政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/147743

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/147743

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113311/144292 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50933719 線上人數 : 963

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 風險管理與保險學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/147743

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/147743

題名:	獨立董監事對董監事股權質押之影響：以台灣法規變化為例 The Impact of Independent Directors on Insiders’ Share Pledging: Evidence from Regulatory Changes in Taiwan
作者:	許富凱 Hsu, Fu-Kai
貢獻者:	鄭士卿 Jeng, Shih-Ching 許富凱 Hsu, Fu-Kai
關鍵詞:	獨立董監事獨立董監事之董事會出席率董監事股權質押 board independence independent directors and supervisors’ board meeting attendance insiders’ share pledging
日期:	2023
上傳時間:	2023-10-03 10:48:19 (UTC+8)
摘要:	獨立董監事身為強化公司治理的重要角色，可以藉由其專業知識及歷練協助董事會進行決策並提升公司經營表現。至於獨立董監事在董事會的出席率，則被視為是衡量其勤奮程度的象徵，能對董事會監督效率有正面影響。然而我國主管機關近年針對不少公司治理相關法令進行修訂，期望透過強制性的規範，達成減少公司代理及董監事股權質押問題之目的。故本研究使用2008年至2021年台灣上市櫃公司資料，探討當公司聘用獨立董監事或獨立董監事積極參與董事會時，於2011年質押法案通過及2017年所有上市櫃公司完成設置獨立董事此兩個事件後，是否會降低公司董監事股權質押情況，而獨立董監事的監督效果又是否會因此發生變化。本研究採用二元固定效果模型，控制年度及產業效果，並以傾向分數配對法(Propensity Score Matching, PSM)解決內生性問題。實證結果發現，於質押法案通過前，公司設置獨立董監事席次及獨立董監事積極出席董事會皆能改善董監事股權質押情況。而即使質押法案通過後，獨立董監事對質押情況的監督效果稍微減弱，但出席率之監督效果並無發生變化，表示獨立董監事比率越高及獨立董監事越積極出席董事會，越能減少董監事股權質押行為。至於當全數的上市櫃公司皆完成設置獨立董事後，獨立董監事之董事會出席率則較獨立董監事比率，對董監事股權質押行為具有更明顯的抑制效果，說明在公司廣設獨立董事的環境下，獨立董監事的積極參與度對強化公司治理及減少董監事股權質押情形上更有幫助。 Independent directors and supervisors can assist the board of directors in making decisions through their professional experience. Independent directors and supervisors’ board meeting attendance is also considered a symbol of their dedication, which can positively influence the supervisory efficiency of the board. However, Taiwanese authorities have revised some relevant regulations to mitigate the agency problems and the negative impacts on insiders’ share pledging in recent years. Therefore, we applied the two-way fixed effect model for companies listed in Taiwan between 2008 and 2021 to examine whether the employment of independent directors and supervisors or their attendance in board meetings will lead to a decrease in insiders’ share pledging after two significant regulatory changes—the passage of Article 197-1 of the Company Act in 2011, which restricts the exercise of voting rights, and the completion of independent director establishment for all listed Taiwanese companies in 2017. After considering the endogeneity problem, the empirical results show that no matter before or after the passage of Article 197-1 of the Company Act, board independence and independent directors and supervisors’ board meeting attendance can both reduce insiders’ willingness to share pledges. Furthermore, when all listed Taiwanese companies have completed the establishment of independent directors, the attendance of independent directors and supervisors in board meetings exhibits a more inhibitory effect on insiders’ share pledging behavior compared to the board independence. Which means diligent independent directors and supervisors are more helpful to strengthen corporate governance and reduce the incentives for insiders’ share pledging when independent directors are widely established.
參考文獻:	方俊儒、楊雲筑、羅勝議 (2010)。應計項目不確定性與會計師查核意見型態之關係：董事會組成與董監事股權質押之影響。當代會計，11(2)，115-149。http://dx.doi.org/10.6675/JCA.2010.11.2.01 高蘭芬、邱正仁 (2002)。董監事股權質押對會計盈餘與股票報酬相關性之影響。臺大管理論叢，13(1)，127-162。http://dx.doi.org/10.6226/NTURM2002.13.1.127 陳安琳、高蘭芬、陳怡凱、陳烷鈺 (2013)，董監事股權質押與公司治理之研究。中山管理評論，21(2)，299-337。https://doi.org/10.6160/2013.06.02 陳家偉、俞一唐 (2022)，董事質押之限制與探討：以台灣上市櫃公司為例。台灣管理學刊，22(1)，67-82。https://doi.org/10.6295/TAMJ.202202_22(1).0004 蘇裕惠、楊孟萍、許聖偉 (2018)，公司增加獨立董事席次及設置審計委員會與盈餘品質之研究-法規擴大強制範圍之影響。當代會計，19(2)，241-268。https://doi.org/10.6675/JCA.201811_19(2).05 Adams, R. B. & Ferreira, D. (2007). A Theory of Friendly Boards. The Journal of Finance, 62(1), 217-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01206.x Adams, R. B. & Ferreira, D. (2008). Do directors perform for pay? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46(1), 154-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.06.002 Anderson, R. C., Reeb, D. M., Upadhyay, A., & Zhao, W. (2011). The Economics of Director Heterogeneity. Financial Management, 40(1), 5–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2010.01133.x Ang, J. S., Cole, R. A., & Lin, J. W. (2000). Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. The Journal of Finance, 55(1), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00201 Baysinger, B., & Hoskisson, R. E. (1990). The Composition of Boards of Directors and Strategic Control: Effects on Corporate Strategy. The Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.2307/258106 Bhagat, S., & Black, B. (1999). The Uncertain Relationship Between Board Composition and Firm Performance. The Business Lawyer, 54(3), 921–963. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.11417 Boone, A., Field, L. C., Karpoff, J. M. & Raheja, C. G. (2007). The Determinants of Corporate Board Size and Composition: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 85(1), 66-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.605762 Brick I. E. & Chidambaran N. K. (2008). Board monitoring, firm risk, and external regulation. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 33(1), 87-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-007-9045-9 Brick I. E. & Chidambaran N. K. (2010). Board meetings, committee structure, and firm value. Journal of Corporate Finance, 16(4), 533-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.06.003 Brickley J. A. & Zimmerman J. L. (2010). Corporate governance myths: Comments on Armstrong, Guay, and Weber. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 235-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.10.002 Cai, J., Garner, J. L., & Walkling, R. A. (2009). Electing Directors. The Journal of Finance, 64(5), 2389–2421. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01504.x Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., Neal, T. L., & Riley Jr, R. A. (2002). Board characteristics and audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(3), 365-384. https://doi.org/10.1506/CHWK-GMQ0-MLKE-K03V Chan, K., Chen, H. K., Hu, S. Y., & Liu, Y. J. (2018). Share pledges and margin call pressure. Journal of Corporate Finance, 52, 96-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.08.003 Chen, Y., & Hu, S. Y. (2007). The controlling shareholder`s personal leverage and firm performance. Applied Economics, 39(8), 1059-1075. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500462004 Chen, A., Kao, L., & Chen, Y. K. (2007). Agency costs of controlling shareholders` share collateral with Taiwan evidence. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 10(2), 173-191. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021909150700101X Chiou, J. R., Hsiung, T. C., & Kao, L., (2002). A Study of the Relationship between Financial Distress and Collateralized Shares. Taiwan Accounting Review, 3(l), 79- 111. https://doi.org/10.6226/NTURM2002.13.1.127 Chou, R. K., Wang, Y. C., & Yang, J. J. (2021). Share pledging, payout policy, and the value of cash holdings. Journal of Empirical Finance, 61, 18-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2020.12.004 Conger, J. A., Finegold, D., & Lawler, E. E. (1998). Appraising boardroom performance. Harvard Business Review, 76, 136-164. Coughlan, A. T., & Schmidt, R. M. (1985). Executive compensation, management turnover, and firm performance: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Eeconomics, 7(1-3), 43-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(85)90027-8 Dou, Y., Masulis, R. W., & Zein, J. (2019). Shareholder wealth consequences of insider pledging of company stock as collateral for personal loans. The Review of Financial Studies, 32(12), 4810-4854. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz034 Duchin, R., Matsusaka, J. G., & Ozbas, O. (2010). When are outside directors effective? Journal of Financial Economics, 96(2), 195-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.12.004 Elyasiani, E., & Zhang, L. (2015). Bank holding company performance, risk, and “busy” board of directors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 60, 239-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.08.022 Fabisik, K. (2019). Why Do US CEOs Pledge Their Own Company`s Stock? Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper, 19-60. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3486231 Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.94034 Galbreath, J. (2012). Are boards on board? A model of corporate board influence on sustainability performance. Journal of Management & Organization, 18(4), 445-460. https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.2012.18.4.445 Gilson, S. C. (1990). Bankruptcy, boards, banks, and blockholders: Evidence on changes in corporate ownership and control when firms default. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 355-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(90)90060-D Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of The Econometric Society, 1251-1271. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827 Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1988). The determinants of board composition. The Rand Journal of Economics, 589-606. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555459 Hsiao, C. (2003). Analysis of Panel Data (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754203 Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X Jia, N., & Tang, X. (2018). Directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, independent director behavior, and governance effect. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 85(4), 1013-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12193 Kao, L., Chiou, J. R., & Chen, A. (2004). The agency problems, firm performance and monitoring mechanisms: the evidence from collateralised shares in Taiwan. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(3), 389-402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00380.x Kaplan, S. N., & Reishus, D. (1990). Outside directorships and corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 389-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(90)90061-4 Kim, K., Mauldin, E., & Patro, S. (2014). Outside directors and board advising and monitoring performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 57(2-3), 110-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.02.001 Kor, Y. Y., & Sundaramurthy, C. (2009). Experience-based human capital and social capital of outside directors. Journal of Management, 35(4), 981-1006. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/0149206308321551 Lee, T. S., & Yeh, Y. H. (2004). Corporate governance and financial distress: Evidence from Taiwan. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(3), 378-388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00379.x Lin, Y. F., Yeh, Y. M. C., & Yang, F. M. (2014). Supervisory quality of board and firm performance: a perspective of board meeting attendance. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(3-4), 264-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2012.756751 Liu, Y., Miletkov, M. K., Wei, Z., & Yang, T. (2015). Board independence and firm performance in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 30, 223-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.12.004 Liu, H., Wang, H., & Wu, L. (2016). Removing vacant chairs: Does independent directors’ attendance at board meetings matter? Journal of Business Ethics, 133, 375-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2402-6 Milgrom, P. & Roberts, J. (1992) Economics, Organization & Management. Prentice Hall, New York. Min, B. S., & Chizema, A. (2018). Board meeting attendance by outside directors. Journal of Business Ethics, 147, 901-917. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10551-015-2990-9 Min, B. S., & Verhoeven, P. (2013). Outsider Board Activity, Ownership Structure and Firm Value: Evidence from Korea. International Review of Finance, 13(2), 187-214. https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.12004 Morikawa, M. (2020). Effects of outside directors on firms’ investments and performance: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in Japan. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 56, 101074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjie.2020.101074 Pan, Y., Huang, P., & Gopal, A. (2016). Board independence and firm performance in the IT industry: the moderating role of new entry threats. MIS quarterly, 42(3), 979-999. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2018/14688 Rashid, A. (2015). Revisiting agency theory: Evidence of board independence and agency cost from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 181-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2211-y Ryan Jr, H. E., & Wiggins III, R. A. (2004). Who is in whose pocket? Director compensation, board independence, and barriers to effective monitoring. Journal of Financial Economics, 73(3), 497-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2003.11.002 Singh, M., & Davidson III, W. N. (2003). Agency costs, ownership structure and corporate governance mechanisms. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(5), 793-816. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(01)00260-6 Vintilă, G., Onofrei, M., & Gherghina, Ş. C. (2015). The effects of corporate board and CEO characteristics on firm value: Empirical evidence from listed companies on the Bucharest stock exchange. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 51(6), 1244-1260. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2015.1073518 Wang, Y. C., & Chou, R. K. (2018). The impact of share pledging regulations on stock trading and firm valuation. Journal of Banking & Finance, 89, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.01.016 Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(95)00844-5 金融監督管理委員會 (2020，8月25日)。公司治理3.0 - 永續發展藍圖。取自：https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=96&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=202008250004&dtable=News
描述:	碩士國立政治大學風險管理與保險學系 110358006
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110358006
資料類型:	thesis
顯示於類別:	[風險管理與保險學系] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	描述	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
800601.pdf		1821Kb	Adobe PDF2	0	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋