English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51082544      Online Users : 903
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/152484
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152484


    Title: 新冠疫情下,CEO薪水縮減之決定因素與其對Say-on-Pay結果之影響
    Determinants of CEO Pay Cut and Its Impact on Say-on-Pay During the COVID-19
    Authors: 陳奐君
    Chen, Huan-Chun
    Contributors: 梁嘉紋
    Liang, Jia-Wen
    陳奐君
    Chen, Huan-Chun
    Keywords: 新冠疫情
    CEO權力
    薪水縮減
    Say-on-Pay
    COVID-19 pandemic
    CEO power
    Pay cuts
    Say-on-Pay
    Date: 2024
    Issue Date: 2024-08-05 12:21:16 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 經理人薪酬待遇包含了薪水、紅利及股票酬勞等項目,本研究主要檢視疫情期間,CEO權力對其薪水縮減及薪水縮減主導權之影響,同時檢視薪水縮減之主導者與縮減比例對於薪水縮減與Say-on-Pay支持率間正向關係之調節性。本研究透過2020年之EXECUCOMP公司資料發現,CEO權力越大越能促使公司採取縮減CEO薪水之措施,而對於是否自願提出縮減薪水則無顯著相關;此外透過薪水縮減主導者與縮減薪水裁量交乘分析,本研究發現CEO自願縮減薪水與否並無法正向調節薪水縮減對Say-on-Pay結果之正向關係;而透過薪水縮減比例與縮減薪水裁量交乘分析,則發現薪水縮減比例能正向調節薪水縮減對Say-on-Pay支持率之正向關係,說明當CEO縮減薪水比例越高,能有效加強縮減薪水裁量提升Say-on-Pay支持率。
    CEO compensation package includes salary, bonuses, and stock-based compensation. This paper primarily examines the effect of CEO power on pay cuts of salary and the authority to initiate pay cuts during the pandemic. Moreover, this paper also investigates how the initiator and the extent of pay cuts moderate the positive relationship between pay cuts and Say-on-Pay support rates. From the data of listed companies on EXECUCOMP from 2020, I find that greater CEO power increases the likelihood of companies implementing CEO pay cuts, though it does not significantly relate to whether the CEO voluntarily proposes the pay cut. Additionally, through the interaction analysis between the initiator of the pay cut and the decision to initiate pay cuts, this study finds that whether the CEO voluntarily reduces their salary does not positively moderate the relationship between pay cuts and Say-on-Pay outcomes. However, through the interaction analysis between the extent of the pay cut and the decision to initiate pay cuts, I found that the extent of the pay cut positively moderates the relationship between pay cuts and Say-on-Pay support rates. This indicates that higher proportions of CEO pay cuts effectively enhance the positive impact of discretionary pay cuts on Say-on-Pay support rates.
    Reference: 周振鋒. 2014. 美國 Say-on-pay 制度介紹與引進可行性之分析. 政大法學評論(137): 217-266.
    Abernethy M. A., Y. F. Kuang, and B. Qin. 2015. The influence of CEO power on compensation contract design. The Accounting Review 90(4): 1265-1306.
    Alves D. L., M. B. Gietzmann, and B. N. Jørgensen. 2021. Show me the money-cut: Shareholder dividend suspensions and voluntary CEO pay cuts during the COVID pandemic. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 40(6): 106898.
    Balogh A., D. J. Wright, and J. Zein. 2023. Does Stakeholder Outrage Determine Executive Pay? Available at SSRN 4053057.
    Balsam S., Boone, J., Liu, H., and Yin, J. 2016. The impact of say-on-pay on executive compensation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 35(2): 162-191.
    Batish A., Gordon, A., Larcker, D. F., Tayan, B., Watts, E. M., and Yu, C. 2020. Sharing the pain: how did boards adjust CEO pay in response to covid-19? Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University Closer Look Series: Topics, Issues and Controversies in Corporate Governance No. CGRP-86.
    Bebchuk L. A. 2002. Managerial power and rent rxtraction in the design of executive compensation. University of Chicago Law Review.
    Bebchuk L. A., K. M. Cremers, and U. C. Peyer. 2011. The CEO pay slice. Journal of Financial Economics 102(1): 199-221.
    Bebchuk L. A., and J. M. Fried. 2003. Executive compensation as an agency problem. Journal of Economic Perspectives 17(3): 71-92.
    Bebchuk L. A., and J. M. Fried. 2006. Pay without performance: Overview of the issues. Academy of Management Perspectives 20(1): 5-24.
    Bebchuk L. A., Y. Grinstein, and U. Peyer. 2010. Lucky CEOs and lucky directors. The Journal of Finance 65(6): 2363-2401.
    Bedford A., Bugeja, M., Ghannam, S., Jeganathan, D., and Ma, N. 2023. Were CEO pay cuts during the COVID-19 pandemic merely symbolic? Shareholders' reaction and outrage. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 79: 101993.
    Bertrand M., and S. Mullainathan. 2001. Are CEOs rewarded for luck? The ones without principals are. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(3): 901-932.
    Cai J., and R. A. Walkling. 2011. Shareholders’ say on pay: Does it create value? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 46(2): 299-339.
    Core J. E., R. W. Holthausen, and D. F. Larcker. 1999. Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 51(3): 371-406.
    Dang C., Z. F. Li, and C. Yang. 2018. Measuring firm size in empirical corporate finance. Journal of Banking & Finance 86: 159-176.
    Donaldson L., and J. H. Davis. 1991. Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of management 16(1): 49-64.
    Efron, B. (1979). Computers and the theory of statistics: Thinking the unthinkable. SIAM Review, 21(4), 460-480.
    Fama E. F. 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 88(2): 288-307.
    Fehr E., and K. M. Schmidt. 1999. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(3): 817-868.
    Feichter C., and M. Wiernsperger. 2023. Voluntary managerial pay cuts and employee effort. Available at SSRN 4115631.
    Finkelstein S. 1992. Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal 35(3): 505-538.
    Fisch J., D. Palia, and S. D. Solomon. 2018. Is say on pay all about pay: The impact of firm performance. Harv. Bus. L. Rev. 8: 101.
    Gao H., J. Harford, and K. Li. 2012. CEO pay cuts and forced turnover: Their causes and consequences. Journal of Corporate Finance 18(2): 291-310.
    Garvey G. T., and T. T. Milbourn. 2006. Asymmetric benchmarking in compensation: Executives are rewarded for good luck but not penalized for bad. Journal of Financial Economics 82(1): 197-225.
    Grabke-Rundell A., and L. R. Gomez-Mejia. 2002. Power as a determinant of executive compensation. Human Resource Management Review 12(1): 3-23.
    Hamm S. J., M. J. Jung, and C. Wang. 2015. Making sense of one dollar CEO salaries. Contemporary Accounting Research 32(3): 941-972.
    Han S., V. K. Nanda, and S. Silveri. 2016. CEO power and firm performance under pressure. Financial Management 45(2): 369-400.
    Hassan M. K., Houston, R., Karim, M. S., and Sabit, A. 2023. CEO duality and firm performance during the 2020 coronavirus outbreak. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries 27: e00278.
    Heckman J. J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society: 153-161.
    Jensen M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm. Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.
    Kimbro M. B., and D. Xu. 2016. Shareholders have a say in executive compensation: Evidence from say-on-pay in the United States. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 35(1): 19-42.
    Kuhnen C. M., and A. Niessen. 2012. Public opinion and executive compensation. Management Science 58(7): 1249-1272.
    Li F., T. Li, and D. Minor. 2016. CEO power, corporate social responsibility, and firm value: A test of agency theory. International Journal of Managerial Finance 12(5): 611-628.
    Lobo G. J., H. Manchiraju, and S. S. Sridharan. 2018. Accounting and economic consequences of CEO paycuts. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 37(1): 1-20.
    Matsunaga S. R., and C. W. Park. 2001. The effect of missing a quarterly earnings benchmark on the CEO's annual bonus. The Accounting Review 76(3): 313-332.
    Mehran H. 1995. Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 38(2): 163-184.
    Mergenthaler R., S. Rajgopal, and S. Srinivasan. 2012. CEO and CFO career penalties to missing quarterly analysts forecasts. Available at SSRN 1152421.
    Morse A., V. Nanda, and A. Seru. 2011. Are incentive contracts rigged by powerful CEOs? The Journal of Finance 66(5): 1779-1821.
    Murphy K. J. 1985. Corporate performance and managerial remuneration: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7(1-3): 11-42.
    Preacher K. J., and A. F. Hayes. 2008. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods 40(3): 879-891.
    Schwartz-Ziv M., and R. Wermers. 2022. Do institutional investors monitor their large-scale vs. small-scale investments differently? Evidence from the say-on-pay vote. Journal of Banking & Finance 141: 106532.
    Sheikh S. 2018. CEO power, product market competition and firm value. Research in International Business and Finance 46: 373-386.
    Sheikh S. 2019. An examination of the dimensions of CEO power and corporate social responsibility. Review of Accounting and Finance 18(2): 221-244.
    Song W.-L., and K.-M. Wan. 2019. Does CEO compensation reflect managerial ability or managerial power? Evidence from the compensation of powerful CEOs. Journal of Corporate Finance 56: 1-14.
    Tang J., M. Crossan, and W. G. Rowe. 2011. Dominant CEO, deviant strategy, and extreme performance: The moderating role of a powerful board. Journal of Management Studies 48(7): 1479-1503.
    Tanyi P., D. B. Smith, and X. Cheng. 2021. Does firm payout policy affect shareholders’ dissatisfaction with directors? Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 57: 279-320.
    Thomas R. S., and C. Van der Elst. 2015. Say on pay around the world. Washington University Law Review 92(3).
    Thurm S. 2013. Pay for performance’no longer a punchline. Wall Street Journal 31.
    Van Essen M., J. Otten, and E. J. Carberry. 2015. Assessing managerial power theory: A meta-analytic approach to understanding the determinants of CEO compensation. Journal of Management 41(1): 164-202.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    111353021
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111353021
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    302101.pdf2431KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback