice.” Reflec-tions on Progress in Marketing, L. G. Smith, ed. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 290-303.
    Birdwell, Al E. (1968). “A Study of the Influence of Image Congruence on Consumer Choice.” Journal of Business, 41 (1), 76-88.
    Blau, Zena Smith (1956). “Changes in Status and Age Identification.” American Socio-logical Review, 21 (2), 198-203.
    Bucklin, Louis P. (1963). “Retail Strategy and the Classification of Consumer Goods.” Journal of Marketing, 27 (1), 50-55.
    Bultena, Gordon L. & Edward A. Powers (1978). “Denial of Aging: Age Identification and Reference Group.” Journal of Gerontology, 33 (5), 748-754.
    Carrigan, Marylyn & Isabelle Szmigin (1999). “The Representation of Older People in Advertisements.” Journal of the Market Research Society, 41 (3), 311-326.
    Chang, Chingching (2008). “Chronological Age versus Cognitive Age for Younger Con-sumers: Implications for Advertising Persuasion.” Journal of Advertising, 37 (3), 19-32.
    Chua, Caroline, Joseph A. Cote, & Siew Meng Leong (1990). “The Antecedents of Cognitive Age.” Advances in Consumer Research, 17, M. E. Goldberg et al., ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 880-885.
    Dolich, Ira J. (1969). “Congruence Relationship Between Self-Image and Product Brands.” Journal of Marketing Research, 6 (1), 80-84.
    Epstein, Seymour (1980). “The Self-Concept: A Review and Proposal of an Integrated Theory of Personality.” Personality: Basic Aspects and Current Research, Ervin Staub, ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Escalas, Jennifer Edson (2004). “Narrative Processing: Building Consumer Connec-tions to Brands.” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14 (1&2), 168-180.
    Gargner, Burleigh B. & Sidney J. Levy (1955). “The Product and the Brand.” Harvard Business Review, 33 (2), 33-39.
    George, Linda K., Elizabeth J. Mutran, & Margaret R. Pennybacker (1980). “The Meaning and Measurement of Age Identity.” Experimental Aging Research, 6 (3), 283-298.
    Graeff, Timothy R. (1996). “Image Congruence Effects on Product Evaluations: The Role of Self-Monitoring and Public/Private Consumption.” Psychology and Mar-keting, 13, (5), 481-499.
    Grubb, Edward L. & Harrison L. Grathwohl (1967). "Consumer Self-Concept, Symbol-ism, and Market Behavior: A Theoretical Approach." Journal of Marketing Re-search, 31 (4), 22-27.
    Guptill, Carleton S. (1969). “A Measure of Age Identification.” The Gerontologist, 9 (2), 96-102.
    Gwinner, Kevin P. & Nancy Stephens (2001). “Testing the Implied Mediational Role of Cognitive Age.” Psychology and Marketing, 18 (10), 1031-1048.
    Haig, Matt (2003). Brand Failures: The Truth about the 100 Biggest Branding Mistakes of All Time. USA: Sterling VA. Kogan Page US, 257-299.
    Henderson, Kenneth V., Ronald E. Goldsmith, & Leisa R. Flynn (1995). “Demographic Characteristics of Subjective Age.” The Journal of Social Psychology, 135 (4), 447-457.
    Holbrook, Morris B. & Elizabeth C. Hirschman (1982). “The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun.” Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (2), 132-140.
    Hughes, G. David & Jose L. Guerrero (1971). “Automobile Self-Congruity Models Reexamined.” Journal of Marketing Research, 8 (1), 125-127.
    Johnson, Michael D. (1984). "Consumer Choice Strategies for Company Noncompara-ble Alternatives." Journal of Consumer Research, 11 (3), 741-753.
    Kastenbaum, Robert, Valarie Derbin, Paul Sabatini, & Steven Artt (1972), “ ‘The Ages of Me’: Toward Personal and Interpersonal Definitions of Functional Aging.” Ag-ing and Human Development, 3 (2), 197-211.
    Kempf, DeAnna S. (1999). “Attitude Formation from Product Trial: Distinct Roles of Cognition and Affect for Hedonic and Functional Products.” Psychology & Mar-keting, 16 (1), 35-50.
    Kleine, Susan Schultz, Robert E. Kleine, & Chris T. Allen (1995). “How Is a Possession ‘Me’ or ‘Not Me’? Characterizing Types and an Antecedent of Material Posses-sion Attachment.” Journal of Consumer Research, 22 (3), 327-343.
    Lehu, Jean Marc (2004). “Back to Life! Why Brands Grow Old and Sometimes Die and What Managers Then Do: An Exploratory Qualitative Research Put into the French Context.” Journal of Marketing Communications, 10 (2), 133-152.
    Linn, Margaret W. & Kathleen Hunter (1979), “Perception of Age in the Elderly.” Journal of Gerontology, 34 (1), 46-52.
    Markides, Kyriakos S. & Joanne S. Boldt (1983). “Change in Subjective Age Among the Elderly: A Longitudinal Analysis.” The Gerontologist, 23 (4), 422-427.
    Miller, George A. (1956). “The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits of our Capacity for Processing Information.” Psychological Review, 63 (2), 81-97.
    Montpare, J. M. & M. E. Lachman (1989). “You’re Only as Old as You Feel: Self-Perception of Age, Fears of Aging, and Life Satisfaction from Adolescence to Old Age.” Psychology and Aging, 4 (1), 73-84.
    Munson, J. Michael & W. Austin Spivey (1981). "Product and Brand-User Stereotypes Among Social Classes." Journal of Advertising Research, 21 (4), 37-46.
    Murphy, Patrick E. & Ben M. Enis (1986) “Classifying Products Strategically.” Journal of Marketing, 50 (3), 24-42.
    Onkvisit, Sak & John Shaw (1987). “Self-Concept and Image Congruence: Some Re-search and Managerial Implications.” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 4 (1), 13-24.
    Park, C. Whan, Bernard J. Jaworski, & Deborah J. Maclnnis (1986). “Strategic Brand Concept-Image Management.” Journal of Marketing, 50 (4), 135-145.
    Peters, George R. (1971). “Self-Conceptions of the Aged, Age Identification, and Ag-ing.” The Gerontologist, 11 (1), 69-73.
    Phillips, Bernard S. (1957). “A Role Theory Approach to Adjustment in Old Age.” American Sociological Review, 22 (2), 212-217.
    Rosenberg, Morris (1979). Conceiving the Self. Reprint ed. Malabar, FL: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Co.
    Ross, Ivan (1971). “Self-Concept and Brand Preference.” Journal of Business, 44 (1), 38-50.
    Schiffman, Leon G. & Elaine Sherman (1991). “Value Orientations of New-Age Elderly: The Coming of an Ageless Market.” Journal of Business Research, 22 (2), 187-194.
    Sengupta, Jaideep & Gavan J. Fitzsimons (2000). “The Effect of Analyzing Reasons for Brand Preferences: Disruption or Reinforcement?” Journal of Marketing, 37 (3), 318-330.
    Sirgy, M. Joseph (1982). “Self-Concept and Consumer Behavior: A Critical Review.” Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (3), 287-300.
    Stephens, Nancy (1991). “Cognitive Age: A Useful Concept for Advertising?” Journal of Advertising, 20 (4), 37-48.
    Strahilevitz, Michael & John G. Myers (1998). “Donations to Charity as Purchase In-centives: How Well They Work May Depend on What You Are Trying to Sell.” Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (4), 434-446.
    Szmigin, Isabelle & Marylyn Carrigan (2000). “The Older Consumer as Innovator: Does Cognitive Age Hold the Key?” Journal of Marketing Management, 4 (2), 107-132.
    Tucker, William Thomas (1957). Foundations for a Theory of Consumer Behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 139.
    Tuckman, Jocob & Martha Lavell (1957), “Self-Classification as Old or Not Old.” Geriatric, 12 (11), 666-671.
    Underhill, Lois, & Franchellie Cadwell (1983). “‘What Age Do You Feel’: Age Percep-tion Study.” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 1 (1), 18-22.
    Uotinen, V. (1998). “Age Identification: A Comparison between Finnish and North-American Cultures.” International Journal of Aging and Human Develop-ment, 46 (2), 109-124.
    Van Auken, Stuart & Thomas E. Barry (1995). “An Assessment of the Trait Validity of Cognitive Age Measure.” Journal of Consumer Research, 4 (2), 107-132.
    Van Auken, Stuart, Thomas E. Barry, & Robert L. Anderson (1993). “Observations: Toward the Internal Validation of Cognitive Age Measures in Advertising Re-search.” Journal of Advertising Research, 33 (3), 82-84.
    Vaugh, Richard (1980). “How Advertising Works: A Planning Model Revised.” Journal of Advertising Research, 26 (1), 57-66.
    Ward, Russell A. (1977). “The Impact of Subjective Age and Stigma on Older Persons.” Journal of Gerontology, 32 (2), 227-232.
    Wilkes, Robert E. (1992). “A Structural Modeling Approach to the Measurement and Meaning of Cognitive Age.” Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (2), 292-301.
    Woods, A. Walter (1960). “Psychological Dimensions of Consumer Decision,” Journal of Marketing, 24 (April), 15-19.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    96355030
    97
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0963550301
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2323View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback