| Reference: | Akbar, S. A., Hossain, M. M., Wood, T., Chin, S.-C., Salinas, E. M., Alvarez, V., & Cornejo, E. (2024). HalluMeasure: Fine-grained hallucination measurement using chain-of-thought reasoning. In Y. Al-Onaizan, M. Bansal, & Y.-N. Chen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2024 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (pp. 15020–15037). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.837
Al Nazi, Z., Hossain, M. R., & Al Mamun, F. (2025). Evaluation of open and closed-source LLMs for low-resource language with zero-shot, few-shot, and chain-of-thought prompting. Natural Language Processing Journal, 10, 100124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlp.2024.100124
Alam, F., Danieli, M., & Riccardi, G. (2016). Can we detect speakers’ empathy?: A real-life case study. Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1109/CogInfoCom.2016.7804525
Alban, M. W. (2024). Word choice affects social judgments: Relational messages containing low-frequency words get low evaluations [Advance online publication]. Psychological Reports. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941241287411
Alelaiwi, A. (2019). Multimodal patient satisfaction recognition for smart healthcare. IEEE Access, 7, 174219–174226. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2956083
Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). Effects of fluency on psychological distance and mental construal (or why New York is a large city, but New York is a civilized jungle). Psychological Science, 19(2), 161–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02062.x
Azijah, D., & Gulö, I. (2020). Interpersonal metadiscourse markers in Jacinda Ardern speech at Christchurch memorial. Linguistics and Literature Journal, 1(2), 70–77. https://doi.org/10.33365/llj.v1i2.594
Batt-Rawden, S. A., Chisolm, M. S., Anton, B., & Flickinger, T. E. (2013). Teaching empathy to medical students: An updated, systematic review. Academic Medicine, 88(8), 1171–1177. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318299f3e3
Bigi, S. (2011). The persuasive role of ethos in doctor-patient interactions. Communication & Medicine, 8(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1558/cam.v8i1.67
Bonvicini, K. A., Perlin, M. J., Bylund, C. L., Carroll, G., Rouse, R. A., & Goldstein, M. G. (2009). Impact of communication training on physician expression of empathy in patient encounters. Patient Education and Counseling, 75(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.09.007
Branch Jr, W. T., Kern, D., Haidet, P., Weissmann, P., Gracey, C. F., Mitchell, G., & Inui, T. (2001). Teaching the human dimensions of care in clinical settings. JAMA, 286(9), 1067–1074. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.9.1067
Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J. D., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Agarwal, S., Herbert-Voss, A., Krueger, G., Henighan, T., Child, R., Ramesh, A., Ziegler, D., Wu, J., Winter, C., … Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 1877–1901.
Chen, J., Wu, G., Zhang, T., Zhao, B., Wang, R., Zhai, X., & Guo, F. (2024). Exploring factors affecting patient satisfaction in online healthcare: A machine learning approach grounded in empathy theory. Digital Health, 10, 20552076241309223. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241309223
Chen, W.-M. (2024). A pragmatic analysis and pedagogical application of persuasive speech in Chinese issue-oriented videos [Master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University (Taiwan)].
Cheng, X., & Steffensen, M. S. (1996). Metadiscourse: A technique for improving student writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 30(2), 149–181. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte199615322
Clark, H. H., & Carlson, T. B. (1982). Hearers and speech acts. Language, 58(2), 332–373.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
Crismore, A., & Farnsworth, R. (1990). Metadiscourse in popular and professional science discourse. In W. Nash (Ed.), The writing scholar: Studies in academic discourse (pp. 118–136). Sage.
Cruickshank, I. J., & Ng, L. H. X. (2023). Prompting and fine-tuning open-sourced large language models for stance classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.13734. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.13734
De Witte, N. A., Carlbring, P., Etzelmueller, A., Nordgreen, T., Karekla, M., Haddouk, L., Belmont, A., Øverland, S., Abi-Habib, R., Bernaerts, S., Brugnera, A., Compare, A., Duque, A., Ebert, D. D., Eimontas, J., Kassianos, A. P., Salgado, J., Schwerdtfeger, A., Tohme, P., … Van Daele, T. (2021). Online consultations in mental healthcare during the COVID-19 outbreak: An international survey study on professionals’ motivations and perceived barriers. Internet Interventions, 25, 100405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2021.100405
Deng, L., Fatemeh, B., & Gao, X. (2021). Exploring the interactive and interactional metadiscourse in doctoral dissertation writing: A diachronic study. Scientometrics, 126(8), 7223–7250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04064-0
Deng, Y., Xie, Y., Li, Y., Yang, M., Lam, W., & Shen, Y. (2021). Contextualized knowledge-aware attentive neural network: Enhancing answer selection with knowledge. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 40(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3457533
Dhuliawala, S., Komeili, M., Xu, J., Raileanu, R., Li, X., Celikyilmaz, A., & Weston, J. (2023). Chain-of-verification reduces hallucination in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.11495. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.11495
Diani, G. (2019). Metadiscourse in web-mediated health communication. Token: A Journal of English Linguistics, 9, 13–34. https://doi.org/10.25951/2955
Du, Y., & Gu, Y. (2024). The development of evaluation scale of the patient satisfaction with telemedicine: A systematic review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 24(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02436-z
Flach, P., & Kull, M. (2015). Precision-recall-gain curves: Pr analysis done right. Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 838–846. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2969239.2969333
Flussfisch, T. (2025). An analysis of pragmatic strategies in Chinese and German internet recipes and their pedagogical application [Master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University (Taiwan)].
Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., & Kubli, M. (2023). ChatGPT outperforms crowd workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(30), e2305016120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2305016120
Guo, Z., Lai, A., Thygesen, J. H., Farrington, J., Keen, T., Li, K., et al. (2024). Large language models for mental health applications: Systematic review. JMIR mental health, 11(1), e57400. https://doi.org/10.2196/57400
Halpern, J. (2003). What is clinical empathy? Journal of General Internal Medicine, 18(8), 670–674. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21017.x
Head, K. J., Forster, A. K., Harsin, A., & Bartlett Ellis, R. J. (2023). Identifying sources of patient dissatisfaction when seeking care for a chronic and complex disease. Patient Experience Journal, 10(2), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.35680/2372-0247.1803
Hojat, M., Gonnella, J. S., Nasca, T. J., Mangione, S., Vergare, M., & Magee, M. (2002). Physician Empathy: Definition, Components, Measurement, and Relationship to Gender and Specialty. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159(9), 1563–1569. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.159.9.1563
Howick, J., Moscrop, A., Mebius, A., Fanshawe, T. R., Lewith, G., Bishop, F. L., Mis- tiaen, P., Roberts, N. W., Dieninytė, E., Hu, X.-Y., et al. (2018). Effects of empathic and positive communication in healthcare consultations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 111(7), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076818769477
Hsieh, C.-L., & Wu, X.-R. (2023). A Study of Metadiscourse in Chinese-Language Academic Papers. Taiwan Journal of Chinese as a Second Language, (27), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.29748/TJCSL.202312_(27).0001
Huang, J., & Xiao, W. (2024). Use of interactional metadiscourse and identity construction in responses to negative online reviews of Chinese and British hotels. PloS one, 19(12), e0316071. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316071
Huang, Y., Wang, H., Tang, J., et al. (2020). A study of interactional metadiscourse in English travel blogs. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 10(06), 785. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2020.106048
Hyland, K. (1998). Exploring corporate rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the CEO’s letter. Journal of Business Communication, 35(2), 224–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/002194369803500203
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Continuum.
Hyland, K. (2010). Metadiscourse: Mapping interactions in academic writing. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(S2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.220
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156
Intaraprawat, P., & Steffensen, M. S. (1995). The use of metadiscourse in good and poor ESL essays. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(3), 253–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(95)90012-8
Islam, R., & Moushi, O. M. (2024). Gpt-4o: The cutting-edge advancement in multimodal LLM. Authorea Preprints.
Jo, E., Epstein, D. A., Jung, H., & Kim, Y.-H. (2023). Understanding the benefits and challenges of deploying conversational AI leveraging large language models for public health intervention. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581503
Jones, J. (2011). Using metadiscourse to improve coherence in academic writing. Language Education in Asia, 2(1), 1–14.
Kim, L. C., & Lim, J. M.-H. (2013). Metadiscourse in English and Chinese research article introductions. Discourse Studies, 15(2), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612471476
Kim, S. S., Kaplowitz, S., & Johnston, M. V. (2004). The effects of physician empathy on patient satisfaction and compliance. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 27(3), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278704267037
Kim, Y., Guo, L., Yu, B., & Li, Y. (2023). Can ChatGPT understand causal language in science claims? Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment, & Social Media Analysis, 379–389. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.wassa-1.33
Kojima, T., Gu, S. S., Reid, M., Matsuo, Y., & Iwasawa, Y. (2022). Large language models are zero-shot reasoners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 22199–22213.
Lee, S., Park, S. H., Kim, S., & Seo, M. (2025). Aligning to thousands of preferences via system message generalization. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37, 73783–73829.
Lee, Y.-J., Lim, C.-G., & Choi, H.-J. (2022). Does GPT-3 generate empathetic dialogues? A novel in-context example selection method and automatic evaluation metric for empathetic dialogue generation. Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 669–683.
Leilei, Z., & Fe, L. (2022). The pragmatic functions of the tilde “~” in China’s social media among youth groups. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and. Translation, 5(12), 136–143. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2022.5.12.17
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. University of California Press.
Li, Q., Li, P., Ren, Z., Ren, P., & Chen, Z. (2022). Knowledge bridging for empathetic dialogue generation. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 36(10), 10993–11001. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v36i10.21347
Li, Y. (2023). A practical survey on zero-shot prompt design for in-context learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.13205. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.13205
Lief, H. I., & Fox, R. C. (1963). Training for “detached concern” in medical students. In H. I. Lief, V. F. Lief, & N. R. Lief (Eds.), The psychological basis of medical practice (pp. 12–35). Harper & Row.
Lin, C. Y., Wu, Y.-H., & Chen, A. L. (2021). Selecting the most helpful answers in online health question answering communities. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 57(2), 271–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10844-021-00640-1
Lin, J., Han, Z., Thomas, D. R., Gurung, A., Gupta, S., Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2025). How can I get it right? using GPT to rephrase incorrect trainee responses. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 35, 482–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-024-00408-y
Ling, Y. (2023). Bio+ Clinical BERT, BERT Base, and CNN performance comparison for predicting drug-review satisfaction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.03782. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.03782
Liu, P., Yuan, W., Fu, J., Jiang, Z., Hayashi, H., & Neubig, G. (2023). Pre-train, prompt, and predict: A systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing. ACM computing surveys, 55(9), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3560815
Lloyd, M., Bor, R., & Noble, L. M. (2018). Clinical communication skills for medicine. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Lorié, Á., Reinero, D. A., Phillips, M., Zhang, L., & Riess, H. (2017). Culture and non-verbal expressions of empathy in clinical settings: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling, 100(3), 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.09.018
Ma, W.-Y., & Chen, K.-J. (2003). Introduction to CKIP Chinese word segmentation system for the first international Chinese word segmentation bakeoff. Proceedings of the Second SIGHAN Workshop on Chinese Language Processing, 168–171. https://doi.org/10.3115/1119250.1119276
Martin, J. R., & White., P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.
Min, S., Lyu, X., Holtzman, A., Artetxe, M., Lewis, M., Hajishirzi, H., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2022). Rethinking the role of demonstrations: What makes in-context learning work? In Y. Goldberg, Z. Kozareva, & Y. Zhang (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2022 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (pp. 11048– 11064). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.759
Mishra, S., Khashabi, D., Baral, C., Choi, Y., & Hajishirzi, H. (2021). Reframing instructional prompts to GPTk’s language. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.07830. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2109.07830
Mousavi, R., Raghu, T., & Frey, K. (2020). Harnessing artificial intelligence to improve the quality of answers in online question-answering health forums. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37(4), 1073–1098. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2020.1831775
Mu, C., Zhang, L. J., Ehrich, J., & Hong, H. (2015). The use of metadiscourse for knowledge construction in Chinese and English research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.09.003
Nambisan, P. (2011). Information seeking and social support in online health communities: Impact on patients’ perceived empathy. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 18(3), 298–304. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000058
Oniani, D., & Wang, Y. (2020). A qualitative evaluation of language models on automatic question-answering for COVID-19. Proceedings of the 11th ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Health Informatics, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3388440.3412413
Parviainen, J., & Rantala, J. (2022). Chatbot breakthrough in the 2020s? An ethical reflection on the trend of automated consultations in health care. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 25(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-021-10049-w
Pearson, W. S., & Abdollahzadeh, E. (2023). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A systematic review. Lingua, 293, 103561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2023.103561
Peters, G. (2021). Metadiscourse, materiality and morality in communication skills training with simulated patients. Communication & Medicine, 16(3), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1558/cam.39725
Pollak, K. I., Alexander, S. C., Tulsky, J. A., Lyna, P., Coffman, C. J., Dolor, R. J., Gulbrandsen, P., & Østbye, T. (2011). Physician empathy and listening: Associations with patient satisfaction and autonomy. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 24(6), 665–672. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2011.06.110025
Pounds, G. (2011). Empathy as ‘appraisal’. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 7(2), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v7i2.145
Pounds, G. (2012). Enhancing empathic skills in clinical practice: A linguistic approach.
International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, 5(2), 114–131. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWOE.2012.049516
Qian, Y., Zhang, W.-N., & Liu, T. (2023). Harnessing the power of large language models for empathetic response generation: Empirical investigations and improvements. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.05140. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.05140
Qiu, Y., Ding, S., Tian, D., Zhang, C., & Zhou, D. (2022). Predicting the quality of answers with less bias in online health question answering communities. Information Processing & Management, 59(6), 103112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103112
Radford, A., Wu, J., Child, R., Luan, D., Amodei, D., & Sutskever, I. (2019). Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:160025533
Rahmanti, A. R., Yang, H.-C., Bintoro, B. S., Nursetyo, A. A., Muhtar, M. S., Syed-Abdul, S., & Li, Y.-C. J. (2022). Slimme, a chatbot with artificial empathy for personal weight management: System design and finding. Frontiers in Nutrition, 9, 870775. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.870775
Reynolds, L., & McDonell, K. (2021). Prompt programming for large language models: Beyond the few-shot paradigm. Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451760
Riess, H., Kelley, J. M., Bailey, R. W., Dunn, E. J., & Phillips, M. (2012). Empathy training for resident physicians: A randomized controlled trial of a neuroscience-informed curriculum. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 27(10), 1280–1286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2063-z
Rivas, R., Montazeri, N., Le, N. X., & Hristidis, V. (2018). Automatic classification of online doctor reviews: Evaluation of text classifier algorithms. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(11), e11141. https://doi.org/10.2196/11141
Rizzi, D. A. (1994). Causal reasoning and the diagnostic process. Theoretical Medicine, 15, 315–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01313345
Rosoł, M., Gąsior, J. S., Łaba, J., Korzeniewski, K., & Młyńczak, M. (2023). Evaluation of the performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on the Polish Medical Final Examination. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 20512. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46995-z
Russell, A. (2011). The Arab Spring extra-national information flows, social media and the 2011 Egyptian uprising. International Journal of Communication, 5, 10.
Ruytenbeek, N., & Decock, S. (2024). Expressing and responding to customer (dis)satisfaction online: New insights from discourse and linguistic approaches. International Journal of Business Communication, 61(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884231199740
Schiffrin, D. (1980). Meta-talk: Organizational and evaluate brackets in discourse. Sociological inquiry, 50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00021.x
Searle, J. R. (1969). The structure of illocutionary acts. In Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language (pp. 54–71). Cambridge University Press.
Senitan, M., Alhaiti, A. H., & Gillespie, J. (2018). Patient satisfaction and experience of primary care in Saudi Arabia: A systematic review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 30(10), 751–759. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzy104
Smith, A. (2006). Cognitive empathy and emotional empathy in human behavior and evolution. The Psychological Record, 56(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395534
Soltner, C., Giquello, J., Monrigal-Martin, C., & Beydon, L. (2011). Continuous care and empathic anaesthesiologist attitude in the preoperative period: Impact on patient anxiety and satisfaction. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 106(5), 680–686. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aer034
Stueber, K. (2019). Empathy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2019). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/empathy/
Sun, S. (2011). Meta-analysis of cohen’s kappa. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 11, 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-011-0077-3
Tan, L., Le, M. K., Yu, C. C., Liaw, S. Y., Tierney, T., Ho, Y. Y., Lim, E., Lim, D.,
Ng, R., Ngeow, C., & Low, J. (2021). Defining clinical empathy: A grounded theory approach from the perspective of healthcare workers and patients in a multicultural setting. BMJ Open, 11(9), e045224. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045224
Tseng, M.-Y., & Zhang, G. (2018). Pragmeme, adaptability, and elasticity in online medical consultations. Journal of Pragmatics, 137, 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.09.004
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Informa- tion Processing Systems, 30.
Vogel, D., Meyer, M., & Harendza, S. (2018). Verbal and non-verbal communication skills including empathy during history taking of undergraduate medical students. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 157. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1260-9
Wang, L., Xu, W., Lan, Y., Hu, Z., Lan, Y., Lee, R. K.-W., & Lim, E.-P. (2023). Plan-and-solve prompting: Improving zero-shot chain-of-thought reasoning by large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.04091. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.04091
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q. V., Zhou, D., et al. (2022). Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 24824–24837.
Wind, T. R., Rijkeboer, M., Andersson, G., & Riper, H. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic: The ‘black swan’ for mental health care and a turning point for e-health. Internet Interventions, 20, 100317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2020.100317
Wu, J., Zhang, G., Xing, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, Z., Dong, Y., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2023). A sentiment analysis driven method based on public and personal preferences with correlated attributes to select online doctors. Applied Intelligence, 53(16), 19093–19114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-023-04485-9
Wynn, R., & Wynn, M. (2006). Empathy as an interactionally achieved phenomenon in psychotherapy: Characteristics of some conversational resources. Journal of pragmatics, 38(9), 1385–1397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.008
Xia, J. (2020). “Loving you”: Use of metadiscourse for relational acts in WeChat public account advertisements. Discourse, Context & Media, 37, 100416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100416
Xie, Z. (2020). Two types of verb reduplications in Mandarin Chinese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics, 41(1), 73–108. https://doi.org/10.2478/scl-2020-0003
Xu, H., & Xia, D. (2023). Digital tildes (“~”) may convey more: analyzing innovative uses of tildes in Chinese WeChat messages. Language and Semiotic Studies, 9(3), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1515/lass-2023-0009
Xu, Y., Wu, G., & Chen, Y. (2022). Predicting patients’ satisfaction with doctors in online medical communities: An approach based on XGBoost algorithm. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC), 34(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.287571
Yang, N. (2021). Engaging readers across participants: A cross-interactant analysis of metadiscourse in letters of advice during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Pragmatics, 186, 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.017
Yang, X., Peynetti, E., Meerman, V., & Tanner, C. (2022). What GPT knows about who is who. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.07407. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.07407
Zhang, Y. (2021). How doctors do things with empathy in online medical consultations in China: A discourse-analytic approach. Health Communication, 36(7), 816–825. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1712527
Zhang, Y., Lu, W., Ou, W., Zhang, G., Zhang, X., Cheng, J., & Zhang, W. (2020). Chinese medical question answer selection via hybrid models based on CNN and GRU. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 79, 14751–14776. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11042-019-7240-1
Zhou, R., & Li, S. (2023). A study on the persuasive function of metadiscourse in hotel responses to negative reviews on tripadvisor. English Language Teaching, 16(6), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v16n6p55 |
