政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/141768

政大典藏 > College of Social Science > Graduate Institute of Social Administration and Social Work > Theses > Item 140.119/141768

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/141768

Title:	矛盾的紐帶-從同袍情誼中看見異性戀盟友 Contradictory Bond: Seeing Heterosexual Allies through Comradeships
Authors:	陳靜儀 Chen, Ching-Yi
Contributors:	王增勇 Wang, Tsen-Yung 陳靜儀 Chen,Ching-Yi
Keywords:	異性戀盟友霸權陽剛男性紐帶生活史 Heterosexual Ally Hegemonic Masculinity Male Bond Life History
Date:	2022
Issue Date:	2022-09-02 15:32:20 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本研究旨在探索軍隊異性戀男性，成為同志軍人在軍隊中的異性戀盟友之歷程與經驗。本研究以批判性男性研究的視角，探討在我國軍隊情境中，促使異性戀男性發展成為盟友的因素，以及異性戀男性，在軍隊情境中實踐盟友行動的方式與策略。透過生活史的敘事方法，藉由十位軍隊異性戀盟友的真實經驗，探索可供軍隊在相關政策制定與實務工作推展上的建議。本研究發現如下：一、軍隊異性戀盟友的發展，是隨著情境條件，不斷進行內在修正，與外在實踐的循環動態歷程。盟友發展的關鍵在於，促使個人認知得以跨越偏見的接觸經驗。但接觸並不一定必然帶來改變，更關鍵的是接觸過程中的情境條件。二、軍隊情境中的紐帶關係，是異性戀盟友採取行動前的最優先考量。多數盟友會選擇迴避軍事階級上的權力衝突，而不採取盟友行動，但也有部分盟友會在情感性紐帶的催化下挺身而出。因此，軍隊的男性紐帶就如同一把雙面刃，它可增強對同志的壓迫，但也可激發個人對同袍的保護，成為軍隊性別文化變革的可能。三、軍隊中異性戀盟友的行動範圍，如同心圓般的｢差序格局｣，形成四種類型：由內而外分別是緘默型、草根型、關係型以及社會正義型盟友，行動範圍愈大，所採取之行動方式也愈具衝突性。四、軍隊異性戀盟友的行動方式，可區分為獨善其身、擴展接觸以及制度衝撞等三種，個人將根據情境中的社會位置，制定出符合情境需求的行動策略。本研究建議，軍隊的性別工作，應從禁止性歧視等命令法規，轉向幫助官兵對多元性別概念的更多認識；並且將宣教對象從基層官兵向上延伸至各層級單位，以提供高階長官接觸性別新知的機會，進而拉近與基層官兵間的世代差距。 The purpose of this study is to explore the journey and experience of heterosexual men in the military as they develop into heterosexual allies. From the perspective of Critical Study of Male, this paper attempts to explore the factors that promote the development of heterosexual men into allies, as well as the ways and strategies that allies practice in the military in Taiwan. Through the narrative method of life history, it is expected that with the real experience of 10 military heterosexual allies, we can firure out some suggestions for the military to improve relevant policies and practical work. This study found the following: 1. The development of the military heterosexual allies is influenced by the individual`s social position, and is a dynamic process of continuous internal revision and external practice according to situational conditions. The key of the development is the contact experiences that enable individuals to transcend the prejudice. Therefore, contact does not necessarily bring about changes, but the situational conditions during the contact process may be more critical. 2. The bonds in the military are the top priority for heterosexual allies before taking action. Most allies avoid military-class power conflicts rather than taking ally actions, but some allies will come forward because of the emotional bonds between them and gay. Therefore, the male bond in the military is like a double-edged sword. It not only c enhancing the gender oppression to gays, but also inspiring allies to protect their comrades, and become the potential for the transformation of the military`s gender culture. 3. The scope of action of heterosexual allies in the military is like a heart-shaped "differential pattern". From the inside out, four ally types can be distinguished: silent, grassroots, relational, and social justice allies. The larger the scope of the action, the more conflicting action way is taken. 4. The actions of heterosexual allies in the military can be divided into three types: getting own way, expanding contact, and challenging the institution. According to their social position, allies will develop different action strategies to meet the needs of the situation, This study suggests that the military should shift the gender work from prohibiting sexual discrimination to helping soldiers with understanding the concept of gender diversity; and to extend the target of missionary education from grass-roots unit to all levels, to provide senior officers with opportunities to gain new knowledge about gender,and further narrow the generational gap in the military.
Reference:	參考書目壹、中文文獻王大維(2018)。大學校園異性戀盟友的認同發展與實踐。科技部補助專題研究計畫成果報告(編號：MOST 105-2629-H-153-001-)，未出版。王威(2011)。性的歷程: 從兩宋到明清。湖北：湖北人民出版社。王堯平(2019)。微攻擊對同志心理健康之影響：社會支持、同志盟友支持之調節作用。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系碩士論文，彰化。王詩穎(2009)。國民革命軍與近代中國男性氣概的形塑 (1924-1945)。國立臺灣師範大學歷史學系碩士論文, 台北。王麗雲(2000）。自傳∕傳記∕生命史研究在教育上的應用。教育學門研究生「質的研究方法」研討會，國立中正大學教育研究所，嘉義。田芳華(1998）。自傳記憶與事件－生命史調查之應用與前瞻。調查研究，6，5-38。李惟農（2018）。異性戀社會工作者倡導同志權益之經驗探究。朝陽科技大學，台中市。石東威（2017）。探討軍事社會化程度與同性戀態度之關聯—以陸軍基層單位為例。國防大學政治作戰學院心理及社會工作學系研究所碩士論文, 台北。安可敬（2013）。形塑制服下的魔鬼? 比較平面媒體報導軍人與員警違法違紀事件之差異。臺北大學犯罪學研究所碩士論文, 台北。戎健(1951)。軍醫人員對軍隊中性衛生應負的責任，《大眾醫學》卷2期1:22。朱偉誠(2003)。〈台灣同志學：回顧與前瞻〉，國科會專題研究計畫成果報告，國立台灣大學外國語文學系暨研究所，台北。江峰碩(2020)。同婚專法施行對我國國軍人事法制之影響。國防大學管理學院法律學系研究所碩士論文，台北。吳佩芳（2019）。臺灣軍事身體生成及後軍事展演現象研究。國立臺北藝術大學，台北。吳瑞元(1997)。孽子的印記─臺灣近代男性「同性戀」的浮現(1970-1990)。國立中央大學歷史研究所碩士論文：桃園。李宇文（2020）。從具陰柔特質的男同志之生命故事探討台灣男同志圈的陽剛霸權意識。國立政治大學國家發展研究所碩士學位論文，台北。周佑儒（2007）。大學男同志學生出櫃經驗之敘事分析。國立暨南國際大學輔導與諮商學系（未出版之碩士論文），南投。官雅萱(2015) 。美少女戰士-陰柔性男同性戀軍人的部隊處境。銘傳大學企業管理學系未出版之碩士論文，台北。林巧雯（2013）。國中同志/非同志教師其同志態度及同志教育教學實踐之研究。國立中正大學教育學系碩士論文，嘉義。林宜薇（2016）。國小教師實踐同志教育研究。國立東華大學教育與潛能開發學系碩士論文，台東。林政彥（2001）《從同性戀者入伍服役政策論同性戀者權力主體地位之建構與解構》。國立台灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文。林瑩如(2015)。非同志傾向輔導教師對同性婚姻態度與同志教育實踐之探討。國立臺東大學進修部暑期諮商心理系碩士專班論文，台東。姚惠耀（2019）。戰後臺灣「軍中樂園」研究（1951-1992）。國立臺灣師範大學臺灣史研究所碩士論文，台北。柯仲修（2012）。漫步彩虹雲端─基層教師同志教育實施經驗之研究。國立臺東大學未出版碩士論文，台東。柯瑞明（1991），臺灣風月。臺北：自立晚報。胡來安（1997）。同志當兵好鐵打釘。G&L熱愛雜誌，6，21-31。徐梓倫(2021)。軍中同志伴侶維持親密關係之初探。國立政治大學行政管理研究所碩士學位論文，台北。祝韻芬(2020)。彩虹戰士的現身與隱沒：軍中文化與性／別少數生命處境之研究。世新性別研究所碩士學位論文，台北。秦光輝(1997)。「當兵」現形記：從台灣男性兵役經驗看軍隊父權體制再生產的性別邏輯》。清華大學社會人類學研究所碩士論文，新竹。高穎超（2006）。做兵、儀式、男人類：台灣義務役男服役過程之陽剛氣質研究 (2000-2006）。國立臺灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文，台北。張金權（2011）。役男不死酷兒不酷—台灣強迫兵役/勞役制度之法律與性別正義容許性分析。台灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文，台北。張雅筑（2016）《國軍推動性別主流化下的士官兵因應經驗》。國防大學政治作戰學員心理及社會工作學系研究所碩士論文，台北。張藝寶(2020)。酷兒教育關鍵時刻：性少數高中生培力工作坊之行動研究。國立東華大學教育與潛能開發學系博士論文，花蓮。曹開明,劉大華. (2019)。網路論述的語藝生態學初探: 以網路社群討論軍中同志議題為例.。傳播研究與實踐, 9(1), 65-103。莊琇婷(2019)。同志員警職場出櫃經驗探究。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系碩士論文，彰化。許維賢(2015)。從豔史到性史︰同志書寫與近現代中國的男性建構。台北：遠流。郭盛哲(2009)。軍事動員模式的變遷：歷史趨勢與理論。復興崗學報，96，107-126。陳佩甄(2019)。反共意識形態與性政治：1950-1960年代台韓社會中的他者們。台灣學誌，18，21-42。陳靜儀（2014）。性別麻煩不麻煩?軍隊適應歷程中的性別角色操演。國防大學政治作戰學院心理及社會工作學系研究所碩士論文，台北。彭仁郁、王紹中（譯）（2019）。臨床的誕生（原作者：Foucault, M.）。臺北市：時報出版。（著出版年：1963）彭渰雯，(2018)。婦女運動與政治。載於黃淑玲、游美惠(主編)，性別向度與台灣社會(頁149-69)。臺北：巨流。彭懷真(1981)。真假同性戀—性取向的變異者，綜合月刊，155，143:157。黃金麟（2009）。戰爭、身體、現代性：近代台灣的軍事治理與身體（1895-2005）。臺北：聯經。黃惠蓮（2020）。女同志軍人出櫃經驗之探究。國防大學政治作戰學院心理及社會工作學系研究所碩士論文，台北。黃應貴(2021)。導論日常生活中的社會運動。載於黃應貴(主編)，日常生活中的社會運動(1-46頁)。新北市：群學出版。葉峻宇（2015）。多元性別者部隊生活經驗歷程之研究。國防大學政治作戰學員心理及社會工作學系研究所碩士論文，台北。董珆均（2020）。軍隊陽剛職場經驗初探─以男同志視角為例。國立高雄醫學大學性別研究所碩士學位論文，高雄。管仁健(2011)。你不知道的台灣．國軍故事(初版)。臺北：文經社。裴學儒（2001）。軍隊文化、男性氣概與性傾向壓迫：台灣男同性戀者的兵役經驗分析。世新大學社會發展研究所碩士論文，台北。趙彥寧(1998)。痛之華：五零年代國共之間變態政治性想像，性別研究，4，235-259。趙彥寧（2004）。公民身分、現代國家與親密生活：以老單身榮民與「大陸新娘」的婚姻為研究案例。臺灣社會學，8，1-41。劉人鵬，丁乃非（1998）。罔兩問景：含蓄美學與酷兒政略。中央大學：性別研究室。取自：http://sex.ncu.edu.tw>Penumbra_01 潘怡渟（2017）。你真的懂我嗎?多元性別在部隊中的社會支持系統。國防大學政治作戰學院心理及社會工作學系研究所碩士論文，台北。蔡綵柔（2017）。陰柔特質男同志兵役經驗之研究。樹德科技大學人類性學研究所碩士論文，高雄。蔣琬斯（2019）。同志教育之建構與推動：中學教師的實踐經驗與行動策略。國立高雄師範大學性別教育博士學位學程未出版博士論文，高雄。鄭智偉(2006)。在行動中與同志父母相遇-一個同志組織工作者的實踐與反思。國立陽明大學衛生福利學系碩士論文，台北。錢淑芬（2013）。全控機構的制度設計與制度化：以國防大學政戰學院初官養成教育的模塑制度為例。復興崗學報，103，147-174。https://doi.org/10.29857/FHKAJ.200912.0006 貳、英文文獻 Abercrombie, N& B.S. Turner (1978) ‘The Dominant Ideology Thesis’, British Journal of Sociology 29(2): 149–70. Adams, A. (2011). ‘Josh wears pink cleats’: Inclusive masculinity on the soccer field. Journal of Homosexuality, 58, 579–596. Adams, M., & Zúñiga, X. (2016). Getting started: Core concepts for social justice education. In Teaching for diversity and social justice , 113-148, Routledge. Anderson, E( 2005) Orthodox and inclusive masculinity: Competing masculinities among heterosexual men in a feminized terrain. Sociological Perspectives, 48, 337-355. Anderson, E. & Mccormack, M. (2018). Inclusive Masculinity Theory: overview, reflection and refinement . Journal of Gender Studies, 27, 547-561. Anderson, E. (2009). Inclusive masculinity: The changing nature of masculinities, London,Routledge. Apitzsch, U., Bornat, J., & Chamberlayne,(2004) P. Biographical methods and professional practice. Bristol University Press. Arxer, S. L.(2011). Hybrid Masculine Power: Reconceptualizing the Relationship between Homosociality and Hegemonic Masculinity. Humanity & Society, 35, 390-422. Asta, E.L. and Vacha-Haase, T. (2013) Heterosexual ally development in counseling psychologists: Experiences, training, and advocacy. The Counseling Psychologist , 41, 493–529. Available from: doi:10.1177/ 0011000012453174. Ayvazian, A. (1995). Interrupting the cycle of oppression: The role of allies as agents of change. Fellowship, 6–9. Bailey, A. (1998). Locating traitorous identities: Toward a view of privilege-cognizant white character. Hypatia, 13(3), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1998.tb01368.x Barone, T. (2009). Comments on Coulter and Smith: Narrative researchers as witnesses of injustice and agents of social change?. Educational Researcher, 38(8), 591-597. Barrett, F. J. (2001). The Organisational Construction of Hegemonic Masculinities”. In The Masculinities Reader, Edited by: Barret, F. J. and Whitehead, S. M. 77–99. Cambridge: Polity Press Bartoş, S. E., Berger, I., & Hegarty, P. (2014). Interventions to Reduce Sexual Prejudice: A Study-Space Analysis and Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Sex Research, 51(4), 363-382. Bederman, Gail (1995) Manliness and Civilization: A Cultural History of Gender and Race in the United States, 1880–1917, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Berggren, K. (2013). Degrees of intersectionality: Male rap artists in Sweden negotiating class, race and gender. Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research, 5, 189-211. Berggren, K. (2014). Sticky masculinity: Post-structuralism, phenomenology and subjectivity in critical studies on men. Men and masculinities, 17(3), 231-252. Binder, J., Zagefka, H., Brown, R., Funke, F., Kessler, T., Mummendey, A., . . . Leyens, J.-P. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three European countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 843–856. Bird, B. (1996). Welcome to the men’s club: homosociality and the maintenance of hegemonic masculinity. Gender and Society, 10, 120–132. Bird, S. R. (1996). Welcome to the men`s club: Homosociality and the maintenance of hegemonic masculinity. Gender & society, 10(2), 120-132. Bishop, A. (2002). Becoming an ally: Breaking the cycle of oppression in people (6th ed.).New York, NY: Zed Books. Black, L. L., & Stone, D. (2005). Expanding the definition of privilege: The concept of social privilege. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 33(4), 243-255. Blanchard, F. A., Crandall, C. S., Brigham, J. C., & Vaughn, L. A. (1994). Condemning and condoning racism: A social context approach to interracial settings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(6), 993. Bologh, R. W. (1990). Love or greatness: Max Weber and masculine thinking--A feminist inquiry. Bolzendahl, C. I., & Myers, D. J. (2004). Feminist attitudes and support for gender equality: Opinion change in women and men, 1974–1998. Social forces, 83(2), 759-789. Bourassa, D. M. (1996). Profiles of practice: The reflections of white student affairs practitioners engaged in the practice of race awareness education Brandyberry, L. J. (1999). Pain and perseverance: Perspectives from an ally. Journal of Counseling and Development: JCD, 77(1), 7. Bridges, C. E. (2011). Privileged students: White men as social justice allies (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio University). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/875244853?accountid=10906 Bridges, T. & Pascoe, C. J. (2014). Hybrid Masculinities: New Directions in the Sociology of Men and Masculinities. Sociology Compass, 8, 246-258. Bridges, T.( 2010). Men Just Weren`t Made To Do This: Performances of Drag at `Walk a Mile in Her Shoes` Marches. Gender & Society, 24, 5-30. Broadhurst, C., Martin, G., Hoffshire, M., & Takewell, W. (2018). “Bumpin’up against people and their beliefs”: Narratives of student affairs administrators creating change for LGBTQ students in the South. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 11(4), 385. Brodyn, A., & Ghaziani, A. (2018). Performative progressiveness: Accounting for new forms of inequality in the gayborhood. City & Community, 17(2), 307-329. Broido, E. M. (2000). The development of social justice allies during college: A phenomenological investigation. Journal of College Student Development, 41(1), 3-18. Broido, E. M., & Reason, R. D. (2005). The development of social justice attitudes and actions: An overview of current understandings. New Directions for Student Services, 110, 17. Brown, C. S. (2002). Refusing racism: White allies and the struggle for civil rights. NewYork, NY: Teachers College Press. Brown, R., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology , 37, 255–343. Academic Press. Bruner, J. (2001). Self-making and world-making. Narrative and identity: Studies in autobiography, self, and culture, 25-37. Bruner, J., & Feldman, C. F. (1996). Group narrative as a cultural context of autobiography. Bulmer, S. (2013). Patriarchal confusion? Making sense of gay and lesbian military identity. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 15(2), 137-156. Byrne, B. (2003). Reciting the self: Narrative representations of the self in qualitative interviews. Feminist Theory, 4(1), 29-49. Calcagno, J. (2016). Transforming straight guilt into collective action for LGBs via close cross-group friendships: A gender-moderated process. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(3), 451-463. Caldwell, J. C., & Vera, E. M. (2010). Critical incidents in counseling psychology professionals` and trainees` social justice orientation development. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 4(3), 163. Carless SA& De Paola C(2000). The measurement of cohesion in work teams. Small Group Research, 31, 71 - 88. Carless, D., & Douglas, K. (2013). Living, resisting, and playing the part of athlete: Narrative tensions in elite sport. Psychology of sport and exercise, 14(5), 701-708. Carrigan, T., Connell, R., & Lee, J. (1985). Toward a new sociology of masculinity. Theory and Society, 14(5), 551–604. Carrigan, T., R.W. Connell and J. Lee (1985) ‘Towards a New Sociology of Masculinity’, Theory and Society 14(5): 551–604. Carron AV& Brawley LR( 2000). Cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues. Small Group Research, 31: 89 - 106. Case, K. A. (2012). Discovering the privilege of whiteness: White women’s reflections on anti-racist identity and ally behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 68(1), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01737.x Casey-Campbell M& Martens ML,( 2009). Sticking it all together: A critical assessment of the group cohesionperformance literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11: 223-246 Channon, A., & Matthews, C. R. (2015). ‘It is what it is’: Masculinity, homosexuality, and inclusive discourse in mixed martial arts. Journal of Homosexuality, 62, 936–956. Cheng, Y. H. A., Wu, F. C. F., & Adamczyk, A. (2016). Changing attitudes toward homosexuality in Taiwan, 1995–2012. Chinese Sociological Review, 48(4), 317-345. Coker, A. L., Fisher, B. S., Bush, H. M., Swan, S. C., Williams, C. M., Clear, E. R., & DeGue, S. (2015). Evaluation of the green dot bystander intervention to reduce interpersonal violence among college students across three campuses. Violence Against Women, 21, 1507-1527. Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought in the matrix of domination. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment, 138(1990), 221-238. Connell, R. (1987). Gender and power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Connell, R. (1995). Masculinities. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Connell, R. W. & Messerschmidt, J. W( 2005). Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept. Gender and Society, 19, 829-859 Connell, R. W. (2003). Men`s bodies. The Body: Critical Concepts in Sociology, 1, 227. Connell, R.W. (2000) The Men and the Boys. Cambridge: Polity. Connell, R.W. (2002) Gender. Cambridge: Polity. Coppola, E. C. (2020). The social construction of transgender individuals and US militarypolicy. Journal of homosexuality, 1-23. Cortese, D. K. (2006). Are We Thinking Straight?: The Politics of Straightness in a Lesbian and Gay Social Movement Organization. Routledge. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. In K. T. Bartlett & R. Kennedy(Ed.), Feminist legal theory. Routledge. Croce, J. (2021). Brotherhood in Tension: The Militarized Appropriation of Homosocialism and Homoeroticism. Flux: International Relations Review, 11(1). Cruikshank, M. (1994) “Gay and lesbian liberation: An overview”. In Gays and lesbians in the military: Issues, concerns, and contrasts, Edited by: Scott, W. and Stanley, S . New York: Aldine De Gruyter. Czopp, A. M., Monteith, M. J., & Mark, A. Y. (2006). Standing up for a change: Reducing bias through interpersonal confrontation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 90(5), 784. Davies, B. (1989). The discursive production of the male/female dualism in school settings. Oxford Review of Education, 15(3), 229-241. De Boise, S.(2015). I’m Not Homophobic, “I’ve Got Gay Friends”: Evaluating the Validity of Inclusive Masculinity. Men and Masculinities, 18, 318-339. Dean Sinclair, G. (2009). Homosexuality and the military: A review of the literature. Journal of Homosexuality, 56(6), 701-718. Dean, J. J.( 2013). Heterosexual Masculinitiess, Anti-homophobias, and Shifts in Hegemonic Masculinity: The Identity Practices of Black and White Heterosexual Men. The Sociological Quarterly, 54, 27. Demetriou, D. Z.( 2001). Connell`s Concept of Hegemonic Masculinity: A Critique. Theory and Society, 30, 337-361. DeTurk, S. (2011). Allies in action: The communicative experiences of people who challenge social injustice on behalf of others. Communication Quarterly, 59(5), 569-590. Dhont, K. & Van Hiel, A. (2011). Direct contact and authoritarianism as moderators between extended contact and reduced prejudice: Lower threat and greater trust as mediators. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(2), 223-237. Dickter, C. L., Kittel, J. A., & Gyurovski, I. I. (2012). Perceptions of non‐target confronters in response to racist and heterosexist remarks. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(1), 112-119. Diefendorf, S., & Bridges, T. (2019). The shifting relationship between masculinity and homophobia. Routledge international handbook of masculinity studies, 233-243. Diefendorf, S., & Bridges, T. (2020). On the enduring relationship between masculinity and homophobia. Sexualities, 23(7), 1264-1284. Dillon, F. R., Worthington, R. L., Savoy, H. B., Rooney, S. C., Becker‐Schutte, A., & Guerra, R. M. (2004). On becoming allies: A qualitative study of lesbian‐, gay‐, and bisexual‐affirmative counselor training. Counselor Education and Supervision, 43(3), 162-178. DiStefano, T., Croteau, J., Anderson, M., Kampa-Kokesch, S., and Bullard, M. (2000) Experiences of being heterosexual allies to lesbian, gay, bisexual people: A qualitative exploration. Journal of College Counseling , 3(2), 131–141. Duhigg, J. M., Rostosky, S. S., Gray, B. E., & Wimsatt, M. K. (2010). Development of heterosexuals into sexual-minority allies: A qualitative exploration. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 7, 2_14. Edwards, K. (2006). Aspiring social justice ally identity development: A conceptual model. NASPA Journal, 43(4), 39-60. Eichler, M. A. (2010). Joining the family: Experiences of being and becoming ally activists of LGBTQ people. Journal of Transformative Education, 8(2), 89-102. Eisen, D. B., & Yamashita, L. (2019). Borrowing from femininity: The caring man, hybrid masculinities, and maintaining male dominance. Men and Masculinities, 22(5), 801–820. Eller, A., Abrams, D., & Zimmerman, A. (2011). Two degrees of separation: a longitudinal study of actual and perceived extended international contact. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(2), 175-191. Elliott, K. (2016). Caring masculinities: Theorizing an emerging concept. Men and Masculinities, 19(3), 240–259. Enloe, C. (1990) Bananas, Beaches and Bases. Berkeley. University of California Press. Fazio, R. H., & Hilden, L. E. (2001). Emotional reactions to a seemingly prejudiced response: The role of automatically activated racial attitudes and motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(5), 538-549. Fingerhut, A.W. (2011) Straight allies: What predicts heterosexuals’ alliance with the LGBT community? Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 41(9), 2230–2248. Flood, M. (2008). Men, sex, and homosociality: How bonds between men shape their sexual relations with women. Men and masculinities, 10(3), 339-359. Flood, M., & Hamilton, C. (2005). Mapping homophobia in Australia. Australia Institute Webpaper,, 1–15. Retrieved from www.glhv.org.au/files/aust_inst_homophobia_paper.pdf. FRA-European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2014). Violence against women: An EUwide survey: Main results. Publications Office of the European Union. Frühstück, S. (2003). Colonizing sex: Sexology and social control in modern Japan , Univ of California Press. Gelberg, S., & Chojnacki, J. T. (1995). Developmental transitions of gay/lesbian/bisexual-affirmative, heterosexual career counselors. The Career Development Quarterly, 43(3), 267. Getz, C., & Kirkley, E. A. (2003). Identity Development Models: One Size Fits All? Heterosexual Identity Development and the Search for" Allies" in Higher Education. Gilmartin, S. K. (2007). Crafting heterosexual masculine identities on campus: College men talk about romantic love. Men and masculinities, 9(4), 530-539. Goffman, E. (1968). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. AldineTransaction. Goldstein, S. and Davis, D. (2010) Heterosexual allies: A descriptive profile. Equity and Excellence in Education , 43(4), 478–494. Available from: doi:10.1080/10665684.2010.505464 Gonzalez, K., Riggle, E., and Rostosky, S. (2015) Cultivating positive feelings and attitudes: A path to prejudice reduction and ally behavior. Translational Issues in Psychological Science , 1(4), 372–381. Available from: doi:10.1037/tps0000049. Goodman, D. (2000). Motivating people from privileged groups to support social justice. Teachers College Record, 102(6), 1061-1085. Goodman, D. J. (2011). Promoting diversity and social justice: Educating people from privileged groups. Routledge. Goodson, I. F. (1991). History, context and qualitative method. In I. Goodson and R. Goodson, I. F. (1992a). Studying teachers’ lives: an emergent field of inquiry. In I. F. Goodson (Ed.), Studying teachers’ lives (pp.1-17). London: Routledge. Goodson, I. F. (1998). Storying the self: life politics and the study of the teacher’s life and work. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum: Toward new identities (pp.3-20). New York: Garland Publishing. Gough, B. (2018). Contemporary masculinities: Embodiment, emotion and wellbeing. New York: Springer. Gramsci, A. (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebook. London: Lawrence & Wishart. Griffith, K. H., & Hebl, M. R. (2002). The disclosure dilemma for gay men and lesbians: “Coming out” at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 1191-1199. Grzanka, P. R. (2019). " With allies like these...": Toward a sociology of straight allies. In Routledge International Handbook of Heterosexualities Studies (pp. 404-418). Routledge. Grzanka, P.R., Adler, J., and Blazer, J. (2015) Making up allies: The identity choreography of straight LGBT activism. Sexuality Research and Social Policy , 12(3), 165–181. Available from: doi:10.1007/s13178-014-0179-0. Gulker, J. E., Mark, A. Y., & Monteith, M. J. (2013). Confronting prejudice: The who, what, and why of confrontation effectiveness. Social Influence, 8(4), 280-293. Hale, H. C. (2007). Social representations of masculinities in the British Armed Forces (Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge). Hardiman, R., Jackson, B., & Griffin, P. (2013). Conceptual foundations for social justice education. In A. Maurianne, L. Bell, P. Griffin (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice (pp.35-66). New York; NY: Routledge Hartsock, N. C. (1984). Masculinity, citizenship, and the making of war. PS: Political Science & Politics, 17(2), 198-202. Hearn, J. (2004). From hegemonic masculinity to the hegemony of men. Feminist theory, 5(1), 49-72. Hearn, J. 2019. So What Has Been, Is, and Might Be Going on in Studying Men and Masculinities?: Some Continuities and Discontinuities. Men and Masculinities, 22, 53- 63. Hearn, J. and D.L. Collinson (1993) ‘Theorizing Unities and Differences between Men and between Masculinities’, pp. 97–118 in H. Brod and M. Kaufman (eds) Theorizing Masculinities. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Hearn, J., & Parkin, W. (2001). Gender, sexuality and violence in organizations: The unspoken forces of organization violations. Sage. Heggie, J. K. F. (2003). Uniform identity?: lesbians and the negotiations of gender & sexuality in the British Army since 1950 (Doctoral dissertation, University of York). Helms, J. (1995). An update of Helms’s white and people of color racial identity models. In J.Ponterotto, J. Casas, L. Suzuki, and C. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural counseling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Herbert, M. S. (1998). Camouflage isn`t only for combat: Gender, sexuality, and women in the military. NYU Press. Herek, G. M. (1986). On heterosexual masculinity: Some psychical consequences of the social construction of gender and sexuality. American behavioral scientist, 29(5), 563-577. Herek, G. M., & McLemore, K. A. (2013). Sexual prejudice. Annual review of psychology, 64, 309-333. Howard, A. (2011). Privileged pursuits of social justice: Exploring privileged collegestudents‘ motivation for engaging in social justice. Journal of College Student Character, 12(2), 1-14. doi:10.2202/1940-1639.1774 ILGA-Europe Annual Review. (2016). Annual Review of the Human Rights Situation of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex People in Europe Ingram, N., & Waller, R. (2014). Degrees of masculinity: Working and middle-class undergraduate students’ constructions of masculine identities. In S. Roberts (Ed.), Debating modern masculinities: change, continuity, crisis? (pp. 35–51). Palgrave Macmillan Pp: Basingstoke. Israel, T. (2012). 2011 society of counseling psychology presidential address: Exploring privilege in counseling psychology: Shifting the lens. The Counseling Psychologist, 40(1), 158-180. Ji, P. (2007). Being a heterosexual ally to the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered community: Reflections and development. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Psychotherapy, 11(3-4), 173-185. Johansson, T., & Andreasson, J. (2017). Fatherhood in transition: Masculinity, identity and everyday life. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Johansson, T., & Ottemo, A. (2015). Ruptures in hegemonic masculinity: the dialectic between ideology and utopia. Journal of gender studies, 24(2), 192-206. Johansson, T., & Ottemo, A. (2015). Ruptures in hegemonic masculinity: the dialectic between ideology and utopia. Journal of gender studies, 24(2), 192-206. Johnson, A. G. (2006). Privilege, power, and difference (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Johnson, J. and Best, A. (2012) Radical normals: The moral career of straight parents as public advocates for their gay children. Symbolic Interaction , 35(3), 321–339. Available from: doi:10.1002/SYMB.23. Jones, K. N., & Brewster, M. E. (2017). From awareness to action: Examining predictors of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) activism for heterosexual people. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 87(6), 680. Kaplan, D. (2007). Folk models of dyadic male bonds in Israeli culture. The Sociological Quarterly, 48(1), 47-72. Kaplan, D. (2018). Friendship and solidarity: The road not taken in the study of national attachment. In The nation and the promise of friendship (pp. 23-41). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. Karalekas, D. (2018). Civil-Military Relations in Taiwan: Identity and Transformation. Emerald Group Publishing. Katz, J., & Federici, D. (2018). Individual differences in heterosexual cisgender students’ responses to brief education about local LGBTQ+ safe zones. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 13(4), 411-424. Katz-Wise, S. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2012). Victimization experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals: A meta-analysis. Journal of sex research, 49(2-3), 142-167. Kestnbaum, M. (2000). Citizenship and compulsory military service: The revolutionary origins of conscription in the United States. Armed Forces & Society, 27(1), 7-36. Kestnbaum, M. (2009). The sociology of war and the military. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 235-254. Kiesling, S. F. (2005). Homosocial desire in men`s talk: Balancing and re-creating cultural discourses of masculinity. Language in Society, 34(5), 695-726. Kiesling, S. F. (2005). Homosocial desire in men`s talk: Balancing and re-creating cultural discourses of masculinity. Language in Society, 34(5), 695-726. Kimmel, M. S. (1994). Masculinity as homophobia. In H. Brod & M. Kaufman (eds.), Theorizing masculinities (pp. 119–141). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Kimmel, M. S. (2012). Gender of Desire, The: Essays on Male Sexuality, SUNY Press. King, A. (2006). The word of command: Communication and cohesion in the military. Armed Forces & Society, 32(4), 493-512. King, E. B., & Cortina, J. M. (2010). The social and economic imperative of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered supportive organizational policies. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 3(1), 69-78. Kite, M. E. (1984). Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexuals: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Homosexuality, 10(1/2), 69–81. Kong, T. S. (2016). The sexual in Chinese sociology: Homosexuality studies in contemporary China. The Sociological Review, 64(3), 495-514. Kühne, T. (2002). Comradeship: Gender confusion and gender order in the German military, 1918-1945. na. Kumashiro, K. (2002). Against repetition: Addressing resistance to anti-oppressive change in the practices of learning, teaching, supervising, and researching. Harvard Educational Review, 72(1), 67-93. Kumashiro, K. K. (2004). Uncertain beginnings: Learning to teach paradoxically. Theory into practice, 43(2), 111-115. Law, C. L., Martinez, L. R., Ruggs, E. N., Hebl, M. R., & Akers, E. (2011). Trans-parency in the workplace: How the experiences of transsexual employees can be improved. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79, 710_723. Lehne, G. K. (1976). Homophobia among men. The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role, 66-88. Levy, D. P. (2005). Hegemonic complicity, friendship, and comradeship: Validation and causal processes among white, middle-class, middle-aged men. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 13(2), 199-224. Liao, H. Y., Spanierman, L. B., Harlow, A. J., & Neville, H. A. (2017). Do parents matter? Examination of White college students’ intergroup experiences and attitudes. The Counseling Psychologist, 45(2), 193-212. Linder, C., & Johnson, R. C. (2015). Exploring the complexities of men as allies in feminist movements. Journal of Critical Thought and Praxis, 4(1). Lipman-Blumen, J. (1976). Toward a homosocial theory of sex roles: A explanation of the sex segregation of social institutions. M. M. Blaxall & B. Reagan (Eds.), Women and the workplace.( pp. 15–32.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Littlewood, R. (1997). Military rape. Anthropology Today, 13(2), 7-16. Lloren, A., & Parini, L. (2017). How LGBT-supportive workplace policies shape the experience of lesbian, gay men, and bisexual employees. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 14, 289-299. Lyman, P. (1987) The Fraternal Bond as a Joking Relationship, in: M. Kimmel (Ed.) Changing Men (London, Sage). MacCoun, R. J. (1996). Sexual orientation and military cohesion: A critical review of the evidence. University of Chicago Press. MacKenzie, M., & Foster, A. (2017). Masculinity nostalgia: How war and occupation inspire a yearning for gender order. Security Dialogue, 48(3), 206-223. Manning, F. J. (1991). Morale, cohesion, and esprit de corps. Marly, M., & Finch-Boyer, H. (2018). Does the army make the man? Reflections on the “military-virility model”(France, late nineteenth century). Clio. Women, Gender, History, (1), 229-247. Martin, B. J. (2011). Napoleonic Friendship: Military Fraternity, Intimacy, and Sexuality in Nineteenth-Century France. UPNE. Mathers, L.A.B., Sumerau, J.E., and Ueno, K. (2018) “This isn’t just another gay group”: Privileging heterosexuality in a mixed-sexuality LGBTQ advocacy group. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography , 47(6), 834–864. Available from: doi:10.1177/0891241615578905. McAllister, L., Callaghan, J., & Fellin, L. (2019). Masculinities and emotional expression in UK servicemen: ‘Big boys don’t cry’? Journal of Gender Studies 28(3), 257–70. doi:10.1080/09589236.2018.1429898 Mccormack, M. (2012) The Declining Significance of Homophobia: How Teenage Boys are Redefining Masculinity and Heterosexuality, Oxford, Oxford University Press. McGhee, D. (1998). Looking and acting the part: gays in the armed forces—a case of passing masculinity. Feminist Legal Studies, 6(2), 205-244. McIntosh, P. (2003). White privilege and male privilege: A personal account of coming tosee correspondences through work in women‘s studies. In M. S. Kimmel & A. L.Ferber (Eds.), Privilege: A reader (pp. 147-160). Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Messerschmidt, J. W. & Messner, M. A.(2018). Hegemonic, Nonhegemonic, and `New` Masculinities In: MESSERSCHMIDT, J. W., MARTIN, P. Y., MESSNER, M. A. & CONNELL, R. (eds.) Gender Reckonings: New Social Theory and Research. New York: New York University Press. Messerschmidt, J. W. (2000). Nine lives: Adolescent masculinities, the body and violence. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Messerschmidt, J. W. (2004). Flesh and blood: Adolescent gender diversity and violence. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Messner, M. A. (2007). The masculinity of the governator: Muscle and compassion in American politics. Gender & society, 21(4), 461-480. Messner, M. A. 2007. The Masculinity of the Governator: Muscle and Compassion in American Politics. Gender and Society, 21, 461-480. Meyerson, D. E., & Scully, M. A. (1995). Crossroads tempered radicalism and the politics of ambivalence and change. Organization Science, 6(5), 585-600. Midgett, A., Doumas, D. M., Trull, R., & Johnson, J. (2017). Training students who occasionally bully to be peer advocates: Is a bystander intervention effective in reducing bullying behavior? Journal of Child and Adolescent Counseling, 3, 1-13. Miles, M., & Crush, J. (1993). Personal narratives as interactive texts: collecting and interpreting migrant life-histories. The Professional Geographer, 45(1), 84-94. Mio, J. S., & Roades, L. A. (2003). Building bridges in the 21st century: Allies and the power of human connection across demographic divides. In Culturally Diverse Mental Health: The Challenges of Research and Resistance (pp. 105–117). Routledge. Montgomery, S.A. and Stewart, A.J. (2012) Privileged allies in lesbian and gay rights activism: Gender, generation, and resistance to heteronormativity. Journal of Social Issues , 68(1), 162–177. Available from: doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2012.01742.x. Morris, J. A., & Feldman, D. C. (1996). The dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of emotional labor. Academy of management review, 21(4), 986-1010. Mosse GL.(1990). Fallen Soldiers: Reshaping the Memory of the World Wars. New York: Oxford Univ. Press. Mosse, W. E. (1985). Jewish Marriage Strategies: The German Jewish Economic Elite. Studia Rosenthaliana, 188-202. Munin, A., & Speight, S. L. (2010). Factors influencing the ally development of college students. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43(2), 249-264. Murray, A., White, A., Scoats, R., & Anderson, E. (2016). Constructing masculinities in the national rugby league’s footy show. Sociological Research Online, 21(3), 69–82. Nagel, J. (1998). Masculinity and nationalism: Gender and sexuality in the making of nations. Ethnic and racial studies, 21(2), 242-269. O’Neill, R. (2015). Whither critical masculinity studies? Notes on inclusive masculinity theory, postfeminism, and sexual politics. Men and Masculinities, 18(1), 100–120. Olsen, B. (2010). Difficult dialogues: How white male graduate students in student affairs preparation programs make meaning of their whiteness, white privilege, and multiculturalism (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.proxy.lib.iastate.edu/docview/760990650/13AAD54A22D 16D9A7E0/1?accountid=10906 Perry, J. A. (2014). Changing schools of education through grassroots faculty-led change. Innovative Higher Education, 39(2), 155-168. Petersen, A. R., & Petersen, A. (1998). Unmasking the Masculine: Men`and Identity`in a Sceptical Age. Sage. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 90(5), 751-783. Phoenix, A., & Pattynama, P. (2006). intersectionality. European Journal of Women`s Studies, 13(3), 187-192. Polchar, J., Sweijs, T., Marten, P., & Galdiga, J. (2014). LGBT military personnel: A strategic vision for inclusion. The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies. Polkinghorne, D. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. In J. Hatch & R. Wisniewski (Eds.), Life history and narrative (pp. 5-24). London: The Falmer Press. Polkinghorne, D. E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Suny Press. Posen, B. R. (1993). Nationalism, the mass army, and military power. International security, 18(2), 80-124. Ragins, B. R., & Cornwell, J. C. (2001). Pink triangles: Antecedents and consequences of perceived workplace discrimination against gay and lesbian employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1244_1261. Rasinski, H. M., & Czopp, A. M. (2010). The effect of target status on witnesses` reactions to confrontations of bias. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32(1), 8-16. Reason, R. D., Broido, E. M., Davis, T. L., & Evans, N. J. (2005a). Editor’s notes. In R. D. Reason, E. M. Broido, T. L. Davis & N. J. Evans (Eds.), Developing social justice allies. New directions for student services, no. 110 (pp. 1–3). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Reed, L. C. (2012). The intersection of race and gender in school leadership for three Black female principals. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 25(1), 39-58. Rempel, M. W., & Fisher, R. J. (1997). Perceived threat, cohesion, and group problem solving in intergroup conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management. Reynolds, V. (2010). Fluid and imperfect ally positioning: Some gifts of queer theory. Context, 111, 13-17. Roberts, S. (2014). Introduction: Masculinities in Crisis? Opening the Debate. In: ROBERTS, S. (ed.) Debating modern masculinities: change, continuity, crisis? Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan. Roberts, S., Anderson, E., & Magrath, R. (2017). Continuity, change and complexity in the performance of masculinity among elite young footballers in England: Continuity, change and complexity in the performance of masculinity. The British Journal of Sociology, 68(2), 336–357. Roberts, S., Elliott, K., & Ralph, B. (2021). Absences, presences and unintended consequences in debates about masculinities and social change: a reply to Christofidou. NORMA, 16(3), 190-199. Rosen, H. (1987). Stories and meanings. National Association for the Teaching of English. Rostosky, S. S., Black, W. W., Riggle, E. D. B., & Rosenkrantz, D. (2015). Positive aspects of being a heterosexual ally to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people. American Journal of Orthnopsychiatry, 85, 331_338. Russell, G.M. (2011) Motives of heterosexual allies in collective action for equality. Journal of Social Issues , 67(2), 376–393. Russell, G.M. and Bohan, J. (2016) Institutional allyship and LGBT equality: Underlying processes and potentials for change. Journal of Social Issues , 72(2), 335–354. Available from: doi:10.1111/josi.12169. Salter, N. P., & Migliaccio, L. (2019). Allyship as a Diversity and Inclusion Tool in the Workplace. Diversity within Diversity Management. Sasson-Levy, O. (2003). Military, masculinity, and citizenship: Tensions and contradictions in the experience of blue-collar soldiers. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 10(3), 319-345. Scheer, J. R., & Poteat, V. P. (2016). Factors associated with straight allies` current engagement levels within Gay–Straight Alliances. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 43, 112-119. Schrock, D., & Schwalbe, M. (2009). Men, masculinity, and manhood acts. Annual review of sociology, 35, 277-295. Schwab, G. (2010). Haunting legacies: Violent histories and transgenerational trauma. Columbia University Press. Scully, M., & Rowe, M. (2009). Bystander training within organizations. Journal of the International Ombudsman Association, 2(1), 1-9. Segal, L. (1993). Changing men: Masculinities in context. Theory and society, 625-641. Shils, E. A., & Janowitz, M. (1948). Cohesion and disintegration in the Wehrmacht in World War II. Public opinion quarterly, 12(2), 280-315. Siebold, G. L. (1999). The evolution of the measurement of cohesion. Military psychology, 11(1), 5-26. Sikes, P., & Goodson, I. (2016). What have you got when you’ve got a life story?. In The Routledge international handbook on narrative and life history (pp. 70-81). Routledge. Smith, L., & Redington, R. M. (2010). Lessons from the experiences of white antiracist activists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 41, 541_549. Snyder, M. (2007). Crises of masculinity: Homosocial desire and homosexual panic in the critical Cold War narratives of Mailer and Coover. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, 48(3), 250-277. Snyder, M. (2007). Crises of masculinity: Homosocial desire and homosexual panic in the critical Cold War narratives of Mailer and Coover. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, 48(3), 250-277. Spanierman, L. B., & Smith, L. (2017). Roles and responsibilities for white allies: Implications for research, teaching, and practice. The Counseling Psychologist, 45, 606_617. Sue, D. W., Alsaidi, S., Awad, M. N., Glaeser, E., Calle, C. Z., & Mendez, N. (2019). Disarming racial microaggressions: Microintervention strategies for targets, White allies, and bystanders. American Psychologist, 74(1), 128. Suyemoto, K. L., & Hochman, A. L. (2021). “Taking the empathy to an activist state”: ally development as continuous cycles of critical understanding and action. Research in Human Development, 1-45. Sylvan, A. L. (2017). How Friendships between Heterosexual and Sexual Minority Counseling Psychology Doctoral Students Affect Anti-Heterosexist Identity Development. Thompson, C. (2005). Making parents: the ontological choreography of reproductive technologies. MIT Press. Tomsen, S. (2006). Homophobic violence, cultural essentialism and shifting sexual identities. Social & Legal Studies, 15(3), 389-407. Turner, R. N., Hewstone, M. & Voci, A. (2007). Reducing explicit and implicit outgroup prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 369-388. Van Gilder, B. J. (2019). Sexual Orientation Stigmatization and Identity Work for Gays, Lesbians, and Bisexuals in the US Military. Journal of homosexuality, 66(14), 1949-1973. Van Hoven, B., & Hörschelmann, K. (2005). Spaces of masculinities. Van Manen, M. (1994). Pedagogy, virtue, and narrative identity in teaching. Curriculum inquiry, 24(2), 135-170. Verweij, D. (2007). Comrades or friends? On friendship in the armed forces. Journal of Military Ethics, 6(4), 280-291. Vezzali, L., Hewstone, M., Capozza, D., Giovannini, D., & Wölfer, R. (2014). Improving intergroup relations with extended and vicarious forms of indirect contact. European Review of Social Psychology, 25(1), 314-389. Wadham, B. (2013). Brotherhood: Homosociality, totality and military subjectivity. Australian Feminist Studies, 28(76), 212-235. Walker (Eds.), Biography, identity & schooling: Episodes in educational research, 114-136. New York: The Falmer Press. Warren, M. A., Sekhon, T., & Waldrop, R. J. (2021). Highlighting Strengths in Response to Discrimination: Developing and Testing an Allyship Positive Psychology Intervention. Warren, M. A., Sekhon, T., Winkelman, K. M., & Waldrop, R. J. (2021). Should I ‘check my emotions at the door?’or express how I feel? Role of emotional regulation versus expression by leaders speaking out against prejudice in the workplace. Washington, J., & Evans, N. J. (1991). Becoming an ally. In Beyond tolerance: Gays, lesbians, and bisexuals on campus (pp. 195–204). Watt, S. K. (2007). Difficult Dialogues, Privilege and Social Justice: Uses of the Privileged Identity Exploration (PIE) Model in Student Affairs Practice. College student affairs journal, 26(2), 114-126. Watt, S. K. (2007). Difficult dialogues, privilege and social justice: Uses of the privileged identity exploration (PIE) model in student affairs practice. College student affairs journal, 26(2), 114. Wedgwood, N. (2009). Connell`s theory of masculinity–its origins and influences on the study of gender. Journal of gender studies, 18(4), 329-339. Wessel, J. L. (2017). The importance of allies and allied organizations: Sexual orientation disclosure and concealment at work. Journal of Social Issues, 73, 240_254. Whitehead, S. (2002) Men and Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity. Wong, L., Bliese, P., & McGurk, D. (2003). Military leadership: A context specific review. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 657-692. Wright, S. C., Aaron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T., & Ropp, S. A. (1997). The Extended Contact Effect: Knowledge of Cross-Group Friendships and Prejudice. Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes, 73(1), 73-90. 參、網路資料 Banyan( 2016年12月3日)Taiwan debates gay marriage. 取自https://reurl.cc/5GookR Irene Lei(2019年9月25日)。｢不男不女，有傷士氣」國軍同志情侶想結婚，與保家衛國的能力何干？出自https://womany.net/read/article/21334 國防部（2014）。國防部推動性別主流化執行計畫核定本（103-106 年度）。國防部：台北。取自 http://www.mnd.gov.tw>Publish 國防部（2019）。國防部108 年度性別平等成果報告。國防部：台北。取自http://www.mnd.gov.tw>Publish 孔子編年 (四庫全書本)/卷4。取自 https://reurl.cc/l90dmj 行政院（2002）。案由：本院羅委員世雄，針對國防部對於憲兵選員排除同性戀者事，特向行政院提出質詢。【專案質詢】，第5屆第1會期專案質詢軍事法制取自https://www.ey.gov.tw/Index.aspx 李志良(2017年11月12日)。軍校驚傳推廣同性戀？捍家盟：國防部飽暖思淫慾取自https://newtalk.tw/news/view/2017-11-22/104658 校園同志甦醒日(2017年1月14日)。《莒光園地》撥同志戀情 x 極端反同團體崩潰亂扯被打臉。取自https://www.facebook.com/TaiwanGLAD/posts/1363888353661332/ 高中生看世界(民110年3月14日)。以社會學視角解構「萬般皆下品，唯有讀書高」心態之形成及其影響。取自https://vocus.cc/@lookingbeyondborders/604e0c6dfd897800010a2e04#! 國防部（2019）。國防部性別平等推動計畫（108-111 年度）。國防部：台北。取自http://www.mnd.gov.tw>Publish 游美惠（民104年2月3日）。「異性戀霸權」是什麼？【巷仔口社會學】。取自：https://twstreetcorner.org>you... 程嘉文(110年3月8日)。國軍女性比例已達15.6% 空軍高達18.2%。聯合報，取自https://udn.com/news/story/10930/5302533 黎珍珍(2002年5月3日) 。軍方解禁「同志」可當憲兵。中國時報。取自：http://sex.ncu.edu.tw>blognews 肆、報紙資料成功嶺受訓學生染愛滋（1987年4月21日）。中央日報，第三版。患愛滋病青年仍留三總觀察（1987年7月25日）。中央日報，第三版。衛署擬與國防部合作對役男進行血清檢驗（1987年7月25日）。中央日報，第三版。軍中全面防範愛滋病（1987年8月1日）。中央日報，第三版。鄭雅嬪(1991年12月18日)。娼妓、受型人、役男、同性戀及毒癮注射者衛署決列為愛滋病強制篩檢對象。中央日報，綜合新聞版。
Description:	博士國立政治大學社會工作研究所 107264503
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107264503
Data Type:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU202201279
Appears in Collections:	[Graduate Institute of Social Administration and Social Work] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
450301.pdf		2547Kb	Adobe PDF2	0	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...