政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/145903
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51569779      線上人數 : 988
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/145903


    題名: 育嬰津貼對生育與婦女勞動供給的影響: 來自2018年紐約州改革的證據
    The Effects of Paid Family Leave on Fertility and Maternal Labor Supply: Evidence from 2018 New York Reform
    作者: 金賢
    Kim, Brian
    貢獻者: 楊子霆
    Yang, Tzu-Ting
    金賢
    Kim, Brian
    關鍵詞: 育嬰津貼
    生育
    婦女勞動
    紐約州改革
    Paid leave
    Fertility
    Mother`s labor supply
    New York reform
    日期: 2023
    上傳時間: 2023-07-06 16:56:11 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本文分析紐約提帶薪育嬰假(NY-PFL)對生育率和休假率的 影響。首先，使用差異中差異法，我發現NY-PFL將紐約母親的 生育率提高了2.9%，其中黑人和40多歲的女性受到政策的影響最大。接下來，我發現NY-PFL實施後，紐約母親休假的可能性增加 了10.8%。影響最大的是弱勢女性，即黑人和非大學教育的女性，其次是大學教育和亞洲女性。最後，我也發現30-40歲的女性在改革後較容易休假。
    This paper analyzes the effects of the New York Paid Family Leave (NY-PFL) on fertility and leave-taking rates. First, using a difference-in-differences strategy, I discover that NY-PFL increased the fertility rate of New York mothers by 2.9 percent where Black and women in their 40s were most sensitive to the policy. Next, I employ a difference-in-difference-in-differences design to find that New York mothers are 10.8 percent more likely to be on leave following the NY-PFL. The effects were largest for disadvantaged women, namely Black and non-college-educated women, followed by college-educated and Asian women. In addition, the increases were primarily driven by older women in theirs 30s and 40s.
    參考文獻: Abadie, A., Diamond, A., and Hainmueller, J. (2010). Synthetic Control Meth- ods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(490):493–505.

    Baker, M. and Milligan, K. (2008). How Does Job-Protected Maternity Leave Affect Mothers’ Employment? Journal of Labor Economics, 26(4):655–691.

    Bartel, A. P. (2017). Paid Family Leave, Fathers’ Leave-Taking, and Leave-Sharing in Dual-Earner Households - PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29320808/.

    Bassford, M. and Fisher, H. (2020). The Impact of Paid Parental Leave on Fertility Intentions*. Economic Record, 96(315):402–430.

    Becker, G. (1960). An Economic Analysis of Fertility. NBER Chapters, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Bergsvik, J., Fauske, A., and Hart, R. K. (2020). Effects of policy on fertility: A systematic review of (quasi)experiments. Working Paper 922, Discussion Papers.

    Burtle, A. and Bezruchka, S. (2016). Population Health and Paid Parental Leave: What the United States Can Learn from Two Decades of Research. Healthcare, 4(2):30.

    Cygan-Rehm, K. (2016). Parental leave benefit and differential fertility re- sponses: Evidence from a German reform. Journal of Population Economics, 29(1):73–103.

    Gauthier, A. H. (2007). The impact of family policies on fertility in industrialized countries: A review of the literature. Population Research and Policy Review, 26(3):323–346.

    Golightly, E. and Meyerhofer, P. (2022). Does Paid Family Leave Cause Mothers to Have More Children? Evidence from California. Journal of Labor Research, 43(2):203–238.
    Golightly, E. K. (2020). Essays on Policy, Fertility, and Education. Thesis.

    Grant, J., Hoorens, S., Sivadasan, S., Loo, M. V. H., Davanzo, J., Hale, L., and Butz, W. (2006). Trends in European fertility: Should Europe try to increase its fertility rate. . . or just manage the consequences?1. International Journal of Andrology, 29(1):17–24.

    Guzzo, K. B. and Hayford, S. R. (2023). Evolving Fertility Goals and Behaviors in Current U.S. Childbearing Cohorts. Population and Development Review, n/a(n/a).

    Han, W.-J., Ruhm, C., and Waldfogel, J. (2009). Parental leave policies and parents’ employment and leave-taking. Journal of Policy Analysis and Man- agement, 28(1):29–54.

    Hoem, J. M. (2005). Why does Sweden have such high fertility? Demographic Research, 13:559–572.

    Klerman, J. A. and Leibowitz, A. (1994). The Work-Employment Distinction among New Mothers. The Journal of Human Resources, 29(2):277–303.

    Klerman, J. A. and Leibowitz, A. (1999). Job continuity among new mothers. Demography, 36(2):145–155.


    Luci-Greulich, A. and Thévenon, O. (2013). The Impact of Family Policies on Fertility Trends in Developed Countries. European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie, 29(4):387–416.

    McDonald, P. (2006). Low Fertility and the State: The Efficacy of Policy. Population and Development Review, 32(3):485–510.

    McDonald, P. and Kippen, R. (2001). Labor Supply Prospects in 16 Developed Countries, 2000–2050. Population and Development Review, 27(1):1–32.

    Myong, S., Park, J., and Yi, J. (2021). Social Norms and Fertility. Journal of the European Economic Association, 19(5):2429–2466.

    Nagarajan, N. R., Teixeira, A. A. C., and Silva, S. T. (2016). The impact of an ageing population on economic growth: An exploratory review of the main mechanisms. Análise Social, 51(218):4–35.

    Olivetti, C. and Petrongolo, B. (2017). The Economic Consequences of Family Policies: Lessons from a Century of Legislation in High-Income Countries. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(1):205–230.

    Pronzato, C. D. (2009). Return to work after childbirth: Does parental leave matter in Europe? Review of Economics of the Household, 7(4):341–360.

    Rossin-Slater, M., Ruhm, C. J., and Waldfogel, J. (2013). The Effects of California’s Paid Family Leave Program on Mothers’ Leave-Taking and Subsequent Labor Market Outcomes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(2):224–245.

    Salvanes, K. G., Carneiro, P. M., and Løken, K. V. (2010). A Flying Start? Long Term Consequences of Maternal Time Investments in Children During Their First Year of Life.

    Shim, J. Y. (2014). Family Leave Policy and Child Health.

    Stropnik, N. and Šircelj, M. (2008). Slovenia: Generous family policy without evidence of any fertility impact. Demographic Research, 19:1019–1058.

    Tanaka, S. (2005). Parental Leave and Child Health Across OECD Countries. The Economic Journal, 115(501):F7–F28.

    Thévenon, O. (2011). Family Policies in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis. Population and Development Review, 37(1):57–87.

    Voicu, M. and Bădoi, D. (2021). Fertility and the COVID-19 crisis: Do gender roles really matter? European Societies, 23(sup1):S199–S214.

    Waldfogel, J. (1998). The Family Gap for Young Women in the United States and Britain: Can Maternity Leave Make a Difference? Journal of Labor Economics, 16(3):505–545.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    應用經濟與社會發展英語碩士學位學程(IMES)
    110266021
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110266021
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[應用經濟與社會發展英語碩士學位學程 (IMES)] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    602101.pdf953KbAdobe PDF2230檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋