Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152946
|
| Title: | 以Interesting作為回應標記的語料庫研究
A Corpus-based Study on the Use of Interesting as a Response Token |
| Authors: | 賴嬿平
Lai, Yan-Ping |
| Contributors: | 鍾曉芳
Chung, Siaw-Fong
賴嬿平
Lai, Yan-Ping |
| Keywords: | 回應標記
語料庫語言學
英語教學應用
語用學
Response Token
Corpus Linguistics
Pragmatics
English Teaching Implication |
| Date: | 2024 |
| Issue Date: | 2024-08-05 15:00:41 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究探討了兩組表達方式：[副詞 + interesting] 和單獨使用的詞彙 interesting，作為口語對話中的回應詞及其他相關語用功能。除此之外，本研究旨在為臺灣的八年級學生提供教學應用建議，以增強其對語用的理解。透過語料庫語言學的方法，本研究系統性地分析來自當代美國英語語料庫（COCA）的口語數據，提取真實的實際語境中的例子，經過人工分析並識別了四種不同類型的表達方式：應答詞（Backchannel）、話題延伸（Topic Elaborating）、對話結束（Conversation Closing）和話題轉換（Topic Shifting），每種表達方式展示了不同的口語對話動態策略。這些研究發現為補充臺灣英語教科書提供了英語語用的教學建議，並為語用和教育實踐提供了有價值的見解。希望本研究能彌補臺灣英語教學環境在教授單字時的不足。
This study investigates the various functions of two sets of expressions: [adverb + interesting] and the standalone word interesting, as response tokens in oral conversation. Additionally, the aim is to provide a customized teaching implication for eighth graders in Taiwan to enhance their understanding of pragmatics. Using corpus linguistics, the study systematically analyzes a dataset of spoken genre data from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) to extract authentic, real-world occurrences. The analysis identifies four distinct types of expressions: Backchannel, Topic Elaborating, Conversation Closing, and Topic Shifting, each illustrates different strategies in conversational dynamics. These findings provide a foundation for providing an English implication that complements Taiwan’s English textbooks, offering valuable insights into pragmatic aspects and educational practices. It is hoped that this study will complement the insufficiency in English teaching settings in Taiwan. |
| Reference: | AL-Muttalibi, N. A. Y. (2023). English Intensifiers as Devices of Emotional. Enhancement. Alustath Journal for Human and Social Sciences, 62(2), 462-472.
Atkinson, J. M. (1992). Displaying neutrality: Formal aspects of informal court。proceedings. Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, 199, 211.
Bangerter, A., & Clark, H. H. (2003). Navigating joint projects with dialogue. Cognitive science, 27(2), 195-225.
Baker, M. C. (2003). Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns, and Adjectives. Cambridge
University Press.
Baumann, T. (2020). How a Listener Influences the Speaker. In Speech Prosody (pp. 970-974).
Beltrán-Palanques, V. (2023). Exploring Learners' Backchannel Production in Complaint Sequences Across Proficiency Levels.
Bjørge, A. K. (2010). Conflict or cooperation: The use of backchannelling in ELF negotiations. English for Specific Purposes, 29(3), 191-203.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press.
Brown, P. (2015). Politeness and language. In The International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences (IESBS),(2nd ed.) (pp. 326-330). Elsevier.
Bublitz, W. (1988). Supportive fellow-speakers and cooperative conversations. Supportive Fellow-Speakers and Cooperative Conversations, 1-320.
Chen, Y. (2009). Learner Perceptions of Instruction in L2 Pragmatics. English Language Teaching, 2(4), 154-161.
Chiluwa, I., & Ifukor, P. (2015). ‘War against our Children’: Stance and evaluation in# BringBackOurGirls campaign discourse on Twitter and Facebook. Discourse & Society, 26(3), 267-296.
Clancy, P. M., Thompson, S. A., Suzuki, R., & Tao, H. (1996). The conversational use of reactive tokens in English, Japanese, and Mandarin. Journal of pragmatics, 26(3), 355-387.
Clark, H. H., & Krych, M. A. (2004). Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of memory and language, 50(1), 62-81.
Cohen, A. D. (2008). Teaching and assessing L2 pragmatics: What can we expect from learners? Language Teaching, 41(2), 213-235.
Collins, H. K. (2022). When listening is spoken. Current Opinion in Psychology, 47, 101402.
Cornillie, B., & Gras, P. (2020). Evidentiality and Socioepistemic Status of Participants: a Case Study of Spanish por lo visto 'seemingly' and al parecer 'apparently'. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, (esp), 0183-204.
Crible, L., & Degand, L. (2019). Domains and functions: A two-dimensional account of discourse markers. Discours. Revue de linguistique, psycholinguistique et informatique. A Journal of Linguistics, Psycholinguistics and Computational Linguistics, 24.
Coppock, L. (2005). Politeness strategies in conversation closings. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
Cutrone, P. (2005). A case study examining backchannels in conversations between Japanese–British dyads. Multilingua, 24(3), 237–274. https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.2005.24.3.237
Degand, L., & Van Bergen, G. (2018). Discourse markers as turn-transition devices: Evidence from speech and instant messaging. Discourse Processes, 55(1), 47-71.
Dittmann, A. T., & Llewellyn, L. G. (1968). Relationship between vocalizations and head nods as listener responses. Journal of personality and social psychology, 9(1), 79.
Duncan, S., & Fiske, D. W. (2015). Face-to-face interaction: Research, methods, and theory. Routledge.
Duranti, A. (2010). Husserl, intersubjectivity, and anthropology. Anthropological Theory, 10(1-2), 16-35.
Eslami, Z. R., & Liu, C. N. (2013). Learning pragmatics through computer-mediated communication in Taiwan. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 1(1), 52.
Faiz, A. (2024). English Adjectives Used by Non-natives in ICNALE Spoken Dialogues. J-Lalite: Journal of English Studies, 5(1), 31-39.
Fellegy, A. M. (1995). Patterns and functions of minimal response. American Speech, 70(2), 186-199.
Fishman, P. M. (2019). Interaction: The work women do. In Feminist research methods (pp. 224-237). Routledge.
Floyd, S., Rossi, G., Baranova J., Blythe, J., Dingemanse, M., Kendrick, K. H., Zinken, J, & Enfield, N. J. (2018) Universals and cultural diversity in the expression of gratitude. Royal Society Open Science, 5: 180391. doi:10.1098/rsos.180391
Fraser, B. (1990). An approach to discourse markers. Journal of pragmatics, 14(3), 383-398
Fujimoto, D. T. (2009). Listener responses in interaction: A case for abandoning the term backchannel.
Gardner, R. (2001). When listeners talk. When Listeners Talk, 1-311.
Gardner, R. (2005). Acknowledging Strong Ties between Utterances in Talk: Connections through'Right'as a Response Token.
García García, M. (2021). Turn-initial discourse markers in L2 Spanish conversations: Insights from conversation analysis. Corpus Pragmatics, 5(1), 37-61.
Getsemani, C., & Saswati, R. (2022). Investigating the Employment of Discourse Markers by EFL Learners in Their Speaking Performance. PROCEEDING AISELT, 7(1).
Golato, A., & Fagyal, Z. (2008). Comparing single and double sayings of the German response token ja and the role of prosody: A conversation analytic perspective. Research on language and social interaction, 41(3), 241-270.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Speech Acts (pp. 41-58). Brill.
Grzech, K. (2021). Using discourse markers to negotiate epistemic stance: A view from situated language use. Journal of Pragmatics, 177, 208-223.
Haselow, A. (2019). Discourse marker sequences: Insights into the serial order of communicative tasks in real-time turn production. Journal of Pragmatics, 146, 1-18.
Hata, K. (2016). On the importance of the multimodal approach to discourse markers: a pragmatic view. International Review of Pragmatics, 8(1), 36-54.
Heritage , J. 1984 . “ A change of state token and aspects of its sequential placement ” . In Structures of social action , Edited by: Atkinson , J.M. and Heritage , J. 299 – 345 . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
Heritage, J. (1998). Conversation analysis and institutional talk: Analyzing distinctive turn-taking systems. 3-17.
Hirschman, L. (1994). Female–male differences in conversational interaction. Language in society, 23(3), 427-442.
Holmes, J., & Stubbe, M. (1997). Good listeners: Gender differences in New Zealand conversation. Women and Language, 20(2), 7.
Hsu, H. M., Wang, Y. F., & Hu, K. M. (2015). Direct and indirect conditionals: A corpus-based study of Chinese yaoshi and yaobushi in spoken and written discourse. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 13(2), 31-77.
Indhiarti, T. R., & Chaerunnisa, E. R. (2020). A corpus-driven collocation analysis of degree adverb very, really, quite, and pretty. KEMBARA: Journal of Scientific Language, Literature, and Teaching, 6(2), 226-242.
Ishida, H. (2006). Learners’ perception and interpretation of contextualization cues in spontaneous Japanese conversation: Back-channel cue Uun. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(11), 1943-1981.
Ito, R., & Tagliamonte, S. (2003). Well weird, right dodgy, very strange, really cool: Layering and recycling in English intensifiers. Language in society, 32(2), 257-279.
Idda, A., & Sofi, Y. (2020). Corpus-based analysis of the most frequent adjective on Covid-19. Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 5(2), 505-515.
Kendon, A. (1967). Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. Actapsychologica, 26, 22-63.
Kanık, M., Youbi, G. M., Sharon, T. T., & Kasapoğlu, M. (n.d.). The (Non-) Teaching of Pragmatics in an EFL Context. Journal of Language Education and Research, 9(1), 43-58.
Lambertz, K. (2011). Back-channelling: The use of yeah and mm to portray engaged listenership. Griffith Working Papers in Pragmatics and Intercultural Communication, 4(1/2), 11-18.
Lebedeva, I. S., & Pavlova, E. B. (2016). Intensifiers in modern English. Вестник Московского государственного лингвистического университета. Гуманитарные науки, (21 (760)), 43-56.
Levkina, M. (2018). Developing pragmatic competence through tasks in EFL contexts. Task-based Approaches to Teaching and Assessing Pragmatics, 10, 137-158.
Levinson, S. C. (2016). Turn-taking in human communication–origins and implications for language processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(1), 6-14.
Levinson, S. C., & Torreira, F. (2015). Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 731. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00731
Lewis, D. (2020). Speaker stance and evaluative-ly adverbs in the Modern English period. Language Sciences, 82, 101332.
Lin, M. F., & Wang, Y. F. (2020). Developing Junior High School Students' Email Pragmatic Competence for Specific Purposes. Taiwan International ESP Journal, 11(1), 40-72.
Liu, B. (2017). A contrastive study of discourse markers used by native and Chinese L2 English speakers across speech context. East Asian Pragmatics, 20(1).
Liddicoat, A. J. (2021). An introduction to conversation analysis. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Lunsford, R., Heeman, P. A., & Rennie, E. (2016, September). Measuring Turn-Taking Offsets in Human-Human Dialogues. In INTERSPEECH (pp. 2895-2899).
Maynard, S. K. (1986). On back-channel behavior in Japanese and English casual conversation.
McCarthy, M. (2002). Good listenership made plain. Using corpora to explore linguistic variation, 9, 49.
McCarthy, M. (2003). Talking back: 'Small' interactional response tokens in everyday conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36(1), 33-63.
Méndez-Naya, B. (2008). Special issue on English intensifiers. English Language & Linguistics, 12(2), 213-219.
Meywirth, I. D., & Götze, J. (2022, November). Can you tell that I’m confused? An overhearer study for German backchannels by an embodied agent. In Companion Publication of the 2022 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (pp. 89-93).
Nurjaleka, L. (2019, June). Backchannel behavior in interview discourse: A contrastive study between Japanese and Indonesian. In Eleventh Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2018) (pp. 451-457). Atlantis Press.
Nurul, A., & Amrin, S. (2021, November). Discourse Markers Used by Students in Nonformal Education. In 6th Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL 2021) (pp. 472-475). Atlantis Press.
Nurjaleka, L. (2023). Backchannels Responses as Conversational Strategies in the Interaction of Indonesian Speakers in Interview Setting. REiLA: Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 5(2), 99-114.
O’Keeffe, A., & Adolphs, S. (2008). Response tokens in British and Irish discourse. Variational pragmatics, 69-98.
Ono, T., & Suzuki, R. (2018). The use of frequent verbs as reactive tokens in Japanese everyday talk: Formulaicity, florescence, and grammaticization. Journal of Pragmatics, 123, 209-219.
Ondáš, S., Kiktová, E., Pleva, M., & Juhár, J. (2023). Analysis of Backchannel Inviting Cues in Dyadic Speech Communication. Electronics, 12(17), 3705.
Pavlidou, T. S., Gialabouki, L., Alvanoudi, A., & Ananiadis, C. (2022). On the recipients’ part: Responding with m/mm (and nods) in Greek conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 199, 105-123.
Pérez-Paredes, P., & Bueno-Alastuey, M. C. (2019). A corpus-driven analysis of certainty stance adverbs: Obviously, really and actually in spoken native and learner English. Journal of Pragmatics, 140, 22-32.
Purwanti, I. T. (2018). Backchannels in the interactions of Indonesian L2 speakers of English in the Australian academic context. International Journal of Educational Best Practices, 2(1), 39-53.
Rabab’ah, G., Ma’touq, A., & Alghazo, S. (2022). Discourse markers in narrative essays: A case study of Jordanian high school EFL learners. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures, 14(1), 203-217.
Rhee, S. (2016). On the emergence of the stance-marking function of English adverbs: A case of intensifiers. Linguistic Research, 33(3).
Rivera, A. G., & Ward, N. G. (2007). Three prosodic features that cue back-channel feedback in Northern Mexican Spanish.
Ross, S. (2018). Listener response as a facet of interactional competence. Language Testing, 35(3), 357-375.
Ryabova, M. (2015). Politeness strategy in everyday communication. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, 90-95.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). Linguistic society of America. Language, 50(1), 696-735.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1978). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. In Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction (pp. 7-55). Academic Press.
Sbranna, S., Möking, E., Wehrle, S., & Grice, M. (2022). Backchannelling across languages: Rate, lexical choice and intonation in L1 Italian, L1 German and L2 German. In Proc. Speech Prosody (Vol. 2022, pp. 734-738).
Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings.
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers (No. 5). Cambridge University Press.
Schweinberger, M. (2021). On the waning of forms–A corpus-based analysis of decline and loss in adjective amplification. In Lost in Change (pp. 235-260). John Benjamins.
Schweinberger, M. (2024). A corpus‐based analysis of adjective amplification in Hong Kong, Indian and Philippine English. World Englishes.
Seglem, R., & Haling, L. (2018). " I Got Confused Reading It": Using Backchannels to Collaboratively Build Meaning with Texts. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 7, 43-58.
Sharifi, M., & Azadmanesh, M. (2012). Persian back-channel responses in formal versus informal contexts. Linguistic Discovery, 10(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.401
Stratton, J. M. (2021). ‘That's proper cool’: The emerging intensifier proper in British English. English Today, 37(4), 206-213.
Sinclair & Coulthard (1975) Toward an analysis of discourse: the English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford University Press.
Sorjonen, M. L. (2001). Simple answers to polar questions. Studies in interactional linguistics, 10, 405.
Sørensen, S. S. (2021). Affiliating in second position: response tokens with rising pitch in Danish. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 54(1), 101-125.
Taboada, M. (2006). Spontaneous and non-spontaneous turn-taking. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 16(2-3), 329-360.
Tai, H. Y., & Chen, Y. S. (2021). The effects of L2 proficiency on pragmatic comprehension and learner strategies. Education Sciences, 11(4), 174.
Tao, H. (2007). A corpus-based investigation of absolutely and related phenomena in spoken American English. Journal of English Linguistics, 35(1), 5-29.
Taleghani-Nikazm, C. (2016). 'achJA dann kenn ich das auch!' managing understanding and knowledge: On teaching response tokens in the German language classroom. Die Unterrichtspraxis, 49(2), 199-213. Retrieved from https://proxyone.lib.nccu.edu.tw/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/achja-dann-kenn-ich-das-auch-managing/docview/1842785565/se-2
Tolins, J., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2016). Overhearers use addressee backchannels in dialog comprehension. Cognitive Science, 40(6), 1412-1434.
Tao, H., & Thompson, S. A. (1991). English backchannels in Mandarin conversations: A case study of superstratum pragmatic ‘interference’. Journal of Pragmatics, 16(3), 209-223.
Vainik, E., & Brzozowska, D. (2019). The use of positively valued adjectives and adverbs in Polish and Estonian casual conversations. Journal of pragmatics, 153, 103-115.
Ward, N., & Tsukahara, W. (2000). Prosodic features which cue back-channel responses in English and Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(8), 1177-1207.
Waksler, R. (2012). Super, uber, so, and totally: Over-the-top intensification to mark subjectivity in colloquial discourse. In Subjectivity in language and discourse (pp. 15-32). Brill.
Wharton, T. (2009). Pragmatics and non-verbal communication. Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, M., & Wilson, T. P. (2005). An oscillator model of the timing of turn-taking. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 12, 957-968.
Wolf, J. P. (2008). The effects of backchannels on fluency in L2 oral task production. System, 36(2), 279-294.
Wulandari, N. (2017). A conversation analysis of verbal backchannel response in radio program Valentine in the Morning interview with Michael Bublé. Sastra Inggris-Quill, 6(6), 585-596.
Xu, J. (2014). Displaying status of recipiency through reactive tokens in Mandarin task-oriented interaction. Journal of pragmatics, 74, 33-51.
Yang, L. C. (2016). Feedback markers in Mandarin: Tracking cognitive status in conversation. In CogSci.
Yngve, V. H. (1970). On getting a word in edgewise. In Papers from the sixth regional meeting Chicago Linguistic Society, April 16-18, 1970, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago (pp. 567-578).
Zellers, M. (2021). An overview of forms, functions, and configurations of backchannels in Ruruuli/Lunyala. Journal of Pragmatics, 175, 38-52. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
英國語文學系
110551020 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110551020 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [英國語文學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 102001.pdf | | 3641Kb | Adobe PDF | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
