政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/137144
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51028312      Online Users : 985
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137144


    Title: 永續轉型歷程中創新類型與社會科技體制的互動與變遷─以丹麥能源轉型與風機產業為例
    The Interactions and Changes of Innovation Types and Socio-technical Regime in Sustainability Transitions Process: A Case Study of Danish Energy Transition and Wind Turbine Industry
    Authors: 王政憲
    Wang, Jeng-Shian
    Contributors: 許牧彥
    Hsu, Mu-Yen
    王政憲
    Wang, Jeng-Shian
    Keywords: 波特假說
    永續轉型
    社會科技體制
    創新類型
    創新政策
    Porter hypothesis
    Sustainability transitions
    Socio-technical regime
    Innovation types
    Innovation policies
    Date: 2021
    Issue Date: 2021-09-02 18:11:24 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 產業在經歷永續轉型如何同時兼顧環境保護與經濟競爭力？這是 Michael Porter 與 Claas van der Linde 於 1995 年所發表的論文的探討核心，後繼學者將其整理歸納為著名的「波特假說」。然而遺憾的是，如此理想性的期待，近三十年來卻少有實質性的內容補充。對此，本研究認為基進式創新是達成雙贏局面的關鍵。本研究的貢獻之一在於，以社會科技轉型的理論模型來彌補此文獻空缺，藉此重新檢視波特假說中所探討的幾個問題。同時我也發現轉型研究中缺乏對於「創新類型」的關照，因此本研究的另一貢獻在於釐清創新的類型，並探討產業在經歷永續轉型的過程中，創新類型、轉型路徑與雙贏局面之間的關聯。這些貢獻能適度彌補波特假說與社會科技轉型在理論上的不足。
    為了探究環境保護與經濟競爭力的雙贏局面如何發生，本研究選擇一個成功的歷史個案：以丹麥自 1972-2019 年間推動的能源產業轉型和風電設備產業發展為例。透過彙整大量的質性次級文獻，本研究將呈現此段期間所發生的關鍵事件、政策轉變、以及參與者互動等；接著使用多種量化數據來源，分析丹麥的電力產業的雙贏局面如何達成，以及風電設備產業在先行者優勢的建立。本研究得到的結果如下：首先，本研究發現創新類型中的基進式／分隔式創新為促成雙贏局面的關鍵。其次，永續轉型往往是以社會科技體制的根本翻轉為目標，進行逐步的調整──以轉型路徑來看，便是以「體制破壞」為最終目標，進行「體制延展」。由於任何轉型都會涉及既得利益的變動，因此一個穩定、可預測、逐步調整的轉型過程，似乎是造就產業在轉型後仍能保有經濟競爭力、同時達到環境保護的關鍵。最後，政府所提供的支持政策依照創新類型而有所差異。此外本研究也補充了先行者優勢的形成機制，並說明科技推力與需求拉力政策的併用對於延續先行者優勢的重要性，藉此指出波特假說中狹義強版本的論述瑕疵。
    How the industry make great balance on the environmental protection and economic competitiveness during the sustainability transitions is a core question that was explored by Michael Porter and Claas van der Linde in Journal of Economic Perspective, 1995; and it has come to be known as the "Porter hypothesis.” Such ideal expectancy, however, have unfortunately not been substantively complemented in the past 30 years. This study stresses that radical innovation is a critical point for achieving the win-win situation. One of the contributions of this study is to fill the research gap with socio-technical transitions theory, thereby revisiting several issues discussed in Porter hypothesis. I also find that there are a handful of discussions among the “innovation types” in the transition studies. So the other contribution of this study is to clarify the innovation types, and explore the relationship between innovation types, transition pathways and win-win situations in sustainability transitions process. These contributions can moderately make up for the theoretical shortcomings of both Porter hypothesis and socio-technical transitions theory.
    In order to explore how the win-win situation of environmental protection and economic competitiveness occurred, this study selects a successful historical case: the Danish energy transitions and wind power equipment industry development from 1972 to 2019. By compiling a large number of qualitative secondary literature, this research will try to present the key events, policy changes, and interactions among actors that occurred during this period; then, using a variety of quantitative data sources, analyze how Danish electricity sector achieve the win-win situation, and the establishment of the “first-mover advantage” in the wind power equipment industry. Here are pieces of our findings: First, we find that radical/segmenting innovation in the innovation types is a key to achieve a win-win situation. Secondly, sustainability transitions are often aimed at the fundamentally transition, and gradual adjustments are carried out. By the words of transition pathway, industries would conduct the “regime extension” with the ultimate goal of “regime disruption.” Any transition will involve changes in vested interests, so a stable, predictable, and gradual adjustment process seems to be the key to maintaining the economic competitiveness and environmental protection. Finally, the support policies provided by the government vary according to the innovation types. Moreover, this study also supplements the formation mechanism of the first-mover advantage, and explains the importance of the combined use of technology-push and demand-pull policies for the continuation of the first mover advantage, thereby pointing out the flaws in the narrowly strong version of the Porter hypothesis.
    Reference: 1. Abernathy, W. J., Clark, K. B., 1985. Innovation: mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy 14(1), 3–22.
    2. Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L., Hemous, D., 2012.  The Environment and Directed Technical Change. American Economic Review 102(1), 131–166.
    3. ACER/CEER, 2019. Annual Report on the Results of Monitoring the Internal Electricity and Natural Gas Markets in 2018. Ljubljana: ACER/CEER.
    4. Adner, R., Levinthal, D. A., 2001. The emergence of emerging technologies. California Management Review 45(1), 50–66.
    5. Afuah, A. N., Bahram, N., 1995. The hypercube of innovation. Research Policy 24(1), 51–76.
    6. Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., Rey, P., 1997. Corporate Governance, Competition Policy and Industrial Policy. European Economic Review 41, 797–805.
    7. Aghion, P., Howitt, P., 1992. A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60(2), 323–351.
    8. Akerlof, G. A., 1970. The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84(3), 488–500.
    9. Aldersey-Williams, J., Broadbent, I. D., Strachan, P. A., 2019. Better estimates of LCOE from audited accounts - A new methodology with examples from United Kingdom offshore wind and CCGT. Energy Policy 128,  25–35.
    10. Alexandros, P. N., Metaxas, T., 2016. “Porter vs Krugman”: History, Analysis and Critique of Regional Competitiveness. Journal of Economics and Political Economy 3(1), 65–80.
    11. Alkemade, F., Hekkert, M. P., Negro, S. O., 2011. Transition policy and innovation policy: friends or foes? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1(1), 125–129.
    12. Ambec, S., Barla, P., 2006. Can Environmental Regulations Be Good for Business? An Assessment of the Porter Hypothesis. Energy Studies Review, 14, 42–62.
    13. Ambec, S., Lanoie, P., 2008.  Does It Pay to Be Green? A Systematic Overview. Academy of Management Perspectives 23(4), 45–62.
    14. Ambec, S., Cohen, M., Elgie, S., Lanoie, P., 2013. The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness?. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 7(1), 2–22.
    15. Amit, R., Schoemaker, P. J. H., 1993. Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent. Strategic Management Journal 14(1), 33–46.
    16. Ang, J. B., 2007.  CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energy Policy 35(10), 4772–4778.
    17. Angelo, F. D., Jabbour, C. J. C., Galina, S. V., 2012. Environmental innovation: in search of a meaning. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development 8(2/3), 113–121.
    18. Appelt, S., Bajgar, M., Criscuolo, C., Galindo-Rueda, C., 2016. R&D Tax Incentives: Evidence on design, incidence and impacts. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 32. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlr8fldqk7j-en.
    19. Arimura, T., Hibiki, A., Johnstone, N., 2007. An Empirical Study of Environmental R&D: What Encourages Facilities to Be Environmentally-Innovative?. In: Johnstone, N. (Eds.), Corporate Behaviour and Environmental Policy, 142–173. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar in association with OECD.
    20. Arrow, K. J., 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for inventions. In: Nelson, R. (Eds.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, 609–626. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    21. Arthur, W. B., 1989. Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events. The Economic Journal 99(394), 116–131.
    22. Atalay, Y., Biermann, F., Kalfagianni, A., 2016.  Adoption of renewable energy technologies in oil-rich countries: Explaining policy variation in the Gulf Cooperation Council states. Renewable Energy 85, 206–214.
    23. Avelino, F., Grin, J., Pel, B., Jhagroe, S., 2016.  The politics of sustainability transitions. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 18(5), 557–567.
    24. Avelino, F., Wittmayer, J. M., 2016. Shifting Power Relations in Sustainability Transitions: A Multi-actor Perspective. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 18(5), 628–649.
    25. Basalla, G., 1988. The evolution of technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 
    26. Becker, R., Henderson, V., 2000. Effects of Air Quality Regulations on Polluting Industries. Journal of Political Economy 108(2), 379–421.
    27. Beerepoot, M., Beerepoot, N., 2007. Government regulation as an impetus for innovation: Evidence from energy performance regulation in the Dutch residential building sector. Energy Policy 35(10), 4812–4825. 
    28. Bento, N., Wilson, C., 2016.  Measuring the duration of formative phases for energy technologies. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 21, 95–112. 
    29. Bergek, A., Berggren, C., KITE Research Group, 2014.  The impact of environmental policy instruments on innovation: A review of energy and automotive industry studies. Ecological Economics 106, 112–123.
    30. Bergek, A., Berggren, C., Magnusson, T., Hobday, M., 2013. Technological discontinuities and the challenge for incumbent firms: Destruction, disruption or creative accumulation?. Research Policy 42(6-7), 1210–1224.
    31. Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., Rickne, A., 2008. Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy 37(3), 407–429.
    32. Bergek, A., Hekkert, M., Jacobsson, S., Markard, J., Sanden, B., Truffer, B., 2015.  Technological innovation systems in contexts: Conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics. Environmental Innovation & Societal Transitions 16, 51–64.
    33. Berggren, C., Magnusson, T., Sushandoyo, D., 2015. Transition pathways revisited: Established firms as multi-level actors in the heavy vehicle industry. Research Policy 44(5), 1017–1028.
    34. Berman E, Bui L. T. M., 2001. Environmental regulation and productivity: evidence from oil refineries. The Review of Economics and Statistics 83(3), 498–510.
    35. Blazquez, J., Fuentes-Bracamontes, R., Bollino, C. A., Nezamuddin, N., 2018.  The renewable energy policy Paradox. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Review 82, 1–5.
    36. Blegaa, S., Josephsen, L., Meyer, N. I., Sørensen, B., 1977. Alternative Danish energy planning. Energy Policy 5(2), 87–94.
    37. Bolinger, M., 2001. Community Wind Power Ownership Schemes in Europe and their Relevance to the United States. California: Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
    38. Borrás, S., Edquist, C., 2013.  The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80(8), 1513–1522.
    39. Bower, J. L., Christensen, C. M., 1995. Disruptive technologies: catching the wave. Harvard Business Review 73(1), 43–53.
    40. Boyd, G. A., McClelland, J. D., 1999. The Impact of Environmental Constraints on Productivity Improvement in Integrated Paper Plants. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 38(2), 121–142.
    41. Boyd, G. A, Pang, J. X., 2000. Estimating the linkage between energy efficiency and productivity. Energy Policy 28(5), 289–296.
    42. Breschi, S., Malerba, F., Orsenigo, L., 2000. Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. Economic Journal 110(463), 388–410.
    43. Brezis, E. S., Krugman, P. R., Tsiddon, D., 1993. Leapfrogging in International Competition: A Theory of Cycles in National Technological Leadership. American Economic Review 83(5), 1211–1219.
    44. Buchanan, J. M., 1987. The Constitution of Economic Policy. American Economic Review 77(3), 243–250.
    45. Buen, J., 2006. Danish and Norwegian wind industry: The relationship between policy instruments, innovation and diffusion. Energy Policy 34(18), 3887–3897.
    46. Burtraw, D., 2000. Innovation under the Tradable Sulfur Dioxide Emission Permits Program in the U.S. Electricity Sector. Discussion Paper 00-38. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
    47. Chandy, R. K., Tellis, G. J., 1998. Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize. Journal of Market Research 35(4), 474–487.
    48. Chandy, R. K., Tellis, G. J., 2000.  The incumbent`s curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing 64(3), 1–17.
    49. Chittum, A., Østergaard, P. A., 2014. How Danish communal heat planning empowers municipalities and benefits individual consumers. Energy Policy 7, 465–474.
    50. Christensen, C., 1997. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    51. Christensen, C. M., Bower, J. L., 1996. Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management Journal 17(3), 197–218.
    52. Christensen, C. M., McDonald, R., Altman, E. J., Palmer, J. E., 2018. Disruptive Innovation: An Intellectual History and Directions for Future Research. Journal of Management Studies 55(7), 1043–1078.
    53. Christensen, C. M., Ojomo, E., Dillon, K., 2019. The Prosperity Paradox: How Innovation Can Lift Nations Out of Poverty. NY: Harper Business.
    54. Christensen, C. M., Rosenbloom, R. S., 1995. Explaining the attacker`s advantage: technological paradigms, organizational dynamics, and the value network. Research Policy 24(2), 233–257.
    55. Christensen, C. M.,  Raynor, M. E., 2003. The innovator’s solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    56. Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M. E, McDonald R., 2015. What is disruptive innovation. Harvard Business Review 93(12), 44–53.
    57. Clark, K. B., 1985. The Interaction of Design Hierarchies and Market Concepts in Technological Evolution. Research Policy 14(5), 235–251.
    58. Coase, R., 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3, 1–44.
    59. Cohen, W. M., Goto, A., Nagata, A., Nelson, R. R., Walsh, J. R., 2002. R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States. Research Policy 31(8-9), 1349–1367.
    60. Cohen, W. M., Levinthal, D. A., 1990.  Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1), 128–152.
    61. Commission of the European Communities, 2006. A European Strategy for Sustainable, Competitive and Secure Energy. Brussels: European Commission.
    62. Cooper, A. C., Schendel, D., 1976. Strategic responses to technological threats. Business Horizons 19(1), 61–69.
    63. Costantini, V, Crespi F., 2008. Environmental regulation and the export dynamics of energy technologies. Ecological Economics 66(2-3), 447–460.
    64. Costantini, C., Mazzanti, V., 2012. On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness? The impact of environmental policies and innovation on EU exports. Research Policy 41(1), 132–153.
    65. Couture, T., Gagnon, Y., 2010. An analysis of feed-in tariff remuneration models: Implications for renewable energy investment. Energy Policy 38(2), 955–965.
    66. Cropper, M., Griffiths, C., 1994. The interaction of population growth and environmental quality. American Economic Review 84(2), 250–254.
    67. DAEC, 1958. Report on the Activities of the Danish Atomic Energy Commission up to 31 March 1957. Copenhagen: Danish Atomic Energy Commission.
    68. den Hertog, J. A., 1999. General theories of regulation. In: Bouckaert, B., De Geest, G. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of law and economics, 223–270. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
    69. DEA, 2017. Regulation and planning of district heating in Denmark. Copenhagen: Danish Energy Agency.
    70. DEA, 2019. Energy Statistics 2019. Copenhagen: Danish Energy Agency.
    71. DEA, 2020a. Liberalisation of the Danish power sector 1995-2020. Copenhagen: Danish Energy Agency.
    72. DEA, 2020b. Technology Data: Generation of Electricity and District heating (updated in April 2020). Copenhagen: Danish Energy Agency.
    73. Dechezleprêtre, A., Glachant, M., 2014. Does Foreign Environmental Policy Influence Domestic Innovation? Evidence from the Wind Industry. Environmental & Resource Economics 58(3), 391–413.
    74. Dechezleprêtre, A., Sato, M., 2017.  The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Competitiveness. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 11(2), 183–206. 
    75. Di Stefano, G., Gambardella, A., Verona, G., 2012.  Technology push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies: Current findings and future research directions. Research Policy 41(8), 1283–1295.
    76. Dosi, G., 1982. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy 11(3), 147–162.
    77. Dosi, G., 1988. The nature of the innovative process. In: Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., Soete, L.(Eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory, 221–238. London: Pinter Publishers.
    78. Dosi, G., Soete, L., 1983. Technology Gaps and Cost-based Adjustment: Some Explorations on the Determinants of International Competitiveness. Metroeconomica 35(3), 197–222.
    79. Dosi, G., Soete, L., 1991. Technological Innovation and International Competitiveness. In: Niosi, J. (Eds.), Technology and National Competitiveness, 91–118.
    80. Downing, P. B., White, L. J., 1986.  Innovation in Pollution Control. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 13(1), 18–29.
    81. Drezner, D. W., 2007. All Politics is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    82. Drezner, D. W., 2001. Globalization and Policy Convergence. International Studies Review 3(1), 53–78.
    83. Driesen, D., 2005. Economic Instruments for Sustainable Development. In: Wood, S., Richardson, B.(Eds.),  Environmental Law for Sustainability: A Critical Reader, 277–308. Oxford: Hart Publications.
    84. Ederington, J., Minier, J., 2004. Is environmental policy a secondary trade barrier? An empirical analysis. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d`économique 36(1), 137–154.
    85. EHP, 2011. Overview of DHC Legislative Framework. Brussels: Euroheat & Power.
    86. Eikeland, P. O., Inderberg, T. H. J., 2016. Energy system transformation and long-term interest constellations in Denmark: can agency beat structure?. Energy Research & Social Science 11, 164–173.
    87. Eisenhardt, K. M., 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
    88. Eisenhardt, K. M., 1991. Better Stories and Better Constructs: The Case for Rigor and Comparative Logic. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 620–627.
    89. Eisenhardt, K. M., Graebner, M. E., 2007. Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.
    90. Energinet, 2019. Security of Electricity Supply Report 2019. Erritsø: Energinet.
    91. EurObserv’ER, 2014-2019. The State of Renewable Energies in Europe (Edition 2014-2019). Paris: EurObserv’ER.
    92. Fagerberg, J., 1987. A technology gap approach to why growth rates differ. Research Policy 16(2–4), 87–99.
    93. Fagerberg, J.,1988. International Competitiveness. Economic Journal 98(391), 355–374.
    94. Fagerberg, J., 2017. Innovation Policy: Rationales, Lessons, and Challenges. Journal of Economic Surveys 31(2), 497–512. 
    95. Fagerberg, J., 2018. Mobilizing innovation for sustainability transitions: A comment on transformative innovation policy. Research Policy 47(9), 1568–1576.
    96. Fagerberg, J., Hutschenreiter, G., 2020. Coping with Societal Challenges: Lessons for Innovation Policy Governance. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 20, 279–305.
    97. Farla, J., Markard, J., Raven, R., Coenen, L., 2012.  Sustainability transitions in the making: A closer look at actors, strategies and resources. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79(6), 991–998.
    98. Finnemore, M., 1996. National Interests and International Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    99. Foray, D., Mowery, DC., Nelson, R. R., 2012. Public R&D and social challenges: What lessons from mission R&D programs?. Research Policy 41(10), 1697–1702.
    100. Foster, R. N., 1986. Innovation: The attacker`s advantage. New York: Summit Books.
    101. Freeman, C., 1987. Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan. London: Pinter Publishers.
    102. Freeman, C., 1995. The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics 19(1), 5–24.
    103. Freeman, C., Perez, C., 1988. Structural crisis of adjustment, business cycles and investment behaviour. In: Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., Soete, L. (Eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory, 38–66. London: Printer. 
    104. Fullerton, D., Stavins, R., 1998. How economists see the environment. Nature 395(6701), 433–434.
    105. Gallagher, K. S., 2006. Limits to leapfrogging in energy technologies? Evidence from the Chinese automobile industry. Energy Policy 34(4), 383–394.
    106. Geels, F. W., 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy 31(8-9), 1257–1274.
    107. Geels, F.W., 2004. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy 33(6-7), 897–920.
    108. Geels, F. W., 2005. Technological Transitions and System Innovations: A Co-evolutionary and Socio-technical Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    109. Geels, F. W., 2006. The hygienic transition from cesspools to sewer systems (1840–1930): the dynamics of regime transformation. Research Policy 35(7), 1069–1082.
    110. Geels, F. W., 2010. Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy 39(4), 495–510.
    111. Geels, F. W., 2011. The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1(1), 24–40. 
    112. Geels, F. W., 2014. Reconceptualising the co-evolution of firms-in-industries and their environments: Developing an inter-disciplinary Triple Embeddedness Framework. Research Policy 43(2), 261–277.
    113. Geels, F., 2018. Disruption and low-carbon system transformation: progress and new challenges in socio-technical transitions research and the Multi-Level Perspective. Energy Research & Social Science 37, 224–231.
    114. Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Fuchs, G., Hinderer, N., Kungl, G., Mylan, J., Neukirch, M., Wassermann, S., 2016. The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: A reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990-2014). Research Policy 45(4), 896–913.
    115. Geels, F. W., Schot, J., 2007.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy 36(3), 399–417.
    116. Geels, F. W., Schot, J. W., 2010. The dynamics of transitions: a socio-technical perspective. In: Grin, J., Rotmans, J., Schot, J., Geels, F. W., Loorbach, D. (Eds.), Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change, 9–101. New York: Routledge. 
    117. Ghisetti, C., Rennings, K., 2014. Environmental innovations and profitability: how does it pay to be green? An empirical analysis on the German innovation survey. Journal of Cleaner Production 75(15), 106–117.
    118. Giebel, G., Hasager, C. B., 2016. An Overview of Offshore Wind Farm Design. In: Ostachowicz, W., McGugan, M., Schröder-Hinrichs, J.U., Luczak, M. (Eds.), MARE-WINT: New Materials and Reliability in Offshore Wind Turbine Technology. Berlin: Springer.
    119. Gilbert, C. G., 2005. Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Academy of Management Journal 48(5), 741–763.
    120. Gilbert, C., Bower, J. L., 2002. Disruptive change. When trying harder is part of the problem. Harvard Business Review 80(5), 94–101.
    121. Goldthau, A., Sovacool, B. K., 2012. The Uniqueness of the Energy Security, Justice, and Governance Problem. Energy Policy 41, 232–240.
    122. Gollop, F. M., Roberts, M. J., 1983. Environmental regulations and productivity growth: the case of fossil‐fuelled electric power generation. Journal of Political Economy 91(4), 654–674.
    123. Gorroño-Albizu, L., Sperling, K., Djorup, S., 2019. The past, present and uncertain future of community energy in Denmark: Critically reviewing and conceptualising citizen ownership. Energy Research & Social Science 57, 101231.
    124. Gotchev, B., 2015. Market integration and the development of wind power cooperatives in Denmark. Lessons learned for Germany. https://publications.iass-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_1342056
    125. Grant, R. M., 2016. Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Text and Cases Edition, 9th Edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
    126. Gray, W. B., 1987. The Cost of Regulation: OSHA, EPA and the Productivity Slowdown. American Economic Review 77(5), 998–1006.
    127. Gray, W. B., Shadbegian, R. J., 1998. Environmental regulation, investment timing, and technology choice. Journal of Industrial Economics 46(2), 235–256.
    128. Green, S. G. Gavin, M. B., Aiman-Smith, L., 1995. Assessing a Multidimensional Measure of Radical Technological Innovation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 42(3), 203–214.
    129. Green, R., Newbery, D., 1992. Competition in the British Electricity Spot Market. Journal of Political Economy 100(5), 929–53.
    130. Greenhalgh, C., 1990. Innovation and Trade Performance in the United Kingdom. Economic Journal 100(400), 105–118.
    131. Greenstone, M., 2002. The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Industrial Activity: Evidence from the 1970 and 1977 Clean Air Act Amendments and the Census of Manufactures. Journal of Political Economy 110(6), 1175–1219.
    132. Griliches, Z., 1979. Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth. The Bell Journal of Economics 10(1), 92–116.
    133. Griliches, Z., 1992. The Search for R&D Spillovers. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94, 29–47.
    134. Grossman, G. M, Krueger, A. B., 1995. Economic environment and the economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (2), 353–377.
    135. Gruber, L., 2000. Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions. Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press.
    136. Hahn, R. W., 1989. Economic Prescriptions for Environmental Problems: How the Patient Followed the Doctor`s Orders. Journal of Economic Perspectives 3(2),  95–114.
    137. Hahn, R. W., Hester, G. L., 1989. Marketable Permits: Lessons from Theory and Practice. Ecology Law Quarterly 16(2), 361–406.
    138. Hahn, R. W., Stavins, R. N., 1992. Economic Incentives for Environmental Protection: Integrating Theory and Practice. American Economic Review 82(2), 464–468.
    139. Hall, P. A., Taylor, R. C., 1996. Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies 44(5), 936–957.
    140. Henderson, R. M., 2006. The innovator’s dilemma as a problem of organizational competence. Journal of Product Innovation Management 23(1), 5–11.
    141. Henderson, R. M., Clark, K.B., 1990. Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1), 9–30.
    142. Hess, D. J., 2014. Sustainability transitions: a political coalition perspective. Research Policy 43(2), 278–283.
    143. Hess, D. J., 2016. The politics of niche-regime conflicts: Distributed solar energy in the United States. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 19, 42–50.
    144. Heymann, M., 1998. Signs of hubris—The shaping of wind technology styles in Germany, Denmark, and the United States, 1940–1990. Technology and Culture 39(4), 641–670.
    145. Hickel, J., Kallis, G., 2020.  Is Green Growth Possible?. New Political Economy 25(4), 469–486.
    146. Hill, C. W. L., Rothaermel, F. T., 2003. The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Academy of Management Review 28(2), 257–274.
    147. Hirth, L., Ueckerdt, F., Edenhofer, O., 2016. Why Wind Is Not Coal: On the Economics of Electricity Generation. The Energy Journal 37(3), 1–27.
    148. Horbach, J., 2008.  Determinants of environmental innovation - New evidence from German panel data sources. Research Policy 37(1), 163–173.
    149. Horbach, J., Rammer, C., Rennings, K., 2012. Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact — The role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecological Economics 78, 112–122.
    150. Hu, J., Harmsen, R., Crijns-Graus, W., Worrell, E., van den Broek, M., 2018. Identifying barriers to large-scale integration of variable renewable electricity into the electricity market: A literature review of market design. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 81(2), 2181–2195.
    151. Hughes, T. P., 1987. The evolution of large technological systems. In: Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., Pinch, T. (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems. New directions in the sociology and history of technology, 51-82. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    152. Hvelplund, F., 2013. Innovative Democracy, Political Economy, and the Transition to Renewable Energy: A full-Scale Experiment in Denmark 1976-2013. Aplinkos Tyrimai, Inzinerija ir Vadyba 66(4), 5–20.
    153. Hvelplund, F., Østergaard, P. A., Meyer, N. I., 2017. Incentives and barriers for wind power expansion and system integration in Denmark. Energy Policy 107, 573–584.
    154. IEA, 2002. Renewable Energy Working Party 2002. Paris: International Energy Agency.
    155. IRENA, 2013. 30 Years of Policies for Wind Energy: Lessons from 12 Wind Energy Markets. Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency. https://www.irena.org/publications/2013/Jan/30-Years-of-Policies-for-Wind-Energy-Lessons-from-12-Wind-Energy-Markets
    156. IRENA, 2018. Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2018. Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency. 
    157. Isaksson, H. L., 2005. Abatement Costs in Response to the Swedish Charge on Nitrogen Oxide Emissions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 50(1), 102–120.
    158. Islam, M. M., Hasanuzzaman, M., 2020. Introduction to energy and sustainable development. Energy for Sustainable Development 1, 1–18.
    159. Jaffe, A. B., Newell, R. G., Stavins, R. N., 2002. Environmental policy and technological change. Environmental and Resource Economics 22(1-2), 41–69.
    160. Jaffe, A. B., Newell, R. G, Stavins, R., 2005. A tale of two market failures: technology and environmental policy. Ecological Economics 54(2-3), 164–174.
    161. Jaffe, A. B., Palmer, K., 1997. Environmental Regulation and Innovation: A Panel Data Study. Review of Economics and Statistics 79(4), 610–619.
    162. Jaffe, A. B., Peterson, S. R., Portney, P. R., Stavins, R. N., 1995. Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us?. Journal of Economic Literature 33(1), 132–163.
    163. Johnstone, N., Haščič, I., Popp, D., 2010.  Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts. Environmental & Resource Economics 45(1), 133–155.
    164. Johnstone, P., Rogge, K. S., Kivimaa, P., Fratini, C. F., Primmer, E., Stirling, A., 2020.  Waves of disruption in clean energy transitions: Sociotechnical dimensions of system disruption in Germany and the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science 59, 101287.
    165. Joskow, P. L., 2011. Comparing the costs of intermittent and dispatchable electricity generating technologies. American Economic Review 101(3), 238–241.
    166. Jung, C. H., Krutilla, K., Boyd, R., 1996. Incentives for Advanced Pollution Abatement Technology at the Industry Level: An Evaluation of Policy Alternatives. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30(1), 95–111.
    167. Junginger, M., van Sark, W., Faaij, A. (Eds.), 2010. Technological Learning in the Energy Sector: Lessons for Policy, Industry and Science. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    168. Kaldellis, J. K., Zafirakis, D., 2011. The wind energy (r)evolution: A short review of a long history. Renewable Energy 36, 1887–1901.
    169. Kamien, M. I., Schwartz, N. L., 1982. Market Structure and Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    170. Kammerer, D., 2009. The effects of customer benefit and regulation on environmental product innovation. Empirical evidence from appliance manufacturers in Germany. Ecological Economics 68(8-9), 2285–2295.
    171. Kamp, L. M., Smits, R. E. H. M., Andriesse, C. D., 2004.  Notions on learning applied to wind turbine development in the Netherlands and Denmark. 32(14), 1625–1637.
    172. Kaplan, S., Tripsas, M., 2008.  Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change. Research Policy 37(5), 790–805.
    173. Karnøe, P., Garud, R., 2012. Path Creation: Co-creation of Heterogeneous Resources in the Emergence of the Danish Wind Turbine Cluster. European Planning Studies 20(5), 733–752.
    174. Kauffman, S., 1995. At home in the universe: the search for laws of self-organization and complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    175. Kemp, R., 1994. Technology and the transition to environmental sustainability – the problem of technological regime shifts. Futures 26(10), 1023–1046.
    176. Kemp, R., Schot, J. W., Hoogma, R., 1998. Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 10(2), 175–195.
    177. Kennedy, P., 1994. Innovation stochastique et coût de la réglementation environnementale. L’Actualité économique 70(2), 199–209.
    178. Kern, F., 2011. Ideas, institutions, and interests: explaining policy divergence in fostering ‘system innovations’ towards sustainability. Environment Planning C: Government Policy 29, 1116–1134.
    179. Kern, F., Howlett, M., 2009. Implementing transition management as policy reforms: a case study of the Dutch energy sector. Policy Science 42(4), 391–408.
    180. Kern, F., Smith, A., 2008. Restructuring energy systems for sustainability? Energy transition policy in the Netherlands?. Energy Policy 36(11), 4093–4103.
    181. Kivimaa, P., Kern, F., 2016.  Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Research Policy 45(1), 205–217.
    182. Kivimaa, P., Laakso, S., Lonkila, A., Kaljonen, M., 2021.  Moving beyond disruptive innovation: A review of disruption in sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 38, 110–126.
    183. Klein, B. H., 1977. Dynamic Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    184. Klenner, P., Hüsig, S., Dowling, M., 2013. Ex-ante evaluation of disruptive susceptibility in established value networks—when are markets ready for disruptive innovations?. Research Policy 42(4), 914–927.
    185. Klepper, S., 1997. Industry life cycles. Industrial and Corporate Change 6(1), 145–181.
    186. Klevorick, A. K., R. Levin, R. R. Nelson, Winter, S., 1995. On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy 24(2), 195–205.
    187. Klitkou, A., Bolwig, S., Hansen, T., Wessberg, N., 2015. The role of lock-in mechanisms in transition processes: The case of energy for road transport. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 16, 22–37.
    188. Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., Boons, F., Fünfschilling, L., Hess, D., Holtz, G., Hyysalo, S., Jenkins, K., Kivimaa, P., Martiskainen, M., McMeekin, A., Mühlemeier, M. S., Nykvist, B., Pel, B., Raven, R., Rohracher, H., Sanden, B., Schot, J., Sovacool, B., Turnheim, B., Welch, D., Wells, P., 2019. An agenda for sustainability transitions research: state of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 31, 1–32.
    189. Kriegler, E., Weyant, J. P., Blanford, G. J., Krey, V., Clarke, L., Edmonds, J., Fawcett, A., Luderer, G., Riahi, K., Richels, R., Rose, S. K., Tavoni, M., van Vuuren, D. P., 2014.  The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies. Climate Change 123(3–4), 353–367.
    190. Krog, L., Sperling, K., 2019. A comprehensive framework for strategic energy planning based on Danish and international insights. Energy Strategy Reviews 24, 83–93. 
    191. Krohn, S., 2002a. Danish Wind Turbines: An Industrial Success Story. Copenhagen: Danish Wind Industry Association.
    192. Krohn, S., 2002b. Wind Energy Policy in Denmark: 25 years of success-what now?. Copenhagen: Danish Wind Industry Association.
    193. Krugman, P. R., 1996. Making Sense of the Competitiveness Debate. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 12(3), 17–25.
    194. Lacal-Arántegui, R. Globalization in the wind energy industry: contribution and economic impact of European companies. Renewable Energy 134, 612–628.
    195. Lam, L. T., Branstetter, L., Azevedo, I. M. L., 2017. China`s wind industry: Leading in deployment, lagging in innovation. Energy Policy 106, 588–599.
    196. Lanjouw, J. O., Mody, A., 1996. Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology. Research Policy 25(4), 549–571.
    197. Lankoski, L., 2010. Linkages between Environmental Policy and Competitiveness. OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 13. Paris: OECD Publishing.
    198. Lanoie, P., Laurent-Lucchetti, J., Johnstone, N., Ambec, S., 2011. Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance: New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 20(3), 803–842.
    199. Lee, K., Malerba, F., 2017. Catch-up cycles and changes in industrial leadership:Windows of opportunity and responses of firms and countries in the evolution of sectoral systems. Research Policy 46(2), 338–351.
    200. Lehtonen, M., Nye, S., 2009. History of electricity network control and distributed generation in the UK and Western Denmark. Energy Policy 37(9), 2338–2345.
    201. Leiter, A. M., Parolini, A., Winner, H., 2011. Environmental regulation and investment: Evidence from European industry data. Ecological Economics 70(4), 759–770.
    202. Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G., Gilbert, R., Griliches, Z., 1987. Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 3, 783–831.
    203. Levinson, A., 2010. Offshoring pollution: Is the US increasingly importing pollution intensive production? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 4(1), 63–83. 
    204. Levinson, A., Taylor, M., 2008. Unmasking the pollution haven effect. International Economic Review 49(1), 223–254.
    205. Levinthal, D. A., 1998. The slow pace of rapid technological change: gradualism and punctuation in technological change. Industrial and Corporate Change 7(2), 217–247.
    206. Lewis, J. I., Wiser, R. H., 2007. Fostering a renewable energy technology industry: An international comparison of wind industry policy support mechanisms. Energy Policy 35(3), 1844–1857.
    207. Lieberman, M. B., Montgomery, D. B., 1988. First-Mover Advantages. Strategic Management Journal  9, 41–58. 
    208. Lipp, J., 2007. Lessons for effective renewable electricity policy from Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom. Energy Policy 35(11), 5481–5495.
    209. Lockwood, M., 2015. Heat and the Community: The Institutional Roots of Danish Energy Conversion Efficiency. http://projects.exeter.ac.uk/igov/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ML-Heat-and-the-City-Community.pdf
    210. Loorbach, D., 2010.  Transition Management for Sustainable Development: A Prescriptive, Complexity-Based Governance Framework. Governance-An International Journal Of Policy Administration And Institutions 23(1), 161–183.
    211. Lundvall, B. A., 1988. Innovation as an Interactive Process: From User-Producer Interaction to the National System of Innovation. In: Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R. R., Silverberg, G., Soete, L. L. G. (Eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory, 349–369. London: Frances Pinter.
    212. Lundvall, B. A., 1992. National Systems of Innovation—Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
    213. Mani, M., Wheeler, D., 1998. In Search of Pollution Havens? Dirty Industry in the World Economy: 1960-1995. Journal of Environment and Development 7(3), 215–247.
    214. March, J. G., 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2(1),  71–81.
    215. Markard, J., Raven, R., Truffer, B., 2012.  Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy 41(6), 955–967.
    216. Markard, J., Suter, M., Ingold, K., 2016. Socio-technical transitions and policy change - Advocacy coalitions in Swiss energy policy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 18, 215–237.
    217. Markard, J., Truffer, B., 2006. Innovation processes in large technical systems: Market liberalization as a driver for radical change?. Research Policy 35(5), 609–625.
    218. Markard, J., Truffer, B., 2008.  Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy 37(4), 596–615.
    219. Martínez, D. M., Ebenhack, B. W., Wagner, T. P., 2019. Energy efficiency: concepts and calculations. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
    220. Mazzoleni, R., Nelson, R. R., 1998. The benefits and costs of strong patent protection. Research Policy, 27(3), 273–284.
    221. Mazzucato, M., 2016. From market fixing to market-creating: a new framework for innovation policy. Industry and Innovation 23(2), 140–156.
    222. Mazzucato, M., 2018.  Mission-oriented innovation policies: challenges and opportunities. Industrial and Corporate Change 27(5), 803–815.
    223. McDowall, W., 2018.  Disruptive innovation and energy transitions: Is Christensen`s theory helpful?. 
    224. McGuire, M. C. 1982. Regulation, factor rewards, and international trade. Journal of Public Economics 17(3), 335–354.
    225. Meadowcroft, J., 2007. Who is in charge here? Governance for sustainable development in a complex world. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 9(3-4), 299–314.
    226. Meadowcroft, J., 2011. Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1, 70–75..
    227. Mendonça, M., Lacey, S., Hvelplund, F., 2009. Stability, participation and transparency in renewable energy policy: lessons from Denmark and the United States. Policy and Society 27, 379–398.
    228. Meyer, N. I., 2007. Learning from Wind Energy Policy in the EU: Lessons from Denmark, Sweden and Spain. European Environment 17, 347–362.
    229. Milliman, S. R., Prince, R., 1989.  Firm Incentives to Promote Technological Change in Pollution Control. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 17(3), 247–265.
    230. Mitchell, C., 2016. Momentum is increasing towards a flexible electricity system based on renewables. Nature Energy 1, 15030.
    231. Moe, E., 2017. Does politics matter? Explaining swings in wind power installations. AIMS Energy 5(3), 341–373.
    232. Mohr, R. D., 2002. Technical change, external economies, and the Porter hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 43(1), 158–168.
    233. Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., 1999. Sources of Industrial Leadership: Studies of Seven Industries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    234. Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Martin, B. R., 2010. Technology policy and global warming: Why new policy models are needed (or why putting new wine in old bottles won’t work). Research Policy 39(8), 1011–1023.
    235. Mowery, D. C., Rosenberg, N., 1979. The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies. Research Policy 8(2), 102–153. 
    236. Murphy, D. D., 2004. The Structure of Regulatory Competition: Corporations and Public Policy in a Global Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    237. Murphy, J., Gouldson, A., 2000. Environmental policy and industrial innovation: integrating environment and economy through ecological modernisation. Geoforum 31(1), 33–44.
    238. Nelson, R. R., 1990. Capitalism as an engine of progress. Research Policy 19(3), 193-214.
    239. Nelson, R. R., 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    240. Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G., 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    241. Nemet, G. F., 2009. Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change. Research Policy 38(5), 700–709.
    242. Nesta, L., Vona, F., Nicolli, F., 2014. Environmental policies, competition and innovation in renewable energy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 67(3), 396–411.
    243. Newbery, D., 2006. Electricity Liberalization in Britain and the Evolution of Market Design. In: Sioshansi, F., Pfaffenberger, W. (Ed.), Electricity Market Reform: An International Perspective, 109–144. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
    244. Newbery, D., Pollitt, M., 1997. The Restructuring and Privatization of Britain’s CEGB – Was it Worth It? Journal of Industrial Economics 45(3), 269–303.
    245. Newell, R. G., 2010. The role of markets and policies in delivering innovation for climate change mitigation. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 26(2), 253–269.
    246. Newell, R. G., Wilson, N., 2005. Technology Prizes for Climate Mitigation. RFF discussion paper 05-33. Washington, DC: Resource for Future. https://media.rff.org/documents/RFF-DP-05-33.pdf
    247. Nielsen, V. V., 2017. The Danish Wind Cluster: The Microeconomics of Competitiveness. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
    248. Nielsen, H., Knudsen, H., 2010. The troublesome life of peaceful atoms in Denmark. History and Technology 26(2), 91–118.
    249. Niosi, J., Reid, S. E., 2007. Biotechnology and nanotechnology: Science-based enabling technologies as windows of opportunity for LDCs?. World Development 35(3), 426–438.
    250. Noailly, J., 2012. Improving the energy efficiency of buildings: the impact of environmental policy on technological innovation. Energy Economics 34(3), 795–806.
    251. Nyborg, S., Røpke, I., 2015. Heat pumps in Denmark-From ugly duckling to white swan. Energy Research & Social Science 9, 166–177.
    252. Oatley, T., 2019. International Political Economy. London: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
    253. OECD, 2000. Regulatory Reform in Denmark: Regulatory Reform in the Electricity Sector. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
    254. OECD, 2005. Environmentally Harmful Subsidies: Challenges for Reform. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
    255. OECD, 2014. Tax incentives for R&D and innovation. In: OECD, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2014. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development . https://doi.org/10.1787/sti_outlook-2014-18-en.
    256. OECD, 2015. Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development. Paris: OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239012-en.
    257. OECD/Eurostat, 2019. Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th Edition, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. Paris: OECD Publishing/Luxembourg: Eurostat. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en
    258. Olson, M. L., 1971. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    259. O`Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. 2008. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator`s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior 28, 185–206.
    260. Palmer, K., Oates, W. E., Portney, P. R., 1995. Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm?. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(4), 119–132.
    261. Patlitzianas, K. D., Doukas, H., Psarras, J., 2006.  Enhancing renewable energy in the Arab States of the Gulf: Constraints & efforts. Energy Policy 34(18), 3719–3726.
    262. Pavitt, K., 1982. R&D, patenting and innovative activities: A statistical exploration. Research Policy 11(1), 33–51.
    263. Penna, C. C. R., Geels, F. W., 2012. Multi-dimensional struggles in the greening of industry: A dialectic issue lifecycle model and case study. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 79(6), 999–1020.
    264. Pepermans, G., 2018. European energy market liberalization: experiences and challenges. International Journal of Economic Policy Studies 13(1), 3–26.
    265. Perez, C., Soete, L., 1988. Catching-up in technology: entry barriers and windows of opportunity. In: Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., Soete, L. (Eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory, 458–479. London: Pinter Publishers..
    266. Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Brostrom, A., D`Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., Krabel, S., Kitson, M., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F., Salter, A., Sobrero, M., 2013. Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy 42(2), 423–442.
    267. Peters, M., Schneider, M., Griesshaber, T., Hoffmann, V. H., 2012. The impact of technology-push and demand-pull policies on technical change – Does the locus of policies matter? Research Policy 41(8), 1296–1308. 
    268. Petersen, H. J. S., 1993. Succession of Technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 43, 177–183.
    269. Pigou, A., 1938. The Economics of Welfare, 4th ed. London: Macmillan.
    270. Pollitt, M. G., 2019. The European Single Market in Electricity: An Economic Assessment. Review of Industrial Organization 55(1), 63–87.
    271. Popp, D., 2002. Induced innovation and energy prices. American Economic Review 92(1), 160–180.
    272. Porter, M. E., 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Harvard Business Review 68(2), 73–93.
    273. Porter, M. E., 2000.  Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly 14(1), 15–34.
    274. Porter, M. E., van der Linde, C., 1995a. Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review 73(5), 120–34.
    275. Porter, M. E., van der Linde, C., 1995b. Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(4), 97–118.
    276. Portney, P. R., 2007. Market-Based Approaches to Environmental Policy: A “Refresher” Course. In: Visgilio, G. R., Whitelaw, D. M. (Eds.), Acid in the Environment, 225–231. Boston, MA: Springer.
    277. Posner, M. V., 1961. International Trade and Technical Change. Oxford Economic Papers, 13(3), 323–341.
    278. Poulsen, T., Lema, R., 2017. Is the supply chain ready for the green transformation? The case of offshore wind logistics. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 73, 758–771.
    279. Prakash, A., Potoski, M., 2006. Racing to the bottom? Trade, environmental governance, and ISO 14001. American Journal of Political Science 50(2), 350–364.
    280. Praktiknjo, A., Erdmann, G., 2016.  Renewable Electricity and Backup Capacities: An (Un-) Resolvable Problem?. Energy Journal 37, 89–106.
    281. Raven, R. P. J. M., Verbong, G. P. J., 2009. Boundary crossing innovations: Case studies from the energy domain. Technology in Society 31(1), 85–93.
    282. Reiche, D., 2010.  Energy Policies of Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries-possibilities and limitations of ecological modernization in rentier states. 38(5), 2395–2403.
    283. Rennings, K., 2000. Redefining innovation – eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics 32(2), 319–332.
    284. Rennings, K., Ziegler, A., Ankele, K., Hoffmann, E., 2006. The influence of different characteristics of the EU environmental management and auditing scheme on technical environmental innovations and economic performance. Ecological Economics 57(1), 45–59.
    285. Rexhäuser, S., Rammer, C., 2014. Environmental Innovations and Firm Profitability: Unmasking the Porter Hypothesis. Environmental and Resource Economics 57, 145–167.
    286. Rip, A., 1995. Introduction of new technology: making use of recent insights from sociology and economics of technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 7(4), 417–431.
    287. Rip, A., Kemp, R., 1998. Technological change. In: Rayner, S., Malone, E. (Eds.), Human Choice and Climate Change, vol. 2, pp. 327–399. Columbus, Ohio: Battelle Press.
    288. Roberts, C., 2017. Discursive destabilisation of socio-technical regimes: negative storylines and the decline of the American railroads, Energy Research & Social Science 31, 86–99.
    289. Roberts, C., Geels, F. W., 2019. Conditions and intervention strategies for the deliberate acceleration of socio-technical transitions: lessons from a comparative multi-level analysis of two historical case studies in Dutch and Danish heating. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 31(9), 1081–1103.
    290. Robison, H. D., 1988. Industrial Pollution Abatement: The Impact on the Balance of Trade. Canadian Journal of Economics 21(1), 187–199.
    291. Rogelj, J., Luderer, G., Pietzcker, R. C., Kriegler, E., Schaeffer, M., Krey, V., Riahi, K., 2015.  Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 degrees C. Nature Climate Change 5(6), 519–528.
    292. Rogers, E. M. 1995. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
    293. Rogge, K. S., Reichardt, K., 2016. Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis. Research Policy 45(8), 132–147.
    294. Rogoski, R., 1987. Trade and the variety of democratic institutions. International Organization 41(2), 203–223.
    295. Ropenus, S., Jacobsen, H. K., 2015. A Snapshot of the Danish Energy Transition: Objectives, Markets, Grid, Support Schemes and Acceptance. Study. Agora Energiewende. http://www.agora-energiewende.de/en/topics/-agothem-/Produkt/produkt/233/A+Snapshot+of+the+Danish+Energy+Transition/
    296. Rosenkopf, L., Tushman, M. L., 1998. The coevolution of community networks and technology: lessons from the flight simulation industry. Industrial and Corporate Change 7(2), 311–346.
    297. Rothaermel, F. T., 2001. Incumbent’s advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management Journal 22(6–7), 687–699.
    298. Rothwell, R., 1982. Government innovation policy: Some past problems and recent trends. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 22(1), 3–30.
    299. Rotmans, J., Kemp, R., van Asselt, M., 2001. More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy. Foresight 3(1), 15–31.
    300. Rubashkina, Y., Galeotti, M., Verdolini, E., 2015.  Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors. Energy Policy 83, 288–300.
    301. Rudberg, M., Waldemarsson, M., Lidestam, H., 2013. Strategic perspectives on energy management: A case study in the process industry. Applied Energy 104, 487–496.
    302. Rüdiger, M., 2014. The 1973 Oil Crisis and the Designing of a Danish Energy Policy. Historical Social Research 39(4), 94–112.
    303. Rüdiger, M., 2019. From import dependence to self-sufficiency in Denmark, 1945−2000. Energy Policy 125, 82–89. 
    304. Ryland, E., 2010. Danish wind power policy: domestic and international forces. Environmental Politics 19(1), 80–85.
    305. Sabatier, P., Weible, C., 2007. The advocacy coalition framework: innovations and clarifications. In: Sabatier, P. A. (Eds.), Theories of the Policy Process, 189–220. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
    306. Saidur, R., Islam, M. R., Rahim, N. A., Solangi, K. H., 2010. A review on global wind energy policy. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 14(7), 1744–1762.
    307. Scharpf, F. W., 1997. Introduction: the problem- solving capacity of multi-level governance. Journal of European Public Policy 4(4), 520–538.
    308. Schot, J., Geels, F. W., 2007. Niches in evolutionary theories of technical change - A critical survey of the literature. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 17(5), 605–622.
    309. Schot, J., Geels, F. W., 2008. Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20(5), 537–554.
    310. Schot, J., Hoogma, R., Elzen, B., 1994. Strategies for shifting technological systems. The case of the automobile system. Futures 26(10), 1060–1076.
    311. Schot, J., Steinmueller, W. E., 2018.  Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy 47(9), 1554–1567.
    312. Schumpeter, J. A., 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. MA: Harvard University Press.
    313. Schumpeter, J. A., 1942. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper.
    314. Selden, T. M., Song, D., 1995. Neoclassical growth, the J curve for abatement and the inverted U for pollution. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29(2), 162–168.
    315. Seyfang, G., Haxeltine, A., 2012. Growing grassroots innovations: exploring the role of community-based initiatives in governing sustainable energy transitions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 30(3), 381–400.
    316. Seyfang, G., Smith, A., 2007. Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda. Environmental Politics 16(4), 584–603.
    317. Shahbaz, M., Hye, Q. M. A., Tiwari, A. K., Leitao, N. C., 2013.  Economic growth, energy consumption, financial development, international trade and CO2 emissions in Indonesia. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 25, 109–121.
    318. Sharman, J. C., 2008. Power and discourse in policy diffusion: Anti-money laundering in developing states. International Studies Quarterly 52(3), 635–656.
    319. Simmons, B., 2001. The international politics of harmonization: The case of capital market regulation. International Organization 55(3), 589–620.
    320. Smit, T., Junginger, M., Smits, R., 2007.  Technological learning in offshore wind energy: Different roles of the government. Energy Policy 35(12),  6431–6444.
    321. Smith, A., 2007.  Translating sustainabilities between green niches and socio-technical regimes. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 19(4), 427–450.
    322. Smith, A., Kern, F., 2009. The transitions storyline in Dutch environmental policy. Environmental Politics 18(1), 78–98.
    323. Smith, A., Raven, R., 2012. What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy 41(6), 1025–1036.
    324. Smith, A., Stirling, A., Berkhout, F., 2005. The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy 34(10), 1491–1510.
    325. Smith, A., Voß, J. P., Grin, J., 2010.  Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges. Research Policy 39(4), 435–448.
    326. Smits, R., Kuhlmann, S., 2005. The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy. International  Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 1(1/2), 4–32.
    327. Soete, L. G., 1981. A General Test of Technological Gap Trade Theory. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 117(4), 638–660.
    328. Sovacool, B. K., 2013. Energy policymaking in Denmark: Implications for global energy security and sustainability. Energy Policy 61, 829–839.
    329. Sovacool, B. K., 2016. How long will it take? Conceptualizing the temporal dynamics of energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Change 13, 202–215.
    330. Sovacool, B. K., Blyth, P. L., 2015. Energy and environmental attitudes in the green state of Denmark: Implications for energy democracy, low carbon transitions, and energy literacy. Energy Science & Policy 54, 304–315.
    331. Sovacool, B. K., Tambo, T., 2016. Comparing consumer perceptions of energy security, policy, and low-carbon technology: Insights from Denmark. Energy Research & Social Science 11, 79–91.
    332. Soytas, U., Sari, R., Ewing, B. T., 2007.  Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States. Ecological Economics 62(3-4), 482–489.
    333. Stavins, R. N., 1998. What can we learn from the grand policy experiment? Lessons from SO2 allowance trading. Journal of Economic Perspective 12(3), 69–88.
    334. Stavins, R. N., 2000. Market-Based Environmental Policies. In: Portney, P. R., Stavins, R. N. (Eds.), Public Policies for Environmental Protection, 31–76. Washington DC: Resources for the Future.
    335. Stavins, R. N., 2003. Experience with Market-Based Environmental Policy Instruments. In: Mäler, K., Vincent, J. R. (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Economics, Volume 1, 355–435. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
    336. Stern, N., 2008.  The economics of climate change. American Economic Review 98(2), 1–37.
    337. Steward, F., 2012. Transformative innovation policy to meet the challenge of climate change: sociotechnical networks aligned with consumption and end-use as new transition arenas for a low-carbon society or green economy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 24(4), 331–343.
    338. Strang, D., Meyer, J. W., 1993. Institutional Conditions for Diffusion. Theory and Society 22(4), 487–511.
    339. Suarez, F. F., Oliva, R., 2005.  Environmental change and organizational transformation. Industrial and Corporate Change 14(6), 1017–1041.
    340. Teece, D. J., 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy 15(6), 285–305.
    341. Telle, K., Larsson, J., 2007. Do environmental regulations hamper productivity growth? How accounting for improvements of plants` environmental performance can change the conclusion. Ecological Economics 61(2–3), 438–445.
    342. Tellis, G. J., 2006. Disruptive technology or visionary leadership?. Journal of Product Innovation Management 23(1), 34–38.
    343. Thurow, L., 1992. Head to Head: The Coming Economic Battle among Japan, Europe, and America. New York, NY: William Morrow & Co.
    344. Ting, M. B., Byrne, R., 2020. Eskom and the rise of renewables: Regime-resistance, crisis and the strategy of incumbency in South Africa`s electricity system. Energy Research & Social Science 60, 101333.
    345. Tõnurist, P., 2015. Framework for analysing the role of state owned enterprises in innovation policy management: The case of energy technologies and Eesti Energia. Technovation 38, 1–14.
    346. Tripsas, M., 1997.  Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management Journal 18, 119–142.
    347. Turnheim, B., Geels, F. W., 2012. Regime destabilisation as the flipside of energy transitions: lessons from the history of the British coal industry (1913–1997). Energy Policy 50, 35–49.
    348. Turnheim, B., Geels, F. W., 2013. The destabilisation of existing regimes: Confronting a multi-dimensional framework with a case study of the British coal industry (1913–1967). Research Policy 42(10), 1749–1767.
    349. Tushman, M., Anderson, P., 1986. Technological discontinuities and organization environments. Administrative Science Quarterly 31, 465–493.
    350. Tushman, M. L., O`Reilly, C. A., 1996. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review 38(4), 8–30.
    351. Tyson, L. D`A., 1992. Who`s Bashing Whom: Trade Conflict in High Technology Industries. Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.
    352. UNEP, 2019. Emissions Gap Report 2019. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.
    353. Unruh, G. C., 2000. Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28(12), 817–830.
    354. Urpelainen, J., 2011. A California effect for international environmental externalities? International Interactions 37(2), 170–189.
    355. Utterback, J. M., Abernathy, W. J., 1975. A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega 3(6), 639–656.
    356. Van de Ven, A. H., Garud, R., 1993. The coevolution of technical and institutional events in the development of an innovation. In: Baum, J. A. C., Singh, J. (Eds.), Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    357. van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., 2011. Energy conservation more effective with rebound policy. Environmental Resource Economics 48(1), 43–58.
    358. van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., 2017.A third option for climate policy within potential limits to growth. Nature Climate Change 7(2), 107–112.
    359. van der Vleuten, E., Raven, R., 2006: Lock-in and change: Distributed generation in Denmark in a long-term perspective. Energy Policy 34(18), 3739–3748.
    360. Van Driel, H., Schot, J., 2005. Radical innovation as a multilevel process - Introducing floating grain elevators in the port of Rotterdam. Technology and Culture 46(1), 51–76.
    361. Vernon, R., 1966. International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80(2), 190–207.
    362. Vogel, D., 1995. Trading Up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    363. Vogel, D., 1997. Trading up and governing across: transnational governance and environmental protection. Journal of European Public Policy 4(4), 556–571.
    364. Walley, N., Whitehead, B., 1994. It’s Not Easy Being Green. Harvard Business Review 72, 46–52.
    365. Weber, K. M., Rohracher, H., 2012. Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive `failures` framework. Research Policy 41(6), 1037–1047.
    366. Weible, C., Heikkila, T., deLeon, P., Sabatier, P., 2012. Understanding and Influencing the Policy Process. Policy Sciences 45(1), 1–21.
    367. Wheeler, D., 2001. Racing to the Bottom? Foreign Investment and Air Pollution in Developing Countries. Journal of Environment and Development 10(3), 224–245.
    368. Wieczorek, A. J., Hekkert, M. P., 2012. Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems: A framework for policy makers and innovation scholars. Science and Public Policy 39, 74–87.
    369. Wiener, J., 1999. Global Environmental Regulation: Instrument Choice in Legal Context. Yale Law Journal 108(4), 677–800.
    370. Wilson, C., Pettifor, H., Cassar, E., Kerr, L., Wilson, M., 2019. The potential contribution of disruptive low-carbon innovations to 1.5 degrees C climate mitigation. Energy Efficiency 12(2), 423–440.
    371. WindEurope, 2019. Offshore Wind in Europe: Key trends and statistics 2019. Brussel: WindEurope.
    372. World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987. Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    373. Yin, R. K., 1984. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: Sage.
    374. Zhang, H. M., Zheng, Y., Zhou, D. Q., Long, X. L., 2018.  Selection of key technology policies for Chinese offshore wind power: A perspective on patent maps. Marine Policy 93, 47–53.
    375. Zhang, X. P., Cheng, X. M., 2009. Energy consumption, carbon emissions, and economic growth in China. Ecological Economics 68(10), 2706–2712
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理與智慧財產研究所
    107364123
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107364123
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202101501
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of TIPM] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    412301.pdf8558KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback