政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/145931

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/145931

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文笔数/总笔数 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造访人次 : 51291287 在线人数 : 806

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜寻范围

查询小技巧：

您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果

若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据

进阶搜寻

主页 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上传 ‧ 说明 ‧ 关于政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手机版

政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 輔導與諮商碩士學位學程 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/145931

请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/145931

题名:	通訊諮商準備度與心理師自我效能相關之研究 A study on the relationship between readiness of online counselling and psychologists’ self-efficacy.
作者:	劉又寧 Liu, Yu-Ning
贡献者:	陳婉真 Chen, Wan-Chen 劉又寧 Liu, Yu-Ning
关键词:	通訊諮商準備度自我效能 Online counseling Readiness Self-efficacy
日期:	2023
上传时间:	2023-07-06 17:02:28 (UTC+8)
摘要:	本研究旨在建立通訊諮商準備度之量化工具，以暸解國內心理師對於通訊諮商準備度之現況為何，並探究通訊諮商準備度與心理師自我效能是否具有相關性。本研究採用質性訪談及問卷調查法，進行訪談後，使用自編織「通訊諮商準備度量表」進行滾雪球式抽樣，抽取306位國內領有證照之心理師作為研究對象，所得資料進行探索性因素分析、驗證性因素分析、描述性統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析等方法進行統計分析。研究結果發現如下：一、自編之「通訊諮商準備度量表」具有不錯的建構校度及關聯性效度，總量表之內部一致性係數高達.90，顯示本量表為信效度良好之測量工具。二、經由統計方法分析受試者之得分情形後，總量表平均分數較低，顯示目前國內心理師對於通訊諮商準備度略顯不足，此外，結果發現兩分量表之間具有顯著差異，比較後可知「個案感知利益」之得分高於「通訊諮商意願」分數，由此可知心理師在「個案感知利益」之準備度較高，對於「通訊諮商意願」之準備程度較低。三、本研究透過皮爾森積差相關之統計結果探討「通訊諮商準備度」與「心理師自我效能」兩者間之相關情形。研究結果顯示，通訊諮商準備度總量表及「個案感知利益」皆與自我效能具有低度相關。結果符合研究者之 H3 假設:通訊諮商準備度與自我效能之間存在顯著相關。整體而言，本研究之貢獻乃發展出通訊諮商準備度量表，提供測量通訊諮商準備度之測量工具，並根據結果提出相關建議，供相關單位、心理師及未來研究進行參考。 The main purpose of this study was to develop a quantitative tmeasure for assess online counseling’s readiness, to understand the current status of domestic psychologists` readiness for online consultation. Moreover, the study alsot wanted to discuss whether there is a correlation between online consultation readiness and psychologists` self-efficacy.。This study adopted qualitative interviews and questionnaires. After the interviews, a self-woven "Online Consultation Readiness Scale" The study used snowball sampling to get 306 domestic licensed psychologists as the research objects. The obtained data were analyzed by exploratory factors analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, descriptive statistics, t test, one-way anova of variance and other methods for statistical analysis. The results of the study found the following: 1. The self-compiled "Communication Counseling Readiness Scale" has good construct validity and correlation validity. The internal consistency coefficient of the total scale is as high as .90, which shows that this scale is a measurement tool with good reliability and validity. 2. After analyzing the scores of the subjects through statistical methods, the average score of the total scale is relatively low, which shows that domestic psychologists are slightly insufficient for online consultation. In addition, the results found that there are significant differences between the two subscales. After comparison, it can be seen that the score of "perceived benefit of the case" is higher than the score of "willingness to online consultation ", which shows that the psychologist has a higher degree of preparation for "perceived benefit of the case", but a lower degree of preparation for "willingness to conline consultation. 3. This study explores the relationship between " online counseling readiness" and "psychologist self-efficacy" .Through the statistical results of Pearson`s differential correlation. The results of the study showed that both the online counseling readiness scale and the "Perceived Perceived Benefits of the Case" had a low correlation with self-efficacy. The results shows that: There is a significant correlation between online counseling’s readiness and self-efficacy. Overall, the contribution of this study is to develop a online counseling readiness scale, provide a measurement tool for measuring online counseling readiness, and make relevant recommendations based on the results for reference by relevant units, psychologists, and future research.
參考文獻:	文美華、王智弘、陳慶福（2009）。網路諮商機構實施電子郵件諮商服務之實務經驗與倫理行為探討。教育心理學報，40(3)，419-438。http://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20080526 王智弘（2019）。國際與本土、變遷與因應：網路諮商的本土發展。本土諮商心理學學刊，10(4)，6-16。王才康、胡中鋒、劉勇（2001）。一般自我效能感量表的信度與效度研究。應用心理學，(1)，37-40。http://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6020.2001.01.007. 王智弘、林清文、劉淑慧、楊淳斐、蕭宜綾（2008）。台灣地區網路諮商服務發展之調查研究。教育心理學報，39(3)，395-412。http://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20070730.2 台灣輔導與諮商學會（2001年11月16日）。台灣輔導與諮商學會諮商專業倫理守則。李姿儀（2016）。教師面對ADHD學童之工作壓力、情緒管理與自我效能之關係研究（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立大學。李偉斌、陳慶福、王智弘(2008)。網路即時諮商與晤談諮商中助人技巧、工作同盟與晤談感受之研究－以準諮商員為例。教育心理學報，40(1)，1-22。http://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20071128 吳敏綺（2018）。大學生網路諮商之倫理議題與因應。諮商與輔導，391，40-44。http://doi.org/10.29837/CG 林士傑、劉祉吟、葉致寬、吳佩瑾、吳芝儀（2015）。網路諮商模式與相關倫理議題探討。輔導季刊，51(4)，18-27。http://doi.org/10.29742/GQ 林志鈞、陳建銘（2019）。教師之幽默感、壓力知覺、自我效能對教學創新之影響。樹德科技大學學報，21(1)，113-141。http://doi.org/10.29648/JSTU 林寶生（2005）。組織氣候、工作特性、內外控人格、自我效能與工作績效之關係研究－以陸軍某基地進訓基層單位為例。大葉大學。車佩娟（2011）。國內網路諮商之發展現況。諮商與輔導，309，30-34。http://doi.org/10.29837/CG.201109.0012 邱皓政（2010）。量化研究與統計分析：SPSS／PASW 資料分析範例解析(第五版)。五南。范孜筠（2012）。大學生依附風格、社交自我效能與憂鬱之相關研究［未發表之碩士論文］。國立臺中教育大學。柴康偉、歐瑋明、李湟惟（2021）。探討科技準備度對使用態度與行為意圖之調節效果－以餐飲平台foodpanda為例。觀光與休閒管理期刊，9，11-22。http://doi.org/10.6510/JTLM.202108/SP_9.0002 梁淑媛、蔡秀鸞、莊宇慧、吳淑芳、童恆新、王采芷、李慧貞（2013）。淺談自我效能信念及測量工具。馬偕護理雜誌，7(2)，7-12。http://doi.org/10.29415/JMKN.201307_7(2).0001 陳景蕙（2021）。國中生自我效能、社會支持與憂鬱傾向之研究［未發表之碩士論文］。國立嘉義大學。張乃皓（2019）。大學生自我效能與憂鬱之關係: 以未來時間觀及品味為雙中介與遠程中介檢定［未發表之碩士論文］。玄奘大學。張春興（1991）。張氏心理辭典。台北：東華。張勻銘、王智弘(2009)。以全球資訊網為介面之認知治療網路即時諮商研究:以憂鬱情緒當事人為例。教育心理學報，41(1)，45-67。http://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20081007.2 武燕燕、劉登賢、鄭一寧、夏月、趙立新（2012）。實習護生自主學習準備度及自我效能的調查研究。中國護理管理，12(6)，29-32。http://www.zghlgl.com/CN/Y2012/V12/I6/29 黃聰銘（2000）。綜合所得稅申報方式的電腦相關因素研究（未出版之碩士論文）。大葉大學。蔡秉宸（2021）。自我效能與學業成就的相關性之後設分析：資優學生與一般學生比較。嘉大教育研究學刊，46，59-106。http://doi.org/10.6474/NCUJER 葉寶玲、蔡佳容、簡文英（2021）。COVID-19疫情期間諮商心理師的通訊諮商經驗。教育實踐與研究，34(3)，121-164。http://doi.org/10.6776/JEPR 楊依雯（2010）。高中生之生涯發展準備度、學校幸福感與生涯自我效能之相關研究［未發表之碩士論文］。國立臺灣師範大學。潘慧玲、黃囇莉、陳文彥、鄭淑惠（2020）。學校準備好了嗎？國高中教育人員實施108課綱的變革準備度。教育研究與發展期刊，16(1)，65-100。http://doi.org/10.6925/SCJ.202003_16(1).0003 鄭致道（2020）。醫療領域之破壞性創新：以遠距心理諮商為例［未發表之碩士論文］。國立政治大學。http://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU202100067 蔣曉蓮、薛詠紅、汪國成（2004）。自我效能研究進展。護理研究，18(5), 763-767。https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/61166124.pdf 賴建和、張子健（2021）。通訊心理諮商運用於災難與創傷治療。諮商與輔導，421，29-32。http://doi.org/10.29837/CG 盧素娥、蔣明雄、季力康（2007）。舉重選手之運動目標取向、自我效能與成敗歸因之相關研究。國立體育學院論叢，18(4)，97-114。http://doi.org/10.6591/JPES.2007.12.08 藍菊梅（2012）。大學生有身心障礙者其網路諮商需求、意願與成效之關係研究（NSC100-2511-S309-001）。長榮大學健康心理學系。 Aypay, A. (2010). The adaptation study of General Self-Efficacy (GSE) Scale to Turkish. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education (INUJFE), 11(2). Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs. Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 87-99. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.87 Bandura, A. (2006). Going global with social cognitive theory: From prospect to paydirt. In S. I. Donaldson, D. E. Berger, & K. Pezdek (Eds.), Applied psychology: New frontiers and rewarding careers (pp. 53-79). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Barbee, P. W., Scherer, D., & Combs, D. C. (2003). Prepracticum service-learning: Examining the relationship with counselor self-efficacy and anxiety. Counselor Education and Supervision, 43, 108-119. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.2003.tb01835.x Barker, G., & Barker, E. (2022). Online therapy: Lessons learned from the COVID-19 health crisis. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 50(1), 66-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2021.1889462 Békés, V., & Aafjes‐van Doorn, K. (2020). Psychotherapists` attitudes toward online therapy during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 30(2), 238-247. https://doi.org/10.1037/int0000214 Békés, V., Aafjes-van Doorn, K., Prout, T. A., & Hoffman, L. (2020). Stretching the analytic frame: Analytic therapists` experiences with remote therapy during COVID‐19. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 68(3), 437-446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003065120939298 Békés, V., Aafjes-van Doorn, K., McCollum, J., Prout, T. R., & Hoffman, L. (2022). The development of a self-report scale to assess therapists` acceptance of telepsychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 78(6), 1240-1260. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23289 Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 Brooks, E., Turvey, C., & Augusterfer, E. F. (2013). Provider barriers to telemental health: Obstacles overcome, obstacles remaining. Telemedicine and E‐Health, 19(6), 433-437. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2013.0068 Centorem, A. J., & Milacci, F. (2008). A study of mental health counselors’ use of and perspectives on distance counseling. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 30, 267-282. https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.30.3.q871r684n863u75r Cervone, D. (2000). Thinking about self-efficacy. Behavior Modification, 24(1), 30-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445500241002 Chauhan, S., & Jaiswal, M. (2016). Determinants of acceptance of ERP software training in business schools: Empirical investigation using UTAUT model. The International Journal of Management Education, 14(3), 248-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2016.05.005 Cuban, L. (1922). Why some reforms last: The case of the kindergarten. American Journal of Education, 10, 16-194. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1085567 Glueckauf, R. L., Maheu, M. M., Drude, K. P., Wells, B. A., Wang, Y., Gustafson, D. J., & Nelson, E. L. (2018). Survey of psychologists’ telebehavioral health practices: Technology use, ethical issues, and training needs. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 49(3), 205. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000188 Hanley, T., & Wyatt, C. (2021). A systematic review of higher education students` experiences of engaging with online therapy. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(3), 522-534. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12371 Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Macmillan. Hill, C. E., Roffman, M., Stahl, J., Friedman, S., Hummel, A., & Wallace, C. (2008). Helping skills training for undergraduates: Outcomes and prediction of outcomes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55, 359-370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000015613142 Hord, S. M, Rutherford, W, L., Huling, L., & Hall, G. E. (2014). Taking charge of change (Revised Version). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Retrieved from http://www.sedl.org/pubs/change22/taking-charge-of- change-2014.pdf Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 Ipsen, C., Rigles, B., Arnold, N., & Seekins, T. (2012). The use of telecommunication to deliver services to rural and urban vocational rehabilitation clients. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 55(3), 144-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/003435521143 Joe, S. H. (2010). Assessing job self-efficacy and organizational commitment considering a mediating role of information asymmetry. The Social Science Journal, 47, 541-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2010.01.011 Joyce, N. (2020, May 26). Online therapy having its moment, bringing insights on how to expand mental health services going forward. The Conversation. Retrived from https://theconversation.com/online-therapy-having-its-moment-bringing-insights-on-how-to-expand-mental-health-services-going-forward-136374 Kaplan, D. (2013). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions (2nd ed.). Sage. Khechine, H., & Lakhal, S. (2018). Technology as a double‐edged sword: From behavior prediction with UTAUT to students` outcomes considering personal characteristics. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 17, 63-102. https://doi.org/10.28945/4022 Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford. Kluger, J. (2020, August 27). Online therapy, booming during the coronavirus pandemic, may be here to stay. Time. https://time.com/5883704/teletherapy-coronavirus. Kozina, K., Grabovari, N., De Stefano, J., & Drapeau, M. (2010). Measuring changes in counselor self-efficacy: Further validation and implications for training and supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 29, 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2010.517483 Layne, C. M., & Hohenshil, T. H. (2005). High tech counseling: Revisited. Journal of Counseling & Development, 83(2), 222-226. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2005.tb00599.x Leganger, A., Kraft, P., & Roysamb, E. (2000). Perceived self-efficacy in health behavior research: Conceptualization, measurement and correlates. Psychology and Health, 15, 51-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440008400288 Li, T. M. H., & Leung, C. S. Y. (2020). Exploring student mental health and intention to use online counselling in Hong Kong during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 74(10), 564-565. https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.13117 Luszczynska, A., Scholz, U., Schwarzer,R. (2005). The general self-efficacy scale: Multicultural validation studies. The Journal of Psychology, 139(5), 439-457. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.139.5.439-457. Madsen, S. R., Miller, D., & John, C. R. (2005). Readiness for organizational change: Do organizational commitment and social relationships in the workplace make a difference? Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16(2), 213-234. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1134 Melchert, T. P., Hays, V. L., Wiljanen, L. M., & Kolocek, A. K. (1996). Testing models of counselor development with a measure of counseling self‐efficacy. Journal of Counseling & Development, 74(6), 640-644. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1996.tb02304.x Mosley Jr., D. C., Boyar, S. L., Carson, C. M., & Pearson, A. W. (2008). A production self-efficacy scale: An exploratory study. Journal of Managerial Issues, 20(2), 272-285. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40604608 Oparaduru, J. O. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic in the society: Basic issues and implications for counselling. International Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 127-138. Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology readiness index (TRI): A multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050024001 Perry, K., Gold, S., & Shearer, E. M. (2020). Identifying and addressing mental health providers` perceived barriers to clinical video telehealth utilization. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 76(6), 1125-1134. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22770 Prochaska, J. O., Redding, C. A., Harlow, L. L., Rossi, J. S., & Velicer, W. F. (1994). The transtheoretical model of change and HIV prevention: A review. Health Education Quarterly, 21(4), 471-486. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819402100410 Prochaska, J. O., & Velicer, W. F. (1997). The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. American Journal of Health Promotion, 12(1), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38 Rigotti, T., Schyns, B., & Mohr, G. (2008). A short version of the occupational self- efficacy scale: Structural and construct validity across five countries. Journal of Career Assessment, 16(2), 238-255. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00540-018-2583-8 Schunk, D. H. (1981). Modeling and attributional effects on children`s achievement: A self- efficacy analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(1), 93-105. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.73.1.93 Schunk, D. H., & Cox, P. D. (1986). Strategy training and attributional feedback with learning disabled students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(3), 201-209. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.78.3.201 Schwarzer, R., Mueller, J., & Greenglass, E. (1999). Assessment of perceived general self efficacy on the Internet: Data collection in cyberspace. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 12, 145-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615809908248327 Situmorang, D. (2020). Online/cyber counseling services in the COVID-19 outbreak: Are they really new? The Journal of Pastoral Care & Counseling, 74(3), 166-174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1542305020948170 Stephen, O. (2020). E-counselling implementation: Consideration during the COVID-19 deepen crisis in Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 11(17), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.7176/JEP/11-17-02 Tentama, F., & Merdiaty, N. (2019). Self-efficacy and work readiness among vocational high school students. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) 13(2), 277-281. http://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v13i2.12677 Tyler, E. (1964). Issues related to readiness to learn. In E. Hilgard (Ed.), Theories of learning and instruction: The sixty-third year book of the national society for the study of education, Part I (pp. 210-239). University of Chicago Press. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540 Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412 Weinberg, H. (2020). Online group psychotherapy: Challenges and possibilities during COVID-19- a practice review. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 24(3), 201-211. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000140 Zainudin, Z., Hassan, S., Ahmad, N. A., Yusop, Y., Wan Othman, W. N., & Alias, B. (2021). A comparison of a client’s satisfaction between online and face-to-face counselling in a school setting. Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology, 29(S1), 135-153. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.s1.08 Zhang, J. X., Schwarzer, R., Jerusalem, M. (1995). Measuring optimistic self-beliefs: A Chinese adaptation of the general self-efficacy scale. Psychologia, 38(3),174-181.
描述:	碩士國立政治大學輔導與諮商碩士學位學程 110172007
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110172007
数据类型:	thesis
显示于类别:	[輔導與諮商碩士學位學程] 學位論文

文件中的档案:

档案	描述	大小	格式	浏览次数
200701.pdf		1588Kb	Adobe PDF2	0	检视/开启

在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回馈