政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/144601
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113392/144379 (79%)
Visitors : 51193871      Online Users : 907
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/144601


    Title: 學習間隔如何影響長期記憶：從McCabe效應出發，以詞句檢驗
    How Does Time-Spacing Influence LTM？ Begin with McCabe and Examining with Sentence
    Authors: 林育棋
    Lin, Yu-Chi
    Contributors: 楊立行
    顏乃欣
    Yang, Lee-Xieng
    Yen, Nai-Shing
    林育棋
    Lin, Yu-Chi
    Keywords: 序列再憶
    工作記憶
    固化
    詞句刺激
    ISI
    Date: 2023
    Issue Date: 2023-05-02 15:05:51 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: McCabe（2008）發現在序列再憶作業中，拉長刺激呈現的時間間距（ISI）並從中填充分心作業，相對於只有短暫ISI，會形成較差的短期、但較好的長期記憶表現，這個現象被稱為McCabe效應（McCabe effect）。有數種假說曾被提出來解釋McCabe效應，而目前的研究證據較支持工作記憶固化假說。另一種相似的注意力刷新假說，指的是一種內容－脈絡綁定的機制，認為長ISI有助於內容和時間標籤的表徵整合，以穩固長期記憶的提取暗示。本研究從內容本身和脈絡兩端著手，檢驗了不同ISI和刺激類型與再憶表現的關係，其中我們最小化ISI，形成同時呈現情境（ISI = 0）。在實驗一，相較於簡單廣度情境（ISI = 0.5秒），同時呈現情境在延遲再憶時的正確率較低，且僅發生於成句刺激，非句刺激則沒有差異；實驗二加入慢速廣度情境作為對照（ISI = 3.5秒），並設計具語法結構但缺乏語義的類句刺激。如同預期，實驗二的延遲再憶正確率為成句>類句>非句刺激，顯示記憶內容的組織性確實提供一定的精緻化效果，但在此基礎上，豐富的語義能夠形成較多與既有長期記憶的連結，進一步幫助長期記憶；其次，實驗二中簡單廣度的立即和延遲再憶正確率皆低於同時呈現情境，說明縮短ISI對長期記憶的影響並非完全連續，本文對此提出了四種較合理的猜測，並且發現這些猜測和近期一篇研究的許多證據（Mızrak & Oberauer, 2021）不謀而合。總結而言，本研究在Souza與Oberauer（2017）提出的工作記憶固化假說基礎上，進行了部分的修正，並且同意Mızrak與Oberauer（2021）的研究發現。
    Reference: Allen, R. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2009). Working memory and sentence recall. Interactions between short-term and long-term memory in the verbal domain, 63-85.
    Baddeley, A. D. (1966a). The influence of acoustic and semantic similarity on long-term memory for word sequences. The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 18(4), 302-309.
    Baddeley, A. D. (1966b). Short-term memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic and formal similarity. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 18(4), 362-365.
    Baddeley, A. D., Hitch, G. J., & Allen, R. J. (2009). Working memory and binding in sentence recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(3), 438-456.
    Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 11(6), 717-726.
    Brener, R. (1940). An experimental investigation of memory span. Journal of experimental psychology, 26(5), 467.
    Brown, G. D., Neath, I., & Chater, N. (2007). A temporal ratio model of memory. Psychological review, 114(3), 539.
    Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155.
    Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system. Psychological Bulletin, 104(2), 163.
    Cowan, N. (1998). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. Oxford University Press.
    Cowan, N. (1999). An embedded-processes model of working memory.
    Craik, F. I., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 11(6), 671-684.
    Craik, F. I., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of experimental Psychology: general, 104(3), 268.
    Gallo, D. A., Meadow, N. G., Johnson, E. L., & Foster, K. T. (2008). Deep levels of processing elicit a distinctiveness heuristic: Evidence from the criterial recollection task. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(4), 1095-1111.
    Greene, R. L. (1987). Effects of maintenance rehearsal on human memory. Psychological Bulletin, 102(3), 403.
    Johnson, M. K. (1992). MEM: Mechanisms of recollection. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 4(3), 268-280.
    Johnson, M. K., Reeder, J. A., Raye, C. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2002). Second thoughts versus second looks: An age-related deficit in reflectively refreshing just-activated information. Psychological Science, 13(1), 64-67.
    Jolicœur, P., & Dell`Acqua, R. (1998). The demonstration of short-term consolidation. Cognitive psychology, 36(2), 138-202.
    Klatzky, R. L. (1988). Theories of information processing and theories of aging. Language, memory, and aging, 1-16.
    Loaiza, V. M., Duperreault, K. A., Rhodes, M. G., & McCabe, D. P. (2015). Long-term semantic representations moderate the effect of attentional refreshing on episodic memory. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 22(1), 274-280.
    Loaiza, V. M., & Lavilla, E. T. (2021). Elaborative strategies contribute to the long-term benefits of time in working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 117, 104205.
    Loaiza, V. M., & McCabe, D. P. (2012). Temporal–contextual processing in working memory: Evidence from delayed cued recall and delayed free recall tests. Memory & Cognition, 40(2), 191-203.
    Loaiza, V. M., & McCabe, D. P. (2013). The influence of aging on attentional refreshing and articulatory rehearsal during working memory on later episodic memory performance. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 20(4), 471-493.
    Loaiza, V. M., Rhodes, M. G., & Anglin, J. (2015). The influence of age-related differences in prior knowledge and attentional refreshing opportunities on episodic memory. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 70(5), 729-736.
    McCabe, D. P. (2008). The role of covert retrieval in working memory span tasks: Evidence from delayed recall tests. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 480-494.
    Mızrak, E., & Oberauer, K. (2021). What is time good for in working memory? Psychological Science, 32(8), 1325-1337.
    Murdock, B. B. (1962). The serial position effect of free recall. Journal of experimental psychology, 64(5), 482.
    Nieuwenstein, M., & Wyble, B. (2014). Beyond a mask and against the bottleneck: retroactive dual-task interference during working memory consolidation of a masked visual target. Journal of experimental Psychology: general, 143(3), 1409.
    Popov, V., & Reder, L. M. (2020). Frequency effects on memory: A resource-limited theory. Psychological review, 127(1), 1.
    Ricker, T. J. (2015). The role of short-term consolidation in memory persistence. AIMS Neuroscience, 2(4), 259-279.
    Ricker, T. J., & Cowan, N. (2014). Differences between presentation methods in working memory procedures: a matter of working memory consolidation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(2), 417.
    Ricker, T. J., & Hardman, K. O. (2017). The nature of short-term consolidation in visual working memory. Journal of experimental Psychology: general, 146(11), 1551.
    Ricker, T. J., Nieuwenstein, M. R., Bayliss, D. M., & Barrouillet, P. (2018). Working memory consolidation: insights from studies on attention and working memory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1424(1), 8-18.
    Souza, A. S., & Oberauer, K. (2017). Time to process information in working memory improves episodic memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 96, 155-167.
    Turvey, M. T. (1973). On peripheral and central processes in vision: inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli. Psychological review, 80(1), 1.
    Vergauwe, E., Camos, V., & Barrouillet, P. (2014). The impact of storage on processing: How is information maintained in working memory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(4), 1072.
    Vergauwe, E., & Langerock, N. (2017). Attentional refreshing of information in working memory: Increased immediate accessibility of just-refreshed representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 96, 23-35.
    Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2006). The time course of consolidation in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(6), 1436.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    心理學系
    106752004
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106752004
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Psychology] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    200401.pdf1753KbAdobe PDF2190View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback